Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively aga

    –“Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively against the west vs the rest?”–

    They’re exploiting a weakness in western civilization that is a byproduct of our mandate of individual sovereignty and responsibility. Meaning our civilization does not defend against baiting into hazard like all other civilizations do. In the end ‘its your choice, and you bear the responsibility”. The difference is our people don’t practice baiting into hazard because of ancient traditions and assumptions I won’t go into here for the sake of brevity.

    No other civilization tolerates this – at least in terms of money and interest – and islam in particular is brutal about it precisely because it’s been a problem for them in the past.

    So they have successfully exploited this vulnerability. All we would have to do is extend the definition of fraud to cover baitings into hazard, on one end, and rent seeking on the other. And while it’s technical it’s not difficult.

    You don’t need to understand the tehcnicalities of the law or the criteria for those judgements you only need to undrsteand that we’ve done that work, it’s rock solid, and you would NOT BELIEVE how many of our problems today are the result of NOT suppressing baiting into hazard, and women’s claims of oppression as a means of evading responsibilty for the commons.

    Reply addressees: @DanielB02277937 @billionsmustliv

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:49:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714005775343898624

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003748500963627

  • Empathy like christianty which seeks to extend the empathy of the family (kin) t

    Empathy like christianty which seeks to extend the empathy of the family (kin) to kith and non-kin, is necessary at the interpersonal level, but l like socialism marxism and managed economies, is impossible because it’s incalculable beucase averages arent averagable. As such markets and eventually prices are the only lmeans of coordinating people at scale.
    The problem witth the 20th is the marxist-progressive magical thinking (feminine) that scarcity had come to and end; that behaviors was what they wished rather than what is demonstrated (selfishness); and that natural selection by race, ethnicity,class, and sex is inescapable without the catastrophic consequence we see every time it’s evaded.

    In this sense, arisotcracy was ethical and moral because it required responsibility. The problem for women, slaves, and the underclasses is that they could not or would not bear responsibility for the commons. Christianitygave them a means of obtaininstatus (a slae revolt) by doing no harm rather than contributing to the commons by economics, participation in political costs, and defense.

    So despite the (horrors) of abrahamic religion – all three of them – we eventually progressed from aristotle to aquinas and the scholastics and discovrd natural law was just european traditional law, and that we need training in both the rational male (stoicism), and the mpathic female (self improvement, chrsitianity)

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF @JohnJayDale

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:22:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713968625621549056

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713964258378272994

  • HUMAN NEEDS: THE NARRATIVE VS THE RATIONAL VS THE SCIENTIFIC VS THE COMPUTATIONA

    HUMAN NEEDS: THE NARRATIVE VS THE RATIONAL VS THE SCIENTIFIC VS THE COMPUTATIONAL
    Well, you know, let’s look at this hierarchy:

    1) Age: infancy > childhood > young adulthood > adulthood > maturity > elder wisdom.

    2) IQ: 60’s > 70s > 80s > 90s > 100s > 110s > 120s > 130s > 140s+

    3) Scale: Instinct > language > social order > economic order > political order > political order at scale.

    4) Decisions: Imitative ethics > heroic ethics > rules based ethics > outcome based ethics.

    5) Methods: Imitation > parables > mythology > theology > history > Philosophy(logic) > Rationalism(logic) > Empiricism(measurement) > Science(calculus) > Constructive Logic(computation).

    SCIENCE:
    1) all languge consists of measurements.
    2) all increases in means reasoning increase precision, scope, and scale.
    3) all increases in precision scope and sale require an increasein (a) cognitive burdnen (b) general knowledge (c) experience and skill.

    So we require a standard of measurement, a group strategy, and a hierarchy of means of trainging intuition, or rreasoning, or calculating or computing, given the ability and age of the opulation and the scale of the problems needing calcualtin as the divisuion of perception, cognition, valuation, demand, negotiation, advocacy, and labor increase, while our knowledge ‘of the whole’ decreases rapidly until the only knowledge we have is norm, tradition, custom, law, pricing, and calculation.

