Form: Mini Essay

  • Unpacking “Democracy Requires Homogeneity”

    October 13th, 2018 4:18 PM UNPACKING “DEMOCRACY REQUIRES HOMOGENEITY” by Richard Nikoley

    —“Markets allow us to cooperate on means despite disparate ends. Democracy, only on same ends. Democracy requires homogeneity.”— CD

    Let me unpack this a bit for those unfamiliar. Markets, or trade, is inherently win-win or the trade doesn’t happen and there is no market. When you buy a pound of apples for $1, it’s because you want the apples more than you want the dollar and the tradesman wants the dollar more than he wants the pound of apples. This happens billions of times a day, globally. How many trades do you do in a single day, on average? 5-10, maybe? Multiply that by 7 Billion. That’s upwards of 70 billion trades daily and as a win-win, that’s a lot of happiness. We should be thankful. Moreover, markets are typically ideologically, racially, gender, culturally, etc. agnostic or neutral. It’s the great mediator. Traders tend not to care a bit who the other person is or what they believe, and yet they serve each other. How amazing. How fortunate we are. Now, contrast that with democracy. Democracy is winner take all. Either you keep your dollar AND get his pound of apples, or he keeps his apples and gets your dollar. It’s windfall win-lose. It only tends to work reasonably well in homogenous populations or institutions. Think Japan and Scandinavian counties (as they used to be before the Muslim influx). Relatively small populations of largely the same race, culture, national history. Or, consider a large public company where directors are elected quasi-democratically by shareholders, but everyone is more or less on the same page of making capital gains and paying dividends. Democracy does not scale to something like a European Union or a United States. Totally dumb idea, especially extending the franchise to those with no stake (no property, no financial assets, no business concern with employees, etc.).

  • No More Kicking The Can Down The Road

    October 13th, 2018 5:27 PM [A]s far as I know universal suffrage has been the subject of criticism throughout all of history, and the evidence of the 20th century that it provides little but the slow road to authoritarian redistributionism. The only reason that it’s been possible in the 20th century is the luxury of the returns on the debt possible under fiat money capitalism, at the cost of continuous dygenia (reduction of and now the reversal of, intergenerational human capital). There is a vast difference between those of us who understand both micro, macro, political, and human capital economics, and grasp that political systems are simply those we can afford in the moment, and nothing more. And that the only way to preserve the liberty created by western civilization is to continue the eugenic program of the ancient and medieval manorialists: meritocratic tripartism (slave-serf-freman-citizen-nobleman meritocracy) or the british invention of adding houses for each of the classes as they contribute to responsibility for management of the economy: Monarch, Landed Nobility (Regions), Commons (small business owners), and Church (proxy for the working classes). The mistake they made was not adding a new house for the working classes, and another for women upon their enfranchisement. This would let us continue the historical market for commons between the classes, rather than under liberalism(classical liberalism in the english speaking world). The result instead was underclass rule, and the use of propaganda and media to (lie to) use ideological hyperbole to obtain power by non-market means. Majoritarian democracy is and can only be, a monopoly. We had the nearly perfect government. Rule of law resulting in markets for commons, as well as markets for goods, services and information. However, the middle class seizure of power from the landed aristocracy, and the inclusion of the underclass as a means of opposing the rise of marxism-communism, merely kicked the political can down the road. And we are all standing around looking at that can wondering where to kick it next. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine RE: https://notesonliberty.com/2018/10/13/liberalism-democracy-and-polarization/

  • IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN OR INTEND. —“Marxists believe…”— You’re co

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN OR INTEND.

    —“Marxists believe…”—

    You’re confusing what people intend, with the 1) method of argument (sophism, and self deception) 2) whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises, 3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce, 4) whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU “MEAN”.

    It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia.

    a) people were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them.

    b) the classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because there are only three means of organizing people: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction). And three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), conflated (egypt, mesopotamia.

    c) we do not, and the evidence is marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) lack the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort a feminist (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias.

    SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 16:58:00 UTC

  • A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES by Tom McSweeny Restore the brotherhoods (tribal), res

    A BROTHERHOOD OF UPGRADES

    by Tom McSweeny

    Restore the brotherhoods (tribal), restore the militia (local), restore the think tanks (national), restore the monarchies (international).

    Brotherhood of upgrades – look what has been achieved in the last few years here, the quality of community and info that has been discovered, presented and discussed. We’ve put in hours to digest, debate, contribute to varying (and increasingly, hopefully) degrees. We’ve come a long way. It’s great to see in myself and others how we’ve changed over the years, in our worldviews coming more in line with reality as is (Curt), debunking practices (Bill…first came across you with the takedown of meditation) in the quality of our arguments (James slaying it), and now to see the effects go further as it spreads (watch the world turn once the book is out and the advocates increase (thanks to the back and forth training on the likes of fb) worldwide. (And i’d encourage any who don’t pitch in to do so….the learning is in the back and forth for us all).

