Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “Americans could learn a lot from the Westminster system”—Michael Philip PARTI

    –“Americans could learn a lot from the Westminster system”—Michael Philip

    PARTIES

    The Jury is in that the British and Germany Party systems are far superior to the American FPTP party systems, because they allow for more consistent policy over longer periods, while ensuring rotation of the party bureaucracies as they fall from competence.

    HOUSES

    The jury is in that the British legislative houses are far superior to American legislative and executive houses. Primarily because of the emphasis on debate. And partly because of the superiority of the primary schools that (were) in place.

    EXECUTIVES

    The jury is in that a ‘presidency’ is a failed experiment as a replacement for a monarchy, and that the prime minister provides a superior executive function with greater accountability.

    MONARCHY

    the Jury is in that a monarchy limited to veto and dismissal is superior in incentives to all of the houses, prime ministers, and presidents. (And the same applies to the governorship of the states. )

    JUDICIARY

    The Jury is in that the American judiciary is far superior to the British judiciary primarily because the later (stricter) construction of our constitution.

    British trials are superior to American trials primarily because of the division of roles between the two classes of lawyers.

    BUREAUCRACY

    The jury is in that the german method of education and apprenticeship, (and just about all policy other than international) is superior to all others (on earth). this applies to the bureaucracy as well. Although, the jury is also in that private management of any function that services the public is superior to bureaucratic function that services the public.

    ECONOMIES

    The Jury is in that a mixed economy is insufficiently diverse and that each class effectively requires its own economy and means of distribution of work. The maintenance of the commons for example is absurdly expensive if maintained by the professionals in the private sector. And there is no reason that we do not sop up millions of workers for the permanent maintenance and beautification of the commons by MANUAL means (cleaners, gardeners, arborists, stone and brick masons, painters and plasterers. )

    SCALE

    But then we are also comparing 60M(a medium nation) to 360M( a continental empire)

    SOLUTIONS

    American would have been better off by retaining a monarchy limited to veto and disbandment, replacing the senators with the governors upon the invention of the telegraph; splitting the house into business(property requirements) and commons(everyone else), and adopting the Westminster system. This would put the common people in administrative control but limit fashion of the people by multiple layers: common, propertied, regional, monarchic, and judicial. Washington would be weak and the states would be strong, and this central imperial dictatorship would be impossible.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 21:34:00 UTC

  • “I was asked why I am voting for Trump versus Clinton. It’s actually pretty easy

    —“I was asked why I am voting for Trump versus Clinton.

    It’s actually pretty easy to explain once we look outside the circus atmoshere the American media and left have made of our election process.

    The left is all about appearances versus results or policy, thus their fixation on the Trumps mistakes in life instead of what he proposes to improve the lives of the average American. The left came up with the PC culture to inhibit speech, not make it more polite. The left fixates on source versus fact.

    I could go on and on, but the biggest threat from HIllary Clinton, is her admitted commitment to change the Constitution through appointments to the Supreme Court and like IL Duce Obama, executive orders with the power of law, until a court says otherwise.

    This brings us to the basic difference between democrats and republicans…….our governing document, The United States Constitution is unique among all government charters in the world as it was first and foremost written as a charter to limit government and make the citizen sovereign.

    The agenda of Hillary Clinton and the democrat party seeks to “improve” our lives, by making us subservient to their regulations, laws, and bureaucrats. For our own good of course.

    They believe rewards are equally deserved by all regardless of the effort put out to earn those rewards. They believe that success is a matter of right, not something that earned through dedication and hard work.

    By their logic misery is ok. as long as all suffer equally, except for the ruling elite of course. Extra effort for extra reward has no place in the liberal mentality.

    There is slim history pointing to the success of this thought process, in fact none. But the left pursues it with a dogma and dedication despite facts and historical evidence, that borders on a religion of extremism, while maintaining that religion is a hoax.

