“you’re no philosopher!”— First, ridicule, rallying and shaming is (a) feminin

—“you’re no philosopher!”—

First, ridicule, rallying and shaming is (a) feminine, (b) marxist, (c) demonstration of the failure of one’s ability to construct arguments (d) demonstration of the failure of one’s ideology.

I qualify for having increased decidability and explanatory power in my domain of inquiry. That is what qualifies one as a philosopher. Sorry. Just how it is.

I probably qualify for merely explaining the reason why Mises failed along with Brouwer and Bridgman. But certainly for explaining the relationship between them, popper and hayek. And for solving the problem hayek couldn’t complete, by translating rothbard’s ghetto legal ethics, and hoppe’s kantian rationalist ethics, into anglo empirical and scientific language. A language that can be used to construct proofs – what hoppe was trying to construct.

So again, you don’t have an argument, right? You are just another crypto-marxist begging for free redistribution of the productivity of others by parasitic consumption of and free-riding upon the commons they produce, rather than directly upon the productivity of what they originally produce?

Right? That’s what you demonstrate that you do? You’re just another crypto marxist with a different strategy for parasitism. Andyou defend your parasitism with ridicule rallying and shaming beause you, like women, cannot face the truth of your fantasies: you beg for free riding as a claim against the productivity of others.

I eat you libertine munchkins like pringles with beer. lol

Bend over.