Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • RUSSIANS AND ANGLOS AS INSURER OF THE WORLD SYSTEM The Russians are better negot

    RUSSIANS AND ANGLOS AS INSURER OF THE WORLD SYSTEM

    The Russians are better negotiators, better spies, better warriors, and better guarantors of keeping peace and order. In no small part because they are suspicious, unforgiving, and ‘clear’.

    Russian is not a commercial, political, diplomatic, language. It is a martial language. The Americans are better judges, and escrow-holders, diplomats, and commercial investors. The British are better bankers, more able to maintain cultural distance than the Americans. And insulated from the problems of corruption in Russia.

    This is an exceptional partnership for the world: American defense of commerce and trade, and are flexible on such matters; British defense of Banking and Credit, and are flexible on such matters; and Russian defense of people, politics, capital, and territory, and are pragmatically flexible on such things.

    “You really want to work with me. Because If you don’t work with me you work with the Russians. Russians have zero tolerance for threats.” vs “You are wasting my time. This is not serious. This is something for Americans.”

    “Yeah, we could get away with that under the Americans, But we the Russians will just blow up everything and kill us.” vs “The Americans are too religious about such things, the British are more practical”.

    Russia’s internal problem is trust, black markets, and a judiciary, and bureaucracy open to ‘influence’ (corruption). Britain’s problem is infantilization and hyper-moralism on anything visible – thankfully money is invisible.

    American political processes are corrupt as hell, but the courts and the media do a very good job of insulating the commercial sector from the corruption of the government.

    The germans build things. Until they get their balls back they’re pretty much useless. And the only way to do that is to withdraw from Europe so that they have no choice.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:46:00 UTC

  • In this region of Connecticut, I’m surrounded by these 90-95 IQ Sicilians and So

    In this region of Connecticut, I’m surrounded by these 90-95 IQ Sicilians and Southern Italians. Traditional. Familial. Hard Working. Proud.

    Now Italians, Irish and Poles had a very bad influence on this area (god forbid you tell them that), but not as bad as the blacks have had on the ‘shit-cities’ of Springfield, Hartford, Marien, North-Haven, New-Haven, Bridgeport, Bristol, and Danbury. Or the absolute devastation caused by the Puerto Ricans (Technically Carribean by Culture) have had on places like New Haven.

    Irish aren’t german or English but they’ve done some good in the middle-class Italians at least keep (tacky) working class homes, and small businesses (and are great at it). My own people’s underclass is freaking frightening (as are the french underclasses here). I mean, I want to sanitize my gene pool and the commons.

    But my point is that you can try to make it to the aristocratic high investment parenting, highly selective mating, high capital accumulating, and executive classes. But if you simply make it to the Italian/Sicillian level with a strong traditional family, with pride, you can still make a nice commons to live in even if you’re below 100 on the scale.

    Our problem is that once you drop below 90 (the majority of the black and puerto-rican communities) you simply cannot put together a civilization unless the administration is run by people who compensate for your deficiencies. In other words, self-government is a problem of distributions.

    I don’t know what that hill-living sheep-and-goat herding, black haired, (I think they’re “I’s”???) gene pool from southern europe is but they are more passionate and much more distributed at the lower end. But they seem to be able to build good families with ease.

    Family structures reflect class structures, and the monopoly on family structure is not helpful. The aristocracy does not need familial insurance, and the peasantry does. And the implusive that cannot form families and are stuck in serial ‘baby dady’ relationships are just damaging to the societies that host them.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:30:00 UTC

  • THE “TALK” FOR FEMALE MILLENNIALS Let me help you ladies: It’s ok. Estrogen is t

    THE “TALK” FOR FEMALE MILLENNIALS

    Let me help you ladies: It’s ok. Estrogen is to irrational thought in young women what testosterone is to impulsivity and aggressiveness in young men.

    We know that a girl from 14-28 is a totally irrational evolutionary product of the need to care for fragile infants with urgency, at the expense of all other considerations, despite the absurdly burdensome cost of doing so. And we know that delaying childbearing allows young women to direct this irrational energy to non-child-caring purposes, where it causes as much damage to society as young men full of testosterone. The only difference is the assets that men damage tend to be physical, and the assets that young women damage tend to be civilizational, cultural, and political.

