Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE by John Mark “They have no idea wh

    THEY CAN”T UNDERSTAND US – WE ARE ANTIFRAGILE

    by John Mark

    “They have no idea what is coming”

    —RE: “I thrive on attacks”– Curt

    This is an area where, from what I can tell, the Left truly does not understand the Right, especially the hard Right.

    We are antifragile. Because we have agency. A very large percentage (probably a majority) of our group are men of agency. If we did not have it, most of us would not be part of the hard right, because NPCs are incapable of paying the price one must pay – dedication to seeking the truth regardless of cost.

    Because leftists and NPCs lack agency, they have difficulty grasping what they are dealing with when they encounter a man of agency in the political realm. Most leftists alive today have never dealt with a political opponent like Trump in their lifetimes. (Reagan was a light version, but America was very different then.) The Left has no idea how to handle him except to double down on the same tactics, which merely energize him.

    My theory is, *they underestimate us* largely because *they cannot imagine being like us*. If *they* were subjected to the shaming they hurl at us, *they* would cower and conform. They cheer every time they censor one of us successfully, not realizing they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction. Because they are feeding the energy of the antifragile beast: men of agency of the West.

    Imagine being an NPC. You’ve never questioned the “popular accepted” narrative in your life. How could you have any idea what you’re dealing with when you’re dealing with Men of Agency of the West?

    They have no idea what’s coming. Just like they had no idea Trump would win, and could not fathom it, they cannot fathom the forces they have awakened by attacking us, our civilization, our honor, and our forefathers’ honor.

    WE LOVE THE FIGHT.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 15:53:00 UTC

  • “Are you a right wing libertarian?”— Hard to answer that question any longer.

    —“Are you a right wing libertarian?”—

    Hard to answer that question any longer. I write on Testimonial (Complete Scientific) Truth; the natural law of reciprocity; nomocracy (rule of law) under that natural law; the uniqueness of western civlization (individual sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, judge-jury-law, and the resulting markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war). In effect the formal logic and science of cooperation that we call ‘social science’ written as ‘law’.

    “Libertarian” now refers unfortunately to Anarchism since it was usurped by the anarcho capitalists. And “Liberal” has been usurped by the american socialists. And I have lost nearly all my confidence in any form of democracy other than markets – and in doing so moved those markets into the houses of government, eliminating monopoly rule. So classical liberal is not available to me either.

    You would find my policy recommendations left of center, but my democratic recommendations right of center, and you probably wouldnt understand my economic work.

    But in the end result, all questions of politics devolve into Masculine Meritocratic, Capitalization, and Eugenics, versus Feminine Equalitarian, Consumption, and Dysgenics. In that sense I am an economic paleolibertarian and an normative paleoconservative in that it is impossible to both be intellectually honest, and sufficiently informed in economics and biology to hold any other proposition than we must pay the underclass to stop reproducing very soon if not immediately, and we must end all underclass immigration and reverse as much of it as possible.

    There is no other option other than ‘faith’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:26:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_780420385

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_7804203851711512576_n_10156773963172264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003571_10156773963232264_278249366077046784_n_10156773963227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46147274_10156773963307264_1440236687652290560_n_10156773963302264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45986512_10156773963402264_187061742889598976_n_10156773963397264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46059111_10156773963472264_7868449265310236672_n_10156773963467264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46124379_10156773963647264_187492863116836864_n_10156773963637264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46093252_10156773971407264_1038939411942735872_o_10156773971402264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46101417_10156773984882264_1392653294735720448_o_10156773984852264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46002442_10156774005477264_4966488550875856896_n_10156774005462264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46174807_10156774005757264_4053197492349566976_n_10156774005752264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46049040_10156774006387264_1881615019074912256_n_10156774006382264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46139976_10156774006572264_2252364588999770112_n_10156774006567264.jpg Greg HamiltonInteresting I’ve been doing genealogy and unbeknownst to me most my ancestors end up from Normandy and that upper green part of France

    I was brought up thinking I was Irish and Scottish (and I am) I’m just a whole lot of Viking/Norman alsoNov 13, 2018, 2:21 PMCurt Doolittle(Same here)Nov 13, 2018, 3:38 PMGreg HamiltonLike most conquering peoples the Normans married into local ruling families.