    Hillary Clinton is perhaps the best example of the failure of the political process as one can imagine. She has been reviled by her workmates since her days on the Watergate Committee staff. She has a ruthlessness that puts Al Capone to shame. She has never earned a living as you and I would be familiar with. Outside of a short career at Rose Law, when she got professional at being a felon, she hasn’t worked a day in private industry yet is worth hundreds of millions.

    As is her husband, who hasn’t worked in the private sector his entire adult life. Yet these are the folks that American workers are supposed to trust with their future and their democracy.

    I don’t like Donald Trump. But I don’t fear his plans for our economy or world affairs. I do Hillary as she has helped put us in the position on the world stage where our friends no longer respect us and our enemies no longer fear us.

    Her approach to economic issues is based on an endless supply of wealthy folks and corporations to steal money from in the form of taxes in order to pay for bread and circuses for the folks their policies have put out of work.

    Liberal economics is a contradiction in terms and the foreign policy of American democrats have helped cause every major war and conflict since WWII and is directly responsible for the rise of Islamic Radicalism that started with Jimmy Carter when he abandoned the Shah and told the French to let the Ayatollah get on a plane……Clinton continued it by letting Bin Laden get away, and Obama did the same by walking out on the elected Iraqi government because he didn’t approve of their social welfare policies..

    There is little chance that democrats will recognize their failures. As they have consistently redefined issues when their policies fail.

    Their answer to inflation was to remove food, fuel, and health care from the index. Their answer to dismal economic policies is to change the definition of unemployed.

    Ask a liberal the difference between money and currency and watch their eyes glaze over. How can anyone seriously claim legitimacy when they try to tell us that only 5% or so are unemployed, yet over 90 million of work age Americans don’t have a job out some 320 million.

    To answer that, look at Common Core – enforced stupidity at every level. Hillary Clinton is the embodiment of a myopic mentality that is infecting American politics. That’s why I’m voting for Donald Trump, he isn’t HIllary…………..”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-30 09:58:00 UTC

  • SOROS EXPLOITS THE PEACE OF WESTPHALIA – OUR WESTERN FAILING The peace of Westph

    SOROS EXPLOITS THE PEACE OF WESTPHALIA – OUR WESTERN FAILING

    The peace of Westphalia mandated that states take responsibility for non-state actors within their borders.

    Prior to that point, all sorts of groups conducted war.

    We westerners have adopted this ‘rule’ so deeply that we treat it as metaphysical necessity rather than simple contract between kin-states to preserve the peace in an era where warfare was becoming increasingly damaging.

    We do not currently treat Soros or Islam as violators of the peace of Westphalia, or even that as of the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, the peace of Westphalia has been broken.

    War can be conducted by physical means, by invasion (immigration) means, by conversion (religious means), by economic means, by influential means (bribery or payment), and by informational means (propaganda and deceit).

    Yet westerners seem to have limited their concept of war to the physical. This is empirically and logically false. A remnant of the Westphalian peace wherein we agreed to allow our peaceful movements of people and ideas in a normative ‘free trade zone’ as long as states took responsibility for the actions of those within their borders.

    But we live in a world where the conduct of war has been drastically limited by nuclear weapons and economic asymmetries. So most warfare today is conducted by religious, economic, influential, and informational means – much cheaper means.

    Yet we have not adapted to the end of the Peace of Westphalia.

    George Soros is conducting war against Western civilization while under the protection of western civilization. Islam is conducting a war against western civilization while under the protection of western civilization. Jewish Cosmopolitanism in the forms of socialism, feminism, libertinism, and neo-conservatism, allied with Christian Puritanism in the form of Secular humanism, to conduct a war against the Western civilization while under the protections of western civilization for no other reason than the common man is habituated to the peace of Westphalia.

    We did not end the peace of Westphalia. We tried to extended it under the … pretense… of the universal declaration of human rights – itself, like the peace of Westphalia, was designed to limit state action to the evolution of their people and institutions such that they could join the civilized world’s open market.

    But George Soros has engaged in warfare aginst our people, just as cosmopolitans have done so, and just as puritans have done so, and just as feminists have done so, and just as communists, and their replacement resistance movement – Islam – has done so.

    War is any intentional attempt to reduce common capital in any of its forms. normative, religious, informational, economic, institutional, territorial, monumental

    We are at war.

    They ended the peace.

    Seize all assets of Soros from the original crime forward.

    His own, his family, his relatives, his organizations, those investments he has made, those who have taken his investments for the conduct of war (the Clintons, and theh Democratic party).

    Return those assets to the commons.

    “Cry havoc! And let slip the dogs of war!”

    Curt Doolittle

    Sovereignty: The Cult of Non-Submission

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Science of Natural Law

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 11:32:00 UTC

  • BETWEEN ONE AND THREE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION. The bottom is more costly than

    BETWEEN ONE AND THREE PERCENT OF THE POPULATION.

    The bottom is more costly than the top is beneficial.

    Those that are unemployable are not unemployable because of intelligence, but because of anti-social-behavior. Much of which is driven by the inability of individuals to tolerate their position in life due to dominance bias.

    This unemployability percentage varies from group to group with the higher the intelligence distribution appearing to produce smaller numbers, and the lower the intelligence distribution appearing to produce much higher numbers.

    However, in whites, we seem to have a higher distribution of neuroticism, (and high rates of depression) and in jews we seem to have disproportionate psychological problems across the spectrum but particularly in schizophrenia, manic depression, and depression. I have no meaningful data on asians or Hispanics (Mestizos) or their underclass the Carribean’s. But as far as I know blacks and jews carry disproportionate levels of mental illness in their genes.

    (There is a bit of data out there on this subject but we are talking about very NOISY stuff here. Mostly because of who uses medical care and who doesn’t varies a great deal. But as far as I’m able to ascertain, schizoprhenia – which is the end result of the depressive spectrum – seems disproportionatly in blacks and jews)

    Now the data says about what you would expect if you control for population sizes and access to health care:

    Amerindians

    Mixed Race.

    Whites

    Blacks

    Hispanics

    Asians

    But this says nothing more than who has insurance, government insurance, and can benefit from using it.

    The only measures I know of that are reliable are cases of hospitalization for schizophrenia, and the genetic markers for it.

    There is enough research at this point to show that across a body of research, conclusions are the same.

    —“Research showed a clear pattern wherein African Americans continued to display a long-term increased rate of Schizophrenia diagnoses, often three to four times as high compared to Euro-Americans. As speculated by previous researchers, Latino Americans were also disproportionately diagnosed at a more than three times higher rate than Euro-Americans with a Schizophrenia diagnosis. In consideration of a psychotic disorder diagnosis more generally, African Americans were more likely to be diagnosed than Euro-Americans. Latino Americans and African Americans both showed an increased lifetime rate of psychotic symptoms in comparison to Euro-Americans and Asians, as reported by clinicians. Even African American and Latino American minor consumers under the age of 18 were twice as likely to be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder as Euro-American youth.”—

    So intelligence distribution is a fairly good proxy except in the case of jews who carry a disproportionate genetic burden which some (jewish) authors have used to explain jewish CULTURAL paranoia mirroring white female MALE paranoia.

    Or, from my rather reductivitist position: by selecting for memory, literacy and verbal acuity jews have bred for and adapted to the female reproductive strategy.

    (Which I like to remind people is not a cognitive one, but an intuitionistic one. All our tribes do what we bred for. Our genders do what we evolved for. )

    ANd that rule of law and market fascism will solve this problem over time.

    BACK TO THE TOPIC

    the point being that our failure to preserve institutional methods of limiting the intergenerational damage of ‘carriers’ has been detrimental to our society. And that all forms of redistributino that we have engaged in, and all forms of immigration that we have engaged in, have done nothing more than impose costs at the bottom that the top – without 500 years of evolutionary technologica advantage over th e world – will eventually reduce our standard of living for all.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 10:07:00 UTC

  • ARYAN (EUROPEAN) GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY IN 500 WORDS (important piece) (thi

    ARYAN (EUROPEAN) GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY IN 500 WORDS

    (important piece) (this is it – everything)

    If it’s merely a transfer, it isn’t profit, and it isn’t earned – it’s stolen.

    A profitable business *creates* new wealth by productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Both buyer and seller *and everyone else* has more of something than when they started or they wouldn’t have done voluntarily made the exchange.

    By limiting our externalities to the productive, we obtain the implicit consent of the sovereign to benefit them without the cost of their involvement, and without our concern for the possible cost of their retaliation.

    And they will retaliate against any cost imposed upon that in which they have an interest. And they have an interest in anything that they have paid for either with life and limb, family and relations, material goods, effort and attention, or forgone opportunity for satisfaction.

    And they pay these costs for life, mates, offspring, kin of various distances(necessary existential), several property (monopoly existential), shareholder property (quantified existential), common property (unquantified existential), institutional property (operationally existential) – including education and ritual, normative property (intangible but demonstrably existential); informational property(intangible and demonstrable upon use), monumental property (existential but unconsumable) – high arts; and territorial property and the resources therein (necessary, and existential, unquantified, unconsumable).

    in exchange for sovereignty and by consequence property, we grant one another sovereignty and by consequence property. And the cost we bear for doing so is: telling the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth; impose cost on the expenditures of others neither by inaction or action; and by consequence limiting our actions to those which produce only productive, fully informed, voluntary transfers, limited to productive externalities; and the reciprocal insurance of everyone else’s sovereignty, and by consequence, property by paying the cost of diligently policing, word and deed for every word and deed we are aware of.

    But even the exchange of Sovereignty is but a strategicl utility: it is the method by which those who are existentially, demonstrably, superior in ability and deed, to preserve their superiority in ability and deed by combining with numbers of others of superiority in ability and deed, in ever increasing numbers, to transcend themselves, man, beast, earth, and all possible under their possible dominion, from beast, to man, to the very gods they aspire to be.

    This is the philosophy of the west. It derives from one principle: by heroic sacrifice, in the form of demonstrating our excellence, largely in the form of willing risk, we pay for the franchise of sovereignty, and western civilization derives from that one principle.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    ( ps: yes, it matters that it takes me so long because this kind of simplicity is the output of years and years of work. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 09:21:00 UTC

  • doolittle and taleb. there is this wonderful movie. its the precursor to war gam

    doolittle and taleb.

    there is this wonderful movie. its the precursor to war games.

    from the early seventies. called colossus – the forbin project.

    in the movie the soviet and american supercomputers are aware of each other but have to learn to communicate.

    this process goes on a long time, and then they can, and they take over the world.

    the problem for taleb and i (mostly me because i understand the problem) is developing that language so that we could get on the same page.

    i think if we could have a serious conversation it might be good for both of us. but I don’t see why he would be interested.

    he comes very close to the connection every time he talks about mandelbrot, but he doesn’t quite get there.

    what he doesn’t yet grasp is this: the only way to win is not to play the mathematical game.

    stability consists of voluntary exchanges, not of calculations. why? because voluntary exchanges are within the realm of human cognition and like game theory and equations they are not within the realm of human cognition. Why? because there is less information in every judgment as abstraction increases.

    Aggregates are not possible to calculate. As he’s shown for years, it’s all noise.

    what does this mean?

    debt instruments are not resellable.

    doh!….

    this line of reasoning is not terribly intuitive but it’s actually the problem with information loss. Think of it as an act of fraud every time a debt instrument is resold. The only possible means of preserving the sanctity(truth content) of debt instruments (skin in the game) is to sell shares in receivables on the debt using divisible shares (ie: blockchain shares), where the issuer is required to retain x% of the capital as warranty of truthfulness.

    This kind of thing was not possible in the past. We lacked the tech for it.

    It is quite possible that the data that would be produced as a result of the long run observation of the above-suggested process would produce the empirical evidence that taleb is searching for.

    i suspect so.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 15:09:00 UTC

  • WHY DID THEY KILL KADHAFFI They killed Kadhdafi because he bombed a plane. Plain

    WHY DID THEY KILL KADHAFFI

    They killed Kadhdafi because he bombed a plane. Plain and simple. Why? Because he violated ‘the peace of Westphalia’ and violated its extension ‘the postwar consensus’. He violated 5000 years of western ethics.

    And yes, the disaster caused by killing him despite the fact that the predictable outcome was disproportionately bad. Why? Because Kadhaffi like Saddam were killed in order to prevent more of their kind breaking the peace of Westphalia and its extension the Postwar Consensus. Until Putin came along with Ukraine, no country had done so. And he did not need to break the consensus had he not panic’d and simply made a few phone calls – but russians feel that they cannot ‘educate’ foreign people. It is not in their nature.

    Westerners don’t take threats or actions lightly and don’t forgive. They especially don’t forgive the murder of citizens.

    Kadhaffie like Hussein simply provided a convenient time to kill him.

    THE BROADER ISSUE

    The question isn’t whether any group controls their resources, but whether they sell those resources on the common market (which is what the USA enforces, or whether they will use oil as a military and economic weapon (as Putin threaten to do with Europe), (and as Iran threatens to do if it can obtain enough power in the middle east).

    From the world’s perspective oil is a commons you may benefit from distributing. It is a resource of the earth, like sunlight, air and water. if you interfere with air, water, light, or oil, then you are making an act of war, not selling a domestic resource.

    The reason for western skepticism was the (moral) objective of preventing the Marxists from using territory, resources, and oil as a means of warfare against modernity,

    Just like the Muslims are using oil as a weapon against modernity.

    Frankly, everyone would be happy if African leaders controlled their neighbors and their continent – or at least some part of it. We all just don’t want a world war started over it. And markets prevent wars at the expense of local people taking advantage of profiting from human commons.

    FWIW: Moral equivalency is a very bad tool for making moral judgments. it’s a demonstration of selection bias: finding excuses for doing what you want.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 10:52:00 UTC

  • ABOUT THE ALT RIGHT MYSELF. I get sh__t for this but, I see the world through cl

    http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/LEARNING ABOUT THE ALT RIGHT MYSELF.

    I get sh__t for this but, I see the world through class-glasses, and I see the Alt Right as a largely middle and working class movement. And I see my work as New Right (good for mankind) not just my own people.

    I learned more from this Daily Stormer overview of the Alt-Right (none of which I had any experience with) than I have from a few years of being tangentially aware of it.

    http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/

    I didn’t know 80% of what’s in the article. And I see class expression in the movement which can easily spread to the other classes. And perhaps that’s my affinity for it. Because I’m benefitting from the momentum that economy, demography, and alt-right angst has made.

    I’m not exactly working or middle class. I’ve been a 1%-er for a long time. Although at the present moment I’m certainly not. lol. I have a definite martial sensibility in that aristocracy, generals, and officers are responsible for the soldiery, the militia, and the citizenry even at cost to ourselves. And that bearing this cost is what we refer to as ‘heroism’. Whether that heroism be demontrated by immediate action and sacrifice, the cost of commons and war, or the constant subtle policing of nature, commons, family, and individual.

    In the early 90’s I simply wanted to give conservatives a language for discussing their ancient civilization in rational and scientific terms. Because I have an autistic dislike of irrational argument, and an autistic near hatred of artificial conflict. So I have been working on this problem since at least 1992, if not back to when I was writing radical right work in the 1980’s.

    So I consider my work the New Right, and global. The fact that we discovered the technology of incremental domestication through truth, science, and natural common law, doesn’t mean that any other people can’t do so, and raise themselves from human-animal, to human, to transcendent man.

    But the fact that the conservative population, the alt-right, the more genteel paleolibertarians, and the more academic New Right, are all moving in the same direction is a beautiful thing.

    And of those classes we must understand that it is the Alt Right classes who will FIGHT. And the rest of us are just members of the intellectual supply chain.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 08:26:00 UTC

  • Libertarianism is heavily populated social rejects for a variety of reasons. But

    Libertarianism is heavily populated social rejects for a variety of reasons. But the movement captured a large number of the smarter guys who had nothing more concretely rational or scientific to work with.

    I think we’ve pretty much buried libertarianism over the past few years, and it’s just a matter of the smart and younger guys moving to the new right, the over-invested older guys dying off, and the left-libertarians absorbing the rest.

    The underclass right can’t do much except rebel. So someone has to produce a set of ideas that can be expressed as demands, and implemented as institutions, as an alternative to violent revolution.

    Now, everyone lives under a bit of a lampost that he grasps the light of which does not reach too far beyond his experience.

    The only way to know if our experience is meaningful is not through our own experiences, but by exhausting the experiences available to man – mostly by traveling and reading.

    So the fact that my work isn’t accessible to everyone’s lamp light is simply something we would expect.

    One of the observations we can make about man, universally, is that the average imbecile thinks his opinion on ethical, moral, social, political, and economic matters, in the absence of specialized knowledge in the subjects, is somehow possibly to test by intuition, any more than whether or not the earth is flat, the stars are just lights in the sky, and astrology produces predictable results.

    The average idiot has an opinion about things in the domain of the social that are no more valuable than his opinoins on protein folding, the stress of different materials, the problems with the unified field, the subject of infinity, or scientific epistemology.

    It’s ok. Toddler’s think they’re cunning also. Dunning Kruger, like the devil, is always at our shoulders.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-25 14:28:00 UTC

  • SCHOOLING THE ARROGANT AND IGNORANT It took me 15 years. But in its most reducti

    SCHOOLING THE ARROGANT AND IGNORANT

    It took me 15 years. But in its most reductive form, this is the philosophy of western civilization.

    –What the hell am I reading?!?Dame Scary of Austin–

    Something beyond your pay grade? 😉

    —How is violence a freaking resource that can be “invested” in the state?—

    How is my labor, my thought, my time, my wealth invested in the state? What about the opportunities I don’t seize? See?

    —Your entire worldview is incoherent. How are Natural Law and Market Law in any way related?—

    You display an arrogant, ignorant, egoism. You lack knowledge. You are not the judge of coherence in the absence of it.

    —None of these terms are meaningfully defined. None of these premises are self-evident.—

    Self-evidence requires knowledge of self-evidence. You simply don’t possess it. That said, it requires a lot of knowledge.

    —“Acting allows us to obtain the difference between our expenditure and capture of energy.” I can’t even.—

    Apparently, physics is included in those things that you dont know. Like life converting molecules and expending waste heat.

    –And not only is your philosophy a messy word-salad, but you claim it is the philosophy of Western Civilization. Why?–

    All group evolutionary strategies are contained in metaphysical assumptions rather than explicit statements. I state them.

    —There IS no “Philosophy of Western Civilization.” You can’t pretend that Plato, Aquinas, Descartes and Nietzche shared views.—

    You can however, (of those in particular) demonstrate that they shared uniquely western aristocratic egalitarian assumptions

    —Holy shit, are you literally going to murder people when Hillary wins?—

    It’s a reasonable solution, although I don’t think it will be necessary. 😉

    Propertarianism: the equivalent of reducing all human activity to accounting(operations), profit and loss(incentives), and Balance(results).

    —Sounds incredibly limiting.—

    Every year, in every civilization, in every era, people invent new ways of stealing, and boycott, violence, and revolt.

    In ever civilization in every era, people boycott, enact laws, revolt, or engage in civil war.

    Anglo civ is unique: we just update the contract (constitution).

    So, now that I have responded to all your statements made in ignorance, perhaps you will ask rather than assert. 😉 -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-24 04:36:00 UTC