Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “WHO IS A CONSERVATIVE?”— (From Marginal Revolution) Avoiding the marxist-post

    —“WHO IS A CONSERVATIVE?”—

    (From Marginal Revolution)

    Avoiding the marxist-postmodern love of verbal sophistry:

    Conservatism consists in:

    – Empiricism as a defense against hubris.

    – Meritocracy as a defense against hubris.

    – Private Property as a defense against hubris.

    – Markets as a defense against hubris.

    – The common (natural) law of tort as a defense against hubris

    – The Jury-of-requisite-scale as a defense against hubris.

    – Late Marriage as a defense against hubris.

    – Intergenerational lending as a defense against hubris

    – Taking no action for which one cannot perform restitution(Reversal) as a defense against hubris.

    – Competition between the Scientific, Legal, Philosophical, and Theological as a defense against hubris.

    – Small Nation States as a defense against hubris.

    – Militias as a Defense against Hubris.

    (That should be enough to get the point across.)

    Not that Dunning-Kruger’s universal law, or the French Revolution, or all of continental philosophy, or the pseudosciences of Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno; or the innumeracy of the general theory’s change of economics from measurement by balance sheet to measurement by income statement; or the sophisms of Derrida through Rorty and Rawls …. none need explaining to a Conservative. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 15:16:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN ACTIVE WARFARE STRATEGIES —“Curt, are Russians Pragmat

    CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN ACTIVE WARFARE STRATEGIES

    —“Curt, are Russians Pragmatists?”—

    Russians (Orthodoxy) learned from Mongols (Brutality) and Bolshevik Jews (Propaganda, and Polluting the CIvic Informational Well) that the CHEAPEST WARFARE is gossip and undermining (propaganda and ideology). The gradual decay of the will of the people to care for and defend one another.

    Just as judaism and christianity undermined the roman empire, allowing the north (germans) and east (muslims) to invade in times of weakness due to over expansion, the Russians (orthodox, mongols) and the Bolsheviks (Jewish Socialists and Communists) understood that they don’t need to do anything to the west except sew dissent by feeding envy.

    The west runs on trust, risk taking, commons, and rule of law. It is the most difficult and expensive set of norms to develop. Because commons have higher returns(multipliers) than private investments. All Enemies have to do is destroy the trust between the classes (martial, priesthood, burgher, labor), and the cultural, economic and military advantage of the west (commons) is destroyed.

    Russians are not pragmatists, they are persistent goal oriented, expansionist underminers, who wait, then invade and hold territory in a rush, and destroy the capital structure, and take possession of all assets.

    Russians are at present only a power becauase of their inventory of missiles. But they have a tiny economy unable to wage war, or even produce weapons in sufficient numbers to conduct current warfare on other than a narrow channel into russian territory.

    Russians did the same thing in Crimea twice now that they did in the caucuses twice now. They are doing the same thing in ukraine: keep raiding, funding dissent, informational undermining, blowing up industry, blowing up ammunition, conducting assassinations, setting arson fires, and when the West is in a moment of weakness they will expand to at least the Dnipr if not all the way to the mountains. Because with the mountains they can reach south again.

    1 – The Chinese slowly move, assimilate, and boil the frog.

    2 – The Russians(Mongols) undermine, and then seize opportunities.

    3 – The Jews and muslims (Semites) invade, undermine, and seize opportunities from within.

    4 – The Hindus (Hindu) do nothing except take care of themselves.

    5 – The West (Christian Monarchies) is optimistic and stupid and fights as if we are still fighting our own.

    6 – And america has spent a century trying to preserve the british empire so that everyone could evolve into a good international citizen at the cost of much blood and treasure, and so that we never have another world war.

    Unfortunately, the CHinese, Russians, Semites (jews and muslims), and now the frenc-german alliance, are cumulatively making that ORDER impossible.

    The primary reason? Hispanic immigration. THat’s right.

