Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • NPCs, and Their Method of Resistance

    October 15th, 2018 11:03 AM NPCs, AND THEIR METHOD OF RESISTANCE [O]ne of the NPCs traits is to rely on Euphemism when it suits them and Literalism when it suits them, but then attack the use of Euphemism or Literalism by opponents when it doesn’t. As always, an NPC simply withdraws consent to agree no matter what, by whatever excuse possible, as a means of avoiding continuous, recursive, cooperative pursuit of decidability (the truth) that would require that they change their prior bias and commitment. You do not have to be intelligent to engage in this form of non-cooperation-by -continuous-denial. You just have to find a way to disagree and prevent progress to decidability NPC’s merely transmit and imitate means of denying cooperation on the discovery of decidability (truth) and resist all attempts at discovery of decidability. It is by this method the Herd ‘sticks together’ and is not ‘divided’ by reason, truth, science, argument, morality, reciprocity or any other criteria. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • NPCs, and Their Method of Resistance

    October 15th, 2018 11:03 AM NPCs, AND THEIR METHOD OF RESISTANCE [O]ne of the NPCs traits is to rely on Euphemism when it suits them and Literalism when it suits them, but then attack the use of Euphemism or Literalism by opponents when it doesn’t. As always, an NPC simply withdraws consent to agree no matter what, by whatever excuse possible, as a means of avoiding continuous, recursive, cooperative pursuit of decidability (the truth) that would require that they change their prior bias and commitment. You do not have to be intelligent to engage in this form of non-cooperation-by -continuous-denial. You just have to find a way to disagree and prevent progress to decidability NPC’s merely transmit and imitate means of denying cooperation on the discovery of decidability (truth) and resist all attempts at discovery of decidability. It is by this method the Herd ‘sticks together’ and is not ‘divided’ by reason, truth, science, argument, morality, reciprocity or any other criteria. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Why Intellectuals Debate in Text Not Speech

    October 16th, 2018 1:36 PM WHY INTELLECTUALS DEBATE IN TEXT NOT SPEECH

    —“Let’s schedule a video call, and we can exhaust this without the unnecessary social incentives until I find out where I’m wrong, and I’ll leave you guys be in Aryan Propertyland.”—

    The Value of Text 1) leaves a record of the evolution of the argument, and the tactics used in pursuing it. 2) Sophisms, Signaling, and Frauds are much harder to get away with in text. 3) The chain of reasoning one can produce in text is more suitable to proof by falsification, whereas verbal reparté is more suitable to analogy and justification (fraud). 4) I do not care whether you continue to argue or depart, because articulate debate only serves to educate the followers – there is no chance that you can win such an argument – you just don’t know that yet. I do. You can only say “Lying is a strategic advantage if you can get enough people to do it without getting them killed in the process.” 5) I am now aware of you, just as you are aware of me. And I don’t practice philosophy but law. And prosecution of those who perpetuate harm against the commons is not only my job, my art but my moral duty. 6) You can use the pejorative ‘aryan’ as if aryan (law) vs semitic (religion) is some sort of dispute over taste rather than a dispute over truth and transcendence, vs lies and dysgenic regression. You’re reasonably talented but it’s too clear that you are used to confusing the tactic of winning by sophism against the common folk, and not experienced at such debate with professionals with the hard science of it all. Trying to repeat the past is simply an admission of the failure to solve the problems of the present. The problem of the present is the same as it has always been: the conflict between the agrarian-metalworkers using law and markets (Male reproductive strategy), and the pastoralists using cults, and separatism (the female reproductive strategy) Horse+bronze+wheel+sky-worshipping+Militaristic+expansionist vs earth worshipping, pacifist, separatists.The eternal war between Cain and Able: The Masculine vs the Feminine. This is the fourth cycle of that war of civilizations.

