INHERENT RIGHTS ARE LOGICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE Natural Law describes NE

INHERENT RIGHTS ARE LOGICALLY AND PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE

Natural Law describes NECESSARY rights. We can’t possibly posses ‘inherent’ rights, since all rights consist of claims against (demands against) others. Since a claim or demand from others can only exist in a contract or agreement, and that the term ‘right’ is only possible when appealing to a third party – we can on say we NEED these rights inherently, as human beings, but not that we possess them. That’s impossible. It’s physically and logically impossible. So if we describe natural law as inherently possessed rather than inherently required, we attempt an act of fraud: which is to ignore the very simple fact that to obtain rights of any kind requires that we exchange them with others, and that we insure them, and at any scale, that we pay an insurer to insure them for all of us (judiciary). Any statement of inherently possessed rights is an act of fraud whereby the individual seeks claims against others without entering into a contract for exchange, and preferably, both with a third party insurer that renders asymmetry of violence neutral.