Form: Mini Essay

  • Conservative Think Tanks -Vs- Liberal Protests

    October 8th, 2018 9:19 PM CONSERVATIVE THINK TANKS -vs- LIBERAL PROTESTS

    —“The Kochs fund conservative think tanks whose members publish thoughtful papers on current issues. The Kochs also fund a lot of PBS series and are involved in other educational endeavors. There is no comparison between what these philanthropists do and what Soros does.”—

    SOROS’ CONTRIVED MEDIA CIRCUS IN WASHINGTON: By Asra Q. Nomani https://www.wsj.com/articles/george-soross-march-on-washington-1538951025 In a series of tweets and rally comments, President Trump described the crowd as “an angry left-wing mob” of “professional protesters who are handed expensive signs” and “paid for by [George] Soros and others.” Mr. Trump’s detractors accused him of engaging in conspiracy theories, and even of anti-Semitism against Mr. Soros, a billionaire donor to liberal causes. ( … ) I started following the money for the “resistance” when it was born, hours after Election Day 2016. I have organized my findings in a spreadsheet I have made public. HERE IS THE DOC: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zYoQoffWRAHrECq2PDshlPvNpNDSLtdmNjtW-gUuhqw/edit?usp=sharing At least 50 of the largest organizations that participated as “partners” in the Jan. 21, 2017, Women’s March had received grants from Mr. Soros’s Open Society Foundations or similar funds in the “House of Soros,” as his philanthropic empire was once called internally. The number of Soros-backed partners has grown to at least 80. At least 20 of the largest groups that led the Saturday anti-Kavanaugh protests have been Open Society grantees. On Saturday I also studied the fine print on the signs as protesters waved them defiantly at the Capitol and the high court. They came from a familiar list of Democratic interest groups that have received millions from Mr. Soros: the American Civil Liberties Union, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the Center for Popular Democracy, Human Rights Campaign and on and on. MoveOn.org, a Democratic organizing and lobbying group founded with Soros money, sent its army of partisan followers regular missives that led them to a Google form to ask for train tickets and places to stay. Under a ginkgo tree on the East Lawn of the Capitol, Center for Popular Democracy field marshals put protesters through a “training” Saturday morning. “Are you ready to be arrested?” she asks. “Yes!” the crowd shouts, although one woman asks quietly: “For what?” “If not,” the field marshal orders, “stand in line for the visitor’s gallery so an experienced protester can go inside and yell.” One organizer hands out tickets to the Senate visitors gallery for the express purpose of violating the law. That they did—the proceedings were repeatedly interrupted by shrieks from the gallery. The agitators even have help with their handmade signs. Across the street from the Supreme Court, a woman uses supplies provided by UltraViolet Action to write, in Spanish: “No more rapists in power.” Back on the Capitol lawn, people from Megaphone Strategies, a public-relations firm founded by former Obama adviser Van Jones, manage interview requests from USA Today and other news outlets. Women’s March lieutenants exchange T-shirts for completed “Legal Support Sheets” with information in case of arrest. Suddenly everyone stands to walk in unison to the Capitol steps. When they arrive, the few Capitol Police officers on the scene silently watch them. The protesters walk up the stairs—though they don’t “storm” them, as the leaders have claimed. There are no barricades, no phalanx of armed police. Rethink Media created a “social media strategy sheet” back in August for anti-Kavanaugh protesters. One talking point: “Kavanaugh was hand-picked by dark money groups and their billionaire backers.” Rethink Media is itself a Soros grantee, and Saturday’s protests and unlawful disruptions were part of a well-funded, orchestrated network that books buses, hotel rooms and churches for such agitation. MoveOn.org wrote a guide, “How to Bird Dog”—harass officials in public places—in the spring of 2017, in preparation for town-hall meetings during a congressional recess. Over the past year, I have dialed in to MoveOn.org’s Sunday evening phone calls where they plan the operations and tell their “troublemakers” how to corner lawmakers. I still get alerts for their planning sessions. The last ones have been to # stopKavanaugh. MoveOn.org announced that its call the night after Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation would feature Ana Maria Archila, the Colombia-born sexual-assault victim who cornered Sen. Jeff Flake in a Senate elevator last month while a confederate screamed “Look at me!” She is co-executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy. Her salary was listed as $156,333, with a bonus of $21,378, in a recent Internal Revenue Service 990 form. What I have pieced together is an open secret but one that journalists tend to avoid. Many (including me) sympathize with the liberal causes Open Society champions. Some have been paid Open Society Fellows or grantees. And many are put off by conservative anti-Soros rhetoric, which gets truculent at times. Mr. Soros, much like the Koch brothers, funds causes he cares about. There’s nothing wrong with that, but democracy is better served if we follow the money on the right and left and find solutions where they are likeliest to lie: in the middle.