    Militia – you’ve nailed this as far as I’m concerned. Decentralised, reciprocal insurance of property. A living network exchanging info and protection to self similar.

    Think tanks / courtiers – though now seemingly corrupted and not spending their time working out the best way for the nation and it’s people… A pretty good investment for a nation if they could be returned to that. Get the synthesizers and measurers pushing policy based on data rather than feels. Lot of big questions to face that are simply going to escalate through time (e.g. highly reproductive invasive demographics in democracies) which require answers and action.

    Monarchies – practical, judge of last resort, easier to make deals with fewer decision makers involved.

    Hierarchy. The brotherhood nourishes the militia, nourishes the think tanks, nourishes the monarchy. For best results, all in that hierarchy are invested intergenerationally with skin in the game through time. Fail in that, with undue influence at any level by those without investment, we get mess and dysgenia.

    The importance of getting this right cannot be ignored. At all. Not even a little bit.

    Love you guys.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 10:16:00 UTC

  • GROUP STRATEGY OF THE TRIBES You don’t understand. Islam is a Militial Order of

    GROUP STRATEGY OF THE TRIBES

    You don’t understand.

    Islam is a Militial Order of the poor and illiterate tribal alliances, devoting all resources to reproduction and predation thru raiding. Their wisdom literature, is the myth of the expansionary warrior, the raider, and their laws. (Herdsmen, and raiding)

    Europeanism is a Militial order of the technological, upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through kinship warriors, creating markets. Our wisdom literature is the law: reciprocity of heroes: conquest of self, man, nature, and the universe. (cattle, hose, and holding the land to feed them, and domesticating beast, land, and man for profit)

    Sinism is a bureaucrat order of administrators upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction to administrators, administering their market. Their wisdom literature is literally ‘wisdom literature’ of Sun Tzu, Confucius, Lao Tzu and Mao. The literature of ‘harmony’. (Administering kin for profit).

    Judaism is a reactionary order of pacifist separatists (Female strategy) upwardly redistributing resources and reproduction through teachers, parasitically dependent upon the markets of others. Their wisdom literature is their history and their law – the literature of ‘suffering’. (Sustaining kin through Trade and Moral Hazard)

    Hinduism (‘The Way of Life”) is the optimum hierarchical social order for the massive poor. It is just defenseless and can afford to be given the isolation of the continent by oceans, mountains, and deserts. Buddhism attempts to reform hinduism but spawns something very different, because it is personal.

    TRIBAL ORDERS ALL.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 10:08:00 UTC

  • Germany Under Merkel

    October 12th, 2018 6:11 PM GERMANY UNDER MERKEL Curt Doolittle Merkel is an east german educated by soviets and pursuing the soviet social strategy using soviet political techniques, within the german ethical moral, and political structure. there is a lot to be said of soviet political teachings, even if we find it unethical. Unfortunately without a ‘man’ in there and the restoration of the military under him it will be a serious problem for germans as this generation dies off. Sarunas Navickis I was born and grew up under soviet rule (thought I am Lithuanian and most of us considered soviets as occupants and oppressors) and now I live in Germany (western part) – I see these things first hand. There is problem over problem and over problem… Worst part of it is that some (most?) of these problems cannot be understood here any longer… Fuck… How could we get to this point of stupidity?! Curt Doolittle BY DESIGN. Sarunas Navickis You know, this is one of these times when I’d like to disagree even with my blood – and I cant…

  • The Constitution of Religion

    October 12th, 2018 3:43 PM THE CONSTITUTION OF RELIGION – “THOSE WHO COME UPON US IN OUR WILDER DAYS NOT KNOWING WHAT USE WE MADE OF THEM. 😉 “

    —“Curt Doolittle, you confessed to some aspergerism. Asperger people tend to be general intelligences, and fail to see archetypes, swiss-knife like cognitive schemata, and therefore, the value of religion. Can you explain where I’m wrong?”—- Giego Caleiro

    [W]ell, instead, I would say that those of us at the edge of the spectrum are more fully human (dependent upon reason), and those of you who are not, are less fully human (still dependent on animal impulse and intuition). I am not the first person to say that aspie-ness is the next step in evolution since it simply means there is more introspective capacity than neuro-commoners possess, and greater ability to process volumes of information, and that we are perfectly happy with one another, and that it’s neuro-commoners that are no longer ‘fit’ for socialization. That said, to address your question about associative (pre-cognitive) rather than rational or calculative (cognitive) relations: you know, you can find VALUE in archetypes and I’ve argued about reforming stoicism to make use of archetypes and thereby limit ‘religious’ literature to heroic rather than submissive and supernatural content. This is the future of ‘Religion’ as I undrestand it since it is not dependent on professed belief in and dedication to ritualization of falsehoods. But when we talk about SOCIAL and POLITICAL and ECONOMIC orders, which is my job, “Meaning” is how you coerce people to agree with your FRAME while TRUTH is how you render disputes and limit people to that which is not parasitic and predatory and deceitful with the UNIVERSAL FRAME (what we call scientific frame). So what you call religion and are indoctrinated to think of religion as monotheism, I (correctly) understand that it is just a method of training the intuition (emotions) such that they conform to the group’s evolutionary strategy. And this same process can be achieved through many ways – some of which are nearly perfect (stoicism), some a be less so (greco-roman polytheism, shintoism, ritual, ancestor worship), some quite a bit less so (buddhism), some outright bad (christianity), some outright catastrophic (islam) and some outright evil (judaism). So while my ‘gift’ allows me to see subtle patterns independent of emotional and cognitive bias better than the vast majority of people, it doesn’t mean I don’t understand (or practice) some version of religion. It means, that like Nietzsche, I undrestand the depth of the evil of abrahamic religions and that we are still struggling to release ourselves from the dark ages that they imposed upon this world, through the use of a particular frailty of the human mind when open to suggestion. So I specialize in VIA NEGATIVA (law, decidability) which says only what you must not do, not what you must do. Whatever you do that doesn’t violate that law is either amoral (irrelevant) or moral (not bad), or good (additive to the commons). One can, VIA POSITIVA (meaning, education) train the body, intuition(emotions), and mind (calculation) and memory (general knowledge) by various means. And I judge those means and the law judges those means not by how easy it is or familiar it is to transfer meaning – but, via-negativa, by the damage caused by any falsehood, parasitism, predation therein. Ergo, abrahamic religions are all evil – the greatest evil man has faced other than the great plagues. The question is how can we produce a literature (“Wisdom Literature” is the name for this category of education) that is absent those ‘bads and falsehoods’. Stoicism was eventually invented by the late greeks and romans and it was the combination of stoicism and mithraism that should have resulted in the ideal man, and the ideal virtues – for the simple reason that Homer provided a hero of the aristocracy, zeno a hero of the new middle class, and the jews a hero for the slaves women and underclass. The problem is, that the underclass hero was authoritarian slave owner and judaism a rebellion, christianity an undermining, and islam a conquest of the great civilizations – destroying aristocracy wherever it went, and knowledge and learning with it. We have ancestors worthy of worship – hundreds if not a thousand. Those who have shit ancestors make up gods. Those of us with ancestors (Odin) or archetypes (greco-roman-egyptian) need not fabricate false heroes from the leftover scraps of their betters. If you are not capable of having this discussion I will understand. Few are. Which is why these religions are evil. There is no difference between cigarette addiction, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, and monotheistic abrahamic addiction, other than the means by which the opiates are released into the system. That is why religious people demonstrate addiction responses and withdrawal symptoms when they are confronted with the fact that their mindfulness (training of their emotions) can be performed by many means, but they lack the will courage and honor to leave superstition behind. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Prussian Order (martial) vs Others

    October 12th, 2018 2:51 PM THE PRUSSIAN ORDER (MARTIAL) VS OTHERS [R]ussia longs for the Prussian Order but cannot produce it – loyalty for russians is a matter of family not state. Germany has been castigated for it, and broken to prevent its revival. Britain virtue-spirals her pretense of superiority to it meanwhile dying off after 500 years of rule. France is it’s feminine enemy to the last. America produces it and would maintain it if not for underclass immigration and population replacement. Some of us simply prefer the martial established male order. some of us the commercial ascendent male order, and some of us the cult feminine order. It’s semitic universalism in french postmodern and jewish marxist, russian orthodox, and western utopianism that resists it. Greek, Roman, German, British, American, Australian Masculinism of the Militia. Russia has missed her window when she allowed the jewish bolsheviks to kill her own. France lost it in 1789 when she killed her own. There is a small chance that we can restore germany if we leave her to her own devices. There is a good chance we can restore the british empire if we make the right choices. But that choice will come at the point of a gun. Therefore “SO BE IT.”