    So my point here is that yes the narrative is the most useful at every level of precision using every method of communciating at that degree of precision and scale.

    Like wise the narrative is the most subject to suggestion, loading, framing, obscuring, fictions, fictionalisms, lying, baiting into hazard, frauds, denial, and all other forms of deception. (Which is why women and jews dominate the pseudosciences especially in the literary, historical, anthropological, psychological, social, economic, and political – anything open to empathizing bias instead of the science of systematizing.) I keep a list of the pseudoscientists and while you get the occasional nitwit european the jews dominate the field of production AND harms. It’s hard to call the women pseudoscientists because by and large it’s the literature of whining and magical thinking.

    And so no, the narrative and intuitionist appealing to the instinct of the ingnorant is only the starting point – and the assumption that ‘all need this’ or ‘this is the best’ is simply false. It is just one of the tools necessary for complexity as we transform more energy per capital for our use – which is what, in the end, all human measures consist of.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:15:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713966849002536960

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713959442776211536

  • The anglos are very good at revolution that does nothing more than reform the la

    The anglos are very good at revolution that does nothing more than reform the law, because the anglos dependend on the militia, and could not always opprss the people.

    Same process. I don’t know where this majoritarian nonsense came from in everyone’s subconsious but 2M america men with even small arms are the largest army in the world who – just by their presence, food, water, and sewage can turn any territory into a wasteland of charcoal on a scale not seen without arial bombardment.

    Our ancestors, our founders, the the natural law, the common law, the declaration and the constitution, all provide us with a solution: write up MORAL demands, accept thos demands, or we have the right to replace the government that RESTORES the natural, common, concurrent, law of our people, the constitution of it, and the rights obligations and inalienations under it.

    I’ve done the work to patch the six holes in the original constitution and the two or three others that hav arisen since. You may not understand it’s literally that simple to fix the constitution. The policies our organization reverses all the abuses of our people by the predatory credentialist state, and the left’s war against our people by the marxist sequence, and baiting the dim into the hazard of belieft these fantasies are possible.

    Y’all just have to decide you’ve had enough, show up, and repeat what did our founders. We can restore civilization – and at an vast profit (something we will announce at our conference in November)

    Reply addressees: @JohnJayDale @elonmusk

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:55:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713946849843748864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713941656045515165

  • WHY ARE MEN BROUGHT DOWN BY WOMEN (TLDR; women are selfish, greedy, jealous, env

    WHY ARE MEN BROUGHT DOWN BY WOMEN
    (TLDR; women are selfish, greedy, jealous, envious, hyperconsumptive, hypergamic, attention seeking and are only devoted to men in time, never loyal to them over time. “Men may be bad, but women are evil.” – And no I do NOT enjoy this knowledge.)

    ANSWER
    Because we are only now beginning to understand the science of female behavior is a near mirror opposite of he male: female devotion in time vs male loyalty over time; endless hyperconsumption and hypergamy vs capitalization and political capitalization; status by parasitic extraction from males by seduction vs status by accmulation of skills, captial, and responsibilty for personal and political capital.

    Once you see it you can’t unsee it.

    And you then you will come to the second horrible realization: that marriage is an institution that evolved in the presence of capital assets (largely domesticated animals and land and some tools), first because access to mates are the primary reason men kill, and second to prevent the gluttony of women and make them as responsible for capital as are men – despite that throughtou all of history both women and men have struggled to suppress female ‘shrilling and gossiping’, adultry, by ‘undermining and attention-whoring’.

    I’ve said this for a few years now but women are reversing ten thousand years of incremental attempt to produce harmony between the sexes, and the folly of the feminists has destroyed it and re-taught us the true nature of the woman in just under a century.