  • Conservative Think Tanks -Vs- Liberal Protests

    October 8th, 2018 9:19 PM CONSERVATIVE THINK TANKS -vs- LIBERAL PROTESTS

    —“The Kochs fund conservative think tanks whose members publish thoughtful papers on current issues. The Kochs also fund a lot of PBS series and are involved in other educational endeavors. There is no comparison between what these philanthropists do and what Soros does.”—

    SOROS’ CONTRIVED MEDIA CIRCUS IN WASHINGTON: By Asra Q. Nomani https://www.wsj.com/articles/george-soross-march-on-washington-1538951025 In a series of tweets and rally comments, President Trump described the crowd as “an angry left-wing mob” of “professional protesters who are handed expensive signs” and “paid for by [George] Soros and others.” Mr. Trump’s detractors accused him of engaging in conspiracy theories, and even of anti-Semitism against Mr. Soros, a billionaire donor to liberal causes. ( … ) I started following the money for the “resistance” when it was born, hours after Election Day 2016. I have organized my findings in a spreadsheet I have made public. HERE IS THE DOC: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zYoQoffWRAHrECq2PDshlPvNpNDSLtdmNjtW-gUuhqw/edit?usp=sharing At least 50 of the largest organizations that participated as “partners” in the Jan. 21, 2017, Women’s March had received grants from Mr. Soros’s Open Society Foundations or similar funds in the “House of Soros,” as his philanthropic empire was once called internally. The number of Soros-backed partners has grown to at least 80. At least 20 of the largest groups that led the Saturday anti-Kavanaugh protests have been Open Society grantees. On Saturday I also studied the fine print on the signs as protesters waved them defiantly at the Capitol and the high court. They came from a familiar list of Democratic interest groups that have received millions from Mr. Soros: the American Civil Liberties Union, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the Center for Popular Democracy, Human Rights Campaign and on and on. MoveOn.org, a Democratic organizing and lobbying group founded with Soros money, sent its army of partisan followers regular missives that led them to a Google form to ask for train tickets and places to stay. Under a ginkgo tree on the East Lawn of the Capitol, Center for Popular Democracy field marshals put protesters through a “training” Saturday morning. “Are you ready to be arrested?” she asks. “Yes!” the crowd shouts, although one woman asks quietly: “For what?” “If not,” the field marshal orders, “stand in line for the visitor’s gallery so an experienced protester can go inside and yell.” One organizer hands out tickets to the Senate visitors gallery for the express purpose of violating the law. That they did—the proceedings were repeatedly interrupted by shrieks from the gallery. The agitators even have help with their handmade signs. Across the street from the Supreme Court, a woman uses supplies provided by UltraViolet Action to write, in Spanish: “No more rapists in power.” Back on the Capitol lawn, people from Megaphone Strategies, a public-relations firm founded by former Obama adviser Van Jones, manage interview requests from USA Today and other news outlets. Women’s March lieutenants exchange T-shirts for completed “Legal Support Sheets” with information in case of arrest. Suddenly everyone stands to walk in unison to the Capitol steps. When they arrive, the few Capitol Police officers on the scene silently watch them. The protesters walk up the stairs—though they don’t “storm” them, as the leaders have claimed. There are no barricades, no phalanx of armed police. Rethink Media created a “social media strategy sheet” back in August for anti-Kavanaugh protesters. One talking point: “Kavanaugh was hand-picked by dark money groups and their billionaire backers.” Rethink Media is itself a Soros grantee, and Saturday’s protests and unlawful disruptions were part of a well-funded, orchestrated network that books buses, hotel rooms and churches for such agitation. MoveOn.org wrote a guide, “How to Bird Dog”—harass officials in public places—in the spring of 2017, in preparation for town-hall meetings during a congressional recess. Over the past year, I have dialed in to MoveOn.org’s Sunday evening phone calls where they plan the operations and tell their “troublemakers” how to corner lawmakers. I still get alerts for their planning sessions. The last ones have been to # stopKavanaugh. MoveOn.org announced that its call the night after Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation would feature Ana Maria Archila, the Colombia-born sexual-assault victim who cornered Sen. Jeff Flake in a Senate elevator last month while a confederate screamed “Look at me!” She is co-executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy. Her salary was listed as $156,333, with a bonus of $21,378, in a recent Internal Revenue Service 990 form. What I have pieced together is an open secret but one that journalists tend to avoid. Many (including me) sympathize with the liberal causes Open Society champions. Some have been paid Open Society Fellows or grantees. And many are put off by conservative anti-Soros rhetoric, which gets truculent at times. Mr. Soros, much like the Koch brothers, funds causes he cares about. There’s nothing wrong with that, but democracy is better served if we follow the money on the right and left and find solutions where they are likeliest to lie: in the middle.

