Source: Facebook

  • “Q: CURT, IS THERE A SECRET TO RUNNING KING OF THE HILL GAMES?”– Well, first, t

    –“Q: CURT, IS THERE A SECRET TO RUNNING KING OF THE HILL GAMES?”–

    Well, first, the reason you do it is (a) it’s participatory, (b) it attracts interest, (c) people will respond with what they really intuit, believe, feel. (d) so you (my case) get to do research on the different positions people hold. people can’t treport truthfully. it’s impossible. They can’t NOT defend their moral and cognitive biases. This is why the technique works for research. It’s very hard to lie (mislead) in KOTH games. It’s your genes talking.

    Second, You’re trying to start a fight. There is a sort of art to it. You have to frame it so that it could be interpreted either way, and it’s going to antagonize the audience no matter what position they hold. After that you try to just ask questions that keep the fight going. In other words, you have to pick a position (flag) that someone wants to defend.

    So, you’re setting up game. A sport. A competition. In this way you teach the audience by the the audience teaching each other without you really doing much ‘teaching’ at all. The hard part is trying to make sure the audience isn’t sure of which position you hold, so that they aregue the idea or each other and not you. I use all three methods: neutral question, positive position, opposite position. And I try to frame the ‘game’ (question) differently each time. Even though I only use like two or three dozen themes.

    I think of it like running plays in football, running scenarios in paintball, running skirmishes in military training, running mock trials in court, or debating scenarios in mba courses.

    Players learn. The Spectators Learn.

    It’s Adversarialism.

    How men need and want to learn.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 16:19:00 UTC

  • A scientist testifies A philosopher opines A theologian recites Testimony: The s

    A scientist testifies

    A philosopher opines

    A theologian recites

    Testimony: The secret of western civilization.

    ===

    Andrew M Gilmour So what are the prerequisites for honest/truthful testimony?

    Ontic: Realism (Domain, Category, property/quality, Genea)

    Epistemic: Empirical (external verification)

    Logical: correspondent (comparison, relational)

    Grammatical: Etymologically consistent

    Rhetorical: Honesty (witnessing, due diligence)

    I think i’m getting closer.

    ===

    Andrew ; you’re getting stuck because you’re trying to map law (realism, action ) to philosophy (idealism, words) and philosophy is insufficient for the task.

    TRY THIS:

    Metaphysics: Premises (Action, Actionability)

    … Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuition, and reason, and mind as motion (no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state.

    Grammars: Communication, Speech: (Actions)

    … Meaning,

    … Stories, Explanation, Justification,

    … [List: Deflationary, Descriptive, Inflationary Grammars]

    Epistemology: Adversarialism (Actions)

    … Falsification, Due Dilligence

    … Three phases,

    … … 1 – discovery,

    … … 2 – due diligence,

    … … 3 – testimony:

    … 1. Epistemology – Discovery process):

    … Free association > Test ( Reason) > NextOrFail

    … … Hypothesis > Test (Calculation) > NextOrFail

    … … … Theory > Test (Action) > NextOrFail

    … … … … Theory > Test (Market) > NextOrFail

    … … … … … Law > Fail

    … 2. Epistemology – Due Diligence process)

    … Adversarial Survival by tests of

    … … Complete Sentences

    … … In promissory form

    … … In operational vocabulary (as actions)

    … … absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)

    … … including all changes in state

    … … including all consequences of change in state

    … … from an observer’s point of view

    … … producing a series of testable transactions.

    … Where the Criteria for Truthful Speech Is:

    … Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man,

    … in The Series:

    … … Categorically Consistent (Non-conflationary, Differences)

    … … Internally Consistent (Logical)

    … … Externally Correspondent (Empirical)

    … … Operationally Consistent (Consisting of Operational Terms that are Repeatable and Testable)

    … … Rational Choice (Consisting of Rational choice, in available time frame)

    … … Reciprocal (Consisting of Reciprocally Rational Choice)

    … With Stated Limits and Fully Accounted (Defense against cherry picking and inflation)

    … Warrantied

    … … (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;

    … … (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;

    … … (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.

    As a Defense Against the Series:

    … Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;

    … Error and failure of Due Diligence;

    … Bias and Wishful Thinking;

    … And the many Deceits of:

    … … (a) Loading and Framing;

    … … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and Overloading and Propaganda;

    … … (c) Fictionalisms of Sophisms, Pseudorationalisms, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism;

    … … (d) and outright Fabrications (fictions).

    … In Defense or Advocacy Of:

    … Any transfer that is not reciprocal, the tests of:

    … … (a) productive

    … … (b) fully informed, fully accounted

    … … (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability

    … … (d) voluntary

    … … (e) free of externality of the same criteria

    … Including but Not Limited To

    … The Series of:

    … … (a) murder,

    … … (b) harm, damage, theft,

    … … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection,baiting into hazard

    … … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons,

    … … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism,

    … … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience),

    … … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding),

    … … (h) conquest (war).

    … 3. Epistemology – Testimony process.

    … … Adversarial competition between Search and Test.

    … … Search Criteria

    … … … Narrative

    … … Test Criteria

    … … … Operationalism: Actions

    … … … … Testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement, consisting of a fully accounting, of a series of transactions (stories) of changes in state.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 15:19:00 UTC

  • POSTS ON THE ABORTION ISSUE (a) someone just asked via PM (b) someone is giving

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/eugenics-in-p-law/KEY POSTS ON THE ABORTION ISSUE

    (a) someone just asked via PM

    (b) someone is giving editing a try using the topic

    Abortion like religion is one of the few hard problems in the law.

