@Communism_Kills And even then, only until it’s more advangageous for some number to be otherwise.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-26 02:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107340913325081196
Source: Original Site Post
-
@MAGA1488 Quite the opposite. I CAN prove it is both true, moral, and good – and
@MAGA1488 Quite the opposite. I CAN prove it is both true, moral, and good – and that no one can demonstrate otherwise. So you try to decieve by a false equivalency between your beliefs and my discovery of the science of law.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 21:04:13 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107339727054911221
-
DEAR MOTHER ENGLAND…. THE SCIENCE SAYS: (1) Rule of Law by the Natural, Common
DEAR MOTHER ENGLAND….
THE SCIENCE SAYS: (1) Rule of Law by the Natural, Common Law of Self Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, and Markets in association, reproduction, production, commons and polities at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of those unfit for those markets (2) Monarch as Judge of Last Resort, Outside the law in restoration of rule of law (3) Government by Cabinet elected by the houses (4) Lords as Judge of Consequences of Economic Fashion and Whimsy (state, culture, civilization) (5) Parliament (business and industry) of as Judge of Economy (Production). (6) New Lower House as Judge of Fashion and Whimsey (consumption). The proper solution to the problem of politicians is to increase the size of the jury (thang, parliament) to the entire population eliminating all need for politicians? Why not break the population into direct voting by house?
Brits have lost their minds in the postwar world. You had the best system of government in human history, but you didn’t have a written constitution so that rule of law of natural law continued to consist of an empirical set of transactions against the accountancy of the law. There is a tendency of postwar Brits to degenerate into petty moralizing the same way the french court degenerated into petty moralizing, just as the chinese degenerated into aesthetics rather than competence. Y’all invented the modern state – and you threw it out the window in the postwar period. That’s what the SCIENCE says. Why not stop all the petty posturing? The USA (falling apart), canada (same), australia and NZ could use the restoration of the anglosphere – but that’s not possible without ‘grandparents’ getting the family together under the on parent we have: you.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 17:59:41 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107339001463639098
-
@MAGA1488 We don’t know what you believe. We only know how you act. There are ot
@MAGA1488 We don’t know what you believe. We only know how you act.
There are other people who believe you are evil and they are good. What is the means by which we know the difference between good and evil given that everyone thinks he or she is correct?
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 16:15:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107338592683067614
-
@rua_patriot1st I showed up before. I took the hit. I’ll show up again. And The
@rua_patriot1st I showed up before. I took the hit. I’ll show up again. And The difference is I know how to fix the holes in the constitution and our laws and in our education and religion, so that our ancient enemy wiether without or within cannot ever again attempt to contine the 100 times they have undermined a people from within, or the muslims destroyed seven great civilizations of the ancient world.
Defending a broken wall the enemyhas marched trough isn’t the same as defeating the enemy, repairing the breach, and building another bulwark against the future.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 16:13:07 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107338582439597009
-
LEARNING P-METHOD, LOGIC, SCIENCE, AND LAW — “Curt; What steps would you sugges
LEARNING P-METHOD, LOGIC, SCIENCE, AND LAW
— “Curt; What steps would you suggest I take towards sculpting myself into a proper representative of this science?” —
I’ve asked around again, because asking how to master this science is something that’s asked frequently. And I always get the same answer.
We are working on the constitution, the book, the wiki, and the slides and courseware from the book. This is a huge and difficult project. In the meantime, the best way is to watch the videos, learn the book as we produce it online, follow along on Twitter and telegram, and by asking questions, and participating, pick it up.
As soon as we can restart the course at the institute we can formalize that education process. I tried running the course from the beginning but found it had to be simplified dramatically for anyone to follow it. So the extra few years we’ve worked on that have been fruitful.
—
Response from Coach Noah Revoy :
Ask someone how to bake a cake from scratch
Every time they mention an ingredient, ask them to explain how to make it from scratch
“Flour? How do I make that? Wheat? How do I grow that? A farm? How do I make a farm?” etc.
Its impossible to explain anything from the beginning
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 15:28:00 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107338404997541541
-
YES IT”S A BIT OF WORK TO LEARN… –“Curt, You skip a lot of steps in your logi
YES IT”S A BIT OF WORK TO LEARN…
–“Curt, You skip a lot of steps in your logical chain”–
1of4 Our legs are of different lengths so our gaits are of different lengths. Likewise, our cognitive networks are of different lengths so our steps in a chain of reasoning are of different lengths.
2of4 There is a natural conflict between my attempts to enumerate a chain of reasoning (system of measurement) and the ability of individuals to identify the constant relations across the arc of the supply-demand curve.
3of4 This is why my work is difficult to grasp: because I cannot resort to ideal types(sets) that are simple for the human mind, but I use sequences (supply-demand curves) as the points along the curve – that’s dense, but hopefully parsimonious enough for grasping and MEMORIZING.
4of4 So yes, the work is difficult to understand at first just as programming languages are difficult to understand at first, just as the terminology of any scientific discipline requires work. And worse, you are habituated to relying on simple intuition in behavioral sciences.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-25 15:17:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107338364127788532
-
WHY YOUNG MEN DOUBLE DOWN ON ‘FAIL’. When a young male that is otherwise unsucce
WHY YOUNG MEN DOUBLE DOWN ON ‘FAIL’.
When a young male that is otherwise unsuccessful in life, finds a paradigm he can feel self worth, self image, and status from empathizing with, identifying with, obtaining competency in, and advocating, he doubles down on his malinvestment reinforcing his error, rather than investigating and mastering the competing theories that falsify not only his presumption but each other. This is a universal behavior among what we call ‘the midwits’. It’s also what we call an addiction response. The fundamental problem with such incompetent, ignorant, addicted midwits is that between their addiction-defense, the intellectual dishonesty that will use in defending it, the volume of knowledge one must convey, and the degree of effort required to educate them, it’s too costly in time and patience to do so – and so we let them stumble around like drunks, repeating their fairy stories, polluting the informational commons simply because cleaning up the mess they are and are making is too much effot.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-24 20:20:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107333891287600466
-
@McChuck I don’t debate with stupid. 😉
@McChuck I don’t debate with stupid. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-24 19:04:03 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107333592231179659
-
@MAGA1488 How do we know you’re not the evil person?
@MAGA1488 How do we know you’re not the evil person?
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-24 16:11:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107332912540044577