THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW

THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF THE 2OTH CENTURY IS A FAILURE OF SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, LAW, AND INSTITUTIONS, TO AMELIORATE THE SUICIDAL URGES OF WOMEN.

There are good and bad people in every clan, tribe, and race. Some have just been better that others at eliminating different kinds of bad.

Whites have notably been TERRIBLE at eliminating the bad trait of FEMALE SOLIPSISM or developing laws to limit its damage, before granting women the franchise with which to express their need to care for children upon non-kin and competitors.

Women, demonstrably, and empirically, are mentally unable to vote unless married with children, so that their ‘urges’ are occupied at home, and not expressed as inappropriate urges in the commons.

Men have these urges: sex, violence, and risk. But we have spent millennia, constraining the danger of those urges through domestication and institutional evolution.

We have not spent the same time constraining women. And it’s more than obvious that we must do so. Since their urges, expressed in the voting booth, direct their nest and nurture instincts outside of the home, and to provide access, comfort, and resources to what are evidentially our competitors and enemies.

WE BLAME THE COMPETITOR NOT OUR WOMEN, AND NOT OURSELVES.

Is it true that the cosmopolitan jews, in all their forms, but in particular, their new religion of Cultural Marxism and the Scripture of Critical Theory, and the Fictitious History of Marxism, had found willing soil in our young, unmarried women? Yes. Is it true that the Academy, freshly licensed by Darwin’s defeat of the Church, but whose revolution in science limited the Academy’s market, seized upon this new intellectual product as a means of profiting from the postwar underclass, and newly enriched women,

A woman over the age of 21 that does not have at least one child is a threat to civilization because she cannot control her urges for nesting, consumption, and the IRRESPONSIBLE satisfaction of her urges for caretaking by employing them against the interests of kin.

That’s not an opinion but a statement of the empirical evidence of the experiments of the various societies in the 20th century.

So there are many ways of controlling the impulses of women without children to harm the polity and our kin. The most obvious being to deprive them of the vote until they are able to manage their urges. Just as we deprive men of their ability to vote if they cannot manage their urges. The difference is only that men require physical restraint, and women require verbal and political restraint.