Source: Facebook

  • I”M NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN – BUT WHICH CHRISTIANITY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? I’m not an

    I”M NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN – BUT WHICH CHRISTIANITY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?

    I’m not anti christian in the pure sense. I distinguish between the teachings of Jesus, the cult of Saul of tarsus, the bible, christian theology, catholic dogma, and the institutions of the churches. And the entire european corpus of myth, literature, philosophy, history, law, science, and mathematics that is otherwise vastly superior.

    The only thing that helped Europe was the teaching of Jesus that gave those of low status and women a political voice – a house of government – in the church.

    The rest: “Paulianity”, “Theology”, and “Churchianity” and “Dogma” are downright evil.

    My bible consists of the Jeffersonian Bible, the Epic Cycle of Greece and Rome, the Works of the Stoics and Epicureans, The Works of Aristotle, and the works of the Physical, Natural and Evolutionary Laws.

    But I acknowledge that the simplest of those messages, is that of Jesus, and that is enough for common folk. For those of us who have grater ability and agency, we require the works of those who demonstrated agency – not submission.

    When Rome brought law, administration, roads, and commerce into the primitive peoples of the middle east, they felt they were being left behind by a new radical way of life, new knowledge, new technology that they could not compete with it or in it. While they endured tolerating the abuses of middle eastern people upon one another – eve their own – they at least understood how to survive under those conditions. But when faced with the ancient world’s equivalent of the european age of sail, the primitive people of the middle east, like all those aware of being left behind, turned to innovation by Luddism – regression. Doubling down on a backward past.

    No there is nothing good in christianity that was not in roman culture before, other than that the new religion provided an organized underclass opposition in supernatural, theocratic political form to the empirical state, to undermine the state, undermining loyalty to roman civilization, and undermine the roman project, which was dependent upon the roman way of ‘baiting’ of people to evolve from slaves, to freemen, to citizens, to sovereigns – climbing the ladder of agency and status.

    Had Christians simply integrated Jesus into the state religion as the romans suggested it wouldn’t have been a problem. The underclasses could have had a path to self respect and civic virtue. But no. They used christianity to undermine. They had to destroy that civilization and stop people from climbing the ladder of agency that was the strategy of european domestication of man, and instead, drag people back to the bottom with superstition and ignorance and false promise.

    The purpose of christianity in the ancient world, like marxism-postmodernism-feminism in the modern, is to resist the continuous domestication and evolution of man from superstitious ignorant beast, into heroic agency.

    It is to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, woven by the hand of god into the fabric of the universe for all to see – and that any man who states otherwise has been not a prophet but a deceiver and a fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 12:33:00 UTC

  • Updated Jun 7, 2020, 12:16 PM

    Updated Jun 7, 2020, 12:16 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 12:16:00 UTC

  • Updated Jun 7, 2020, 12:15 PM

    Updated Jun 7, 2020, 12:15 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 12:15:00 UTC

  • “We know the name of the devil. His name was Abraham. He was from Ur.”

    “We know the name of the devil. His name was Abraham. He was from Ur.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 10:13:00 UTC

  • THE ENEMY’S STRATEGY Just as europeans use a deliberate strategy of sovereignty,

    THE ENEMY’S STRATEGY

    Just as europeans use a deliberate strategy of sovereignty, reciprocity, testimonial speech, in adversarial competition, to discover the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and apply them to innovation, competition, and markets, using evidence, reason, empiricism, science, and mathematics, the enemy uses a deliberate strategy to destroy european civilization:

    Baiting in to Hazard, by use of False Promise, Argued by Sophism, Under cover of Moral Pretense, Justified by Critique, for the purpose of profiting from undermining truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political has been consumed by expansion of the underclasses whose reproduction had been limited by productivity, law, property, market, natural aristocracy.

    The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to condition of animal.

    The female group strategy of undermining organizations of males that are producing eugenic civilization (quality), by the direction of proceeds of production to the production of returns on commons, at the expense of female dysgenic reproduction (quantity), and her irresistible hyper-consumption.

    List the false promises of the enemy?

    It’s a long list.

    In the modern world alone, it’s marxism, communism socialism, cosmopolitanism, universalism, one world government, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denial, and political correctness.

