Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46381393_10156781829982264_648151075

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46381393_10156781829982264_648151075097935872_n_10156781829977264.jpg James SantagataHere’s the deal. Most people have been trained and indoctrinated to believe, actually to “know” that assassinations, death squads, revolutions and civil wars are what happen in less developed or developing countries, not ours…. and that the time for that has long passed, that it would be actually immature. So, once it does kick off, that feeling of power and freedom (think a big drop on a roller coaster) kicks in….. elation…. and an epiphany, that violence not only works, it is the only thing that works, and is timeless. And then people are like – wow, lets break a few things, and fuck some people up.Nov 16, 2018, 8:04 AMTed MidwardShutdown liquor distribution and cancel knyggerball indefinitely. This is the only way to awaken the White Goyim.Nov 16, 2018, 8:33 AMTed MidwardYeah, violence is pretty persuasive where reason and diplomacy fail. This is me speaking as an amateur historian, not endorsing political violence for the record.Nov 16, 2018, 11:40 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-16 07:45:00 UTC

  • THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH (important sequence of ar

    THE GENETIC – DENIERS AND PLOMIN’S UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH

    (important sequence of arguments)

    There are reasons why so many people in the postwar, postmodern, feminist, and underclass movements are rigid deniers of our indifference from breeding of any other domesticated animals, and the similar differences in trait expression. We know those reasons. The fact that people believe the ‘nurture’ fallacy correlates with all other similar social cognitive biases and related fallacies, because people actively select for these falsehoods because their genes encourage and force them to. Even if confronted with the overwhelming evidence that the pseudosciences of Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et all, they will admit the science but deny its application in order to defend their genetic drives. We can easily measure these differences in brain structure with female biased brains favoring this “herd-prey illusion” and male brains favoring the purely empirical “pack-hunter” bias. Evolution gave us those genetic biases for obvious reasons given the distribution of reproductive responsibilities.

    Genese do not exist in isolation, no, however:

    (a) modification of genetic disposition is endocrine and developmental it does not modify the genome

    (b) In the nature-nurture debate it’s 80% nature, and the rest adaptation to circumstances that FAVOR that nature.

    (c) Nurture can only HARM but not improve the individual

    (d) Education only falsifies tests but over time all of us grow into (form to) our genes.

    (e) The most important decision you can make for your children is who you mate with, since regression to the mean is impossible to avoid without controlled breeding (what europeans did for the past 1300 years until 1960)

    (f) This is contrary to mother’s instincts (they intuit everything through amplified perception because they must given the fragility of young, and high pre-modern child mortality rates) and contrary to the instincts of feminized males, but it is incontrovertible in the data. This amplified perception begins in puberty, and is the source of the overwhelmingly common female mental illness when women are not supplied with sufficient child rearing responsibilities in order to burden the cognitive-emotional load.

    (g) These facts are impossible for the pseudoscientists and sophists (created by Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno, Derrida et al) in the marxist, postmodern, feminist movements to accept because it means (correctly) that:

    i) man was not oppressed but domesticated like every other animal and plant, and that those who are on the left are still incompletely domesticated.

    ii) classes are natural reflections of necessity given the abilities of the individuals to both process information and suppress animal impulses, the most common of which is gratification-delay,

    iii) no marxist, postmodern, feminist revolution is possible because the competence structure necessary for the preservation of human standards of living cannot tolerate any other distribution than the Pareto.

    iv) the optimum possible social order requires continuation of the Truth over Face of western civilization that requires we all understand our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value (our ‘status’) is genetically determined, and that we can only create small homogenous ethnocentric polities that due to kin selection are biased to the highly redistributive. But that you are stuck with your ‘status’ at birth unless you are overwhelmingly lucky to match extreme effort with extreme luck.

    So no, Plomin tries very hard to mollify the Genetic-Denialist movement but the data is in and incontestable – Genetic determinism is what it is and we are no different from breeds of dogs, and the differences between individuals as well as groups is the same as the difference between breeds of animals, or in the case of great apes, that we are effectively as different a series of species as are bonobos and chimpanzees.

