Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE CHURCH PAST AND FUTURE: OURS. The Church was never in our people’s interest.

    THE CHURCH PAST AND FUTURE: OURS.

    The Church was never in our people’s interest. Ever. It was invented like marxism to revolt against and end the rule by the aristocracy, and suppress western empiricism, philosophy and stoicism.

    It was imposed upon the west by the byzantines (Greeks, Anatolians, Syrians, and Jews) as a means of reversing the Roman conquest.

    Once rome fell the church prevented the aristocracy from recovering.

    During the Abrahamic Dark Age, the church merely preserved the monopoly on literacy and manufactured supernatural public ignorance as a means of creating high paying administrative jobs, from which every possible cent was extracted from the people.

    Once trade was restored by the Vikings (Slavid Trade), Holy Roman Empire of the Germans (north south), and the Saxons and their Hanseatic League (continental), the people were able to overcome their submission.

    Once literacy expanded we resisted the church and created protestantism – if for no other reason than to keep our wealth near our homes.

    Once commerce expanded, we revolted against the church and put the 50% of dead capital in europe back to work, generating our great leap forward, and conquest of the world.

    Once scientific knowledge expanded we revolted against her deceits – superstitions and lies which made possible her accumulation of capital, administrative jobs, predation upon the people.

    But before we could restore our religion and culture under the German’s Second Scientific Revolution, the Russians and the British allied against the Germans to prevent their expansion and caused the long European Civil War (ww1 and 2), destroying the Germanic foundations of western civilization.

    And this left open the window for the Socialists (french and german), the Marxists ( jewish, and russian), and the then finally the Postmodernists (french) and the feminists (Americans).

    Only now to we save ourselves from these barbarians and their false promises of utopia after death, or utopia after revolution and replacement of white males.

    No man is a hero to his debtors. We must rule. If only out of self defense.

    There is but one natural religion for those of us who have ancestors to whom we owe debts: Ethnocentrism; Nationalism; Nature, Ancestor, and Monarchical Thanks (religion), and the inheritance that they have left us as Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Merit, The Natural Law, A Jury of our Peers, The Militia of Sovereign Men, Markets In everything, and the science and technology that has provided in the present, what *Those Who Lie* had promised them.

    No More Lies. Restore Our Natural Law, and Our Natural Religion, to our Natural Peoples.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 13:59:00 UTC

  • ARE YOU A MAN? OR WILL YOU EVER BE? Religion, Demand for Military Service (milit

    ARE YOU A MAN? OR WILL YOU EVER BE?

    Religion, Demand for Military Service (militia), and the demand to speak the Truth, quite predictably, are the three subjects that people resist the most – and flee from my work the most. The first (religion) requires you to retrain your emotions, which is costly, and the second (warfare) requires you end larping and put skin in the game, which is even more costly, the third (truth) forces you to confront your self worth, and your means of negotiating for your wants and needs – a lower cost, but one we resist bearing.

    Most men transcend the adolescent the moment they must manage either family of any size, or others in any size in either commerce or war. (Not in bureaucracy, but only in commerce, and war. Bureaucracy only maintains the illusion of merit, which is why women dominate political bureaucracy and men dominate commercial management ).

    Whereas in the past, most of us participated in the market as labor or farmers, a declining number of people both in government, academy, school systems, the medical business, charities, and large enterprises, are no longer participating in the market, and no longer forced out of adolescence into adulthood (manhood).

    YOU CAN’T HAVE PERSISTENCE ON THE CHEAP.

    You will either pay the cognitive, emotional, and physical costs of saving your people – or you will not, and they will perish.

    So leave adolescence behind. Become a man, Pay the costs of the intellectual (natural law), emotional (ethnocentrism), and physical (warfare) or look in the mirror and have the intellectual emotional honesty to say “I am not yet a man, and I never will be, and my people past present and future will pay the price for my cowardice.”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 13:20:00 UTC

  • THE FINAL WORD ON POLITICAL ORDERS Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutiona

    THE FINAL WORD ON POLITICAL ORDERS

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, with Nationalism under Monarchy the optimum Religion, and Rule of Law by Natural Law the optimum form of rule, and the choice of government that produces preferred commons dependent upon the condition of competition or war (Authoritarian), Prosperity and Safety (Jury), or Windfalls from Conquest or Invention (Meritocratic Democracy). There is no superior method of organizing people than by ethnocentricity, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity truth, duty, markets in everything, with Monarch as the judge of last resort, the militia of able men as the shareholders in the polity and its commons, defending all of of the above against all competitors or usurpers. The purpose of the militia is to deny power to alter the ethnocentric, nationalist, rule of law, hierarchical, market government, and the people who prosper under it.