  • Germany Under Merkel

    October 12th, 2018 6:11 PM GERMANY UNDER MERKEL Curt Doolittle Merkel is an east german educated by soviets and pursuing the soviet social strategy using soviet political techniques, within the german ethical moral, and political structure. there is a lot to be said of soviet political teachings, even if we find it unethical. Unfortunately without a ‘man’ in there and the restoration of the military under him it will be a serious problem for germans as this generation dies off. Sarunas Navickis I was born and grew up under soviet rule (thought I am Lithuanian and most of us considered soviets as occupants and oppressors) and now I live in Germany (western part) – I see these things first hand. There is problem over problem and over problem… Worst part of it is that some (most?) of these problems cannot be understood here any longer… Fuck… How could we get to this point of stupidity?! Curt Doolittle BY DESIGN. Sarunas Navickis You know, this is one of these times when I’d like to disagree even with my blood – and I cant…

  • The Constitution of Religion

    October 12th, 2018 3:43 PM THE CONSTITUTION OF RELIGION – “THOSE WHO COME UPON US IN OUR WILDER DAYS NOT KNOWING WHAT USE WE MADE OF THEM. 😉 “

    —“Curt Doolittle, you confessed to some aspergerism. Asperger people tend to be general intelligences, and fail to see archetypes, swiss-knife like cognitive schemata, and therefore, the value of religion. Can you explain where I’m wrong?”—- Giego Caleiro

    [W]ell, instead, I would say that those of us at the edge of the spectrum are more fully human (dependent upon reason), and those of you who are not, are less fully human (still dependent on animal impulse and intuition). I am not the first person to say that aspie-ness is the next step in evolution since it simply means there is more introspective capacity than neuro-commoners possess, and greater ability to process volumes of information, and that we are perfectly happy with one another, and that it’s neuro-commoners that are no longer ‘fit’ for socialization. That said, to address your question about associative (pre-cognitive) rather than rational or calculative (cognitive) relations: you know, you can find VALUE in archetypes and I’ve argued about reforming stoicism to make use of archetypes and thereby limit ‘religious’ literature to heroic rather than submissive and supernatural content. This is the future of ‘Religion’ as I undrestand it since it is not dependent on professed belief in and dedication to ritualization of falsehoods. But when we talk about SOCIAL and POLITICAL and ECONOMIC orders, which is my job, “Meaning” is how you coerce people to agree with your FRAME while TRUTH is how you render disputes and limit people to that which is not parasitic and predatory and deceitful with the UNIVERSAL FRAME (what we call scientific frame). So what you call religion and are indoctrinated to think of religion as monotheism, I (correctly) understand that it is just a method of training the intuition (emotions) such that they conform to the group’s evolutionary strategy. And this same process can be achieved through many ways – some of which are nearly perfect (stoicism), some a be less so (greco-roman polytheism, shintoism, ritual, ancestor worship), some quite a bit less so (buddhism), some outright bad (christianity), some outright catastrophic (islam) and some outright evil (judaism). So while my ‘gift’ allows me to see subtle patterns independent of emotional and cognitive bias better than the vast majority of people, it doesn’t mean I don’t understand (or practice) some version of religion. It means, that like Nietzsche, I undrestand the depth of the evil of abrahamic religions and that we are still struggling to release ourselves from the dark ages that they imposed upon this world, through the use of a particular frailty of the human mind when open to suggestion. So I specialize in VIA NEGATIVA (law, decidability) which says only what you must not do, not what you must do. Whatever you do that doesn’t violate that law is either amoral (irrelevant) or moral (not bad), or good (additive to the commons). One can, VIA POSITIVA (meaning, education) train the body, intuition(emotions), and mind (calculation) and memory (general knowledge) by various means. And I judge those means and the law judges those means not by how easy it is or familiar it is to transfer meaning – but, via-negativa, by the damage caused by any falsehood, parasitism, predation therein. Ergo, abrahamic religions are all evil – the greatest evil man has faced other than the great plagues. The question is how can we produce a literature (“Wisdom Literature” is the name for this category of education) that is absent those ‘bads and falsehoods’. Stoicism was eventually invented by the late greeks and romans and it was the combination of stoicism and mithraism that should have resulted in the ideal man, and the ideal virtues – for the simple reason that Homer provided a hero of the aristocracy, zeno a hero of the new middle class, and the jews a hero for the slaves women and underclass. The problem is, that the underclass hero was authoritarian slave owner and judaism a rebellion, christianity an undermining, and islam a conquest of the great civilizations – destroying aristocracy wherever it went, and knowledge and learning with it. We have ancestors worthy of worship – hundreds if not a thousand. Those who have shit ancestors make up gods. Those of us with ancestors (Odin) or archetypes (greco-roman-egyptian) need not fabricate false heroes from the leftover scraps of their betters. If you are not capable of having this discussion I will understand. Few are. Which is why these religions are evil. There is no difference between cigarette addiction, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, and monotheistic abrahamic addiction, other than the means by which the opiates are released into the system. That is why religious people demonstrate addiction responses and withdrawal symptoms when they are confronted with the fact that their mindfulness (training of their emotions) can be performed by many means, but they lack the will courage and honor to leave superstition behind. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine