Source: Facebook

  • A DETAILED PHYSICAL BREAKUP OF LEFT AND RIGHT —“Guys like you and John Mark ne

    A DETAILED PHYSICAL BREAKUP OF LEFT AND RIGHT

    —“Guys like you and John Mark need to layout a detailed physical breakup of what a Cultural/Political separation of America would look like. How would those lines be drawn?”— PTD RADIO

    We have. Twitter Version: Constitution: declaration of natural law, european civ & group strategy explicit rights. Blue cities to city states. Drop house, President. Devolution of all but military, supreme, interior, treasury, insurer to the States. Form Any State w/300k pop.

    —“So America essentially becomes a loose confederation of nation states? Similar to the Articles of Confederation?”—

    America becomes was what it was designed to be: a replication of Europe: of the British empire, of the Holy Roman Empire (Germany), of the Roman Empire, of the Greek City States, of the Tribal proto-states of the Indo European expansion. Under our ancient tradition: SOVEREIGNTY.

    And sovereignty requires reciprocity, and under both, the only solution to all forms of human cooperation is markets in everything: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war.

    That’s our way. It’s the European Way. It’s 5000 years old.

    And because of markets in everything (adversarialism) we evolved faster than the rest despite two dark ages, for a very simple reason. The greatest correspondence of all peoples, with physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

    OUR STRATEGY

    Western Civilization’s Institutionalization of the Production Agency: Individual Sovereignty, Reciprocity,Truth-before-Face, Adversarial Justice,Rule of Law of Natural Law, resulting markets in every aspect of life,Insured by a militia of every able bodied man: Natural Selection.

    That’s why Westerners were, as distribution (a) demographically superior, (b) culturally superior, (c) institutionally superior, (d) economically, financially, scientifically, medically, technologically, intellectually superior.

    Why? Adversarialism: Continuing Natural Selection.

    Markets in Everything Cause Eugenics in Everything:

    Genetics, Institutions, Traditions, and Knowledge.

    And A Universal Militia Grants Sovereignty, Rule of Law, Status

    Dragging The Entire Population Upward.

    (-) Unfit:Dysgenic <- Evolution -> Fit:Eugenic (+)

    And that is the problem of the 20th and 21st centuries. We allowed the immigration of people unequally evolved genetically, culturally, institutionally, and informationally, and as such, unfit to participate in the suite of markets that constitute a eugenic civilization.

    So if you are Unfit for Natural Selection, then Leave. Because you destroyed the last European civilization and created a dark age of ignorance, poverty, and disease. And so fool us once, that’s shame on you. But you will not fool us twice.

    Welcome to the second reconquest of European civilization.

    Revolution comes.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 10:02:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT’S BIG LIE: ACCUSING WHITES OF BEING “GOD” —“This is brilliant. An exp

    THE LEFT’S BIG LIE: ACCUSING WHITES OF BEING “GOD”

    —“This is brilliant. An explanation of how the left demonizes the good intent of the right.”–Jason Smith

    The Enemy Left, foments rebellion by claiming, without any warranty or liability, that the European Success achieved by our discovery and adherence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – that maintains selection pressure, limiting the reproduction of the underclasses, using the empirical evidence of adversarial markets, and as a consequence genetically pacifying, incrementally domesticating, and evolving humans into Agency, is a form of oppression, rather than the gentle domestication of families clans and tribes into humans that are fit for a high trust, high growth, society and the prosperity that comes with it.

    In other words, whether evil or unfit, these enemies of western civilization, blame white people for the universe’s physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, like they blamed the gods before us.

    And they offer false promise of salvation from those laws if we are gone. When the painful truth is – every other civlization failed to discover physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and institutionalize them as their group strategy.

    And that is why they stagnated, fell behind, or died at evolution’s hand.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 18:04:00 UTC

  • NORMIE OPINION “This is all in the cities where people have no stake in the syst

    NORMIE OPINION

    “This is all in the cities where people have no stake in the system. The mayors made the mistake of pandering to them rather than take the criticism for using violence against them, and the activists escalated. The only effect this will have is the decay of the cities and more good people leaving them.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 17:38:00 UTC

  • WELCOME TO THE NEXT AMERICAN REVOLUTION As students of the empirical revolution,

    WELCOME TO THE NEXT AMERICAN REVOLUTION

    As students of the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, and the enlightenment, our american civilization was architected and designed upon the natural law and rule of law. It was an experiment in the third way: one without the parasitism and corruption of the aristocracy or the church, and burden of those of low character and ability.

    They saw the federation of states as a continuation of the european civilization and in particular the British: an alliance of states under government, but this time a middle class -producer – government.

    Now, Natural Law means unlimited “Tort” or “Trespass”.

    Tort or Trespass requires individual sovereignty in his property. Sovereignty requires rule of law, adversarial competition before a jury of peers. And this leaves nothing possible but market competition for individual survival. And this market competition preserves natural selection. And the continuation of natural selection, is just as responsible for western exceptionalism as is our testimonial truth, evidentiary, adversarial law, sovereignty, markets, and perhaps even more importantly, our market for different elites: tri-funcitonalism (military, judicial, and faith).