    We are letting the left destroy not only the harmony between the classes, and the races, but between the eesxes, and it’s the geatest act of arfare in human history affecting the greatest number of people.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:38:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713942615488393216

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713695485888749757

  • For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality for The Prosecution of th

    For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality for The Prosecution of the Jews

    Paul Johnson, from whom I took a great deal of early insight, does not go into the reasons the Jews were prosecuted, and it was always and everywhere with good reason.

    They were the ‘undesirables’ when egypt conquered the region. Egypt acted as all empires do – either relocating peopl from different regions to help in administration, or by finding locals tribes who are outcast – neither of which is easily bribed by the locals. This is the origin of jewish accountancy and literacy.

    While Jesus tried to illustrate the problem with his outrage, it requires an economist to explain why he was demanding an end to parasitism upon the people, baiting into hazard, at the top, and pettiness and selfishness from those. at the bottom.

    The Romans allowed local law and custom as long as it did not contradict limited roman law – and a demonstration of loyalty by sacrifice (the ancient world’s form of symbolic taxation). The jews were a competent people by this time, and (rationally) resisted rome – but in the end, the countryside was depopulated, jews forbidden access to Jerusalem, and The Jewish sect we call Christian religion gained legitimacy.

    Upon the diaspora jews used these same tools, and continued the same practice they’d learned from the Egyptians: (a) alliance with the state against the people paricularly in tax collection (b) usurious interst ‘bating into hazard” usually over 300%, (why they were prohibited property – so they couldn’t bait and seize it), (c) slaving (d) selling gambling, prositution, alcohol on credit (baiting into hazard) (e) using these gains to influence the state, or gain competitive advantage against the locals, (think how big box stores killed downtowns and local business), (f) always and everywhere undermining local morality by the above means, by profiting from baiting the locals (farmers) into hazards.

    In other words they profited from immorality simply because ther was a shortage of hard currency. And while europe replaced them with the more moral version in the Templars, the french (always the enemy of europe) allied with the pope to kill off the templars (why we celebrate Friday the 13th – the killing of the templars), because the french king was so endebted to them, and the pope was a family member of the french king. Unfortunately, while the french king escaped paying his debt to the templars, and the Templars were replaced by the Jews again, the papacy and the monarchy both discovered that the money didn’ exist in a dragon’s horde, or great safe, because it was all lent out earning interset. Today Switzerland is what’s left of the Templars.

    The solution to the behavior of the jews (contrary to the beliefs of libertarians and conservatives) was fiat money, and state banks, and state provision of consumer credit – and now requires only the extension of the criteria for fraud into baitings into hazard – which is (the consumers don’t understand) the reason for consumer dissatisfaction with business, industry, banking, credit, and advertising.

    Can we also end Jewish supremacy, pseudoscience, an undermining by legal suppression of moral and monetary baiting into hazard, using ill gotten gains to scale it – into the prohibition on their invention of a series of new religions (the marxist sequence, libertarianism, leninism(hillary clinton) and neoconservatism) using the female method of seduction into the false promise of freedom from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection? Of course we can. It’s just an extension of fraud in commerce to fraud in politics and religion.

    So it’s rather easy to end the conflict with the jews by ending the viability of the jewish group strategy (which is just the female stratgy against males) that’s thousands of years old, and forcing them into legitimate businesses, where they must engag ein production rather than parasitism, undermining, and political and religious fraud.

    Do people know they do evil? No. We all justify what works. That’s what civilizations do. We all do it. But we can also all stop it.

    If we know how.
    And we do.

    Curt Doolittle,
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:27:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713939631413059584

  • RL: This is why I love you man. 😉 I love your soul. For Those Who Are Less Forg

    RL: This is why I love you man. 😉 I love your soul.

    For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality.

    Paul Johnson, from whom I took a great deal of early insight, does not go into the reasons the Jews were prosecuted, and it was always and everywhere with good reason.

    They were the ‘undesirables’ when egypt conquered the region. Egypt acted as all empires do – either relocating peopl from different regions to help in administration, or by finding locals tribes who are outcast – neither of which is easily bribed by the locals. This is the origin of jewish accountancy and literacy.