  • THE COMING CIVIL WAR The coming civil war will consist of increases in radom vio

    THE COMING CIVIL WAR

    The coming civil war will consist of increases in radom violence – just as we are seeing now. Clashes between urban protestors – just as we are seeing now. Stalking and Attacking the Media and Political Class – just as we are seeing now. Assaults on infrastructure including media, data, energy, fuel transport, food transport, road, rail transport – which is likely to start soon after any further escalation by the state. And massive ‘taking to the streets’ (so called ‘chimping out’) with looting, burning, damaging. And finally Mass Conflict in the streets. At which point government, transportation, police, fire, emergency, first responders, the national guard, will be overwhelmed and retreat to their barracks. Once that occurs individuals and groups will be limited to self defense. And at that point the state will meet whatever demands they must in order to obtain order. The problem is, that after 90 days of raiding a large number of males will prefer that occupation to any other.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/08/24/revolution-never-has-an-empire-been-more-fragile/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 07:59:00 UTC

  • Of Course You Aren’t Going to Understand P Off the Bat.

    Um. You know. If i asked you “How would you go about creating a value-neutral, cross-disciplinary, fully commensurable language that could survive in court under testimony in all matters of conflict.”, I’ll bet you can’t even begin to imagine where to start and how to go about it. So yeah, that’s Propertarianism (or that’s the spectrum within Propertarianism, including vitruvianism->metaphysics, acquisitionism->psychology, compatibilism->sociology, propertarianism->ethics, testimonialism->epistemology, and algorithmic natural law->politics). And it includes reformation of every one of the grammars (disciplines). So of COURSE you aren’t going to understand THAT LANGUAGE off the bat. You aren’t going to understand how to convert from IDEAL language (pretense of knowledge) we use today to REAL language (demonstrating knowledge). Worse you are not going to understand how to convert your thinking from simple human scale justification, to post human scale via negativa falsification, and finally into well formed statements in operational language. So please don’t waste my time until you catch up to the people who HAVE done so. Ok. Yeah. Thanks. sigh…

  • WHAT DEMAND DOES POSTMODERN THOUGHT SATISFY? What Demand does Postmodern thought

    WHAT DEMAND DOES POSTMODERN THOUGHT SATISFY?

    What Demand does Postmodern thought satisfy?

    (FYI: Definition: A “Grammar”: rules of continuous, recursive, disambiguation, within a given set of semantic limitations.”)

    We produce arguments in their constituent …

    – Paradigms,

    – Frames, and ..

    – Ontologies,

    … using …

    – Names,

    – Relations,

    – Values,

    – Methods (operations) and their

    – cumulative imaginary (forecast) models (worlds)

    … to satisfy demand.

    We have little control over that demand as far as I know. But whether or not we do, we generate demand.

    But what demand do the various degrees of correspondence (and non-correspondence) with our three:

    – Physical-Sensory -> or;

    – Emotional-Intuitive ->, or;

    – Intellectual-Rational

    … faculties provide?

    And under what …

    – Geographic -> ,

    – Economic -> ,

    – Demographic -> ,

    – Political -> ,

    – Social

    … conditions?

    We have demonstrated an ability to speak in various grammars: using the …

    – Real-Pseudoscientific-Magical ->

    – Historical-Literary-Mythical ->

    – Ideal-Pseudorational-Sophistic -> and;

    – Supernatural-Theological-Occult,

    … meaning, in the …

    – Deflated (math, logic, algorithm, protocol, process) ->

    – Descriptive, (testimony) ->

    – Narrated, (story) ->

    – Inflated, ( fiction ) -> and;

    – Conflated,

    … models of comparison.