    THE PROBLEMS

    1. Unfortunately the founders assumed those that followed would also have knowledge of natural law, and the common law, and didn’t include those specifications in the constitution. They only specified the organization of government, and as an afterthought, some basic rights that they thought needed defending.

    So the FOUNDATION of western civlization, of anglo civilization, and of the american civilization as the natural law evolved under the common law and those natural rights under that natural law were never stated.

    This is why it has been possible to undermine natural law (rule of law), and to gradually impose positive law (rule by man) -eroding our civilization from within.

    2. The common law did evolved prior to the development of mass media, and while it contained libel and slander, and fraud, they had no concept of the use of social construction to use false promise of the impossible -freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – and therefore baiting people into hazard. They had no idea of the political scams that were possible, and despite Gibbon’s Rise and Fall being published, they could not envision that the christian destruction of the ancient world could be repeated in pseudoscientific terms in the modern world.

    3. They also -although it was a subject of great debate – used free speech instead of free truthful speech because they didn’t know how to specific truthful speech as we do now. And they did not specifically prohibit seditious speech because they didn’t know how to write it into law as we do now.

    4. They also used freedom of religion rather than freedom of Christian religion, because they could not envision a world in which Darwin and the physical sciences had eviscerated the church’s ability to use false promise to bait people into the religion. And even if they did they had no conception of mindfulness and how to use stoicism in stead to replace it.

    5. They also failed to require judicial review PRIOR to ascent of legislation, and failed to provide the return of legislative undecidability to the congress, thereby putting the court in the position of legislating from the bench – which is how the left undermined the constitution.

    6. They failed perhaps most subtly, by not ‘persuading’ (even blackmailing) Washington (or one of the others) into taking the role of monarch – who, like present Elizabeth – is a judge of last resort, and limits the fashions of the government the way the senate was designed to limit the fashions of the population. This is the hardest ‘pill’ of truth to swallow: that of prime ministers, presidents and monarchies, the optimum is monarchy, cabinet and parliament – and the presidency is the worst of all possible models. Whether Americans will tolerate a search for a weak monarch is an open question. The fact that the ant-monarchical propaganda is obviously false, and merely allows for alien people to conquer a nation and convert it to a corporation that can be exploited is not obvious through the fog of enlightenment deceits.

    That was the initial set of six great errors in the constitution

    Assuming we’ve functionally had five constitutions already:

    1- articles of confederation, 2-first constitution, 3-post civil war southern conquest, 4-depression experiment with socialism, 5 – 1960’s experimentation with cosmopolitanism.

    Then, we have, I have, in our Amendments, producing what is in effect the sixth constitution of the united states, which restores the original design as yet ANOTHER european continent of loosely federated states, under the natural law, unified only for the purposes of defense, debt capacity, dispute resolution, and trade.

    And in these, our amendments, we have repaired the six errors of the first constitution, as well as all those errors that have crept in since.

    And we have done so primarily because:

    1 – the 20th century experiments in integrating non-european peoples, even non-protestant peoples, has been a failure. Just as the experiment in extending our rule of law, democracy, and markets in everything has been a failure. With the only exports being our administrative, technological and scientific innovations.

    2 – the european era of expansion, and our accumulated intellectual, institutional, and technological advantage, other than our genetic and cultural advantage, has been distributed to the world in order to drag them out of primitivism: superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, early death, endemic warfare, and frequent victimization by nature.

    3 – And so we can no longer afford to absorb the costs of not only policing the world patterns of finance and trade, but we cannot afford to absorb the unfit into our civilization without following the roman empire into collapse for the same reason. The only thing that distinguishes the invasions of Rome because of the great migrations Rome made possible, is that the barbarians among us fight with political weaponry of Democracy, Pseudoscience, and the ideology of the left, rather than bronze and iron weaponry. Even though, like the barbarians, it is the benefits of the civilization they destroy that they seek.

    So, welcome to the next declaration, the next reconstruction, and the restoration of western civlization.

    It will provide renaissance benefits to the middle, to our own bottom, and It will come at high cost to the elites and their mercenaries (immigrants), who war against us by demographic, ideological, political and financial means.

    Those all before us, and those all yet to be, beg us to defend them. And this time we shall not let Rome fall nor let the enemy, with it’s plan to undermine our people yet again, survive to commit yet another crime, another day.

    Welcome to the Revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 15:01:00 UTC

  • “Curt! I thought you were in your forties!”— Actually. I’m eleven. I just fake

    —“Curt! I thought you were in your forties!”—

    Actually. I’m eleven. I just fake adulthood well. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 12:56:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/103310667_301854271212733_7836379684

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/103310667_301854271212733_7836379684

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/103310667_301854271212733_7836379684877646597_o_301854267879400.jpg “Q: What Do You Think Of Jordan Peterson?””Q: What Do You Think Of Jordan Peterson?”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 12:44:00 UTC

  • EUROPE, STATE FORMATION, AND GENETIC PACIFICATION Henry C. Harpending, Departmen

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470491501300114WESTERN EUROPE, STATE FORMATION, AND GENETIC PACIFICATION

    Henry C. Harpending, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470491501300114?

