Form: Mini Essay

  • JOBS, CS, H1B, AND IMMIGRATION: SCARY NUMBERS Top H1B Initial Employment Sponsor

    JOBS, CS, H1B, AND IMMIGRATION: SCARY NUMBERS

    Top H1B Initial Employment Sponsors, 2022:
    via: Monsieur le Baron @Mssr_le_Baron

    Amazon 6,396
    Infosys 3,151
    Tata Consultancy Services 2,854
    Cognizant 2,521
    Google 1,562
    Meta Platforms 1,546
    HCL 1,260
    IBM 1,239
    Wipro 1,172
    Deloitte Consulting 1,169
    Accenture 1,097
    Capgemini 1,090
    Microsoft 1,008
    Apple 930
    Intel 877
    Ernst & Young 701
    Goldman Sachs 529
    Qualcomm 524
    Tech Mahindra 509
    Oracle 491
    Citibank 489
    McKinsey & Company 481
    Pricewaterhouse Coopers 429
    JP Morgan Chase 420
    Walmart 392
    Mindtree 342
    Tesla 337
    Cisco 326
    Eficens 288
    Nvidia 284

    These *single year* *new hires* now often represent >10% of corporate hires each year for many of these firms.

    MY COMMENTS:

    So, rounding to the nearest big number that’s 30K H1Bs.
    And 72.6% of H1B visas are issued to Indian nationals.

    There are 2.19M (soon 3M) CS related jobs in the USA, with (?) an average age of about 40.

    What we see is indians replacing americans (yes really). Are indians better educated (we are pulling from americans, and in particular european americans). In fact, we are seeing young immigrants replace established workers at lower salaries in many fields.

    POLITICAL JUSTIFICATION
    The progressive narrative is that these are s*** jobs that no American man would want anyway.

    The “conservative” narrative is that no American is skilled enough to fill them.

    WHY?
    (first, the data is cr*p)

    My data:
    The number of CS GRADS from what I can find is about 60,000 for 2021.
    The number of CS JOB openings, from what I can find 125,000 computer science
    These are the numbers I would expect.

    Computer-related jobs are larger in number than computer science jobs so the number is bigger. But even then, only approximately 3.04% of the total U.S. civilian labor force was employed in computer-related roles as of the most recent data available.

    Given that whether 2% or 3% it’s a fraction of the work force, you’d think it wouldn’t matter. However, these jobs pay a lot more than most other jobs.

    DEMOGRAPHICS
    India
    India has 1.3+B People. (I think it’s replaced china now as the largest population – because we’re pretty sure chinese numbers are overcounted). While the IQ is only 81, and only 1% of the population has an IQ over 115 (minimum theoretical college STEM ability), that’s 14.3M people to draw from.
    Average Age in India? 29. Young.

    USA
    The USA white (meaning exclusively of european descent) is only 56% of 330M or 184M. While this number should represent the exclusively european it’s still overstated, certainly by . The number is closer to 51-52%) The most common age of whites in U.S. is 58. For minorities, it’s 27.
    So again, with a 115 minimum theroetical for STEM ability that’s 19% of the population of 184M is 35M. More than twice the available Indian population.
    Howeer, if you want a ticket to wealth in india, you have a narrower set of choices than an american, who may choose from any number of careers by preference rather than maximum income.

    BIRTHS
    “White” 53% (overstated) 1.9M,
    Black 14%, .6M
    Hispanic 24%, .8M
    Asian 6% .2M

    IMMIGRANT POPULATION
    This number is bogus. It does not account for the 16M+ Illegals in the USA at present:
    –“There were a record 44.8 million immigrants living in the U.S. in 2018, making up 13.7% of the nation’s population. This represents a more than fourfold increase since 1960, when 9.7 million immigrants lived in the U.S., accounting for 5.4% of the total U.S. population.”–
    So we have 60M immigrants against a white population of 180M.

    THEREFORE?
    We don’t have a shortage of people. We have a shortage of people wanting to sit in a cubicle and write code – and that’s very likely because (women in education) we lack the rigor in education necessary to train (especially boys) students for CS related work. (b) immigration is suppressing wages that would provide the incentives, because those jobs are paying less (59k) than they would if the shortage was greater, salaries were highter, and demand for talent was higher. Truth is that CS is not hard at all for the vast majority of jobs out there. We taunt Google and FB etc, but what those companies do isn’t rocket science at all. It’s closer to software plubming.