  • Everything You Need to Understand About Religion in 750 Words

    October 15th, 2018 12:18 PM EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT RELIGION IN 750 WORDS (important piece)(synthesis) [R]eligion consist of a category of education for the purpose of training the intuition (emotions), such that we are less dependent upon reason, calculation, and computation. So just as we have: |ANALOGIES| children’s stories, fairy tales, myths, legends > young adult stories > stories > novels > biographies > histories > the sciences and law > mathematics and we have: |ETHICS| Imitation of Parents > Hero Ethics > Virtue Ethics > Rule Ethics > Outcome Ethics we also have: |EDUCATION| Physical Training > Emotional training > Calculation training > Knowledge training > Professional Skills Training And so we have developed these institutions to provide training: |INSTITUTIONS| Play/Sports/Work(physical) > Church (emotion) > Primary School > Secondary School > College > UniversityWHAT WE LEARN FROM RELIGION What we learn from religion can be taught by many methods, and that abrahamic religions are one of the worst possible methods because they have a record of manufacturing ignorance. Despite being th emost literate people in europe the jews contributed nothing to mankind for two thousand years until converted to Aristotelianism (Testimonial Truth). Christianity created order cheaply but maintained ignorance that cut the rate of literacy, learning, and innovation to near zero for over a thousand years. Islam destroyed the accumulated capital of every single great civilization of the ancient world other than india, china, and southern africa who were all geographically isolated from Muslim Raiders, and their continuous destruction of capital, and mandated ignorance through religiously enforced predetermination. Of the major religions of Abrahamism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Ancestor and Nature Worship, and Stoicism, it is quite clear without exception that Nature and Ancestor Worship and Stoicism are the optimum methods – Particularly for the optimum group evolutionary strategy: ethnocentrism and nationalism. In fact, every other strategy is far worse than ethnocentrism. And only ethnocentrism leads to beneficial continuous eugenic evolution by resisting regression to the mean by continuous dysgenia of underclass reproduction. That does not mean church(education and universal cults) and temples(banks and personal cults) aren’t a good thing. Church (communal ritual, of lesson, oath, and feast) is a good thing if it’s actually transmitting temporally useful content. (its not currently.) But the lies of the abrahamic religions are horrificly destructive compared to the Trials of Achilles, hero, ancestor, and nature worship, or the continuous self authoring of virtues in stoicism and buddhism – and our original religions of nature, ancestor worship (thankfulness) and Stoicism (mindfulness) were far superior at making mentally healthy people who are able to adapt to constantly changing conditions – and possessed of independent minds: something the authoritarian semitic religions could not tolerate, and actively suppressed. THE CONSTITUTION OF RELIGION Religion Consists of: |RELIGION| Mythos (strategy) > Repetition (ritual), Recital (oath) > Feast and Festival. But so does every other category of education: |EDUCATION| Mythos (Logic) > Repetition/Ritual (Grammar) > Recital (Rhetoric) > Reward (Recognition of Achievement) All education follows the same process: |LEARNING| Logic > Grammar > Rhetoric > Success by accolade, application, or achievement. All knowledge follows the same process: |EPISTEMOLOGY| free association (+ test) > hypothesis (+ test) > theory (+test) > law ( survival). All due diligence in the production of knowledge follows the same process: |DUE DILIGENCE| identity > consistency > correspondence > demonstrated possibility > rational choice > reciprocity, coherence > limits > and completeness. So, we have a rather odd misconception of ‘religion’ as something other than training the emotions such that we intuit values and relations that are coherent with our group evolutionary strategy (embedded in our mythos), which we rarely if ever understand – those rules of evolutionary strategy are obscured at the metaphysical level. This invisibility makes them sturdier because they are less vulnerable to argument and criticism and therefore more likely to persist due to simply imitation of myths and rituals that produces that strategy by externality rather than by direct apprehension. JUST ANOTHER FORM OF EDUCATION There is nothing special about religion. If we look at the hierarchy of choice: |REACTION| Physical Response (Automatic) > Emotional Response (intuition) > Rational Response(reason) > Calculated Response (calculation) > Computed Response (Computation). … then EACH ONE OF THOSE STEPS allows for increase in precision in the PRESENCE of knowledge, and GRACEFUL FAILURE in the ABSENCE of knowledge. This hierarchy means that at about every Standard Deviation in human mental (cognitive) ability, (75->150 IQ) there exists a grammar (methodology) of decision making from the base animal up to the most skilled professional. Humans are very simple creatures. It’s the lies we tell ourselves that confuse us, and keep us mere animals, responding by intuition and automatic reaction, rather than possessed of agency and welding reason, calculation, and computation, such that we evolve into the gods we imagine. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Why Intellectuals Debate in Text Not Speech

