Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE SCIENCE OF WHY PEOPLE ARE NPCs OR PCs. @Dylan Thomas (TrueDilTom) put out a

    THE SCIENCE OF WHY PEOPLE ARE NPCs OR PCs.

    @Dylan Thomas (TrueDilTom) put out a wonderful podcast on the NPC meme (before it went viral). But most importantly, inside that discussion he reminds us that the origin of the thought is the research showing that the vast majority of people do not rely on language to ‘calculate’ with their internal voice. Language is a form of calculation consisting of categories, religions and values, and with language we can produce frames of different scales of coherence using internal consistency, external correspondence, and existential possibility. Instead they are driven entirely by experience and intuition – they were insufficiently trained, such that they cannot even use LANGUAGE for measurement of their thoughts: that’s before we get to Reason, Logic, Calculation, and Computation. In this sense, people really are NPC’s who are somewhat capable of speech to express intuitive reactions, but lack the agency to calculate with language and therefore speak in argument and reason.

    This is why I say that there is a vast difference between declaring people HUMAN just because they can speak, instead of declaring people HUMAN because they have AGENCY.

    Speech is an insufficient test of sufficient agency to enter into a contract, for the same reason that children lack sufficient agency to enter into contract.

    You can only cooperate with whom you can cooperate, and you cannot enter into contract with people who lack agency.

    They are not yet domesticated (fully human).

    So it is one thing to have your human potential BLOCKED (addiction to supernatural religions); and another lack the TRAINING to transition from primate to human; and another to seek to circumvent the LABOR of exercising agency; and another to possess agency because you have the ability, training, and WILL to possess and therefore demonstrate agency. (This paragraph was important, so read it again.)

    We cannot cooperate with those who cannot cooperate because cooperation on means and ends that require calculation require members of the contract be able to calculate.

    THEY CAN’T.

    Ergo we can’t.

    Therefore Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:43:00 UTC

  • THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION Left and Right is simply the problem of reproduc

    THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION

    Left and Right is simply the problem of reproductively desirable for the purpose of intergenrational families, businesses and polities, versus the desire for satisfaction of sexual impulses, independent of family, industry, and polity. IN other words: “The competition between european paternal, familial, commercial, and political families, and semitic maternal, individual, subsistence, anarchy.

    Those with agency (orderly masculine) vs those lacking it (anarchic feminine).

    We cannot fix this problem because under prosperity people pursue their interests. It’s in the intersets of those with lower sexual, social, economic, political, military market value – they are less domesticated OR less desirable: “politics is the entertainment business for ugly people, and media is the occupation for those who cannot produce, and the academy the occupation for those who cannot materially compete.”

    THE ONLY SOLUTION IS SEPARATION

    “Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 09:54:00 UTC

  • I Mean, Larping Is Larping Is Larping…

    October 17th, 2018 11:56 AM I MEAN, LARPING IS LARPING IS LARPING… [W]hat’s the difference between the people who dress up as fictional characters, or visit medieval festivals, or haunt dance clubs, and people who imitate jesus instead of Achilles, Alexander, Aristotle, or Odin? There isn’t any. I mean, tolkien created, quite purposefully, what was very close to a religious system using our old gods, rather than the semitic gods. He knew exactly what he was doing. I can get plenty of wisdom from “What would Gandalf do?” or ‘What would Bilbo Do?’. I just get more wisdom out of what would Achilles (Excellence, heroism, sacrifice, tragedy), Zeno (philosophy), Aristotle(science), Aurelius (politics), or Alexander (War) do? The problem is, those are all ARISTOCRATS, or middle classes, and what should those that lack agency and ability do? They were slaves in the ancient world. We freed them, because freemen are cheaper to rule, and return a higher profit than slaves and serfs, and they want a narrative for those who are less able. Failing to produce it, they chose marxism (labor), postmodernism (academy/intellectuals/state), and Feminism ( women). What can we give those people that they can face their status class and social, reproductive, economic, and political lack of market value? Lies and false promises, or truth, goods, and services?

  • I Mean, Larping Is Larping Is Larping…

    October 17th, 2018 11:56 AM I MEAN, LARPING IS LARPING IS LARPING… [W]hat’s the difference between the people who dress up as fictional characters, or visit medieval festivals, or haunt dance clubs, and people who imitate jesus instead of Achilles, Alexander, Aristotle, or Odin? There isn’t any. I mean, tolkien created, quite purposefully, what was very close to a religious system using our old gods, rather than the semitic gods. He knew exactly what he was doing. I can get plenty of wisdom from “What would Gandalf do?” or ‘What would Bilbo Do?’. I just get more wisdom out of what would Achilles (Excellence, heroism, sacrifice, tragedy), Zeno (philosophy), Aristotle(science), Aurelius (politics), or Alexander (War) do? The problem is, those are all ARISTOCRATS, or middle classes, and what should those that lack agency and ability do? They were slaves in the ancient world. We freed them, because freemen are cheaper to rule, and return a higher profit than slaves and serfs, and they want a narrative for those who are less able. Failing to produce it, they chose marxism (labor), postmodernism (academy/intellectuals/state), and Feminism ( women). What can we give those people that they can face their status class and social, reproductive, economic, and political lack of market value? Lies and false promises, or truth, goods, and services?

