Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • (can we avoid the underage model thing please. it’s creepy. call me whatever you

    (can we avoid the underage model thing please. it’s creepy. call me whatever you want but it’s creepy. even some of these 21/22 models look 15 and, sorry, it’s creepy. It’s just creepy.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 13:43:00 UTC

  • Alan Colmes Dead at 66. Sad. One of the only honest liberals ever

    Alan Colmes Dead at 66. Sad. One of the only honest liberals ever.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 13:34:00 UTC

  • IMPORTANT- ON TERMS In 2009 when I both sensed that I’d come up with a solution

    IMPORTANT- ON TERMS

    In 2009 when I both sensed that I’d come up with a solution to government, but needed to improve my understanding, the first thing I did was write a glossary.

    I combed every glossary of terms from economics, politics, social science, and philosophy, and substantially refined many of them, so that I could be sure I was speaking from definitions not assumptoins of meaning.

    My glossary alone is something like 80k words. And while I probably could cut some of it, I can also expand it substantially with the terminology that I use today.

    It reminds me of reading encyclopedias. It’s not so much that I remember everything in the encyclopedia (although honestly, I largely do) but it’s that the act of reading all those different topics forces you mind to form a series of associations, and counter associations, such that … like the use of Series i use in propertarianism, or like ‘fields’ in mathematics, or like any ‘one of these things is not like the others’ games. It is very hard for falsehoods to survive without at least questioning them.

    Most people, when they engage in any discourse on cooperation: ethics, morals, politics, economics, group strategy, do so from a position of ignorance of the terms they use, and their use is terribly conflationary. This means that they generally are making a very simple statement with pretentious words that they don’t understand.

    Our ‘grammar’ (our proofs) make that very hard to get away with.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 13:11:00 UTC

  • “you’re no philosopher!”— First, ridicule, rallying and shaming is (a) feminin

    —“you’re no philosopher!”—

    First, ridicule, rallying and shaming is (a) feminine, (b) marxist, (c) demonstration of the failure of one’s ability to construct arguments (d) demonstration of the failure of one’s ideology.

    I qualify for having increased decidability and explanatory power in my domain of inquiry. That is what qualifies one as a philosopher. Sorry. Just how it is.

    I probably qualify for merely explaining the reason why Mises failed along with Brouwer and Bridgman. But certainly for explaining the relationship between them, popper and hayek. And for solving the problem hayek couldn’t complete, by translating rothbard’s ghetto legal ethics, and hoppe’s kantian rationalist ethics, into anglo empirical and scientific language. A language that can be used to construct proofs – what hoppe was trying to construct.

    So again, you don’t have an argument, right? You are just another crypto-marxist begging for free redistribution of the productivity of others by parasitic consumption of and free-riding upon the commons they produce, rather than directly upon the productivity of what they originally produce?

    Right? That’s what you demonstrate that you do? You’re just another crypto marxist with a different strategy for parasitism. Andyou defend your parasitism with ridicule rallying and shaming beause you, like women, cannot face the truth of your fantasies: you beg for free riding as a claim against the productivity of others.

    I eat you libertine munchkins like pringles with beer. lol

    Bend over.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 13:04:00 UTC

  • “”Objectification” is a really cool concept, but the phenomenology is useless or

    —“”Objectification” is a really cool concept, but the phenomenology is useless or even misleading unless you consider it to be the “user interface” for the genotype. This author explains it well: your qualia is the “control panel” of the Self, not the Self itself.—” Adam Voight

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 12:26:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 12:25:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 12:24:00 UTC

  • (yes I know, i’m wasting my time, but damn, it’s fun to make libertines my b–ch

    (yes I know, i’m wasting my time, but damn, it’s fun to make libertines my b–ch.)

    Rik Moore You do realize you are a complete joke in libertarian circles. Just a complete joke.

    Curt Doolittle You do realize that libertarians are a complete joke everywhere except libertarian circles. lol

    And your attempts at shaming in order to avoid arguments demonstrate the reason libertarianism failed: its only suitable for not-so-bright young males that can’t get laid. 😉

    Rik Moore Well I don’t have to move to Ukraine to flash a couple of $20 bills around to get laid, that’s for sure.