    Search data is unhelpful:
    “Data from 2017 recorded the number of computer science US graduates was less than 50,000. This is tragic considering that the same year there were more than 500,000 job openings. (This number is false, becaues it surveys help wnted ads which are multiples of the actual jobs.

    “According to How Many Computer Science Graduates Each Year, the roughly 65,000 CS graduates in the U.S. in 2015 represented only about 10% of all STEM graduates.”

    “According to New Intel – How Many Software Engineers Are There in 2023? – there are less than 30,000 computer science students who graduate each year.”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 15:40:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715392446580793344

  • ON GENERATIONS AND GENX I’m technically Gen Jones (Between Boomers and GenX) but

    ON GENERATIONS AND GENX
    I’m technically Gen Jones (Between Boomers and GenX) but I have a greater affinity for GenX. My gen are a little too ‘Wall Street’ and GenX is a little more ‘Breakfast Club’. Prefer the Breakfast club crowd. And culturally I’m definitely more attuned to GenX experience (Autism? must’ve matured late. 😉 ) Only bad thing about GenX is the parents of Milennials and GenZ because of working mothers and the latchkey kid effect. Cable was originally ok, but between computer games, cell phones, the internet, bad social media and overprotective absent moms, … not good.

    Gen Jones
    “They were children during Watergate, the oil crisis, and stagflation, and were young adults when HIV/AIDS became a worldwide threat in the 1980s. Unlike leading-edge boomers, most of Generation Jones did not grow up with World War II veterans as fathers, and, as they reached adulthood, there was no compulsory military service and no defining political cause.” (We chose biz. Gates, Jobs, etc)

    Narrative:
    I gotta tell ya. That I dunno what the boomers are talking about because everything I remembrer from the Kennedy assasination to the race riots to the weekly marxist bombings, to vietnam, to watergate, to the oil crisis, to carter’s screw up with the Iranian hostages – it was a SH**T time to be alive. But… the difference is we still had social life, we were still fit (not fat), had hair bands, concerts, we had lots of s*x in cars, couldn’t catch a dangerous STD, and all we had was beer and pot. When I got into college the Coke thing started and it seemed like people were dropping out of college like flies because of it. Then the AIDS thing happend and the world changed. 😉

    You can’t really imagine how much everything changed from star was to the Regan recovery. It was like rebirth.

    Reply addressees: @texaho666


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-20 00:41:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715166428272218112

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1715146368405127433

  • WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES? Richard; –“What jumps out to me in th

    WHAT JUMPS OUT IN DONORS TO WOKE PARTIES?

    Richard;

    –“What jumps out to me in these figures is not only how left leaning large institutions are, but how the same is true for most professions.”– Richard Hanania

    WHAT JUMPS OUT?
    What jumps out at me is insulation from the market.
    Luxury Beliefs and Virtue Signaling are both possible and endemic, and match Veblen’s prediction of the wealth effect. “The reason to become educated is to escape the market (and work).”

    DIFFERENCES
    – Conservatives are directly participating in the market. The business owners across the variety of self employed of all scales directly interact with the market.
    This means they are personally responsible for capital.
    -versus-
    – The government
    – The big industries
    – The academy and education
    – The professions and white collar office workers
    – Most women
    All are insulated from the market by scale (or husbands).
    This means they are personally not responsible for capital.
    Which means the are not responsible for risk.

    What separates urban and suburban-rural voters?
    Responsibility for, and capacity for resonsibilty for capital.
    Cities generate demand for authority in lieu of responsibility and territories generate remand for responsibilty in lieu of authority.

    Why? *Asymmetry of Risk* and *Asymmetry of Responsibility*”

    If taxes were allocated by symmetry of risk then the ‘red’ group wouldn’t pay any at all. (In fact, it makes no sense that we tax any of the tradesmen in the country at all. They only contribute 3% to total taxation, and they burn their bodies by their late forties. (Yes our organization proposes this particular tax change.)

    What are the behavioral differences between males and females? Asymmetry of tolerance for risk, and therefore asymmetry of responsibilty for self, private, and common.

    We do not have a Cultural Problem. We have a political problem because we have an incentive problem. We have an incentive problem between urban cities and suburban rural areas. And we have an inescapable problem of women’s voting in favor of irresponsibilities, and men voting infavor of responsibilities.