    With that threat we cannot maintain the martial civic order that exports that power. We are done.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 13:33:00 UTC

  • “If a man/woman says that s/he’s too damaged for you (or too neurotic, or too an

    —“If a man/woman says that s/he’s too damaged for you (or too neurotic, or too anything) just take his/her word for it.”—

    Translated : “I have to monitor myself when I am with you and I do not believe I will be able to maintain this behavior indefinitely because it’s exhausting.”

    —“If you’re bored out of your mind at a venue, you’re probably not going to meet anyone there who you will want to date. Go where others are that you aren’t bored.”—

    (My Market: Any Art Classes. Artsy girls are best. ) Most important reason? You find mates where you aren’t looking for them. So find something to do (primary) so that overzealousness doesn’t force you to see what isnt there.

    –“Sometimes significant others have little annoying habits.”-

    If you learn to love them, or accomodate them, that will work, but you cannot learn to tolerate, or ignore them. Doesn’t work.

    –“Slutty behavior by either gender is a recipe for marital failure, and marital falure is far worse for your life than bankruptcy or business failure or losing multiple jobs.”–

    Just the data. People who professionalize ‘shopping, trying out, and moving on’ develop the habit for life.

    —“Alcohol and Drugs Do Not Improve With Age”—

    Sorry. Just is. Everyone goes to college and tries. Those who don’t stop trying are always a problem. Cellular damage accumulates.

    —“Find someone you feel very lucky to be with. the men who are ‘Players’ who commit do so because they found a woman worth commiting for: they can’t believe they got her. Women are different. They don’t want to think they have married down.”—

    One party or the other must be totally committed no matter what. Men are loyal and women are devoted. There is a difference.

    —“Men cheat for the sole purpose of sex, or because they are married to a nag, harpie, complainer. Women cheat to discover if they can trade up.”—

    —“The current order where men and women are ‘equal’ poses a problem for women who want first tier men. The reason is that once you are successful, younger women who demand fewer compromises are always and everywhere preferable to older women to continue to privatize and monopolize your opportunities.”—

    —“The current order where women are more fungible in the work force poses a problem for men: if you are a house husband or the equivalent you better stay (a) fit, (b) groomed, (c) interesting, and (d) involved in some activity with other males (e) save your own money overseas.”—

    —“In general, all men should save their own exit money overseas”—

    Just some life lessons…..

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 09:16:00 UTC

  • WHY FRANCE MATTERS? (Smart Selfishness) An insignificant power unworthy of secur

    WHY FRANCE MATTERS?

    (Smart Selfishness)

    An insignificant power unworthy of security council participation and constantly hostile to western interests. But, within europe:

    (a) she can grow her own food, and a diversity of it. she concentrated population in urban areas to preserve her food capacity.

    (b) investment in nuclear power makes her relatively energy independent

    (c) Nuclear weapons makes her relatively invulnerable.

    (d) Preservation of central african colonial presence means she maintains a small but trained military.

    (e) Germany carries the entire risk of the european effort (not france) by using the Mark as the Euro, and having germany dependent upon (american-defended) global trade.

    (f) France is responsible for the majority of leftist thought leadership, because she (like the russians) believes her revolution (as the russians their fight against germany) is the founding mythos (rather than the french nation (people) are the founding mythos. And france was and remains the most feminine country in europe in use of language, grammar, argument, political order, social order, and international negotiation technique.

    (g) France is the gateway for the Islamization and Semitization of europe, because she is dependent upon african and islamic wealth to preserve her economy.

    When the crisis comes France can defeat germany for control of european course. This means that eastern europe and russia will be the strong powers in europe after the next ‘great economic and political conflict that will occur due to demographics within the next twenty years.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 08:42:00 UTC