    Curt Doolittle Dude, I did just fine here in the states… ’cause I’m not a douchebag, and I”m accomplished, and good looking, and interesting, so I did better than you ever will.

    I mean you rally and shame like a pussy, you argue like a pussy, you look like a pussy … and if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it’s a duck. lol. You’re a pussy.

    I love trash talking douchebags. It’s a cheap display of dominance. It gives me an excuse to demonstrate the pubescent idiocy of libertinism, and it’s free advertising, and it gives my friends a laugh.

    I mean, I don’t really mind USING you as my bitch. It’s kind of fun and it’s profitable so to speak. lol But it’s like you just can’t help but VOLUNTEER to be my bitch. It’s like you walk up and bend over and hand me a bar of soap. Damn.

    Like lemmings.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 12:23:00 UTC

  • INHERENT RIGHTS ARE LOGICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE Natural Law describes NE

    INHERENT RIGHTS ARE LOGICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE

    Natural Law describes NECESSARY rights. We can’t possibly posses ‘inherent’ rights, since all rights consist of claims against (demands against) others. Since a claim or demand from others can only exist in a contract or agreement, and that the term ‘right’ is only possible when appealing to a third party – we can on say we NEED these rights inherently, as human beings, but not that we possess them. That’s impossible. It’s physically and logically impossible. So if we describe natural law as inherently possessed rather than inherently required, we attempt an act of fraud: which is to ignore the very simple fact that to obtain rights of any kind requires that we exchange them with others, and that we insure them, and at any scale, that we pay an insurer to insure them for all of us (judiciary). Any statement of inherently possessed rights is an act of fraud whereby the individual seeks claims against others without entering into a contract for exchange, and preferably, both with a third party insurer that renders asymmetry of violence neutral.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 11:21:00 UTC

  • I ADVOCATE NATIONALISM, AND THE DEFENSE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR PEOPLE. SO I DONT LIK

    I ADVOCATE NATIONALISM, AND THE DEFENSE OF THE CIRCUMPOLAR PEOPLE. SO I DONT LIKE TO DIS ON RUSSIANS.

    I have been making the Circumpolar argument for a few years now, and the only holdouts are Russians. And they are holdouts for self imposed red-headed-stepchild reasons: internal myths.

    But please don’t put me in a position where I have to dis on Russia Culture. I love russians, and I think american and russian males have more in common than any other two peoples. I envy much of russian life, I just don’t envy what I see as unnecessary relative poverty, and our politician’s inabilty to allow us to use that similarity for mutual gain. I love Ukraine, but want to see her join Poland in european prosperity. And I want the baltics to return to freedom from the crimes the russians imposed upon them. I hate american policy with a passion, and I would exterminate every individual in the federal bureaucracy without remorse – and with celebratory joy. But I also understand that the american deep state evolved and exists to prevent another world war, by forcing states to develop mature economies, secular laws, and aristotelian (secular) science, and to remain within their borders, so that we never have another world war.

    But while we have achieved the defeat of world communism, which was an economic model. We have lost the battle of cultural marxism. And we are being attacked now by the OPPOSITE of everything we aspire to: islam: dysgenic reproduction, economic recidivism, superstitious laws, and anti-science. All of which suit the needs of the vast underclass of the steppe and desert, but threaten the vast middle class of the forest, river, and plain.

    We have reciprocally compatible ideologies both founded on Aryanism. The old german was the best of these ideologies, with anglos the most optimistic, the germans the most realistic, and the russian most pessimistic, for purely territorial reasons. Why can’t we unify on our Aryanism (rule by domestication) and understand our divisions of labor? At present this is because we all continue to beleive our falsehoods. Americans have done no good against islam becuase it is an underclass not middle class civilization. Russians have been right about muslims, mongols, and chinese principly because they must combat them. there is no mediterranean, north sea, or atlantic that protects russia. She must be more ‘on alert’ than the rest of the ‘white’ peoples. Just as the germans had to be more ‘alert’ than the anglo sea faring peoples.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 10:32:00 UTC