    This is totally intolerable to the feminine-marxist-postmodernist-feminist dysgenic religion of pseudoscience, sophism, and denialism, invented by boas, marx, freud, adorno, and derrida etc as a counter-revolution against Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, Maxwell, Poincare, and the second, german, scientific revolution.

    The eugenicists were right and the chinese will get there first and they will win the war – unless we end the pseudoscience, sophism, denial, and deceit of the left cult of equality.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 13:27:00 UTC

  • Mesopotamian (Semitic) literature is underclass the same way that greek literatu

    Mesopotamian (Semitic) literature is underclass the same way that greek literature is upper class and roman literature (and english for that matter) is middle class. River lands and Forests are wonderful. Deserts suck. People are ignorant, dirty, superstitious poor, and tribal. Disease is rampant. Violence endemic. Thieving heroic. There is a vast difference between the wealthy and the poor. This is not so true in western civilization for geographic and demographic reasons. Just as it was not true in east asia. Just as it was less true in india. So while western lit is heroic (early european, aryan european, greek, roman… all of these are heroic literatures. They are not the submissive literatures of the mesopotamians and the egyptians. Whatever happens along the euphrates and the nile, we can certainly see in Gobekli Tepe and in all of the cities in the near east. Submission. This is not the literature of the hittites (anatolians), old europeans (balkans),

    There is a relationship between the russian steppe people, the mongols, and the turkic raiders, in levels of development and harshness of nature, but also an influence and more genetic similarity with the other post-ice-age peoples of europe, which were more influential via the scandinavians, pole-germans, germans, and even french.

    The church came into slavic peoples without being able to create an extractive political order as they were in europe. The bad people were the boyars, not the church. Where europeans took out their anger on the church and the aristocracy, americans did it on the aristocracy, europe in general, but were fully protestant and lacking central church political power, so without need to rebel against.

    During the period where east slavic people would have rebelled they had ‘better enemies’ to rebel against than the church. SO they did.

    Not very difficult really once you understand it but it has been very hard for me to understand it for some reason.

    So, the literature of suffering seems to be a continental thing, where the scandinavians are just pagan in spirit still. Germans are nauseating sometimes because of it. Russians nihilistic. And americans (and brits) have no cognizance of it whatsoever. Because we believe the world is under our control if we want it to be.

    So I am hostile to the submissive narratives for our people. Tragedy is a better substitute (and a western invention by the way), and tragedy calls upon us to fight together, not just suffer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 08:55:00 UTC

  • THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS: (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restori

    THREE IMPORTANT IDEAS:

    (1. I’m not the same as my online persona, 2. I’m restoring violence to the discourse in order to teach the law, and 3. the law I have written recasts libertarians as the judges of the commons.)

    Stellar conversation with James Fox Higgins this morning. 100 minutes. Can’t wait to share it whenever he releases it.

    I learned a few things that I need to get across to the audience.

    1. Um. Please be respectful just to maintain my incentive to invest heavily in being available, but do no not be afraid of me. I am very conscious of what I am doing. When I argue online i’m acting as a judge and prosecutor on one hand, and a disciplinarian of rowdy boys on the other. I am more accommodating as a CEO and even more so as an ordinary guy in conversation. My online personality is my JOB. It is not ME. I am very different in my roles as conversationalist, CEO in business, theoretician-professor, and Prosecutor-Judge.

    2. I am very consciously restoring violence to the discourse, and a lot of my persona and positioning is to do so. Obscuring the fact that violence to force people into markest is the origin of that order we call civilization. It’s not that I enjoy or advocate violence, It’s that upon entry of women in the the political and commercial arena we overly-softened the fact that it is violence alone that creates it, and that the non-violent are RIDERS on that order created by that violence. Conversely, a very small number of men can easily alter the status quo – and have, for millennia.