    The only reason anything moves left, whether education, universities, workblace behavior, political organization, or economic performance, is because women everywhere and always vote for advancing irresponsibilty – despite the fact that the reason for the west’s success (for ‘whiteness’) is the maximization of individual responsibilty – including ‘truth before face’ which woen simply cannot bear. If you pull women from the voting pool everything is always RED except for the coastal immigrant cities whose populations have natural anti-responsibilty incentives.

    In other words, we largely have a ‘women problem’ that can be solved by giving women a separate lower house of government. And restoring the Senate as a proxy for the governor and the legislature of the states.

    Understand Our Govt Step 1
    This would preserve empirical Concurrency(in agreement) – we live in a concurrent republic not a democratic one under the Common law’s empirical Commonality (in disagreement) – not sure why I have to teach this every day. The purpose of concurrency to establish legitimacy (settlement) ACROSS regions, classes (and now sexes). So that the rights of minorities are protected against the malincentives of the majority -thereby preventing majority tyranny.

    Understand Our Govt Step 2
    The USG is a Market for Exchanges Between Classes And Regions – it is for debate on invstments and trades, not rule. The states rule and the people are sovereign. In europe under the napoleonic code instead of the common law, Governments rule, the government is sovereign, and the people are subjects.

    Again. No idea why I have to teach what should be crayon level concepts to the american and european peoples every day – but then I do. Because people are evil and seek power over others so that they don’t have to work, produce, and engage in reciprocal trade. And they will like like the dickens to do so.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 19:07:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714719965830385664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714122208514101668

  • WE CANNOT CHANGE YOU – WE GAVE UP (AGAIN) We cannot change you because you are n

    WE CANNOT CHANGE YOU – WE GAVE UP (AGAIN)
    We cannot change you because you are not capable of change. Half your population has an IQ of 83 or less meaning you are unemployable in any capacity other than repetitive manual labor that is simple and free of decision making. Again, half of the people are effectively uneducated able to read nothing more than the Koran or simple text, with no substantive knowledge of the world. You have the lowest trust people outside of africa, and the least trustworthy, and the most petty. SO islam is necessary for you.

    We have conquered you six times already – and each time found you wanting: The 1) bronze age collapse, 2) the greeks, 3)the romans, 4) the crusaders, 5) Vienna, 6) the world wars and I suspect our halfeuropean jews of- israel will make it a 7th – which they would if we would let them.

    Instead of conquering you we are trying to civilize you. We are trying to unite israel, the kingdoms, and egypt against Iran’s conquest of lebanon, syria, iraq and it’s possible given the conflict in the east, they have eyes on at least parts of the saudi persian gulf coast (oil), as well as the kurdish territory in Turkey. And since the second world war we have been trying to shepherd you into economic prosperity sufficient to raise you out of ingnorance and poverty – as we have the rest of the world by ending empires and creating free trade for all.

    No men have ever been better than we but maybe the victorian english. Otherwise westerners have done more for humanity in a few centuries in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, than all other civilizations in history combined. And it appears rather obvious that every time we come into contact with you it causes some sort of dark age of ignorance and suffering.

    You can’t handle modernity because it requries intelligence, knowledge, contract, trust, and trustworthiness. It’s ok. But we must separate forever, until, possibly, some day, you can.

    The chinese are right. “Build A Great Wall.”

    Reply addressees: @AlMuwahid_1 @Will_of_Europa @RashidaTlaib @POTUS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 18:36:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714712043746418688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714696074391416833

  • CHRISTIAN NEW WORLD VS MUSLIM OLD WORLD Byzantium, Constantinople: A less advanc

    CHRISTIAN NEW WORLD VS MUSLIM OLD WORLD
    Byzantium, Constantinople: A less advanced people (turks) conquered a more advanced people (greco byzantines), because the more advanced people controlled the trade routes between europe and asia. And then used that base to invade the superior people and lands of the Balkans. Even today most turks are not turks but either Greeks or Iranics (Kurds). And the Muslim Ottomans conducted a genocide against the ancient people the Armenians. Today the Balkans are backwards thanks to Ottoman and Islam occupation. And the political strife in the region is due to the backwardness of the muslims vs the christians, and the civil wars in the region because of it. Oddlyl enough, the Russians would have ‘solved’ the issue but the west intervened and protected the muslim populations, ending the wars and demanding political solutions. Which is what we always do.