    Net: Yes abortion is a killing, yes it is intentional so it is murder. We murder people all the time for a variety of reasons. Women have murdered more children than men have one another. In these matters of conflict we measure costs. At present the decision is made by costs. This is not my opinion or preference it is a statement of fact. Abortion then is a political (local) not judicial issue (universal).

    Here are posts in reverse order.

    Closure on Abortion

    https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/closure-on-the-abortion-discussion/

    More Closure On Abortion.

    https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/more-closure-on-the-abortion-discussion/

    https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/103358/

    https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/101131/

    One Immoral Trade for the other.

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/17/abortion-ok-one-immoral-trade-for-another/

    Abortion (simple)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/13/abortion/

    Ireland.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/15/curt-on-irelands-referendum-your-position-on-abortion/

    Most controversial issue

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-238/

    Eugenics

    https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/eugenics-in-p-law/Updated Jun 8, 2020, 11:39 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:39:00 UTC

  • THE LINES IN THE SAND 02 SEP, 2019 Red Flag on Blackout Coffee is the Line in th

    THE LINES IN THE SAND

    02

    SEP, 2019

    Red Flag on Blackout Coffee is the Line in the Sand I Think.

    Posted by

    CURT DOOLITTLE

    Categories

    THOUGHTS

    Comments

    0 COMMENT

    Tags

    Judicial Review wasn’t enough

    The 14th Wasn’t Enough

    Stacking the Court wasn’t enough

    Eliminating libel, slander, and duel wasn’t enough.

    Forcible integration wasn’t enough.

    Outlawing self defense wasn’t enough.

    Bussing wasn’t enough.

    Abortion wasn’t enough

    The ’86 ban wasn’t enough.

    In the Military wasn’t enough

    Marriage wasn’t enough.

    Forcing the bakers to bake wasn’t enough.

    Bathrooms weren’t enough.

    Conspiracy against a president wasn’t enough

    Immigration wasn’t enough

    Islamic Terrorism Wasn’t Enough

    Antifa vs Nationalists wasn’t enough

    Deplatforming wasn’t enough

    Red Flagging … is Enough.

    Electoral College … is more than enough.

    That’s probably enough.

    Because it isn’t someone else.

    It’s You.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:32:00 UTC

  • Most of the objections we get are from people who try (badly) to create rational

    Most of the objections we get are from people who try (badly) to create rational argumetns for rejecting P beause P isn’t accessible to them in Crayon. For those people, John Mark and InTruthVictorious should help you. I can’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 11:25:00 UTC

  • “Fair assessment. Libertarians are a raging dumpster fire.”—Marc Kaller

    —“Fair assessment. Libertarians are a raging dumpster fire.”—Marc Kaller


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 10:56:00 UTC

  • NLP AND NAP (neuro linguisitic programming and non aggression principle) —“NLP

    NLP AND NAP

    (neuro linguisitic programming and non aggression principle)

    —“NLP”–

    That term just means ‘suggestion’. It’s a pseudoscientific term for what is a necessary feature of communication by serialization of continuous recursive disambiguation that gave rise to the ancient technique of mystics, fortune tellers, and scammers of all sorts – the most obvious of which in our community is the NAP, which suggests enough to evoke substitution of limits within the audience, and feeds the false consensus bias, convincing a million idiots they agree when they agree on the trivial (see molyneux) but not on anything else – which is the reason there are no advanced literatures in libertarianism. Because it’s just advanced fortue telling, numerology, astrology in moral guise.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 10:33:00 UTC

  • Updated Jun 8, 2020, 10:08 AM

    Updated Jun 8, 2020, 10:08 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 10:08:00 UTC

  • Updated Jun 8, 2020, 10:05 AM

    Updated Jun 8, 2020, 10:05 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 10:05:00 UTC

  • So again, joyce meyer goes through all sorts of therapy to get over a horrific c

    So again, joyce meyer goes through all sorts of therapy to get over a horrific childhood, becomes a preacher, and I listen to her preach now and then, and it’s just cognitive behavioral therapy using christian prose and god’s love, and it’s fking brilliant. IMO that’s perfect. most people I listen to are appealing to authority. They’re either mindless parrots, shallow pretenders, seeking attention. status, power. They’re horrible or even evil. Listening to this woman I never have the ‘cringe’ feeling that my people are being lied to or made ignorant – they’re being encouraged, educated, and emotionally empowered, in the very simple language of jesus in modern theraputic mode.

    Now, talking to a friend the other day who is working on a reformed stoicism-epicureanism with aurelius as teh figure head, and I hope it works. Because that’s what the mainstream need.

    Those of us able and willing to take on the world, and bend it to our will in the aryan tradition – we don’t need anything other than knowledge. We already have agency.

    UPDATE:

    I’m making the SINGLE POINT that the fundamental purpose of rligion is mindfulness and mindfulness is produced by cognitive behavioral therapy, and that we have discovered a range of CBT, and that submissive religion is ONLY one of them. The differnce is that the jesus character was revolutionary and provided the submissive and the underclasss a means of heroic virtue which as a consquence increased trust. The problem was the jews converted a perfect underclass religion to a political weapon to undermine the empires, and church converted that wapong to an institution that destroyed empirical european sense making, and greek and roman thought. The question I have is how to presereve the good and eliminate the bad, and what I see in this kind of ‘preacher’ is that. If you have enough agency to go without a submissive religion then the natural religions of teh euopean peoples are vastly superior – particularly stoicism-epicureanism, and aristotalianism-aryanism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 09:04:00 UTC