    Period.

    Every alternative is but an attempt to conquer our people and end them. Therefore any and every contrary display word or deed, is an act of theft, war, genocide against our people and shall be reciprocated immediately.

    Therefore, this is the LAW OF OUR PEOPLE.

    …fin…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 12:29:00 UTC

  • GOLDEN RULE: THE LIMIT OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY by John Mark The Golden Rule works f

    GOLDEN RULE: THE LIMIT OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY

    by John Mark

    The Golden Rule works for *individuals* *choosing* to spend their *own* $/time/energy/investment to actively help others.

    As soon as you scale beyond the individual, it turns into communism – whoever is in political power *forcing* (by legislation) me to make investments in actively helping others that I myself have not chosen to make.

    That’s theft. It’s communism.

    The Golden Rule becomes communism as soon as it scales beyond individual choices.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 12:08:00 UTC

  • ELECTIONS – WELL, TIME TO END THEM. 1) A rotating system of individual elections

    ELECTIONS – WELL, TIME TO END THEM.

    1) A rotating system of individual elections is far easier to manipulate since forces (coercion) can be concentrated on one election at a time, where under simultaneous voting, it is extremely difficult to coerce every race without nearly infinite funds.

    2) With the advent of communication there is no reason for representatives any longer, whatsoever, nor for the houses of congress. There is every reason for either devolution of all power to the states, or direct democracy (equidistribution) or direct proportional democracy (by contribution). [There isn’t any reason for one single currency for all purposes any longer either. Nor is there any reason for distribution of liquidity through the financial sector and the credit system. In fact, that’s the source of the economic problem we face today.]

    3) Because it it is far too easy to influence politicians whether they are elected incrementally, through rotation en mass (as now), or all at once (in the athenian method).

    4) The purpose of scale whether at the jury, state representative, or federal representative level, is to increase the cost of bribery.

    Ergo it is time, given our wealth, to increase scale from representatives to the entire populace, since that bribery is impossible for OTHER than the state.

    (As for ‘comparison of legislatures to juries, the evolution of the legislature being Thang 12, 20, 100, or more, depending on the severity of the matter) > The Jury > Senate > Multiple Houses > Direct Democracy, is … well you’d have to be relatively ignorant of the origin of the western tradition and its roots in the sovereignty of individual men, leaving the Thang (Jury) as the ONLY POSSIBLE means of choice, and the Headman, Chieftain, King, Monarch, as a Judge of Last Resort.)

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 07:49:00 UTC

  • How Germany Made Use of Second Mover Advantage:

    BRITAIN VS GERMANY (how germany made use of second mover advantage: england betamax, germany vhs) By Aaron Kahland [I]’ll start by addressing education. Let’s take the metric of universities. Germany had more than ten before 16th century concluded whilst England’s third university was first founded in 1824 and Oxbridge were largely confined to theology and law. The protestant reformation led to compulsory education in Germany well before it was commonplace in England. The pietist movement in Germany led to the concept of ‘Bildung’ or a general education in the humanities which led to a revival of the study of the Classics. By the 19th century, whilst the Britons were busying themselves with superficial comparisons between Victorian and Roman periods, Germans were discovering places like Troy. By 1933, Germany had more Nobel Prize winners than all English speakers on the planet combined. But that is actually a poor metric considering that Germany invented the modern university and it became the model for the rest of the world and, importantly, the United States. I want to emphasize that i am not entirely convinced that the general education of the average German was better than that of the average Briton. Perhaps it was, perhaps it was not – I really don’t know. A good indicator might be book sales and what books were being sold in the 19th century. However, I would argue that by the 19th century, the upper 5% of Germans were better educated than Britons – and this is reflected in the fact that the Second Industrial Revolution occurred not in Britain but Germany. Whilst Britain was the origin of the Scientific Revolution – the Germans scholars absolutely embraced it and built their deucational institutions using the scientific method as a foundation. In fact I might argue that German philosophy was a response / reaction to that tremendous pace of scientific advance. By the 19th century in both France and Britain – Germany became synonymous with science and France had entirely given up hope of ever competing. It came to be understood, in Europe, that there was something peculiar about German civilization that provided it a technological advantage over others. It was this second Industrial Revolution – the fact that Germany now completely dominated electrics, machine tools, chemicals, pharmaceuticals that, in my view, was the cause of this civilizational conflict. By the late 19th Century the British ruling classes were determined to build a global Empire that would be run by a global English-speaking elite – the Rhodes Scholarship was established precisely for the purpose of selecting this elite on merit. Germany however, was the obstacle to achieving this because of her scientific advancement. (I baited Aaron Kahland into this post. He didn’t bite. So I just outright asked him. This is the result. lol -hugs )