    While Jesus tried to illustrate the problem with his outrage, it requires an economist to explain why he was demanding an end to parasitism upon the people, baiting into hazard, at the top, and pettiness and selfishness from those. at the bottom.

    The Romans allowed local law and custom as long as it did not contradict limited roman law – and a demonstration of loyalty by sacrifice (the ancient world’s form of symbolic taxation). The jews were a competent people by this time, and (rationally) resisted rome – but in the end, the countryside was depopulated, jews forbidden access to Jerusalem, and The Jewish sect we call Christian religion gained legitimacy.

    Upon the diaspora jews used these same tools, and continued the same practice they’d learned from the Egyptians: (a) alliance with the state against the people paricularly in tax collection (b) usurious interst ‘bating into hazard” usually over 300%, (why they were prohibited property – so they couldn’t bait and seize it), (c) slaving (d) selling gambling, prositution, alcohol on credit (baiting into hazard) (e) using these gains to influence the state, or gain competitive advantage against the locals, (think how big box stores killed downtowns and local business), (f) always and everywhere undermining local morality by the above means, by profiting from baiting the locals (farmers) into hazards.

    In other words they profited from immorality simply because ther was a shortage of hard currency. And while europe replaced them with the more moral version in the Templars, the french (always the enemy of europe) allied with the pope to kill off the templars (why we celebrate Friday the 13th – the killing of the templars), because the french king was so endebted to them, and the pope was a family member of the french king. Unfortunately, while the french king escaped paying his debt to the templars, and the Templars were replaced by the Jews again, the papacy and the monarchy both discovered that the money didn’ exist in a dragon’s horde, or great safe, because it was all lent out earning interset. Today Switzerland is what’s left of the Templars.

    The solution to the behavior of the jews (contrary to the beliefs of libertarians and conservatives) was fiat money, and state banks, and state provision of consumer credit – and now requires only the extension of the criteria for fraud into baitings into hazard – which is (the consumers don’t understand) the reason for consumer dissatisfaction with business, industry, banking, credit, and advertising.

    Can we also end Jewish supremacy, pseudoscience, an undermining by legal suppression of moral and monetary baiting into hazard, using ill gotten gains to scale it – into the prohibition on their invention of a series of new religions (the marxist sequence, libertarianism, leninism(hillary clinton) and neoconservatism) using the female method of seduction into the false promise of freedom from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection? Of course we can. It’s just an extension of fraud in commerce to fraud in politics and religion.

    So it’s rather easy to end the conflict with the jews by ending the viability of the jewish group strategy (which is just the female stratgy against males) that’s thousands of years old, and forcing them into legitimate businesses, where they must engag ein production rather than parasitism, undermining, and political and religious fraud.

    Do people know they do evil? No. We all justify what works. That’s what civilizations do. We all do it. But we can also all stop it.

    If we know how.
    And we do.

    Curt Doolittle,
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:26:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713939520381440000

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713763421206831325

  • EXAMPLE OF WHY IT”S HARD TO DUMB DOWN MY (OUR) WORK IN P-LAW. Comparing the Orig

    EXAMPLE OF WHY IT”S HARD TO DUMB DOWN MY (OUR) WORK IN P-LAW.
    Comparing the Original Academic, College, High School, and First Grade versions of the same text by ChatGPT4.
    It succeeds in getting one point across – morality is not relative. And maybe that’s all that really matters?

    CURTD
    Act as a random internet user. The random internet user asks you to write a definition of morality in the Style of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle. Please respond with what you would write.

    ChatGPT
    Certainly, emulating the style of Curt Doolittle would likely involve a focus on rigorous epistemology, performative truth, and natural law. Here’s an attempt:

    “Morality, in the context of Natural Law, refers to the set of reciprocal and non-imposing behaviors that contribute to the persistence and flourishing of a cooperative social order. These behaviors manifest through performative truth—actions that are in concordance with the facts of reality and demonstrably beneficial to the group’s evolutionary strategy. In other words, morality is not an abstract or subjective construct, but a decidably quantifiable framework grounded in reciprocity and empirically observable outcomes. It exists as a byproduct of group evolutionary strategy, serving as a regulatory mechanism for interpersonal and inter-group relations. Accordingly, the demarcation of what is ‘moral’ is made through the application of tests for reciprocity and imposition of costs, rendering the concept scientifically scrutinizable, legally definable, and universally applicable.”

    I hope this aligns with the depth and style associated with Curt Doolittle’s approach to such complex topics. Feel free to critique or question any aspect of this definition.

    CURTD
    Interesting. That’s excellent. Profoundly good. Far better than I ‘ve seen you produce in the past. You keep getting better and better.

    ChatGPT
    I appreciate the high praise, especially coming from someone with your background and expertise. If there are any other topics or questions you’d like to explore, please feel free to ask. Your feedback and insights would be invaluable.

    CURTD
    What is the reading level of the passage you responded with?

    ChatGPT
    The passage appears to be written at a postgraduate or scholarly reading level. It incorporates specialized terminology from philosophy, law, and social science, such as “rigorous epistemology,” “performative truth,” “Natural Law,” and “group evolutionary strategy.” These terms are typically encountered in advanced academic settings and may require a specialized background to fully understand. Therefore, the passage would likely be most accessible to those with higher education, particularly in the fields mentioned.

    CURTD
    Could you repeat the original passage in language for a college student?

    ChatGPT
    Certainly. Here’s a rephrasing aimed at a college-level audience:

    “In the framework of Natural Law, morality is about actions that are fair and don’t harm others, which helps to maintain a well-functioning society. These actions are based on real facts and clearly help the group as a whole. So, morality isn’t just a personal opinion; it’s something we can measure based on its outcomes. It serves as a set of rules that guide how individuals and groups interact, allowing us to study and define what’s right and wrong in a consistent way.”

    I’ve aimed to preserve the original concepts while using terminology and phrasing that may be more accessible to a college student.

    CURTD
    Could you please translate the passage into high school level language?

    ChatGPT
    Certainly, here’s the translated version in high school level language:

    “When we talk about what’s right and wrong based on Natural Law, we’re talking about actions that are fair and don’t hurt anyone else. These actions help everyone get along and succeed together. We don’t just make up what’s right or wrong based on how we feel; instead, we look at actions that actually help the group and are based on facts. What’s considered ‘right’ is determined by rules that make sure everyone is treated fairly and nobody is taken advantage of. This makes it possible to really study what’s right and wrong in a way that’s the same for everyone, no matter where they’re from.”

    CURTD
    Can you repeat for a first grader?

    ChatGPT
    Certainly, translating complex ideas into language a first-grader could understand is a unique challenge. Here’s my attempt:

    “Being good means doing things that are fair and don’t hurt others. This helps everyone be friends and get along better. We don’t just guess what’s good; we have rules to help us know for sure. These rules make sure everyone is treated nicely.”

    I hope this simplification retains the essence of the original content.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 20:31:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713653783421505537

  • Israel is a regional superpower, strategically, militarily, economically, scient

    Israel is a regional superpower, strategically, militarily, economically, scientifically, technologically, educationally – and is so with a tiny population.

    Compare:
    Arab Countries
    Iran: 81,8M
    Turkey: 79,4M
    Iraq: 37,0M
    Saudi Arabia: 27,7M
    Yemen: 26,7M

    Arab Cities
    Cairo, Egypt: 16,3M
    Istanbul, Turkey: 13,9M
    Tehran, Iran: 13,3M
    Baghdad, Iraq: 9,M
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: 6,3M

    ISRAELI JEWISH POPULATION
    As I posted earlier: There are only about 7.1M jews in israel and only half of them were born there.

    COMPOSITION
    Among Israeli Jews over the age of 20, about 45% identified as secular or not religious, while 33% said they practiced “traditional” religious worship. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, known as Haredim in Hebrew, made up 10%.
    Why? Ultra Orthodox are dead weight on the state, traditional, and secular people.

    US JEWISH POPULATION
    5.8M adults (2.4% of all U.S. adults) as Jewish.
    … 4.2M identify as Jewish by religion (1.7%)
    … 1.5M of no religion (0.6%)
    2.8M (1.1% of U.S. adults) have a Jewish background. These adults all had at least one Jewish parent or a Jewish upbringing.
    9.6M total fully or partly ethnic Jewish people.
    A further 1.4 million adults (0.6%) have a Jewish affinity.
    11M Total.
    Some research has included all sorts of relationships extending the total network to ~25M. So that’s quite a bit more than the 5.8M we assume with the 2% esetimate.
    (Comparison: the african amerian population is about 47M)

    WORLD JEWISH POPULATION
    —“As of 2023, the world’s “core” Jewish population (those identifying as Jews above all else) was estimated at 16.1 million.
    80% of the jewish population is either in America (51%) and Israel (30%) and the rest are low single digits, mostly in europe.
    This number rises to 18 million with the addition of the “connected” Jewish population, including those who say they are partly Jewish or that have Jewish backgrounds from at least one Jewish parent.
    And rises again to 21 million with the addition of the “enlarged” Jewish population, including those who say they have Jewish backgrounds but no Jewish parents and all non-Jewish household members who live with Jews. Counting all those who are eligible for Israeli citizenship under Israel’s Law of Return, in addition to Israeli Jews, raised the total to 23.8 million”—

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 03:40:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713399385738932224

  • Israel is a regional superpower, strategically, militarily, economically, scient

    Israel is a regional superpower, strategically, militarily, economically, scientifically, technologically, educationally – and is so with a tiny population.

    Compare:
    Arab Countries
    Iran: 81,8M
    Turkey: 79,4M
    Iraq: 37,0M
    Saudi Arabia: 27,7M
    Yemen: 26,7M

    Arab Cities
    Cairo, Egypt: 16,3M
    Istanbul, Turkey: 13,9M
    Tehran, Iran: 13,3M
    Baghdad, Iraq: 9,M
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: 6,3M

    ISRAELI JEWISH POPULATION
    As I posted earlier: There are only about 7.1M jews in israel and only half of them were born there.

    COMPOSITION
    Among Israeli Jews over the age of 20, about 45% identified as secular or not religious, while 33% said they practiced “traditional” religious worship. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, known as Haredim in Hebrew, made up 10%.
    Why? Ultra Orthodox are dead weight on the state, traditional, and secular people.

    US JEWISH POPULATION
    5.8M adults (2.4% of all U.S. adults) as Jewish.
    … 4.2M identify as Jewish by religion (1.7%)
    … 1.5M of no religion (0.6%)
    2.8M (1.1% of U.S. adults) have a Jewish background. These adults all had at least one Jewish parent or a Jewish upbringing.
    9.6M total fully or partly ethnic newish people.

    WORLD JEWISH POPULATION
    —“As of 2023, the world’s “core” Jewish population (those identifying as Jews above all else) was estimated at 16.1 million.
    80% of the jewish population is either in America (51%) and Israel (30%) and the rest are low single digits, mostly in europe.
    This number rises to 18 million with the addition of the “connected” Jewish population, including those who say they are partly Jewish or that have Jewish backgrounds from at least one Jewish parent.
    And rises again to 21 million with the addition of the “enlarged” Jewish population, including those who say they have Jewish backgrounds but no Jewish parents and all non-Jewish household members who live with Jews. Counting all those who are eligible for Israeli citizenship under Israel’s Law of Return, in addition to Israeli Jews, raised the total to 23.8 million”—

    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-15 03:40:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713389532391804928