    October 16th, 2018 1:36 PM WHY INTELLECTUALS DEBATE IN TEXT NOT SPEECH

    —“Let’s schedule a video call, and we can exhaust this without the unnecessary social incentives until I find out where I’m wrong, and I’ll leave you guys be in Aryan Propertyland.”—

    The Value of Text 1) leaves a record of the evolution of the argument, and the tactics used in pursuing it. 2) Sophisms, Signaling, and Frauds are much harder to get away with in text. 3) The chain of reasoning one can produce in text is more suitable to proof by falsification, whereas verbal reparté is more suitable to analogy and justification (fraud). 4) I do not care whether you continue to argue or depart, because articulate debate only serves to educate the followers – there is no chance that you can win such an argument – you just don’t know that yet. I do. You can only say “Lying is a strategic advantage if you can get enough people to do it without getting them killed in the process.” 5) I am now aware of you, just as you are aware of me. And I don’t practice philosophy but law. And prosecution of those who perpetuate harm against the commons is not only my job, my art but my moral duty. 6) You can use the pejorative ‘aryan’ as if aryan (law) vs semitic (religion) is some sort of dispute over taste rather than a dispute over truth and transcendence, vs lies and dysgenic regression. You’re reasonably talented but it’s too clear that you are used to confusing the tactic of winning by sophism against the common folk, and not experienced at such debate with professionals with the hard science of it all. Trying to repeat the past is simply an admission of the failure to solve the problems of the present. The problem of the present is the same as it has always been: the conflict between the agrarian-metalworkers using law and markets (Male reproductive strategy), and the pastoralists using cults, and separatism (the female reproductive strategy) Horse+bronze+wheel+sky-worshipping+Militaristic+expansionist vs earth worshipping, pacifist, separatists.The eternal war between Cain and Able: The Masculine vs the Feminine. This is the fourth cycle of that war of civilizations.

