Ok. well, you’re sentimentalizing now and I don’t have time for that.
If you want to complain there are plenty of others who will larp by complaining.
There are plenty of men. They just aren’t online. The vast majority of Online people are a contrary indicator of competence. The half-handful that aren’t are largely on this thread.
@stoner713@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 17:09:39 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367116251009633
@LogicalExtremist
The degree to which the false promise of democracy, need for numbers, and ‘want of others to take responsibility’, has infected the right, creating a sense of privilege, morality, and virtue that no longer exists by demonstrated behavior, is as severe as the degree to which the left has absorbed the false promise of oppression and the need for authoritarian socialism.
We are either men who demonstrate ownership of our polity or we are not.
We are either men that are stupid f___ks that take the enemey’s bait for optics and feelz (like women) or we are men that ignore the slings and arrows of insult and press forward the line.
Even a lot of military men seem to be administrators and servants rather than warriors. Or fundamentalists that can’t separate myth from reality enough to take responsibility for the state.
@stoner713@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 17:05:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367101420435214
@LogicalExtremist
My argument was, is, and will be, that it will take a minimum number of actors that is sufficient to require at least the potential for military mobilization, in order to capture the attention and control the public discourse. And to force a discourse on political solutions not just venting or childish appeals to fundamentalism or authoritarianism.
The positive strategy is Mao’s (causes internal advocacy) the Negative is ISIS’s (causes internal opposition). Both strategies do not depend on permissive media. They recruit in-person, in context. They provide constant self reinforcing membership, inclusion, inspiration, and confidence.
The problem has been that the right has no set of actionable demands that it’s possible to institutionalize. (Hence why I work on actionable demands).
Start with small demands, get attention, escalate demands. The state will preserve itself by sacrificing the financial sector and restoring freedom of speech (political bias as protected class). After that it’s just a matter of incremental reformation of media, academy, education.
The right cannot run, separate, or wait. The jewish Christians destroyed the empire by the same means they’re destroying ours. They jewish Marxists destroyed the russians by the same means. They’ve destroyed the germans by the same means. They’ve assisted the french by the same means.
History is rather obvious about such things.
@stoner713@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 17:01:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367082954290314
IT”S A WAR ON THE HARMONY OF LOYALTY IN A HIERARCHY
The female instinct doesn’t have to ‘sense’ anything more complicated than loyalty in order to undermine that loyalty by reputation undermining and destruction in order for her to maximize her hyperconsumption at the expense of the common good.
That’s the left’s ‘instinct’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:50:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367041936227520
GLOBALIST FASCISTS? OR FASCISTS RESISTING THE NEW GLOBALISTS?
Well, the US Government is the primary vehicle by which the globalists have obtained sufficient economic power to buy the government, academy, and media, to advance the globalist agenda at the cost of the working and middle classes. Now, it’s important to realize that the globalist agenda has no chance outside of Europe, so that the globalist agenda is just an ant-european agenda – an upper caste application of marxism: the destruction of western civilization’s martial meritocracy.
The science is what it is (a) ethnocentric states produce the optimum outcomes and heterogeneous states produce the worst outcomes. (b) rule of law majority middle class states require full integration because religions are all macro-political institutions. (c) only majority middle-class ethnocentirc states produce optimum outcomes. (b) the USA was designed as a continuation of the UK and the Holy Roman Empire, consisting of a federation of states under the traditional rule of law which only survives in the anglosphere as the common law. (d) the anglo system is the most behaviorally expensive but it produces the highest trust, highest monetary velocity. highest innovation, and highest standard of living. (e) the painful truth is that the median of the distribution determines the groups competitive competency, and it turns out that each racial group both favors its own above other groups, and has a different demographic distribution of competency. (f) different demographic distributions of competency mean superior or inferior adaptability to high trust norms and institutions (g) non-white and non-asian groups appear to be unable or unwilling to pay the high costs of anglo-germanic civilization BUT want the benefits of living in a high cost high trust anglo-germanic civilization. (h) this means that the white folk have to pay for the non white folk and it’s destroying the white middle class to do so. (i) So is self-defense fascism? Well, fascism was a self-defense political system to protect Germanic (nationalist) countries from communist (globalist) countries.
Is fascism bad? Apparently, despite that we won’t admit it, it won the argument of the 20th century over the optimum method of political organization. China is a fascist state. Given the collapse of the anglo project to unify the world under Smithian economic reciprocity, the result is, as predicted, a return to the conflict of civilizations (where civilizations represent macro races), and a return to nationalism (civilizational-ism).
That this is a deterministic outcome is rather obvious to every synthetic historian.
So in other words, you’re effectively practicing a pseudoscientific religion that is being replaced by scientific evidence and you’re rebelling against it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:49:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107367038485135877
— “I think the LARP levels are a camouflage” —
Correct. But there is a correlation between “those who aren’t willing to do much, are not competent or capable of doing much, and who whine the most about it.” In other words, every in-the-field activist who is capable, competent, and willing, is out working every day and just waiting for an opportunity.
Then again when I started talking about civil war I was ridiculed. But it’s now a regular topic of conversation. We all know the end is coming. But there isn’t a trigger event yet that tells the people who are capable, competent, and willing that their chance of victory is high enough to pay the cost of personal sacrifice.
It’s possible to predict demographic and long wave outcomes fairly easily with enough effort – especially with today’s information saturation. I’ve been successful since the 90s. What’s not possible is predicting Overton windows and Trigger events.
Worse, I’m a terrible analyst of popular sentiments, and I’ve consistently underestimated the informational, cognitive, and emotional damage done to the Millennial and subsequent generation. They have no fight in them, and virtue signaling seems to have replaced bravery and loyalty.
But we don’t need large numbers for victory unless you still have faith in majority democracy despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary that it’s a failed experiment – as has been demonstrated throughout history.
There are enough men still left out there. They just don’t say much.
cc: @LogicalExtremist@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:19:31 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107366919166636730
@DeepMaritsahttps://odysee.com/@naturallawinstitute:c?r=9JAEVdZ4MnSt3BSkGz7bQhGc4bDYYKRm
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:05:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107366865317284746
@LogicalExtremist
Moreover, ‘collapse’ will look far more like the great depression on steroids. It’s not going to result in pre-92 nuclear wasteland fantasy. Just lots of very poor people, and a government out of the ability to inflate.
I view preppers and the Jesus-will-save-us group as cowards. Why? Conservative self-overconfidence, over-independence, and high disagreeableness that prevents organization necessary for victory without an authoritarian leader – that the enemy is extraordinarily successful in preventing from rising.
Hierarchies are harder to form than herds. Because the natural intuition of the hierarchical is an inability to compromise one’s overconfidence-despite-ignorance-and-powerlessness for the betterment of the group. And the factions provide competition for overconfidence-despite-failure that doesn’t even need the enemy to keep each other down.
The left doesn’t have that problem.
@stoner713@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 16:05:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107366862792387591
@Communism_Kills Purity Spirals are the refuge of cowards, losers, and imbeciles.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-30 04:11:02 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107364054642292548
SURVEY
Given the choice between nationalizing Twitter, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Wikipedia, and forcing these majority non-european employee organizations to move to India, which would you prefer to do?
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-29 21:32:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107362487365294103