    You can see marriages across the “border”a decent amount to obviously end hostilities

    Hence most the Irish, Scottish, and even the little Welsh blood I have.Nov 13, 2018, 3:50 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45981522_10156774006882264_555580631354966016_n_10156774006872264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46039330_10156774007112264_578697605630918656_n_10156774007092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030537_10156774008097264_1549148936495693824_n_10156774008092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030538_10156774008417264_4321074387852722176_o_10156774008407264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46253609_10156774008582264_2616270991826878464_n_10156774008577264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003568_10156774010212264_6147140267016192000_n_10156774010207264.jpg Dan AltschuldHbdchick is 👍Nov 12, 2018, 8:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46113180_10156774010252264_5399877263875375104_o_10156774010247264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46118480_10156774010232264_7779446354547310592_n_10156774010227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46043952_10156774010302264_983068145189126144_n_10156774010292264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46075107_10156774010332264_4012216013922762752_n_10156774010327264.jpg HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH

    ‏

    @hbdchick

    the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)…

    …tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)…

    …another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of *common* arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne…

    …these furrows *were* the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually…

    …the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place…

    …however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ …):

    …the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added,

    (oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.)

    …and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added,

    here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History…

    by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.)

    …and the outcome of all this, i think (*theorize*)?

    and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows.

    btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire

    (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640050.jpg …); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 …); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM …):

    and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm …

    oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their *common property regimes* (i.e. *collective* village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because…

    …of its collective nature

    wheat plus oats and rye. (^_^)

    SEE:

    (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    …. nw “core” european wheat farming WAS collective for something like 500-1000 years (depending on region).

    afaics, the diff ofc is *who* one is collective with: family? or unrelated individuals?

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 17:39:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_780420385

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_7804203851711512576_n_10156773963172264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003571_10156773963232264_278249366077046784_n_10156773963227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46147274_10156773963307264_1440236687652290560_n_10156773963302264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45986512_10156773963402264_187061742889598976_n_10156773963397264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46059111_10156773963472264_7868449265310236672_n_10156773963467264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46124379_10156773963647264_187492863116836864_n_10156773963637264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46093252_10156773971407264_1038939411942735872_o_10156773971402264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46101417_10156773984882264_1392653294735720448_o_10156773984852264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46002442_10156774005477264_4966488550875856896_n_10156774005462264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46174807_10156774005757264_4053197492349566976_n_10156774005752264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46049040_10156774006387264_1881615019074912256_n_10156774006382264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46139976_10156774006572264_2252364588999770112_n_10156774006567264.jpg Greg HamiltonInteresting I’ve been doing genealogy and unbeknownst to me most my ancestors end up from Normandy and that upper green part of France

    I was brought up thinking I was Irish and Scottish (and I am) I’m just a whole lot of Viking/Norman alsoNov 13, 2018, 2:21 PMCurt Doolittle(Same here)Nov 13, 2018, 3:38 PMGreg HamiltonLike most conquering peoples the Normans married into local ruling families.

    You can see marriages across the “border”a decent amount to obviously end hostilities

    Hence most the Irish, Scottish, and even the little Welsh blood I have.Nov 13, 2018, 3:50 PMKevin WuOnce you go Huguenot

    In France you are welcome notNov 13, 2018, 5:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45981522_10156774006882264_555580631354966016_n_10156774006872264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46039330_10156774007112264_578697605630918656_n_10156774007092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030537_10156774008097264_1549148936495693824_n_10156774008092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030538_10156774008417264_4321074387852722176_o_10156774008407264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46253609_10156774008582264_2616270991826878464_n_10156774008577264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003568_10156774010212264_6147140267016192000_n_10156774010207264.jpg Dan AltschuldHbdchick is 👍Nov 12, 2018, 8:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46113180_10156774010252264_5399877263875375104_o_10156774010247264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46118480_10156774010232264_7779446354547310592_n_10156774010227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46043952_10156774010302264_983068145189126144_n_10156774010292264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46075107_10156774010332264_4012216013922762752_n_10156774010327264.jpg HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH

    ‏

    @hbdchick

    the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)…

    …tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)…

    …another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of *common* arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne…

    …these furrows *were* the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually…

    …the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place…

    …however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ …):

    …the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added,

    (oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.)

