@LogicalExtremist My argument was, is, and will be, that it will take a minimum

@LogicalExtremist
My argument was, is, and will be, that it will take a minimum number of actors that is sufficient to require at least the potential for military mobilization, in order to capture the attention and control the public discourse. And to force a discourse on political solutions not just venting or childish appeals to fundamentalism or authoritarianism.

The positive strategy is Mao’s (causes internal advocacy) the Negative is ISIS’s (causes internal opposition). Both strategies do not depend on permissive media. They recruit in-person, in context. They provide constant self reinforcing membership, inclusion, inspiration, and confidence.

The problem has been that the right has no set of actionable demands that it’s possible to institutionalize. (Hence why I work on actionable demands).

Start with small demands, get attention, escalate demands. The state will preserve itself by sacrificing the financial sector and restoring freedom of speech (political bias as protected class). After that it’s just a matter of incremental reformation of media, academy, education.

The right cannot run, separate, or wait. The jewish Christians destroyed the empire by the same means they’re destroying ours. They jewish Marxists destroyed the russians by the same means. They’ve destroyed the germans by the same means. They’ve assisted the french by the same means.

History is rather obvious about such things.

@stoner713@RadioFreeNorthwest@ChrisLangan@realnickjfuentes