    North America: A much more advanced people (anglo, french, dutch) encounter a stone age people, with an extraordinary propensity for violence (somewhat like africa and the middle east). Most of these people actually died from diseases (the blanket story is a myth), and most died before anglo, french, dutch started settlement. The rest died in wars, as a superior people replaced an inferior people who could not modernize fast enough (low IQ too) to adapt to the superior people. (Same problem with muslims vs jews).

    Islam
    Historian Koenraad Elst has suggested that the total death toll runs into the millions when factoring in multiple campaigns and periods. We have no measure of the deaths from the african slave trade. We have only vague estimates of european slaves, but it’s at least 1.2 millon. The Arab slave trade in africa and eurasian, over 1300 years, captured arount 10M people alone. In africa we have no idea as the men were castrated or killed, and the majority of slaves retained were black women, with no regard to the survival rate as they traveled from capture to market. Women with whom inbreeding further reduced arab demographic measurements.

    Christians Thriving?
    I dunno what Christian people you think are thriving where, but look what y’all did to the other superior country, christian lebanon. Look what muslims are doing to better educated and more peaceful africans in the sahel. And look what muslims are doing to the superiority of the Jews. And look what muslims are doing to the superiority of Europe. India is preparing for a purge. This is why Modi is restoring the emphasis on hindu religion. China is as intolerant as ever and expanding by forcing msulims into re-education camps. Africa is having a problem with muslim terrorists as are peoples of the rest of the world, but they are going to switch from the tolerance of France to the power of russia and china in order to stop muslim terrorism and aggression.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @AlMuwahid_1 @Will_of_Europa @RashidaTlaib @POTUS


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 18:24:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714709102079750144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714696397583511599

  • JEWISH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES ARE A BIT OVERSTATED BUT BIASED A BIT TO THE FEMALE

    JEWISH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES ARE A BIT OVERSTATED BUT BIASED A BIT TO THE FEMALE NEUROSIS SPECTRUM
    (Kind of interesting)

    I can explain this in detail but I’m already complaining about every race on the planet today so I’d prefer to avoid it. So I’ll just give you an overview.

    Now, first, we should start with sex differences in mental illness and antisocial behavior. Women manifest mental instability on an astounding scale, with 30-40% of american women on some sort of mood stabilizer. Men however manifest these behaviors very differently. Usually exteranlizing them as aggression, alcohol, crime, disagreeablness, or laziness.

    We should expect to see certain expressed behaviors in the ashkenazim, and the same for the arabized population, and we do see them. (A jewish friend’s daughter committed suicide years ago ago because the schizophrenia progressed rapidly and dangerously. It was terribly painful for all.)

    However, what we should observe and do observe is the female end of the spectrum with neuroticisms rather than the male version (alcohol and drug abuse)

    And we do: neurosis, manic depression (bipolar disorder), dysthymia, (minor depression, major depression, simple phobia and schizophrenia. Note these are integrative disorders not compartmentalized disorders).

    However other mental illnesses are within the same ranges as the rest of the european population: panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, alcohol, and drug abuse. Note these are compartmentalization disorders not integrative disorders.

    In other words these suggest a sex difference in cognitive organization – which is what we should expect to see.

    So in other words, if men manifest these behaviors (“if you slice open an actor you’ll find an actress”) they’re more visible. And if a woman, and you’re more attention seeking and aggressive, they’re more visible.

    So I don’t think we’re seeing as much mental illness as more expression of female behavior in a group that is cognitively biased for female behavior, both in origin, genetic integration with european wome, and selection for skill sets favoring female cognition.

    In other words, Ashkenazi men manifest female bias in psychological behaviors, and I think we just notice it more because it’s different from our expectations. I’m not sure with ashenazi women. There isn’t any data. My sample is pretty large but IMO the distribution is more stable than the male. But we need science on this issue. I can’t tell if I’m engaging in fitting observations to the theory.

    At least that’s my charitable understanding of the matter. it’s also the opinion of most historians who have thought about the issue.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Abhi_Bilkan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:52:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714686018706685952

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714667239394459871

  • WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR? (not complicated – sorta….) 1) Back h

    WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR?
    (not complicated – sorta….)

    1) Back haired south eurasian semititic male jews from the levant.
    2) Brown, Blonde, Red, haired European Women from the Roman Region
    3) Immediate inbreeding.
    4) Jewish population bottlnecks
    5) Continued Extraordinary inbreeding creating extraordinary mutations – ie: why jews are more vunlerable to genetic defects and diseases.
    6) Coloring, especially hair, is polygenic. Though one gene in particular carries heavy influence.
    7) Small groups with similar complex mutational load combined with polygenic expression, selected for memory, verbal and calculation skills, selects for female traits, yielding european coloring bias. (Yes, turns out that historical observation as well as present suspicions are true. 😉 )

    Summary,
    European female introgression, european female bias in recursive trait selection, inbreeding, mutation, bottlenecking. (Kinda neat really.)

    Sidebar:
    (One of my best friends is a prototypical tall, large round- headed, blue eyed, red haired half jewish male working in the upper reaches of the financial sector. My wife had long red hair. So did my best friend when I was younger. So did my first girlfriend. While my hair was originally blond and matured into taupe (mouse brown), and now as I’m older it’s darker brown, I had quite abit of red and blonde in my beard before it went grey. So I’m kind of partial to red hair. (Very))

    GENETICS OF THE COLOR OF HAIR
    The coloration of hair is primarily determined by the type, amount, and distribution of pigments called eumelanin and pheomelanin, produced by cells known as melanocytes. These pigments are influenced by a variety of genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here are some primary genetic distinctions:

    Note: (a) primary influence is expression of, resistance of antagonism of the MC1R gene. (b) we don’t know how many copies of these genes exist (that I know of) or how many variable expressions are regulated, but it’s dominant. (c) there are really two regions that determine coloration. It’s the Black/Brown and the Blonde. The blond is from the Ancestral North Eurasians where we have genetics from around Lake Bikal I believe. (They’re gone, just integrated into us).

    Black Hair:
    MC1R Gene: In people with black hair, the MC1R gene typically functions efficiently, facilitating a high production of eumelanin. This creates the darkest hair shades.

    ASIP Gene: The Agouti Signaling Protein (ASIP) gene can inhibit the MC1R function to some extent but usually doesn’t in the case of black hair. Efficient MC1R function ensures eumelanin dominates.

    TYR, TYRP1, and DCT Genes: These genes are also crucial for the enzymatic pathway that leads to eumelanin production. Mutations or polymorphisms in these genes usually result in less effective eumelanin production and thus lighter hair.

    HERC2/OCA2 Complex: The intronic SNP rs12913832 in HERC2 influences OCA2 expression, and a specific combination of alleles at this SNP is generally associated with darker hair colors including black.

    Brown Hair:
    MC1R Gene: In brown-haired individuals, the Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R) gene usually functions normally, promoting the production of eumelanin over pheomelanin.

    TYR, TYRP1, and DCT Genes: These genes are also responsible for the production and function of enzymes involved in eumelanin production.

    SNPs: Various SNPs like rs12821256 have been associated with brown hair, usually increasing eumelanin synthesis or affecting its distribution.

    Red Hair:
    MC1R Variants: Variants of the MC1R gene are the most significant factor for red hair. These variants reduce the MC1R protein’s activity, leading to higher levels of pheomelanin.

    RHC or Red Hair Color Alleles: Specific mutations like V60L, D84E, R151C, R160W, and D294H on the MC1R gene are known as RHC alleles and are commonly found in red-haired individuals.

    Other Contributing Genes: Although MC1R is the primary determinant, other genes may also contribute to red hair color when mutated, though these are less well-understood.

    Blond Hair:
    KITLG and SLC24A4 Genes: These genes have been found to influence lighter hair shades, including blond.

    MC1R: A normally functioning MC1R gene can also result in blond hair if other genes that contribute to lighter pigmentation are present.

    SNPs: Various SNPs like rs1667394 in the OCA2 gene have been associated with blond hair.

    Interactions and Modifiers:
    Polygenic Traits: Hair color is polygenic, meaning it’s influenced by multiple genes interacting with each other.

    Environmental Factors: Sun exposure and other environmental factors can also modify hair color over time, although these changes aren’t genetically mediated.

