Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45431003_10156755022457264_381427127

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45431003_10156755022457264_3814271274876665856_o_10156755022452264.jpg WHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM? BE SERIOUS….

    This constant accusation of ‘fear’ isn’t ‘fear’, it’s DISGUST.

    The left (Herd) ‘fears’ the right(Pack) is ‘disgusted’.

    (I mean, this level of fake news outrage is just ridiculous)Noah J RevoyThe more we trust the angrier we get when that trust is broken.Nov 4, 2018, 9:42 AMCurt Doolittleperfect.Nov 4, 2018, 9:43 AMDaniel Roland AndersonNailed it Noah J Revoy.

    If you look at my political progression, it’s a reflection of a decrease in trust and an increase in anger:

    Reaganite Cold Warrior (civnat) (I trust anyone who isn’t a communist or a sympathizer.)

    Buchananite Paleocon

    I stop trusting Establishment Republicans who want to keep our troops out there and won’t defend our culture here. I begin to suspect that most non-whites don’t share my beliefs, but trust that they can be converted.

    Ethno-nationalist: I trust my people, find Kevin MacDonald, and name the “enemy who hath done this.” (Matt. 13:28-30. Great parable, btw!) Yes, I still trust Christianity here.

    Alt Right: I don’t trust most of my own people, but believe they can be converted. Anger rising.

    Full Fash Propertarian: Let those that convert, convert. Suppress those that don’t. Destroy those that resist. Time’s up.

    If there’s a step from here, that step can’t be far from near total destruction. And I’d be so angry at that point, I wouldn’t care.

    Interestingly, anger has actually focused, but mellowed. I’m less affected by anger than ever. It’s a math problem.

    Things will play out deterministically, and I trust that whatever role I have to play (commensurate with my level of agency) will be sufficient.

    Sufficient to what? Sufficient to be remembered by those that come after if we win, and sufficient to look at myself in the mirror one last time and say “you have fought the good fight; you have run your course; you have found and kept the true faith.”

    I don’t need more than this.Nov 4, 2018, 11:58 AMGL SevierAbsolutely, spot on, increase in anger and decrease in trust, and just like the conservative to paleo to ethno, to alt right, there is no going back.Nov 4, 2018, 3:53 PMElgin McConnell LoneyThat goes both ways, NoahNov 4, 2018, 8:04 PMJoe FossLeftist fear is different than conservative fear.

    The left is “scary-wow-bad” while the right is essentially “will we make it?”

    Undirected general fear. Also known as concernNov 5, 2018, 6:07 AMCurt Doolittleshort term long termNov 5, 2018, 6:19 AMCurt DoolittleyesNov 5, 2018, 6:19 AMJames Lyons Sr.Ain’t scared!

    Cept bears, bears gonna eatNov 5, 2018, 5:39 PMWHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM? BE SERIOUS….

    This constant accusation of ‘fear’ isn’t ‘fear’, it’s DISGUST.

    The left (Herd) ‘fears’ the right(Pack) is ‘disgusted’.

    (I mean, this level of fake news outrage is just ridiculous)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:33:00 UTC

  • We all use the tools available to us to attempt express our will to power (deman

    We all use the tools available to us to attempt express our will to power (demand for agency).

    I have built a bunch of companies now, and am building a body of work. I’ve studied every field that I can study without getting my hands too dirty. I amuse myself teaching men of various agencies, as a way testing my work and improving my ability to communicate novel ideas.

    My ‘availability’ for ‘the students’ is simply necessary for my work (and somewhat entertaining since I have either been in a foreign country with limited circle, or here in the states with limited circle since I started working publicly) and my work relationships have always provided my social circle.

    I have had a thousand or more conversations with men and women from all walks of life who think using different words to change meaning is the same thing as acting to cause change in reality. And every individual does the same thing – try to make a story where the world fits his or her needs rather than adapting to the world such that one can seize the opportunity in it.

    So, we are not above a story we tell ourselves (yourselves) because selling a story is the only offering we have to attract attention with. If you have no capital, no organization, no income stream, no power relationships, are not politically engaged or engageable, not strong, athletic, or martial, then you have nothing to sell but stories.

    And if that is the case, then you probably are not willing or able to work hard enough to acquire any of the above.

    You can spend your prime years attempting to tell stories, and sell them. You do what you can with the rather good mind you (y’all) have. And with enough practice over six or ten years, you will either abandon it or find some use for it. But you could be working in craft, commerce, entertainment, education, or politics instead – and while you have probably lost seven to ten years of life to maleducation, you can spend another six to ten selling a story until your consequent failure is sufficient evidence for people your age to dismiss you.

    I’m a scientist, and those of you who sell stories, well, you need, want to be, and admire the priesthood- or rather the secular version of it – just as do all members of the academy. If you are on the libertarian or right end of the spectrum, you are just on the outside of the mainstream, and cannot employ it in the academy and are not knowledgeable enough yet to employ it in the media (might happen). .

    I understand this. But I have an approach to the problem of the present era, and that is to move the world forward, IN THE TERMS OF THOSE WHO HAVE AND MAINTAIN, POWER. Those people with whom I have understanding and experience.

    So, you know, if you want to tell yourself stories or create an english speaking version of the european new right, then I think you will need to work pretty hard at it.

    I will just move forward with ‘if it isn’t true, then how to I satisfy market demand truthfully’. And provide a solution that is in the material economic and kinship interests of enough of my people to cause them to demand that implementation by force.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:17:00 UTC

  • JAMES ON “HONOR (GLOATING) IN DECEIT” Regarding “honor-in-deceit”, let’s tease t

    JAMES ON “HONOR (GLOATING) IN DECEIT”

    Regarding “honor-in-deceit”, let’s tease this out because it is beyond that. If you remember Japanese, say during WWII, only cowards surrender. I true warrior would rather die in battle or by suicide (not agreeing with hat, just observing).

    So here we have not just “honor-in-deceit” but “mocking, and gloating”, so that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon.

    Then if you simply close the doors and say never again they come back, please please or you are racist! to let them in. Then you will get punked again and they laugh and mock you.

    Let’s Repeat That:

    —“It’s not just honor-in-deceit, but a mocking, and gloating, that if you TRUST and show HONOR and get cheated — you got punked like a farm animal and are shat upon.”—

    They POISON the MORAL WELL, and leave only the option for physical retaliation.

    Which is precisely what HONOR REQUIRES (duty, cost of maintaining the commons).

    If we argue and disagree we can separate.

    If we argue and insult we must punish.

    That is the only way to preserve the moral and informational commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 08:53:00 UTC

  • It was different reading SCI-FI in the 60’s and 70’s than it is today. Memories

    It was different reading SCI-FI in the 60’s and 70’s than it is today. Memories of the world war, the vietnam era, the cold war and space race provided context for them. The promise of a star trek future more so. Watergate, Vietnam Exit, and The oil crisis was a death blow. And so these things made us look for options. Which is why we threw ourselves at technology. when princess leah said “you are our only hope” that reflected our perception of the age of computers. So we had star wars, alien, Reagan Revolution, and the age of computers to run to. When I found neuromancer (1981 or 82) and then Snow Crash that was the future most of us went out to build. Why? unlike the cold war which was out of our control, building the world of Neuromancer was WITHIN our control… so we live it today.

    What I notice most is that the time for contemplation (demand for self entertainment when bored) is gone, and we pay the price for it. Good trade maybe. But the ‘pace’ of the world is insane by those standards, and even then, the adults thought the pace of the world compared to the war era was insane. My grandmother had a red-x painted on the door, and neighbors dropped off deliveries at the end of the property, and people hitched up horses to go to town for what they needed. A generation before that was without electricity or running water.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 07:56:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT “DEBATE” STRATEGY ISN’T TO DEBATE Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-d

    THE LEFT “DEBATE” STRATEGY ISN’T TO DEBATE

    Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.

    The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits.

    Left Wing = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique.

    Right wing = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”.

    The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency.

    It’s that simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 07:11:00 UTC

  • The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West

    [T]ruth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters. Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples. WE MUST RULE, IF NOT FOR THE SAKE OF ALL MANKIND, BUT OUT OF SELF DEFENSE.

  • The Truth Is Enough to Restore the West

    [T]ruth is enough. End the lies. End The Entire Abrahamic Program of Lies: False Reality, False History, False Promise (Moral Hazard), Pilpul (via positiva sophism), Critique (via negativa sophism), Straw Manning, and the Dysgenic Strategy of the Herd fearing being left behind by their betters. Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (worship), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what Those Who Lie had promised them. No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples. WE MUST RULE, IF NOT FOR THE SAKE OF ALL MANKIND, BUT OUT OF SELF DEFENSE.

  • Defending Hayek

    [T]here is so much “shyte” written about Hayek that it’s impossible to defend him against the cabbages of sophism. Look, Hayek in the sensory order, in the Knowledge Problem, in the Pricing System’s solution to the Knowledge Problem, can only be understood as he finally understood it, as a question of the Law, and the LAW as the institutional means of preserving the exceptionalism of western civilization. We do not submit to the market, we submit to the law, and we do so because it is, as in all cases, the means by which we provide no incentive to others to fail to submit to the law. The fact that we finally had power of the purse sufficient to interfere in the economy merely required hayek to expand it. Fortunately for me, and unfortunately for hayek, I was born after Turing (and chomsky) and Hayek before. So Hayek’s work can be completed in a method he could sense in the Sensory Order but not develop into the Science of Law he finally understood was the NEGATIVE means by which we produce positive ends. Popper got partway there. Hayek got partway there. Turing got partway there. Chomsky took turing and added a little bit more. But it was too late to prevent the 20th century’s consumption of the accumulated capital of western civilization.

  • Sun Tzu’s Art of War a Work of Agency

    SUN TZU’S ART OF WAR A WORK OF AGENCY (worth repeating) [T]here is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hece all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. (Said this sometime in the past few days and thought it needed repeating that these books are not on war. They are on restoring that which we are untrained in civil orders, and must be if we are to survive competitors.)

  • Sun Tzu’s Art of War a Work of Agency

    SUN TZU’S ART OF WAR A WORK OF AGENCY (worth repeating) [T]here is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hece all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. (Said this sometime in the past few days and thought it needed repeating that these books are not on war. They are on restoring that which we are untrained in civil orders, and must be if we are to survive competitors.)