    Together those movements are a conspiracy to destroy our western civilization – our civilization that both discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and in doing so dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, and disease, in a few hundred years in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is oppressive – where all other civilizations, have, or are, running down the opportunity-clock, have either stagnated or declined, because they have failed to discover and adhere to physical, natural, and evolutionary law.

    Just as primitive man anthropomorphizes natural phenomena, creates animistic religion, and women, Jews, use the Alinsky of method of personalizing a political position, by the strategy of ‘personalize white civilization for their primitivism: a rejection of physical natural and evolutionary laws.

    We are in the process of the the second semitic dark age – just as the jews brought the false promises of monotheism to the empire and destroyed the institutions, religion, temples, academies, knowledge, arts, of the ancient european world, and the muslims destroyed the same of the great civilizations of the ancient world: north Africa, Egypt, the levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, northwest India, Anatolia, and eventually Byzantium.

    That is the complete understanding of our current crisis: the war by the middle east primitives, led by their ((( intellectual ))) class’s verbal advantage, to destroy civlization – They are not happy to cause stagnation. They are not happy to cause decline. They are not happy to run down the clock in this brief period of geological, solar, galactic peace, in a universe increasingly evidently hostile to advanced life.

    We have a choice: to continue to be the only civilization that discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and raises mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death, or to fail like all other peoples, stagnate, and decline, because our men lacked the will to save our people, and by consequence our race, and by consequence mankind, and by consequence, our opportunity to evolve into the gods we imagined.

    We see The Great Filter occurring right before us: the reason the universe appears empty of advanced life. Because the fear of the unfit of being left behind incentivizes primitive life to resist physical, natural, and evolutionary law, and because the cost of leaving behind those unfit to transcend by discovery, adherence to, and use of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, is greater than most can bear.

    We must not join the list of civilizations that either stagnated, declined, or specialized in causing others to stagnate and decline. We must pass through the Great Filter, by continuing our European group strategy of truth before face regardless of cost, and discovery of, adherence to, and use of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, to transcend man in to the gods we imagined.

    As far as we know we are mankind’s, and perhaps our galaxy, and even our universe’s only hope.

    As such all those who came before us, all those that live today, and all those that may come after us, there is no cost beg us, demand us, to pay any cost to save our civilization, and end those who would conspire to or conspire with the destruction of us, our civilization, our race, and mankind.

    But the parasite will never willingly consent to separate from the host – it must be removed by force.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 08:47:00 UTC

  • I’d like to discuss p-law with Dworkin and Epstein, I’d have prefer Scalia but i

    I’d like to discuss p-law with Dworkin and Epstein, I’d have prefer Scalia but it’s too late.

    I’d like to discuss mathematical platonism with Roger Penrose but I think the cat is out of the bag or getting there.

    I’d like a round table with the women in math that I respect to ask why women understand what math is better than men, but why men do math so much better than women. I find this fascinating.

    I’d love to debate Sam Harris because I know his weakness (failing.) And I’d like the world to be able to have that discussion.

    I’d love to debate peterson on his use of literary suggestion vs going for stoicism as I thought he originally might. Only because I’d like the public to understand what he’s doing and what the alternatives are.

    Or any of the other nitwits in the IDW, but since most of them are Jewish and it would result in serial humiliation, since they all use the same method of critique but have no solutions except more of the same knitting circle conversation.

    Molyneux won’t debate me. I have a script and audio to put out that will end his rather ridiculous argument and explain why he fails in his arguments and resorts to the tactics he does. I’ve hoped he would engage so I could get him into reciprocity and testimony and away from his sophistry, because he’s a fantastic teacher – the best, with the best reach but it’s proven impossible so. you know. influence begs.

    For historical reasons I don’t really want to debate any one at mises institute, particularly Walter, but I would if the opportunity arose. They won’t survive long – as I predicted -without transforming (as I recommended), and replacing the last generation of propagandists, and I’d rather that they get there on their own.

    I want to debate Hoppe in order to demonstrate we solved social since in three generations. But he correctly views me as an arrogant american with no respect for hierarchy. I mean, I have respect for the queen. after that, it’s all just the art of the duel.

    I don’t rally want to debate christians. It would be interesting to discussion logos with EMJ.