    …and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added,

    here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History…

    by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.)

    …and the outcome of all this, i think (*theorize*)?

    and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows.

    btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire

    (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640050.jpg …); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 …); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM …):

    and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm …

    oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their *common property regimes* (i.e. *collective* village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because…

    …of its collective nature

    wheat plus oats and rye. (^_^)

    SEE:

    (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    …. nw “core” european wheat farming WAS collective for something like 500-1000 years (depending on region).

    afaics, the diff ofc is *who* one is collective with: family? or unrelated individuals?

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 17:39:00 UTC

  • ( You don’t get it. We’re going from gas station, to shop, to bar, to constructi

    ( You don’t get it. We’re going from gas station, to shop, to bar, to construction site, to campus to recruit door to door, town to town, city to city. Mao did it right. Men who argue are on the internet, but men who will fight and do so for booty, loot, power, and revenge, are those who are valuable. And they don’t care about arguments. They care about change for themselves, their families, and their people – and they care about punishing those who deprived them. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 21:00:00 UTC

  • MACRON TODAY Listen. Paris is the enemy of europe. Without question. Yes, Europe

    MACRON TODAY

    Listen. Paris is the enemy of europe. Without question. Yes, Europe should develop its own military and pay for it, so that the USA doesn’t have to continue to carry the burden of competing with the world.

    But paris is merely attempting to seize this opportunity once again to defeat germany. why? paris has a viable military and viable petroleum independence.

    What does germany have? The Mark (euro), An Export Economy, A superior work force, a more strategic geography, and a natural cultural and strategic alliance with Russia.

    So who is it better to unite? Germany and France, or Germania, The Intermarium, and Russia excluding France?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 20:27:00 UTC

  • STOMPING ON THE BUNNIES OF YOUR SELF WORTH (important if your self worth can tol

    STOMPING ON THE BUNNIES OF YOUR SELF WORTH

    (important if your self worth can tolerate it)

    —“Religion is what you do every day . doctrine and dogma are your expressions of your mental interpretations of your belief system.”— Ken Duggan

    Well, again,that’s a falsehood.

    A religion consists of a false presumption or more, a false promise or more, a set of narratives within those falsehoods, a set of rituals that demonstrate your investments in them, and a group strategy produced by all of the above.

    One can theorize (science and history), philosophize (reason and ideals), or fictionalize (theology and myths).

    A scientist doesn’t lie about that distinction. Both philosophers and theologians do.

    The reason you resort to religion is because the painful truth of your market value to others is too low to rely on philosophy (reason and ideals) or science science and the real).

    This illusion of self worth, social worth, market worth, is the ‘payment’ you receive in the form of mindfulness, in exchange for investing in training your intuition to calculate in falsehoods.

    Because in reality – few of us have much worth other than that we do no harm. And the benefits of the market created by doing no harm exist for us despite the fact that we have little or no value other than doing no harm.

    If that does not crush your ego, I don’t know what will.

    But that is the undeniable, painful, undesirable truth.

    Most people are dead weight on Mankind and The Planet, and the Universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 11:32:00 UTC

  • JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICI

    JORDAN PETERSON’S STRATEGY EXPLAINED FOR THE HARD (ARISTOCRATIC, MARTIAL, JUDICIAL) RIGHT

    Peterson preserves his ability to maintain a low intensity conflict, under the illusion that it is merely a low intensity conflict, as a defensive means of CONTINUING a low intensity conflict for a long period, and thereby accumulating attrition upon the enemy by continuous, incremental, cumulative means.

    THE RIGHT’S INTERPRETATION OF HIS ACTIONS

    The Aristocratic (Truth Telling Warrior) and Judicial (Truth Telling Natural Law) and Defensive Function (truth as extension of disgust, purity, loyalty) of both Martial and Judicial Aristocracy (“The Right”) objects to this technique – but in doing so, illustrates why Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Darwin, Nietzsche, and Military Grand Strategy are necessary courses of study: so that we do not confuse the moral, ideal, and eternal with the scientific, the real, and the temporal: we must retain REASON and AGENCY because of the PARTICULAR CASE, and not resort to HABIT and INTUITION because of the GENERAL standards of measure we rely upon for our group strategy.

    THE CORRECT CRITICISM OF PETERSON (AND HIS PEERS)

    My complaint against Peterson is consistent: (1) Truth proper is enough for western civilization because it is the source of the uniqueness of western civilization, and (2) his claim that wisdom (choice) is the same as truth (decidability) in order to (3) preserve his malinvestment in middle eastern literature (intuitionism) instead of exclusively western literature (reason), because (4) he practices his method of cognitive behavioral therapy (stoicism), by using storytelling (providing the objectivity of the observer) as a means of suggestion (which does succeed), instead of action ( demonstration), and self authority. And he does this because (5) he is artful in the technique of manipulation by suggestion using narrative analogy, and *possess moral intent* – but (6) failing to grasp that the entirety of the problem facing western civilization is that by not forbidding that technique of suggestion, we leave open the MAJORITY USE OF IT, by those who have *possessed immoral intent*: the abrahamists, marxists, feminist, and postmodernists. Because (7) we evolved to be suggestable by mothers using the feminine speech pattern, and it is the weaponization of that speech pattern under Abrahamism, Marxism, postmodernism, feminism – what we call ‘religious thought’ that has exploited the weakness not only in the modern Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist era, but also in the ancient Zoroastrian, Abrahamic (jewish, christian, islamic) era, that brought about the dark ages, leaving ONLY THE FAR EAST (by design) and sub-saharan africa (by cost of access) insulated from the exploitation of this vulnerability.

    THEREFORE

    Think of Peterson as tying some number of the enemy down in the the narrows (Thermopylae) while we (the army and navy) martial our intellectual (strategic) and physical (revolt, civil war). They cannot afford to lose this battle with him. (and they are losing it). But it is up to us to defeat them, crush the army of deceit (Abrahamic, Marxist, Postmodernist, Feminist) and to restore Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, The Rule of Natural Law, and Markets in Everything that result from all of the above, with TOTAL DENIAL OF THE ENEMY of the field of exploiting our people’s weakness to suggestion by ‘want of the comforting and desirable narrative of our mothers that calms us in times of stress’.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 10:40:00 UTC

  • THE MARKET WILL SUPPLY THE ANSWER IF YOU CREATE IT. MARKETS NOT PLANS. GOALS NOT

    THE MARKET WILL SUPPLY THE ANSWER IF YOU CREATE IT. MARKETS NOT PLANS. GOALS NOT TASKS.

    Excuse me for reveling in it a bit, but you know, it seems like Bill’s group has percolated a set of arguments in form of traditional wisdom on top of the analytic content, and that this is the ‘market’ providing leadership by consequence rather than design. It is not what I would have intended, but it is what the majority of men need.

    I had hoped to work with those few young men that fell prey to the easy temptations of authoritarianism, to create a cadre of very analytic judges like myself – because it is the intellectuals I want to fight on intellectual terms in the open field of public debate. And I suspect I must learn something from that failure. That ‘the dark side’ of simplicity is too tempting for the impatience of young men, too inexperienced at the conflict of men of achievement, to have the patience to conduct intellectual warfare rather than the duels of the young men seeking quick status rather than accumulated capital.

    That failure aside, It seems the scientist and engineer in me has produced what I desired. But that the talent of these men has produced what the market needs.

    The market will produce leaders. They merely need the weapons with which to conduct the current war, rather than the last.

    The leaders of the revolution will come from those that do not seek quick personal accolades, in internet duels, but COMBINED ARMS in producing that spectrum of ideas necessary for the spectrum of packs of men to understand, execute, and bring in to fruition.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 21:17:00 UTC

  • Studying legal papers and theory you quickly learn that law is ignorant of econo

    Studying legal papers and theory you quickly learn that law is ignorant of economics and scale. You learn that the problems lawyers and the courts face are problems of economics and scale. You learn that they are trying to solve a social science problem with a crude instrument that changes slowly. Jurist and Lawyers have seen the atomic but not the aggregate. and so it creates a kind of disciplinary blindness. The problem with the profession is that while we have common and continental law, we have lost or only just discovered natural tort law, which solves problems of juridical decision making, where conflating the law with legislation and regulation and to some degree command, create all those problems of interpretation.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 19:26:00 UTC