  • Solving Religion: The Ultimate Test of Agency

    October 17th, 2018 11:42 AM SOLVING RELIGION: THE ULTIMATE TEST OF AGENCY [S]olving religion was the hardest problem. Truth was trivial by comparison. The reason being that we are less invested in truth (reason) than we are in intuitions (training). I solved religion. The question is, what can be done about it for the masses, when the purpose of faith is to circumvent reason and to relieve the individual of all sorts of calculation, particularly STATUS (self image), which is the human’s instinctual accounting system. So, people malinvest in religions (wisdom narratives) for the purpose of cognitive and signaling discounts, and as such they defend their malinvestments like they defend all forms of investment (property). Hence why religion is the ultimate test of Agency.

  • Due to The Pro Dysgenics, Movement, We Are Now Trapped

    October 17th, 2018 12:50 PM [D]URING AGRARIANISM … … Humans were valuable for labor. During urbanization, labor and food were valuable for markets. Markets were valuable for Taxation. Taxation was valuable for producing a calculative class. A calculative class made possible greater scale of cooperation, greater returns, and greater survivability against competitors. During the industrial era, we moved people from subsistence production on farms, to industrial production in factories. During the post industrial era, we spread technologies of production, law (cooperation), accounting (measurement), money (incentives) around the world, adding people to the labor pool and producing consumer goods for lower and lower prices in TIME spent to pay for them. THAT ERA IS OVER At present we are entering the era where extra people that can be replaced by machines are nothing but a burden on each other, world economy, the political and military market, and the productive and reserve capacity of the planet. Had the eugenicists been successful and the anti-nazi (eugenicists) cult been suppressed, then we would have retained the advantage as have the japanese and Koreans. But due to the anti-eugenicists / pro dysgenics, movement, we are now trapped as is the rest of the world . Unless we alter the status quo.

  • Due to The Pro Dysgenics, Movement, We Are Now Trapped

    October 17th, 2018 12:50 PM [D]URING AGRARIANISM … … Humans were valuable for labor. During urbanization, labor and food were valuable for markets. Markets were valuable for Taxation. Taxation was valuable for producing a calculative class. A calculative class made possible greater scale of cooperation, greater returns, and greater survivability against competitors. During the industrial era, we moved people from subsistence production on farms, to industrial production in factories. During the post industrial era, we spread technologies of production, law (cooperation), accounting (measurement), money (incentives) around the world, adding people to the labor pool and producing consumer goods for lower and lower prices in TIME spent to pay for them. THAT ERA IS OVER At present we are entering the era where extra people that can be replaced by machines are nothing but a burden on each other, world economy, the political and military market, and the productive and reserve capacity of the planet. Had the eugenicists been successful and the anti-nazi (eugenicists) cult been suppressed, then we would have retained the advantage as have the japanese and Koreans. But due to the anti-eugenicists / pro dysgenics, movement, we are now trapped as is the rest of the world . Unless we alter the status quo.

  • ECONOMIC PSEUDOSCIENCE = CHERRY PICKING What separates economic science from eco

    ECONOMIC PSEUDOSCIENCE = CHERRY PICKING

    What separates economic science from economic pseudoscience, is selective measurement of changes in capital.

    Labor mobility turns out to be one of the WORST POSSIBLE means of altering poverty.

    Bring capital and rule of law to people, not people to capital and rule of law: One either brings rule of law and capital to people (colonialism) or one brings people to rule of law and capital (reverse-colonialism).

    The only choice is whether you colonize and INCREASE world institutional capital, or are colonized and CONSUME world institutional capital – while claiming you’ve made an increase in productivity rather than consumption.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 17:30:00 UTC

  • DURING AGRARIANISM … … Humans were valuable for labor. During urbanization,

    DURING AGRARIANISM …

    … Humans were valuable for labor. During urbanization, labor and food were valuable for markets. Markets were valuable for Taxation. Taxation was valuable for producing a calculative class. A calculative class made possible greater scale of cooperation, greater returns, and greater survivability against competitors.

    During the industrial era, we moved people from subsistence production on farms, to industrial production in factories.

    During the post industrial era, we spread technologies of production, law (cooperation), accounting (measurement), money (incentives) around the world, adding people to the labor pool and producing consumer goods for lower and lower prices in TIME spent to pay for them.

    THAT ERA IS OVER

    At present we are entering the era where extra people that can be replaced by machines are nothing but a burden on each other, world economy, the political and military market, and the productive and reserve capacity of the planet.

    Had the eugenicists been successful and the anti-nazi (eugenicists) cult been suppressed, then we would have retained the advantage as have the japanese and Koreans.

    But due to the anti-eugenicists / pro dysgenics, movement, we are now trapped as is the rest of the world .

    Unless we alter the status quo.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 12:50:00 UTC

  • SOLVING RELIGION: THE ULTIMATE TEST OF AGENCY Solving religion was the hardest p

    SOLVING RELIGION: THE ULTIMATE TEST OF AGENCY

    Solving religion was the hardest problem. Truth was trivial by comparison. The reason being that we are less invested in truth (reason) than we are in intuitions (training).

    I solved religion. The question is, what can be done about it for the masses, when the purpose of faith is to circumvent reason and to relieve the individual of all sorts of calculation, particularly STATUS (self image), which is the human’s instinctual accounting system.

    So, people malinvest in religions (wisdom narratives) for the purpose of cognitive and signaling discounts, and as such they defend their malinvestments like they defend all forms of investment (property).

    Hence why religion is the ultimate test of Agency.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 11:42:00 UTC