    So, one doesn’t take a young woman’s opinion on interpersonal realtions, business, politics, economics, immigration, or international relations any more seriously than a young man’s on interpersonal relations, business, dispute resolution, martial arts, or culture. It’s just hormones and ignorance talking. What we should do instead, is cut education to the two hours a day that are necessary and return teens to the work-force where they will have opportunity to put energy and emotion to good use in an environment where their impulsiveness from high doses of both estrogen and testosterone, are tempered by the demands of the social order and disciplined, rather than to leave them selfishly reveled within as if they’re some sort of profound insight to be enjoyed.

    Millennials are the most infantilized generation in history. So we probably need to add a decade of maturity to our expectations – and hope that by the age of 40 they have reached adulthood.

    So that fact that no one takes you seriously is justified – you aren’t evidencing any reason to take you seriously. You’re just still children.

    MALES

    For male millennials, take the Red Pill. Read. Lift Heavy Things. Collect Male Friends who do the same. Live Cheaply, and Save Money. As usual, we are far ahead of women in our adaptation to circumstance. And the masculinity movement is growing just fine on its own.

    Curt Doolittle

    the Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 08:39:00 UTC

  • DISTINGUISHING PHILOSOPHY FROM MORAL LITERATURE (getting better at saying this)

    DISTINGUISHING PHILOSOPHY FROM MORAL LITERATURE

    (getting better at saying this)

    Most ‘philosophers’ are either ‘readers’ narrating the story of their learning, or dreamers, sharing the story of their dreams, or teachers, reciting the plot lines of moral literature.

    History, The Common Law and Economics are the three empirical tools we have for examining man’s demonstrated actions, irrespective of his self-reporting. Unfortunately, most philosophy, unlike history, law, and economics, but very much like literature, surveys and polls, consists of self-reporting.

    There are a few of us who conduct investigations into sentient(epistemic) and cooperative(ethical and political and martial) sciences, in an attempt to suggest how we might alter conceptual ‘institutions’ (objects, relations, properties, and the explanatory narratives, frames, and loadings), normative insitutions (values, manners, ethics, morals, goals, and decidability), informal institutions (religion, myth, and ritual), and formal institutions (money, ccredit, banking, contract, law, political systems, military systems, territorial systems).

    The difference in how different philosophers do this work, like heroic, virtue, rule, and outcome ethics, determined by the amout of knowledge of moral literature, history, law, economics, physical science, and the fine arts, that we have collected.

    It is easier now than in the past to possess information across that breadth of topics – but it is still extremely difficult to conduct a research program across that many disciplines.

    But that is what it takes to reorganize conceptual, normative, informal, and formal institutions by scientific rather than wishful, or dreamlike means;

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 08:09:00 UTC

  • THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW

    THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW, AND INSTITUTIONS, TO AMELIORATE THE SUICIDAL URGES OF WOMEN.

    There are good and bad people in every clan, tribe, and race. Some have just been better that others at eliminating different kinds of bad.

    Whites have notably been TERRIBLE at eliminating the bad trait of FEMALE SOLIPSISM or developing laws to limit its damage, before granting women the franchise with which to express their need to care for children upon non-kin and competitors.

    Women, demonstrably, and empirically, are mentally unable to vote unless married with children, so that their ‘urges’ are occupied at home, and not expressed as inappropriate urges in the commons.

    Men have these urges: sex, violence, and risk. But we have spent millennia, constraining the danger of those urges through domestication and institutional evolution.

    We have not spent the same time constraining women. And it’s more than obvious that we must do so. Since their urges, expressed in the voting booth, direct their nest and nurture instincts outside of the home, and to provide access, comfort, and resources to what are evidentially our competitors and enemies.

    WE BLAME THE COMPETITOR NOT OUR WOMEN, AND NOT OURSELVES.

    Is it true that the cosmopolitan jews, in all their forms, but in particular, their new religion of Cultural Marxism and the Scripture of Critical Theory, and the Fictitious History of Marxism, had found willing soil in our young, unmarried women? Yes. Is it true that the Academy, freshly licensed by Darwin’s defeat of the Church, but whose revolution in science limited the Academy’s market, seized upon this new intellectual product as a means of profiting from the postwar underclass, and newly enriched women,

    A woman over the age of 21 that does not have at least one child is a threat to civilization because she cannot control her urges for nesting, consumption, and the IRRESPONSIBLE satisfaction of her urges for caretaking by employing them against the interests of kin.

    That’s not an opinion but a statement of the empirical evidence of the experiments of the various societies in the 20th century.

    So there are many ways of controlling the impulses of women without children to harm the polity and our kin. The most obvious being to deprive them of the vote until they are able to manage their urges. Just as we deprive men of their ability to vote if they cannot manage their urges. The difference is only that men require physical restraint, and women require verbal and political restraint.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 11:33:00 UTC

  • SANTAGATA ON THE TRUTH WE DISCOVERED IN THIS ELECTION Lessons & Observations fro

    SANTAGATA ON THE TRUTH WE DISCOVERED IN THIS ELECTION

    Lessons & Observations from this election:

    1) There is no “mainstream media”. There is only a Controlled Media.

    2) The Polls are almost all lies to shape consent, to shame and to control. And to try and generate and gain “moral outrage” for the losers.

    3) You would never call a Chinese “racist” or “xenophobic” for voting for a Chinese in China, therefore, it’s not just hypocritical but unacceptable to call a white person “racist” or “xenophobic” to do the same in U.S. (btw I have never heard of any Chinese electing whites to significant positions of power anywhere in China as one example).

    4) When you attempt to shame people about who they shouldn’t vote for and tell them their ancestors who put men on the moon and gave you semiconductors and GPS and science and tech ad infinitum that they are tainted and losers they will Reveal preferences at the poll. Push the further and you’ll find out who they fight when cornered.

    5) Trump proved that a Jedi level persuader can take on his party, the opposing party and the entire Controlled Media and win. There are a number Of simple psychological reasons and techniques which tap into our collective hard wired DNA and imprint in our psychological over the eons.

    Enough lessons and observations for today…

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-09 04:25:00 UTC

  • APPARENTLY DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS ARE NOT DEEP AT ALL – JUST WORD GAMES -A

    APPARENTLY DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS ARE NOT DEEP AT ALL – JUST WORD GAMES -AND HERE ARE SOME EXAMPLES.

    >>Wo are you?

    Empty verbalism by substitution. Translation. “What is the name you that exists?” (meaningless) People call me by an identifier. Do you mean instead what preferences do I hold? Do you mean instead what abilities can I demonstrate? Do you mean instead, what actions have I taken? Do you mean instead, what memories I can recall? Any use of the verb to-be in a philosophical question is a form of deceit by substitution and suggestion.

    >>>what are our ”selves” made of?

    Do you mean, under what conditions would I no longer demonstrate expected behavior to others? Do you mean under what conditions would i begin to recognize a change in my behavior? Do you mean under what conditions would I no longer recognize a recording of myself as familiar?

    I think the answer to both of these questions is (a) cognitive biases and preferences of genetic origin, and (b) experiences we retain in memory, (c) the means by which we process and act upon these biases and experiences. Because that is the evidence.

    >>>example: if you would loose all your memories, who would you be?

    Another phrasing that is an empty verbal trick or deception. “Who” refers to the criteria of demarcation by others: a name, a set of memories held by others, a set of memories demonstrated by you, a set of cognitive biases demonstrated by you, and a set of means (algorithms and rules), demonstrated b you.

    One might say “I am not myself”, and others may say “he is not himself’ largely because something in one’s biases or means is inconsistent with those that one has habituated. (Habituation is a discount that does not require the effort of reason.)

    >>> is it that we(our characters), are really just the result of the experiences we had in our life?

    Our character consists of both biases and memories. At present it appears that biases are disproportionately influential in determining the experiences we seek and recall. The debate is whether these biases cause 80% of our behavior or less. The remainder is environmental (experiential). This is logical since there is an advantage to informational evolution (training), prior to its integration (genetic) through selection. But conversely, reason is weak, and greater environmental influence would increase risks of persistence.

    >>> are we merely imitating what we experience?

    We demonstrate through the information accumulated in our (very,very,very expensive)genetics, expressed in our (very expensive) biases, modified by our (expensive) algorithms(habits), and further modified by our(less expensive, but more fragile) memories, that we react to the evolutionary, inter-generational, inter-temporal, and temporal record of experiences. And it is this ‘knowledge’ accumulated in many forms that has allowed us to outwit the dark forces of entropy, time, and ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-08 09:44:00 UTC

  • Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry

    Markets are simply the only means of preserving asymmetry and removing asymmetry of power and information. Courts are the only means of preserving asymmetry of warranty of performance.

    I don’t think markets are subordinate to hierarchy in any sense other than I think that they themselves prohibit hierarchy by permitting the meritocratic rise and fall of the classes by means of DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS.

    I don’t think a market for commons divided by the classes of production is a hierarchy, it is just a means of recognizing the forms of production that the meritocratic families have managed to produce and hold onto: families, business, enterprises, territories, and monarchy.

    The fact that there is greater SCALE OF MERIT in each class is simply a fact of the market operating to ensure that we demonstrate the greatest rotation and maintain the families businesses, enterprises, and institutions, with the greatest merit.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-07 15:31:00 UTC

  • UM. I DO TRUTH. PROPAGANDA IS A NECESSARY TOOL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NECESSITY O

    UM. I DO TRUTH. PROPAGANDA IS A NECESSARY TOOL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NECESSITY OF TRUTH.

    —Q&A–“Curt, what is your opinion on Kek?—

    I am a New Right Philosopher. I work on changing our understanding of reality, and reforming our institutions to correspond to contemporary reality. My philosophy is reducible to increasing the prior scope of law from property and deception, to all information present in the commons, and the reformation of government to restore the market for commons between the classes – that have different interests. And to restore the purpose of policy to the family while preserving the purpose of law to the individual. By doing so I wish to restore our sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, as well as our market for quality families, market for commons, market for leadership, and market for the resolution of disputes.

    I see propaganda and ridicule as a tactic against the working class just as I am using a tactic against the upper classes. So it’s just propaganda.

    I deal with truth.

    So aside from the observation that the adoption of Marxist ridicule rallying and shamming as a means of neutralizing rallying and shaming, seems to work, I don’t have any opinion. And it isn’t even vaguely interesting except that I recognize it’s value in a democracy where lies and propaganda re legal. i would prefer that all leftist parasitism was prosecutable as harm to the informational commons just as are libel and slander are harmful to individuals.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty.

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Social Science of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:43:00 UTC

  • REVOLUTION: ENDING THE LIES, AND THE DESTRUCTION, OF THE DIASPORIC JEWS AND ENGL

    REVOLUTION: ENDING THE LIES, AND THE DESTRUCTION, OF THE DIASPORIC JEWS AND ENGLISH: THE COSMOPOLITANS AND THE PURITANS.

    The Amish, Mennonites, Mormons, and Quakers are our Equivalent of Orthodox Jews. And our Diasporic Puritans are our equivalent of Cosmopolitan Diasporic Jews.

    I’m from Puritan lineage. I’m happy to criticize my own when they are wrong. The Germans were right and the English were wrong and it’s just the Atlantic ocean opportunism of the Spanish, French, Dutch, and English, vs the cautious expansion of the North Sea civilization of the Hansa that determined which branch of Europeans dominated the modern era.

    We can, if we choose to, restore the Hanseatic Order of Europeans by depriving the Puritans and the Cosmopolitans of their tools of predation: 1) fiat credit, 2) spending of genetic, institutional, normative,and informational commons, and 3) by the distribution of parasitic utopian propaganda and the manufacture of ignorance.

    We can deprive them of those tools of warfare against us by the incremental suppression of their thievery, by the formal constitutional inclusion of the Informational Commons and Property in Toto, of which that commons is a member, and it’s most substantive investment.

    All we require is an amendment to the Constitution and sufficient violence to enforce it.

    And while I will shortly supply those amendments – revoking many and replacing most, it is up to moral men of all ages in all territories to use their wealth of violence to impose it and thereby restore our civilian order from conquest by fraud, where conquest by arms was never before possible.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Law of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 12:43:00 UTC