    Why do we choose the grammars (paradigms of communication)?

    Why do …

    – Abrahamists (theological) -> ,

    – Marxists (pseudoscientific) -> ,

    – Postmoderns ( pseudorational) -> ,

    – Feminists (mythical)

    … choose those grammars.

    And why do …

    – mathematicians and logicians (ideal) -> ,

    – scientists (real and historical) -> ,

    – jurists (real and historical) -> ,

    – and writers (literary)

    …choose their grammars?

    The answer is not the first series that will occur to you.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-07 08:29:00 UTC

  • enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

    I started out as a scientist performing research. I evolved into a jurist writing the law. Because of those efforts I wrote down the unwritten philosophy of the west. In doing so I advocate a set of possible choices that we would call a theory of politics today or a philosophy in yesteryear. I have an opinion in the construction of a system of education we call a religion within all of the above. To achieve them I use an ideology to market the set of solutions. So I have produced a complete system of thought entirely in the western group strategy captured in our law, which is our philosophy. But it is not a trivial system. It is a recipe for action. Not one of detachment that like all others limits our responsibility. Just the opposite. To obtain it enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

  • enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

    I started out as a scientist performing research. I evolved into a jurist writing the law. Because of those efforts I wrote down the unwritten philosophy of the west. In doing so I advocate a set of possible choices that we would call a theory of politics today or a philosophy in yesteryear. I have an opinion in the construction of a system of education we call a religion within all of the above. To achieve them I use an ideology to market the set of solutions. So I have produced a complete system of thought entirely in the western group strategy captured in our law, which is our philosophy. But it is not a trivial system. It is a recipe for action. Not one of detachment that like all others limits our responsibility. Just the opposite. To obtain it enough of us must take responsibility such that we act to bring it about.

  • What Demand Does Postmodern Thought Satisfy?

    WHAT DEMAND DOES POSTMODERN THOUGHT SATISFY? What Demand does Postmodern thought satisfy? (FYI: Definition: A “Grammar”: rules of continuous, recursive, disambiguation, within a given set of semantic limitations.”) We produce arguments in their constituent …

    • Paradigms,
    • Frames, and ..
    • Ontologies,

    … using …

    • Names,
    • Relations,
    • Values,
    • Methods (operations) and their
    • cumulative imaginary (forecast) models (worlds)

    … to satisfy demand. We have little control over that demand as far as I know. But whether or not we do, we generate demand. But what demand do the various degrees of correspondence (and non-correspondence) with our three:

    • Physical-Sensory -> or;
    • Emotional-Intuitive ->, or;
    • Intellectual-Rational

    … faculties provide? And under what …

    • Geographic -> ,
    • Economic -> ,
    • Demographic -> ,
    • Political -> ,
    • Social

    … conditions? We have demonstrated an ability to speak in various grammars: using the …

    • Real-Pseudoscientific-Magical ->
    • Historical-Literary-Mythical ->
    • Ideal-Pseudorational-Sophistic -> and;
    • Supernatural-Theological-Occult,

    … meaning, in the …

    • Deflated (math, logic, algorithm, protocol, process) ->
    • Descriptive, (testimony) ->
    • Narrated, (story) ->
    • Inflated, ( fiction ) -> and;
    • Conflated,

    … models of comparison. Why do we choose the grammars (paradigms of communication)?
    Why do …

    • Abrahamists (theological) -> ,
    • Marxists (pseudoscientific) -> ,
    • Postmoderns ( pseudorational) -> ,
    • Feminists (mythical)

    … choose those grammars. And why do …

    • mathematicians and logicians (ideal) -> ,
    • scientists (real and historical) -> ,
    • jurists (real and historical) -> ,
    • and writers (literary)

    …choose their grammars? The answer is not the first series that will occur to you. Curt Doolittle
    The Philosophy of Aristocracy
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

  • THE VULNERABILITY CREATED WITHIN OUR CIVILIZATION – TWICE by Marra McKinney “Whe

    THE VULNERABILITY CREATED WITHIN OUR CIVILIZATION – TWICE

    by Marra McKinney

    “When lower IQ people move to more feminised countries, they find an already existing parasitic environment (created by women) that is particularly well suited for people like them.