    I’m in violent agreement with Duchesne and Macdonald


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 23:04:00 UTC

  • Military, supreme court, treasury, insurer of last resort, and strategic researc

    Military, supreme court, treasury, insurer of last resort, and strategic research functions remain in the federal government. Presidency and house are disbanded. Senate converted to the governors of the states, blue cities converted to free-city city-states in the european tradition, senate is only capable of producing contracts of between states (treaties really) in matters of trade, all social policy is devolved to the states. Law requires barristers to end dual loyalty of lawyers. All interstate treaties must pass the court prior to enactment. And treaties must survive adversarial competition in the courts. States can form, go bankrupt, and dissolve, with just 300K people (the population of Iceland). No existing state government has ‘say’ in the new allocation of state formation. Restoration of anglo civilization via military trade information alliance between Britain, America, Central Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

    It nationalizes visa/mastercard network and all ATM networks (purchases a majority intersest).

    It nationalizes the fed, all its assets, and the assets of its members as restitution and punishment for their crimes against the people.

    All citizens obtain a treasury account, and treasury credit line commensurate with their income and actuarial record of repayment. This account provides zero interest loans for the purchase of durable goods (houses, cars, appliances). In the event there is demand for increase in money supply the treasury can distribute liquidity directly to the citizenry. This will replace credit expansion by the private sector with purchasing power expansion by citizens causing industry and banking to fight for consumer funds rather than consumer to compete for credit from a predatory financial sector. In addition we’ve included right to repair in order to drive out low cost goods, and involuntary warranty of the durability of goods. This will separate the advanced word’s manufacturing from the backward world’s manufacturing. In addition we will repatriate all strategic industries as a military necessity.

    This is a strategy that recognizes total war. and puts military in a position to conduct total war, by military, technological, economic, political, intelligence, informational means that is independent of the domestic folly of the governors of the states.

    It does contain a complete purge of of marxist-pomo-anti-European people, their works, their public speech, from the civilization.

    And the nationalization of Amazon, Wikipedia, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and a purge of their executive and staff of conspirators against western civlization.

    It forces repatriation and export of the staffs of those companies for their participation in those crimes, and that includes Microsoft. This removes the incentive of tech companies who have used cheap immigrant labor to build the tech sector at the expense of the american people, then satisfying their counter-cultural ambitions by weaponizing those industries against the people.

    It forces warranty of due diligence for truthful speech, and prohibits that which is counter to physical, natural, evolutionary laws, and prohibits false and unwarrantable speech. This will collapse the media into a few very careful outlets reflecting the pre marxist ethic in journalism.

    It removes copyright protections and replaces them with universal creative commons protection. This will collapse the holly wood media business.

    It removes the right of interruption advertising, places liability for truth and reciprocity on every person in the chain, and intolerably punitive damages for each violation.

    I puts costs on all international emails, and phone calls.

    This will destroy the media, the advertising industry, the fraud businesses, the telephone scams. (and put new jersey out of business).

    It opens a court for prosecution of all those who have obtained their wealth through false promise, baiting into hazard, unwarrantable speech by reversing buyer beware to seller beware.

    I am taking a risky proposition with the church in order to satisfy christians. but it will probably make them ecstatic with one limitation.

    This is a strategy of containment of the left rather than conquest. I conquest is necessary it will largely be complete by next spring since the cities cannot survive the winter.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 21:44:00 UTC

  • Jun 6, 2020, 1:47 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YqFBRhwZJIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YqFBRhwZJIUpdated Jun 6, 2020, 1:47 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 13:47:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102613405_299464638118363_6153384275

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102613405_299464638118363_6153384275

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102613405_299464638118363_6153384275997505506_o_299464634785030.jpg


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 13:21:00 UTC

  • Sure. I’ll debate an anarchist. What’s the topic? My debate with any anarchist w

    Sure. I’ll debate an anarchist. What’s the topic?

    My debate with any anarchist would consist of a series of asks for the content of a constitution (contract) of terms, how such a polity could be brought into being; and how it would survive competition for trade, population, territory, and control. This invariably results in the anarchist avoiding the questions, making false or wishful claims about human nature and behavior, and counterfactual claims about history.

    I don’t need ‘exposure’. So would this involve wasting my time, and require me to back a naive, intellectually dishonest opponent into a corner, thus only exacerbating my reputation as ‘a meanie’, or would, once (deterministically) falsified the opponent retreated into ‘well it would be nice’, or ‘one can hope at sometime it’s a possibility’?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-06 13:07:00 UTC