    Sources:

    “Genome-wide association studies identify several new loci associated with pigmentation traits and skin cancer risk in European Americans” by D. Liu et al., Human Molecular Genetics, 2015.
    “Genetics of Skin Color Variation in Europeans: Genome-wide Association Studies with Functional Follow-up” by M.A. Visser et al., Human Genetics, 2014.
    “Variants of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) and freckling among Hispanics” by E.J. Herraiz et al., Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714677223876153344

  • CORPORATIONS AND RETURNS –“Most corporations have a negative return on investme

    CORPORATIONS AND RETURNS
    –“Most corporations have a negative return on investment when adjusting for inflation.”– @henge_j

    Well, these things are true – in part. In fact, the hard part of any business is the multipliers you produce on inflation. Your corner gas station <1%, your grocery store 1%, half of the small businesses fail (but half of them don’t and if you want to become wealthy building a small business and selling it is the most reliable way to do so. The vast majority of deca-millionaires achieve wealth by this method of small business growth), most businesses meet or beat the rate of inflation when it’s ‘normal ‘ in the 3% range.

    But that doesn’t mean that the fundamental conflict between inflation and the shortage of money, and the capacity for state debt, isn’t the fundamental problem faced by all people in history. It only means that with just over a century of experience we haven’t fully separated the treasury from the government as we have the courts, and constrained governments from effectively buying votes or donors with the power of debt.

    Now, how do we do this without currency? We do it currently with oil markets.

    There is no escape from the game of maintaining monetary velocity to maintain purchasing power (value), while at the same time maximizing possible investments in speculative search for returns on investment, especially when returns on investment continue to increase in time horizon. This means that both military competitive investment at the top, infrastructure investment, education investment, and the spectrum of industrial to consumer investments at the bottom, are necessary at all times. And it also means, quite to the dismay of the financial, isurance, pension private sector, that they provide consumers no value that wouldn’t better be provided at national scale cutting out the middleman, and providing the treasury with income.

    Here are the round numbers at scale for the USA.

    EBITDA DEFINED
    EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is a financial metric that measures a company’s profitability by calculating its earnings before accounting for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, taxes, and interest payments. This is the true measure of the profitability of a business from operations. The difference between EBITA and Net Profit is the cost of money and taxation.

    EBITDA Margin Ranges by Sector, High to Low
    Software & Services:
    High: 40-50%
    Average: 30-40%
    Low: 20-30%

    Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare:
    High: 35-45%
    Average: 25-35%
    Low: 15-25%

    Telecommunications:
    High: 35-45%
    Average: 25-35%
    Low: 15-25%

    Real Estate:
    High: 30-40%
    Average: 20-30%
    Low: 10-20%

    Consumer Goods:
    High: 25-35%
    Average: 20-30%
    Low: 10-20%

    Energy & Utilities:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 15-25%
    Low: 5-15%

    Financial Services:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 10-20%
    Low: 5-10%

    Manufacturing & Industrial:
    High: 20-30%
    Average: 10-20%
    Low: 5-10%

    Transport & Logistics:
    High: 15-25%
    Average: 10-15%
    Low: 5-10%

    Retail & Wholesale:
    High: 10-20%
    Average: 5-10%
    Low: 0-5%

    EXPLANATION BY SECTOR
    Public Companies
    Indices as Indicators: The long-term performance of stock market indices like the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ often outpace inflation. For instance, the average annual return for the S&P 500 has been around 10% before inflation since its inception.
    Dividend Yields: Some mature companies might not show a high rate of growth but offer dividends that, when considered as part of total ROI, can also outpace inflation.
    Blue Chips: Established companies with stable earnings, often called “blue chips,” usually have a long track record of beating inflation.
    Market Timing: Returns can also depend heavily on market timing. Buying during a downturn and selling during an upturn can beat inflation by a significant margin.

    Small Businesses
    Survival Rates: A significant number of small businesses fail within the first few years, offering negative ROI.
    Capital Efficiency: Some small businesses require less capital up-front and can generate ROI more quickly, making it easier to outpace inflation.
    Niche Markets: Small businesses serving niche markets often have a better chance of generating high ROI, provided the niche is profitable.

    Sector-Specific
    Tech & Innovation: Industries rooted in technology and innovation have generally shown strong growth and ROI, particularly in the 21st century.
    Traditional Industries: Sectors like manufacturing or utilities often offer moderate ROI but are usually stable.
    Cyclical Industries: Sectors like real estate or commodities can provide returns that either vastly outperform or underperform inflation, depending on economic cycles.

    Global Perspective
    Emerging Markets: Countries with rapidly growing economies can offer investment opportunities with ROIs that easily outpace inflation. However, these come with high risk.
    Currency Risks: Inflation must be considered not just for the country of the investment but also against any currency risk that might negate high ROI.

    Time Frame
    Short-Term: Due to market volatility, short-term ROI may not consistently beat inflation.
    Long-Term: Historically, long-term investments have a better chance of beating inflation, as markets tend to grow over time.

    Economic Conditions
    Boom Periods: In a robust economy, more companies will likely offer an ROI that outpaces inflation.
    Recessions: During economic downturns, fewer companies will likely beat inflation, and some might even offer negative ROI.

    Reply addressees: @henge_j


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714310598870134786

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714295243141480909

  • THE PROBLEM: INFLATION VS SHORTAGE OF MONEY It’s not clear that inflation that d

    THE PROBLEM: INFLATION VS SHORTAGE OF MONEY

    It’s not clear that inflation that does not impact the production cycle (usually in months) is meaningful. It’s certainly clear that the central problem of pre-modern economies is the shortage of money. Even today, governments that cannot make use of fiat money as a debt instrument against future returns is at a severe disadvantage against those that can.

    So as in most things ‘libertarianism’ is middle class marxism – meaning a monoply one-class view of the world – instead of historical european Trifunctionalism of elites and Tripartism of the Classes where each class had obligations to one another, as do ranks in the military to which they were all de-facto members because of the need for militia given the territory, trade routes, ad difficulty in concentrating capital in territorial europe as well as the pontic steppe.

    Reply addressees: @albin_dave @neoCamelist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 15:31:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714303068613820416

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714296006576341266

  • “Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”– Research has been done. Always com

    –“Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”–
    Research has been done. Always comes out the same.
    To begin with, a lot of prizes were contentious. Look up nobel prize controversies. These prizes are not ‘certifications’ we think they are. You will learn more from the list of controversies than you will from the list of prizes and prize winners.

    As for jewish Nobel Prize winners.
    1) Many are of obvious merit. Einstein even deserved more than he recieved but his work was later proven by others. Borh is have jewish and I have serious criticisms of some of the nonsense he has stated and the harm it’s done but his math is at least correct.
    2) Most prizes in general are immatieral (seriously, in general.)
    3) There is a ‘promoter’ effect in who gets the award and of course they are always and everywhere performing nepotism regardless of merit (once you see it its actually annoying). The technique is called ‘heaping undue praise’ and again it’s a female behavior applied to male domain which is why we aren’t good at suppressing it yet.

    Even with these criticisms, it appears that at least in physics and possibly chemistry, many of the awards are deserved. And jewish culture has been using high investment parenting in education for non-manual careers for over two thousand years, so selection has done it’s job.

    I’m not so interestedin jewish IQ claims, what I’m interested in is the distribution which appeas to have a wider SD, producing more outliers above 140 with the female ability to utilize verbal acuity and carry a verbal workload.

    Unfortunately ashkenazim also dominate the production of pseudosciences in every singe field to the degree that it’s almost bizarre that it’s continued this long – precisely becaue of the pictoral-verbal bias of the cognitiely feminine.

    How to Think About The Ashkenazim
    So it’s better to think of the Ashkenazim like say, the Dutch, or Austrians (or Hungarians), as a small country that focuses heavily on education and produces a dispropotionate number of scholars, sciencde, tech, and industry per capita

    Compare Israel to The Netherlands (apples to apples):

    Netherlands
    Compare with 18M people in the netherlands with 16,000 square miles of north sea coastal territory. producing a GDP of US$991 billion (about $1T) and it’s Per capita GDP US$72,973.

    Israel
    Israel only has 7.1M jews in 10,241 square miles (the other 25% are arabs and mixed races)
    producing GDP of US$564 billion and
    GDP per capita at US$58,270(astounding).
    Making israel a wealthy country.
    Jews In The USA
    The number of jews in the states is about 11M of various degrees of observance. No way to separate out their per capita GDP.
    Israeli + American Jews (over 80% of jews)
    If American jews moved to israel, that would mean a total jewish population of 18M people, in 10,241 square miles of mediterranean coastal (trade port) territory. Even assuming the GDP per capita remained the same (it would go up becaues of the benefits of scale) it would be, on the order of $1T (about the same as the netherlands).

    The difference is that the netherlands is competing with the other most advanced countries in the world, and israel is competing with neighbors whose GDP is an average of US$ 6,610 – absolute poverty.

    Israel is already a “regional superpower” militarily, economically, politically, scientifically, technically. And the arab world needs what israel is bringing to it if it is ever to escape it’s ignorance and poverty.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @innnspace @madmikeross @FarajRashi93307 @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:42:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714018998126325760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714006311237734838