    Women there already complain that they are victims, that they are oppressed, that men are privileged, that they deserve special quotas and affirmative action, that they should be given stuff via the welfare system, via special (without competitive bidding) government contracts and loans, via special grants and scholarships for women and minorities, or via alimony and divorce.

    Obviously that environment will be great for low IQ “Give me, Give me, I’m Victim” people as well and they too will join the party and start behaving that way (until there are too many takers and the whole redistribution system collapses).

    In contrast, low IQ migrants won’t find a parasitic environment like that in Turkey, Israel or Japan. No one there feels guilty, could be made to feel guilty, or is going to give them anything.

    Men evolved to protect the perimeter against males from other (mainly patriarchal) tribes (chimps do the same). Having women involved in decisions about the perimeter (think of Merkel or Swedish feminists) results in what we see – open borders, multiculture, diversity, “tolerance”, border chaos.

    In nature, when you weaken the local males, then other males move in and replace them. You can observe this among lions, among primates, or among europeans. After feminist women (with the encouragement of jewish thought leadership) weakened their own men, then other men (muslims) started moving in.

    Males are the immune system of society. The nationalism that they create is the wall. Without them, there is no nationalism or resistance to foreigners. Weaken them, and then other foreigners, often males, start moving in.

    Thus, we can expect any ethnic group with large female influence and female leadership to self destroy, as the female leadership will not care about preserving their own ethnicity or group cohesion, leading to the feminised group opening their borders, trying to help anyone in need, accepting anyone in, and eventually becoming a minority in their own country.

    Women, for the most part, care about resources and smoothing conflict over. They evolved to fill that role. Women are less likely to support military action even against ISIS, a group known for enslaving women and using them as sex slaves, and are less likely to support ban on muslim immigration.

    Stockholm Syndrome is more pronounced in females . Women were frequently taken captive by (or in some cases traded to) other groups, and so they evolved to smooth things over with distant groups (whereas their male kinfolk were simply killed). The survival of their genes, unless they were exceptionally ugly, was more or less guaranteed – whichever tribe they end up being with. That is why they are more accepting of foreigners and foreign rule. Men form tribes. Women join tribes. So, women tend to vote for resource redistribution (from men) and being nice to everybody (including those who aren’t in their group), and for helping anyone in need, regardless of their group.

    Theory is that if you want to destroy an ethnic group, simply increase female influence in that group. Increase it a lot. And voila. Since females don’t care about ethnicity that much, and are less xenophobic, the country will open it’s borders, will try to help anyone in need, and will welcome everyone. As a bonus, you will also get a negative birth rate for the feminized host group.

    All kinds of other ethnic, religious and racial groups will move in, and will start vying for dominance; as for the feminized host group, its fate is to become a minority in its own country, to mix with the foreigners, and then to ultimately disappear.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 14:55:00 UTC

  • Deep Meaning

    DEEP MEANING —“Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, resulted in the fall of man… Perhaps the fall of man isn’t so much due to acquisition of knowledge but rather shifting the foundation of knowledge from spectra to dichotomy.”— Bill Joslin “WOTAN IS TO HELP THE MATURING MAN ABOUT IDENTIFYING THE DETAILS AND NUANCE WITHIN THE MYRIAD OF DEGREES FOUND WITHIN THE SPECTRUM BETWEEN THOSE LIMITS.” —“One of the beauties of operational thought is to exhume oneself from arguments of dichotomies to identifying spectra (the range of possibilities within limits). Eating the fruit of the tree of “good and evil”, a dichotomy, resulted in the fall of man… Perhaps the fall of man isn’t so much due to acquisition of knowledge but rather shifting the foundation of knowledge from spectra to dichotomy. There isn’t a good Wotan and an evil Wotan – there is only Wotan whose range of action and experience occurs within a spectra…. Like the rest of us – able to be ultimate asses and wise old silver backs with in one life, body and personality…. And that’s kind of the point. Dichotomies of perfectly good and perfectly bad are only useful to teach children about the tails of a spectrum… To distinguish the tails. Wotan is to help the maturing man about identifying the details and nuance within the myriad of degrees found within those limits.” —- Bill Joslin (from the “stuff I wish I’d said” department)