  • On Demand for The Sacred

    ON DEMAND FOR THE SACRED: EUROPEAN MARKET OR SEMITIC MONOPOLY? 1 – Heidegger=german, which is the point of the discussion. Whether the Truth (knowledge, science, history, heroes, evolution) or Wisdom Literature (parables, fictions, myths) are the basis for civic contract (Monopoly). Or whether a hierarchy of graceful failure from the scientific to the religious is the basis of our civic contract (Market) 2 – The sacred can consist of us, ourselves, can be something else (creatures, anthropomorphic, or formless), can be of things (idols), can be of ideas (of books and words), or of anything that we owe a debt. Although, ideas, things, symbols-proxies for leaders, and ourselves is a very close to complete list of the possibilities. 3 – The sacred serves as a proxy between those who are not good enough to submit to one another. 4 – Religion consists of training (education) the intuition (emotions) so that people ‘feel like’ you do by taking advantage of our pre-cognitive biases. 6 – We can measure increase and decrease demand for ‘the sacred’ (proxies) and I am fairly sure the science of it (like that of status) is simply one that generates denialism. That is to to say that such therapeutic measures are unnecessary, but that they are not explicable.In other words, exposing the content and drive behind the ‘sacred’ makes the sacred impossible, thereby removing which is why it is denied. I 7 – So , to some people the scientific truth is sacred, to some of us (american constitutionalists) the constitution and by proxy ‘we, us, our-way’ is sacred. To some religious tradition is sacred. To some of us a monarchy or leader is sacred. To some of us family, tribe, and nation is sacred. To some of us mankind is sacred. To some of us the transcendence of mankind into the gods we imagine is sacred (that would include me). And to some of us we spread, combine, include, or exclude as suits our interests. 8 – Since debts of submission can be created along those and other axis, the behaviors we want to develop in a polity need only be expressible in all those paradigms – or at least, be sufficiently compatible that group persistence survives competition and shocks. 9 – So the question is, (a) what are those rules of group strategy obscured within and created by some sacred debt, (b) what paradigms within each grammar (system of thought) each system of thought which corresponds to a degree of agency and interests, given our age, class, and accumulated relationships and assets. 10 – it is not … challenging … to understand that the occult is an expression of vulnerability or powerlessness, that ritual an expression of mindfulness, that gatherings are an expression of inclusion, and that festival an expression of trust creation is rather simple. That the narrative content of a mythos allows us categories, relations, and values that can be taught to children (or idiots) which allows graceful (simple) calculation and coordination of cooperation is rather simple. 11 – I don’t do via positiva (religion, philosophy, and literature). I do via negativa law. While we differ in what is preferable and good, and we differ in demand for proportionality, and we differ in demand for liberty (opportunity), we do not differ in demand for reciprocity. Instead, we all seek to preserve our advantageous means of parasitism, predation, deception, and self deception. 12 – philosophy religion and literature (via positiva ) is for others (and frankly, for those who need them). I don’t do either. 13 – It is possible that the clash of civilizations between the german continental and the anglo scandinavian (naval) is simply that the british were smarter, better educated, and more evolved, and the germans, who were the “rednecks” of europe for all of her history, were, and remain a more sentimental people. I just don’t know if that’s an advantage or not. What it appears, is that it’s economically and militarily superior to follow the german model of TRUTH, DUTY, PIETY, AND RECIPROCITY.

  • Western Heroism and Semitic Submission – the Masculine versus The Feminine Across 3500 Years of History

    WESTERN HEROISM and SEMITIC SUBMISSION – THE MASCULINE VERSUS THE FEMININE ACROSS 3500 YEARS OF HISTORY (thanks to whomever asked me to comment) [I]t’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission. Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission. Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)). The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust. Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence. So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas. Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender. Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/