  • Everything You Need to Understand About Religion in 750 Words

    October 15th, 2018 12:18 PM EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT RELIGION IN 750 WORDS (important piece)(synthesis) [R]eligion consist of a category of education for the purpose of training the intuition (emotions), such that we are less dependent upon reason, calculation, and computation. So just as we have: |ANALOGIES| children’s stories, fairy tales, myths, legends > young adult stories > stories > novels > biographies > histories > the sciences and law > mathematics and we have: |ETHICS| Imitation of Parents > Hero Ethics > Virtue Ethics > Rule Ethics > Outcome Ethics we also have: |EDUCATION| Physical Training > Emotional training > Calculation training > Knowledge training > Professional Skills Training And so we have developed these institutions to provide training: |INSTITUTIONS| Play/Sports/Work(physical) > Church (emotion) > Primary School > Secondary School > College > UniversityWHAT WE LEARN FROM RELIGION What we learn from religion can be taught by many methods, and that abrahamic religions are one of the worst possible methods because they have a record of manufacturing ignorance. Despite being th emost literate people in europe the jews contributed nothing to mankind for two thousand years until converted to Aristotelianism (Testimonial Truth). Christianity created order cheaply but maintained ignorance that cut the rate of literacy, learning, and innovation to near zero for over a thousand years. Islam destroyed the accumulated capital of every single great civilization of the ancient world other than india, china, and southern africa who were all geographically isolated from Muslim Raiders, and their continuous destruction of capital, and mandated ignorance through religiously enforced predetermination. Of the major religions of Abrahamism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Ancestor and Nature Worship, and Stoicism, it is quite clear without exception that Nature and Ancestor Worship and Stoicism are the optimum methods – Particularly for the optimum group evolutionary strategy: ethnocentrism and nationalism. In fact, every other strategy is far worse than ethnocentrism. And only ethnocentrism leads to beneficial continuous eugenic evolution by resisting regression to the mean by continuous dysgenia of underclass reproduction. That does not mean church(education and universal cults) and temples(banks and personal cults) aren’t a good thing. Church (communal ritual, of lesson, oath, and feast) is a good thing if it’s actually transmitting temporally useful content. (its not currently.) But the lies of the abrahamic religions are horrificly destructive compared to the Trials of Achilles, hero, ancestor, and nature worship, or the continuous self authoring of virtues in stoicism and buddhism – and our original religions of nature, ancestor worship (thankfulness) and Stoicism (mindfulness) were far superior at making mentally healthy people who are able to adapt to constantly changing conditions – and possessed of independent minds: something the authoritarian semitic religions could not tolerate, and actively suppressed. THE CONSTITUTION OF RELIGION Religion Consists of: |RELIGION| Mythos (strategy) > Repetition (ritual), Recital (oath) > Feast and Festival. But so does every other category of education: |EDUCATION| Mythos (Logic) > Repetition/Ritual (Grammar) > Recital (Rhetoric) > Reward (Recognition of Achievement) All education follows the same process: |LEARNING| Logic > Grammar > Rhetoric > Success by accolade, application, or achievement. All knowledge follows the same process: |EPISTEMOLOGY| free association (+ test) > hypothesis (+ test) > theory (+test) > law ( survival). All due diligence in the production of knowledge follows the same process: |DUE DILIGENCE| identity > consistency > correspondence > demonstrated possibility > rational choice > reciprocity, coherence > limits > and completeness. So, we have a rather odd misconception of ‘religion’ as something other than training the emotions such that we intuit values and relations that are coherent with our group evolutionary strategy (embedded in our mythos), which we rarely if ever understand – those rules of evolutionary strategy are obscured at the metaphysical level. This invisibility makes them sturdier because they are less vulnerable to argument and criticism and therefore more likely to persist due to simply imitation of myths and rituals that produces that strategy by externality rather than by direct apprehension. JUST ANOTHER FORM OF EDUCATION There is nothing special about religion. If we look at the hierarchy of choice: |REACTION| Physical Response (Automatic) > Emotional Response (intuition) > Rational Response(reason) > Calculated Response (calculation) > Computed Response (Computation). … then EACH ONE OF THOSE STEPS allows for increase in precision in the PRESENCE of knowledge, and GRACEFUL FAILURE in the ABSENCE of knowledge. This hierarchy means that at about every Standard Deviation in human mental (cognitive) ability, (75->150 IQ) there exists a grammar (methodology) of decision making from the base animal up to the most skilled professional. Humans are very simple creatures. It’s the lies we tell ourselves that confuse us, and keep us mere animals, responding by intuition and automatic reaction, rather than possessed of agency and welding reason, calculation, and computation, such that we evolve into the gods we imagine. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT RELIGION IN 750 WORDS (important piece)(

    EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT RELIGION IN 750 WORDS

    (important piece)(synthesis)

    Religion consist of a category of education for the purpose of training the intuition (emotions), such that we are less dependent upon reason, calculation, and computation.

    So just as we have:

    |ANALOGIES| children’s stories, fairy tales, myths, legends > young adult stories > stories > novels > biographies > histories > the sciences and law > mathematics

    and we have:

    |ETHICS| Imitation of Parents > Hero Ethics > Virtue Ethics > Rule Ethics > Outcome Ethics

    we also have:

    |EDUCATION| Physical Training > Emotional training > Calculation training > Knowledge training > Professional Skills Training

    And so we have developed these institutions to provide training:

    |INSTITUTIONS| Play/Sports/Work(physical) > Church (emotion) > Primary School > Secondary School > College > University

    WHAT WE LEARN FROM RELIGION

    What we learn from religion can be taught by many methods, and that abrahamic religions are one of the worst possible methods because they have a record of manufacturing ignorance. Despite being th emost literate people in europe the jews contributed nothing to mankind for two thousand years until converted to Aristotelianism (Testimonial Truth). Christianity created order cheaply but maintained ignorance that cut the rate of literacy, learning, and innovation to near zero for over a thousand years. Islam destroyed the accumulated capital of every single great civilization of the ancient world other than india, china, and southern africa who were all geographically isolated from Muslim Raiders, and their continuous destruction of capital, and mandated ignorance through religiously enforced predetermination.

    Of the major religions of Abrahamism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Ancestor and Nature Worship, and Stoicism, it is quite clear without exception that Nature and Ancestor Worship and Stoicism are the optimum methods – Particularly for the optimum group evolutionary strategy: ethnocentrism and nationalism. In fact, every other strategy is far worse than ethnocentrism. And only ethnocentrism leads to beneficial continuous eugenic evolution by resisting regression to the mean by continuous dysgenia of underclass reproduction.

    That does not mean church(education and universal cults) and temples(banks and personal cults) aren’t a good thing. Church (communal ritual, of lesson, oath, and feast) is a good thing if it’s actually transmitting temporally useful content. (its not currently.)

    But the lies of the abrahamic religions are horrificly destructive compared to the Trials of Achilles, hero, ancestor, and nature worship, or the continuous self authoring of virtues in stoicism and buddhism – and our original religions of nature, ancestor worship (thankfulness) and Stoicism (mindfulness) were far superior at making mentally healthy people who are able to adapt to constantly changing conditions – and possessed of independent minds: something the authoritarian semitic religions could not tolerate, and actively suppressed.

    THE CONSTITUTION OF RELIGION

    Religion Consists of:

    |RELIGION| Mythos (strategy) > Repetition (ritual), Recital (oath) > Feast and Festival.

    But so does every other category of education:

    |EDUCATION| Mythos (Logic) > Repetition/Ritual (Grammar) > Recital (Rhetoric) > Reward (Recognition of Achievement)

    All education follows the same process:

    |LEARNING| Logic > Grammar > Rhetoric > Success by accolade, application, or achievement.

    All knowledge follows the same process:

    |EPISTEMOLOGY| free association (+ test) > hypothesis (+ test) > theory (+test) > law ( survival).

    All due diligence in the production of knowledge follows the same process:

    |DUE DILIGENCE| identity > consistency > correspondence > demonstrated possibility > rational choice > reciprocity, coherence > limits > and completeness.

    So, we have a rather odd misconception of ‘religion’ as something other than training the emotions such that we intuit values and relations that are coherent with our group evolutionary strategy (embedded in our mythos), which we rarely if ever understand – those rules of evolutionary strategy are obscured at the metaphysical level. This invisibility makes them sturdier because they are less vulnerable to argument and criticism and therefore more likely to persist due to simply imitation of myths and rituals that produces that strategy by externality rather than by direct apprehension.

    JUST ANOTHER FORM OF EDUCATION

    There is nothing special about religion. If we look at the hierarchy of choice:

    |REACTION| Physical Response (Automatic) > Emotional Response (intuition) > Rational Response(reason) > Calculated Response (calculation) > Computed Response (Computation).

    … then EACH ONE OF THOSE STEPS allows for increase in precision in the PRESENCE of knowledge, and GRACEFUL FAILURE in the ABSENCE of knowledge.

    This hierarchy means that at about every Standard Deviation in human mental (cognitive) ability, (75->150 IQ) there exists a grammar (methodology) of decision making from the base animal up to the most skilled professional.

    Humans are very simple creatures. It’s the lies we tell ourselves that confuse us, and keep us mere animals, responding by intuition and automatic reaction, rather than possessed of agency and welding reason, calculation, and computation, such that we evolve into the gods we imagine.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-15 12:18:00 UTC

  • NPCs, AND THEIR METHOD OF RESISTANCE One of the NPCs traits is to rely on Euphem

    NPCs, AND THEIR METHOD OF RESISTANCE

    One of the NPCs traits is to rely on Euphemism when it suits them and Literalism when it suits them, but then attack the use of Euphemism or Literalism by opponents when it doesn’t.

    As always, an NPC simply withdraws consent to agree no matter what, by whatever excuse possible, as a means of avoiding continuous, recursive, cooperative pursuit of decidability (the truth) that would require that they change their prior bias and commitment. You do not have to be intelligent to engage in this form of non-cooperation-by -continuous-denial. You just have to find a way to disagree and prevent progress to decidability

    NPC’s merely transmit and imitate means of denying cooperation on the discovery of decidability (truth) and resist all attempts at discovery of decidability.

    It is by this method the Herd ‘sticks together’ and is not ‘divided’ by reason, truth, science, argument, morality, reciprocity or any other criteria.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-15 11:03:00 UTC

  • Men and Women

    October 14th, 2018 9:16 AM

    —“If a man/woman says that s/he’s too damaged for you (or too neurotic, or too anything) just take his/her word for it.”—

    Translated : “I have to monitor myself when I am with you and I do not believe I will be able to maintain this behavior indefinitely because it’s exhausting.”

    —“If you’re bored out of your mind at a venue, you’re probably not going to meet anyone there who you will want to date. Go where others are that you aren’t bored.”—

    (My Market: Any Art Classes. Artsy girls are best. ) Most important reason? You find mates where you aren’t looking for them. So find something to do (primary) so that overzealousness doesn’t force you to see what isnt there.

    –“Sometimes significant others have little annoying habits.”-

    If you learn to love them, or accomodate them, that will work, but you cannot learn to tolerate, or ignore them. Doesn’t work.

    –“Slutty behavior by either gender is a recipe for marital failure, and marital falure is far worse for your life than bankruptcy or business failure or losing multiple jobs.”–

    Just the data. People who professionalize ‘shopping, trying out, and moving on’ develop the habit for life.

    —“Alcohol and Drugs Do Not Improve With Age”—

    Sorry. Just is. Everyone goes to college and tries. Those who don’t stop trying are always a problem. Cellular damage accumulates.

    —“Find someone you feel very lucky to be with. the men who are ‘Players’ who commit do so because they found a woman worth commiting for: they can’t believe they got her. Women are different. They don’t want to think they have married down.”—

    One party or the other must be totally committed no matter what. Men are loyal and women are devoted. There is a difference.

    —“Men cheat for the sole purpose of sex, or because they are married to a nag, harpie, complainer. Women cheat to discover if they can trade up.”—

    —“The current order where men and women are ‘equal’ poses a problem for women who want first tier men. The reason is that once you are successful, younger women who demand fewer compromises are always and everywhere preferable to older women to continue to privatize and monopolize your opportunities.”—

    —“The current order where women are more fungible in the work force poses a problem for men: if you are a house husband or the equivalent you better stay (a) fit, (b) groomed, (c) interesting, and (d) involved in some activity with other males (e) save your own money overseas.”—

    —“In general, all men should save their own exit money overseas”—

    Just some life lessons…..

  • Why France Matters?

    October 14th, 2018 8:42 AM WHY FRANCE MATTERS? (Smart Selfishness) [A]n insignificant power unworthy of security council participation and constantly hostile to western interests. But, within europe: (a) she can grow her own food, and a diversity of it. she concentrated population in urban areas to preserve her food capacity. (b) investment in nuclear power makes her relatively energy independent (c) Nuclear weapons makes her relatively invulnerable. (d) Preservation of central african colonial presence means she maintains a small but trained military. (e) Germany carries the entire risk of the european effort (not france) by using the Mark as the Euro, and having germany dependent upon (american-defended) global trade. (f) France is responsible for the majority of leftist thought leadership, because she (like the russians) believes her revolution (as the russians their fight against germany) is the founding mythos (rather than the french nation (people) are the founding mythos. And france was and remains the most feminine country in europe in use of language, grammar, argument, political order, social order, and international negotiation technique. (g) France is the gateway for the Islamization and Semitization of europe, because she is dependent upon african and islamic wealth to preserve her economy. When the crisis comes France can defeat germany for control of european course. This means that eastern europe and russia will be the strong powers in europe after the next ‘great economic and political conflict that will occur due to demographics within the next twenty years.