  • Group Strategy of The Tribes

    October 13th, 2018 10:08 AM GROUP STRATEGY OF THE TRIBES [Y]ou don’t understand. [I]slam is a Militial Order of the poor and illiterate tribal alliances, devoting all resources to reproduction and predation thru raiding. Their wisdom literature, is the myth of the expansionary warrior, the raider, and their laws. (Herdsmen, and raiding) [E]uropeanism is a Militial order of the technological, upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through kinship warriors, creating markets. Our wisdom literature is the law: reciprocity of heroes: conquest of self, man, nature, and the universe. (cattle, hose, and holding the land to feed them, and domesticating beast, land, and man for profit) [S]inism is a bureaucrat order of administrators upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction to administrators, administering their market. Their wisdom literature is literally ‘wisdom literature’ of Sun Tzu, Confucius, Lao Tzu and Mao. The literature of ‘harmony’. (Administering kin for profit). [J]udaism is a reactionary order of pacifist separatists (Female strategy) upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through teachers, parasitically dependent upon the markets of others. Their wisdom literature is their history and their law – the literature of ‘suffering’. (Sustaining kin through Trade and Moral Hazard) [H]induism (‘The Way of Life”) is the optimum hierarchical social order for the massive poor. It is just defenseless and can afford to be given the isolation of the continent by oceans, mountains, and deserts. Buddhism attempts to reform hinduism but spawns something very different, because it is personal. TRIBAL ORDERS ALL.

  • Group Strategy of The Tribes

    October 13th, 2018 10:08 AM GROUP STRATEGY OF THE TRIBES [Y]ou don’t understand. [I]slam is a Militial Order of the poor and illiterate tribal alliances, devoting all resources to reproduction and predation thru raiding. Their wisdom literature, is the myth of the expansionary warrior, the raider, and their laws. (Herdsmen, and raiding) [E]uropeanism is a Militial order of the technological, upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through kinship warriors, creating markets. Our wisdom literature is the law: reciprocity of heroes: conquest of self, man, nature, and the universe. (cattle, hose, and holding the land to feed them, and domesticating beast, land, and man for profit) [S]inism is a bureaucrat order of administrators upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction to administrators, administering their market. Their wisdom literature is literally ‘wisdom literature’ of Sun Tzu, Confucius, Lao Tzu and Mao. The literature of ‘harmony’. (Administering kin for profit). [J]udaism is a reactionary order of pacifist separatists (Female strategy) upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through teachers, parasitically dependent upon the markets of others. Their wisdom literature is their history and their law – the literature of ‘suffering’. (Sustaining kin through Trade and Moral Hazard) [H]induism (‘The Way of Life”) is the optimum hierarchical social order for the massive poor. It is just defenseless and can afford to be given the isolation of the continent by oceans, mountains, and deserts. Buddhism attempts to reform hinduism but spawns something very different, because it is personal. TRIBAL ORDERS ALL.

  • A Brotherhood of Upgrades

    October 13th, 2018 10:16 AM A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES by Tom McSweeny [R]estore the brotherhoods (tribal), restore the militia (local), restore the think tanks (national), restore the monarchies (international). Brotherhood of upgrades – look what has been achieved in the last few years here, the quality of community and info that has been discovered, presented and discussed. We’ve put in hours to digest, debate, contribute to varying (and increasingly, hopefully) degrees. We’ve come a long way. It’s great to see in myself and others how we’ve changed over the years, in our worldviews coming more in line with reality as is (Curt), debunking practices (Bill…first came across you with the takedown of meditation) in the quality of our arguments (James slaying it), and now to see the effects go further as it spreads (watch the world turn once the book is out and the advocates increase (thanks to the back and forth training on the likes of fb) worldwide. (And i’d encourage any who don’t pitch in to do so….the learning is in the back and forth for us all). Militia – you’ve nailed this as far as I’m concerned. Decentralised, reciprocal insurance of property. A living network exchanging info and protection to self similar. Think tanks / courtiers – though now seemingly corrupted and not spending their time working out the best way for the nation and it’s people… A pretty good investment for a nation if they could be returned to that. Get the synthesizers and measurers pushing policy based on data rather than feels. Lot of big questions to face that are simply going to escalate through time (e.g. highly reproductive invasive demographics in democracies) which require answers and action. Monarchies – practical, judge of last resort, easier to make deals with fewer decision makers involved. Hierarchy. The brotherhood nourishes the militia, nourishes the think tanks, nourishes the monarchy. For best results, all in that hierarchy are invested intergenerationally with skin in the game through time. Fail in that, with undue influence at any level by those without investment, we get mess and dysgenia. The importance of getting this right cannot be ignored. At all. Not even a little bit. Love you guys.