  • On Demand for The Sacred

    ON DEMAND FOR THE SACRED: EUROPEAN MARKET OR SEMITIC MONOPOLY? 1 – Heidegger=german, which is the point of the discussion. Whether the Truth (knowledge, science, history, heroes, evolution) or Wisdom Literature (parables, fictions, myths) are the basis for civic contract (Monopoly). Or whether a hierarchy of graceful failure from the scientific to the religious is the basis of our civic contract (Market) 2 – The sacred can consist of us, ourselves, can be something else (creatures, anthropomorphic, or formless), can be of things (idols), can be of ideas (of books and words), or of anything that we owe a debt. Although, ideas, things, symbols-proxies for leaders, and ourselves is a very close to complete list of the possibilities. 3 – The sacred serves as a proxy between those who are not good enough to submit to one another. 4 – Religion consists of training (education) the intuition (emotions) so that people ‘feel like’ you do by taking advantage of our pre-cognitive biases. 6 – We can measure increase and decrease demand for ‘the sacred’ (proxies) and I am fairly sure the science of it (like that of status) is simply one that generates denialism. That is to to say that such therapeutic measures are unnecessary, but that they are not explicable.In other words, exposing the content and drive behind the ‘sacred’ makes the sacred impossible, thereby removing which is why it is denied. I 7 – So , to some people the scientific truth is sacred, to some of us (american constitutionalists) the constitution and by proxy ‘we, us, our-way’ is sacred. To some religious tradition is sacred. To some of us a monarchy or leader is sacred. To some of us family, tribe, and nation is sacred. To some of us mankind is sacred. To some of us the transcendence of mankind into the gods we imagine is sacred (that would include me). And to some of us we spread, combine, include, or exclude as suits our interests. 8 – Since debts of submission can be created along those and other axis, the behaviors we want to develop in a polity need only be expressible in all those paradigms – or at least, be sufficiently compatible that group persistence survives competition and shocks. 9 – So the question is, (a) what are those rules of group strategy obscured within and created by some sacred debt, (b) what paradigms within each grammar (system of thought) each system of thought which corresponds to a degree of agency and interests, given our age, class, and accumulated relationships and assets. 10 – it is not … challenging … to understand that the occult is an expression of vulnerability or powerlessness, that ritual an expression of mindfulness, that gatherings are an expression of inclusion, and that festival an expression of trust creation is rather simple. That the narrative content of a mythos allows us categories, relations, and values that can be taught to children (or idiots) which allows graceful (simple) calculation and coordination of cooperation is rather simple. 11 – I don’t do via positiva (religion, philosophy, and literature). I do via negativa law. While we differ in what is preferable and good, and we differ in demand for proportionality, and we differ in demand for liberty (opportunity), we do not differ in demand for reciprocity. Instead, we all seek to preserve our advantageous means of parasitism, predation, deception, and self deception. 12 – philosophy religion and literature (via positiva ) is for others (and frankly, for those who need them). I don’t do either. 13 – It is possible that the clash of civilizations between the german continental and the anglo scandinavian (naval) is simply that the british were smarter, better educated, and more evolved, and the germans, who were the “rednecks” of europe for all of her history, were, and remain a more sentimental people. I just don’t know if that’s an advantage or not. What it appears, is that it’s economically and militarily superior to follow the german model of TRUTH, DUTY, PIETY, AND RECIPROCITY.

  • Propertarian Government?

    (FB Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT LIBERTY, RULE OF LAW, AND THE OPTIONS FOR GOVERNANCE: PRODUCTION OF COMMONS [L]iberty as far as I know refers to the condition produced by rule of law rather than rule by man. The principal problem with rule of law has been the means of decidability as to the scope of the law. This is why libertarianism failed – it does not define the scope of the law objectively and empirically rather than subjectively and preferentially. In the west this refers to reciprocity both between members, between members and the government, and between governments(international). However, commons must be produced since it is by commons the west outpaced (rapidly) the rest, in the bronze, iron and finally steel ages. We invented the corporation precisely because we have been practicing it for thousands of years – particularly since 700ad under bipartite manorialism (the agrarian corporation). Once the question of the limit of law is defined as reciprocity, the only question then refers to who and how the polity decides to choose which commons to produce that is in the interest of everyone in the hierarchy. A judge of last resort can choose the commons (monarchy). The monarch can choose the commons and then have another ‘house’ approve or not the appropriation of funds. Or a house can choose the commons and the people approve the appropriations, and the monarch (judge of last resort) hold veto. Or the people can choose the commons and then approve the appropriations for those commons, with a house, monarch, or judiciary veto those commons and appropriations. History appears to suggest that monarchs that must obtain permission from industry and the public in order to appropriate the necessary funds, produces the superior set of outcomes. And this is the lesson of the 20th century, and the reason for the systemic failure of democracy – even in the west. Not that we needed to repeat the lesson since it has been known since the ancient era, that democracy was the worst of all possible options. But because democracy coincided with the returns on the second industrial revolution (germany), from which our 20th century wealth arose, the state, academy, media complex has claimed this was due to democracy rather than democracy has brought that wealth to an end through redistribution of reproduction, destroying what that industrial revolution depended upon: the ‘white’ laboring, working, and middle classes – which are the only high trust such classes in the world outside of japan and korea. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine