#NewRight If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 21:05:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796821077498494976
#NewRight If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 21:05:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796821077498494976
When you advocate for the persecution of white males in America, Europe, and South Africa – We make liberty possible.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 20:10:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796807387629965313
Reply addressees: @teerye21 @voxdotcom
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796805738488352768
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796805738488352768
Women are all talk. Men don’t cross a line. If women are equal in practice then beat them if they cross that line also.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 18:09:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796776756015407104
Reply addressees: @GiveMeSprinkles
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796772316923527168
IN REPLY TO:
@GiveMeSprinkles
Men who fear competition with women do not deserve to breed.
You’re an excellent example of why white men have floundered in the US. https://t.co/ELiOHinLUh
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796772316923527168
http://www.infowars.com/shock-video-black-mob-viciously-beats-white-trump-voter/So I guess the truce is broken and we’re back to lynching, right?
(i hate this sh_it)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 17:00:00 UTC
#NewRight If you demonstrate none of these, you possess juridical defense, but no influence against your peers, since voting is violence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 16:05:00 UTC
We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:57:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796743626000834561
Reply addressees: @Rocky_Bukkake @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:57:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796743482060771328
Reply addressees: @Rocky_Bukkake @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:55:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796742983957827584
Reply addressees: @Rocky_Bukkake @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:54:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796742762372730880
Reply addressees: @Rocky_Bukkake @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796740663299538944
But I don’t want you to listen,or your attention,or your approval.I want your silence and submission
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 00:21:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796508022751330304
Reply addressees: @cinnlafey @SamanthaS4899 @shannessian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796504859390382080
IN REPLY TO:
@cinnlafey
@SamanthaS4899 @curtdoolittle @shannessian That’s ignorant. Learn how to have a conversation. Maybe then people will listen.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/796504859390382080