    3. One of the reasons I set out to destroy the libertarian movement is to restore it to leadership of the conservative movement, by eliminating the attraction of the pacifist narrative of the rothbardian (common property marxist) message. In other words, I worked to deny libertarians the field of ideology and return them to the field of law. Biologically and socially, libertarians serve as the JUDICIAL minority between feminine consumptive, and male conservative genetic interests, by insuring that trade is remained. I WROTE THE BOOK OF LAW TO MAKE THAT JUDGEMENT POSSIBLE. Ergo, I need to drive libertarians into roles as JUDGES of the LAW, under european high trust “commons” law, not semitic low trust “ghetto” law. And that is what my work does: I wrote THE LAW. The one law of reciprocity from which western civilization evolved and out-competed other civilizations in rates of adaptation and innovation.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 08:49:00 UTC

  • THE COMING CIVIL WAR (from elsewhere) The Left Demonstrates. The Right Wars. Dem

    THE COMING CIVIL WAR

    (from elsewhere)

    The Left Demonstrates. The Right Wars. Demonstration is cheap and incautiously undertaken. War is expensive and cautiously undertaken. The Right are simply waiting for an excuse to make an example of ANTIFA. When that happens it will be the means by which this cold civil war turns hot. The Right wants that war. As soon as possible. And ANTIFA is the excuses they need to start it.

    In any civil war it requires one tenth of one percent of men to fight, and between one and three percent of men to assist them.

    There are 30M dedicated, conservative men on the Right with nearly all of the weapons and ammunition. A significant portion have military experience, or are, or were police. 70% of the military and police will defect to the Right either outright or by holding their posts and offering feigned resistance.

    The right will act during the winter, and cut the power and data, the fuel transport, the food transport, and the rails. No ATM’s, no EBC cards, no heat, no fuel, no food, no water. The rest is setting fires, and letting the cities fall under their own weight.

    There are only two cities capable of any degree of non-normative policing and those are NY and DC.

    There are a total of 2M military personnel, and another 1M government personnel.

    Never has an empire been more fragile.

    Any civil war will be a slaughter.

    And it’s coming.

    Soon.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-15 08:32:00 UTC

  • THE INSTITUTE AS A DEGREE ISSUING “INSTITUTION” Regulations in the United States

    THE INSTITUTE AS A DEGREE ISSUING “INSTITUTION”

    Regulations in the United States require only a business license and the payment of taxes, and do not require a business issuing degrees to possess accreditation prior to the conduct of operations. The reason being that the accreditation process takes a long time – usually years – and accrediting an operating organization is less failure prone. That does not mean the criteria for accredited organizations can be ignored, just that the startup costs and time of issuing degrees in the Philosophy of Natural Law (whether in the context of ‘theology’, philosophy, or law. The value of accreditation is that it gives access to student loans, and therefore a broader range of students, a broader range of classes, and a larger pool of professors. There are a great number of advantages to conducting business as a THEOLOGICAL rather than purely academic institution and we are still exploring that choice. This allows us to explicitly require physical, emotional and intellectual training for satisfaction of degree requirements. Furthermore, the positioning of Natural Law as a Religion has additional benefits. So again, we are working through it. Because it is not so much that you would use such a degree for career purposes (any more than any philosophy degree).

    As such we WILL BE ISSUING DEGREES.

    Anyway. More as thoughts evolve on this matter.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 16:26:00 UTC

  • HEROISM AND COSTS by Luke Weinhagen Heroism is the application of virtue where t

    HEROISM AND COSTS

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Heroism is the application of virtue where that application has a potential direct cost to you.

    It is hard to train for directly because people interpret virtue so subjectively but training the foundation, overcoming inaction in the face of costs, is something anyone can do. Expose yourself to situation where you have a strong possibility to fail. Fail. Get back up.

    It is best if your parents do this for you as young as possible, but nowadays most parents don’t. So it is likely up to you.