  • It Doesn’t Matter What You Believe, Mean or Intend.

    October 13th, 2018 4:58 PM IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN OR INTEND.

    —“Marxists believe…”—

    You’re confusing what people intend, with the 1) method of argument (sophism, and self deception) 2) whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises, 3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce, 4) whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics. IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU “MEAN”. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia. a) people were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them. b) the classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because there are only three means of organizing people: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction). And three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), conflated (egypt, mesopotamia. c) we do not, and the evidence is marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) lack the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort a feminist (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias. SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.

  • Unpacking “Democracy Requires Homogeneity”

    October 13th, 2018 4:18 PM UNPACKING “DEMOCRACY REQUIRES HOMOGENEITY” by Richard Nikoley

    —“Markets allow us to cooperate on means despite disparate ends. Democracy, only on same ends. Democracy requires homogeneity.”— CD

    Let me unpack this a bit for those unfamiliar. Markets, or trade, is inherently win-win or the trade doesn’t happen and there is no market. When you buy a pound of apples for $1, it’s because you want the apples more than you want the dollar and the tradesman wants the dollar more than he wants the pound of apples. This happens billions of times a day, globally. How many trades do you do in a single day, on average? 5-10, maybe? Multiply that by 7 Billion. That’s upwards of 70 billion trades daily and as a win-win, that’s a lot of happiness. We should be thankful. Moreover, markets are typically ideologically, racially, gender, culturally, etc. agnostic or neutral. It’s the great mediator. Traders tend not to care a bit who the other person is or what they believe, and yet they serve each other. How amazing. How fortunate we are. Now, contrast that with democracy. Democracy is winner take all. Either you keep your dollar AND get his pound of apples, or he keeps his apples and gets your dollar. It’s windfall win-lose. It only tends to work reasonably well in homogenous populations or institutions. Think Japan and Scandinavian counties (as they used to be before the Muslim influx). Relatively small populations of largely the same race, culture, national history. Or, consider a large public company where directors are elected quasi-democratically by shareholders, but everyone is more or less on the same page of making capital gains and paying dividends. Democracy does not scale to something like a European Union or a United States. Totally dumb idea, especially extending the franchise to those with no stake (no property, no financial assets, no business concern with employees, etc.).

  • No More Kicking The Can Down The Road

    October 13th, 2018 5:27 PM [A]s far as I know universal suffrage has been the subject of criticism throughout all of history, and the evidence of the 20th century that it provides little but the slow road to authoritarian redistributionism. The only reason that it’s been possible in the 20th century is the luxury of the returns on the debt possible under fiat money capitalism, at the cost of continuous dygenia (reduction of and now the reversal of, intergenerational human capital). There is a vast difference between those of us who understand both micro, macro, political, and human capital economics, and grasp that political systems are simply those we can afford in the moment, and nothing more. And that the only way to preserve the liberty created by western civilization is to continue the eugenic program of the ancient and medieval manorialists: meritocratic tripartism (slave-serf-freman-citizen-nobleman meritocracy) or the british invention of adding houses for each of the classes as they contribute to responsibility for management of the economy: Monarch, Landed Nobility (Regions), Commons (small business owners), and Church (proxy for the working classes). The mistake they made was not adding a new house for the working classes, and another for women upon their enfranchisement. This would let us continue the historical market for commons between the classes, rather than under liberalism(classical liberalism in the english speaking world). The result instead was underclass rule, and the use of propaganda and media to (lie to) use ideological hyperbole to obtain power by non-market means. Majoritarian democracy is and can only be, a monopoly. We had the nearly perfect government. Rule of law resulting in markets for commons, as well as markets for goods, services and information. However, the middle class seizure of power from the landed aristocracy, and the inclusion of the underclass as a means of opposing the rise of marxism-communism, merely kicked the political can down the road. And we are all standing around looking at that can wondering where to kick it next. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine RE: https://notesonliberty.com/2018/10/13/liberalism-democracy-and-polarization/