    (reminder via a friend)

    ABSTRACT

    Abstract: Through its monopoly on violence, the State tends to pacify social relations.Such pacification proceeded slowly in Western Europe between the 5th and 11th centuries, being hindered by the rudimentary nature of law enforcement, the belief in a man’s right to settle personal disputes as he saw fit, and the Church’s opposition to the death penalty.

    These hindrances began to dissolve in the 11th century with a consensus by Church and State that the wicked should be punished so that the good may live in peace. Courts imposed the death penalty more and more often and, by the late Middle Ages, were condemning to death between 0.5 and 1.0% of all men of each generation, with perhaps just as many offenders dying at the scene of the crime or in prison while awaiting trial. Meanwhile, the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy,

    intoxication, or extreme stress. The decline in personal violence is usually attributed to harsher punishment and the longer-term effects of cultural conditioning. It may also be,

    however, that this new cultural environment selected against propensities for violence.Updated Jun 9, 2020, 10:21 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 10:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102917082_301757837889043_1829160123

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102917082_301757837889043_1829160123

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/102917082_301757837889043_1829160123884686952_o_301757834555710.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/103133618_301758361222324_6958571908942375081_n_301758357888991.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/103960483_301758517888975_6038642074818398690_n_301758514555642.jpg IRAN’S (PERSIANS) PROBLEM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 10:15:00 UTC

  • CANCEL CULTURE JOURNALISM Two liberal editors fall for violations against progre

    CANCEL CULTURE JOURNALISM

    Two liberal editors fall for violations against progressive orthodoxy.

    By The Editorial Board

    June 8, 2020 7:19 pm ET

    The purge of senior editors at progressive newspapers this weekend is no cause for cheering. Their resignations are another milestone in the march of identity politics and cancel culture through our liberal institutions, and American journalism and democracy will be worse for it.

    The long-time editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer, who’d seen the publication through difficult times, was pushed out over a headline, “Buildings Matter, Too.” It was atop a piece by architecture critic Inga Saffron, who worried that buildings damaged by violence could “leave a gaping hole in the heart of Philadelphia.” Staff members deemed the headline an offense to Black Lives Matter. They protested, and no amount of apologizing or changes to the headline were enough. Editor Stan Wischnowski didn’t last the week.

    At the New York Times, editorial page editor James Bennet resigned Sunday after a staff uproar over an op-ed by a U.S. Senator. Arkansas Republican Tom Cotton wrote that military troops should be sent to restore public order in American cities when the police are overwhelmed. A staff revolt deemed the piece fascist, unconstitutional, and too offensive for adults to read and decide for themselves.

    Our editorial last week opposed deploying active-duty troops, but the idea is legal under the Insurrection Act. George H.W. Bush deployed troops in 1992 to quell riots in Los Angeles after the Rodney King verdict, and other Presidents have done it too.

    Mr. Bennet defended the op-ed on Friday as part of his attempt to broaden debate in his pages, and at first so did publisher A.G. Sulzberger. But Mr. Sulzberger changed his mind the same day, suddenly declaring that the op-ed he had defended had not received proper editing and should not have been published. By Sunday Mr. Bennet, as true-blue a progressive as you can find, was out the door. James Dao, the opinion editor who had signed off on the Cotton op-ed, was reassigned.

    An ostensibly independent opinion section was ransacked because the social-justice warriors in the newsroom opposed a single article espousing a view that polls show tens of millions of Americans support if the police can’t handle rioting and violence. The publisher failed to back up his editors, which means the editors no longer run the place. The struggle sessions on Twitter and Slack channels rule.

    All of this shows the extent to which American journalism is now dominated by the same moral denunciation, “safe space” demands, and identity-politics dogmas that began in the universities. The agents of this politics now dominate nearly all of America’s leading cultural institutions—museums, philanthropy, Hollywood, book publishers, even late-night talk shows.

    On matters deemed sacrosanct—and today that includes the view that America is root-and-branch racist—there is no room for debate. You must admit your failure to appreciate this orthodoxy and do penance, or you will not survive in the job.

    Some of our friends on the right are pleased because they say all of this merely exposes what has long been true. But this takeover of the Times and other liberal bastions means that there are ever fewer institutions that will defend free inquiry and the contest of ideas that once defined American liberalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 10:11:00 UTC

  • SEE THE WHITE HATRED EVERYWHERE? IT’S ACROSS HISTORY The destruction of the roma

    SEE THE WHITE HATRED EVERYWHERE? IT’S ACROSS HISTORY

    The destruction of the roman empire for the second time

    First, the destruction of the Greek Aegean empire

    Then the destruction of the Roman Mediterranean empire

    Then the destruction of the German-Holy Roman Continental empire.

    Then the destruction of the British Atlantic empire

    Then the destruction of the American Pacific empire.

    The same technique every time.

    We open the franchise

    We must rule and drag mankind into godhood.

    Or be ruled, and dragged into dark ages.Updated Jun 9, 2020, 9:20 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 09:20:00 UTC