    Find something you are motivated by (so you have a reason to get back up) that also offers you the likelihood of initial failure and overextend yourself into it (ideally not something that will kill you is you are just beginning to embrace failure).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 13:07:00 UTC

  • PETERSON’S FUNCTION IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY Peterson is a clinical psychologist

    PETERSON’S FUNCTION IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY

    Peterson is a clinical psychologist (cognitive behavioral therapist), and his research includes the impact of personality traits on individual and group behavior. His work (authorship) is largely an attempt (knowingly or not) to restore Stoicism. He has (successfully) identified the relationship between jungian categories and literary archetypes and uses those narratives just as the priesthood has, to teach therapeutic concepts by suggestion rather than CBT’s direct exposure. (I am less interested in this technique for therapy but an advocate for its use in teaching (pedagogy) in the first place – since universal prevention eliminate most of the need for therapeutic correction.) So he is providing Stoicism without (a) social separatism, and (b) the ‘woo’ factor. Even if he is providing it (c) for therapeutic and self improvement use, rather than (d) a program for restoring western civilization from the INFANTILIZATION MOVEMENT we call marxism-postmodernism-feminism. There is a worldwide demand for Stoicism because we have almost (finally) restored the level of civilization achieved by the late Empire before the Abrahamic Dark Age. And once we understand institutional restoration required until the age of napoleon, and intellectual restoration until the 2000s, that abrahamic dark age was TWICE as devastating as the first: the Bronze Age Collapse.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 09:25:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM I think you’re looking at the differences between lea

    THE MEANING OF NEO-MARXISM

    I think you’re looking at the differences between leaves rather than the forest. In the end, the criticism is marxism is pseudoscience, postmodernism is sophism, and feminism simply false, and that these three movements, by making false statements and impossible promises are leading people into sadness and our civilization in decline.

    I study the abrahamic > marxist > Postmodern technique of argument (false promises, pilpul (justificationary sophism) and critique (reputation destruction) as the institutionalization of the female anti social personality expression as a persuasive technique. All these are guments use the same technique. They are all false. And they all cause the damage Peterson Claims.

    So the none of the details matter – they are but different decorations on the underlying lie.

    The term Neo Marxism refers to the transition of the means of UNDERMINING (reputation destruction) from the Marxist economic to the postmodern cultural complaint. Egro, yes Abrahamists > Marxists > Postmodernists > Feminist.

    Same technique, same goal, while changing only the critique.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:53:00 UTC

  • RE: PETERSON VS ZIZEK 1) PETERSON – JP is a clinical psychologist (cognitive the

    RE: PETERSON VS ZIZEK

    1) PETERSON – JP is a clinical psychologist (cognitive therapist), and he researches the impact of personality on behavior. His work is largely an attempt (knowingly or not) to restore Stoicism. He has (successfully) identified the relationship between jungian categories and literary archetypes and uses those narratives just as the priesthood has, to teach therapeutic concepts by suggestion rather than CBT’s direct exposure. (I disagree with this technique for therapy but not for teaching in the first place.) There is a worldwide demand for Stoicism because we have almost finally restored the level of civilization achieved by the late Empire before the Abrahamic Dark Age.

    So to flip it around, what is Aizek but a someone who has stolen and parroted others ideas and then practice Critique (Gossip)?

    2) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOBALISM – We don’t need to debunk marx, that’s been done for decades. Marx created a fairy story. (a) Man was not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated by his betters, like every other domesticated animal. Societies advanced best and fastest who most culled the underclasses (European Bipartite Manorialism, and East Asian Rice Farming) and culling the underclass is the cheapest, fastest, most secure means of improving the standard of life of the citizenry. (b) labor has little or no value since it is the organization of production that creates the value, and labor is a fungible low value cost easily and continuously replaced by machines, computers, and now artificial intelligences. (c) the underclass cannot organize production, or govern, or lead because they lack the ABILITIES to do so (dunning kruger, distribution of intelligence). (d) all non-market social orders maximize rent seeking at the expense of the laboring, working, middle, and professional classes, while all market orders suppress rent seeking through competition. (e) the problem we face is immigration of the underclasses, downward redistribution of reproduction to the lower and underclasses, subsidies that encourage this process, and the continuous destruction of the middle class majority produced by centuries of manorialism (hanging, disease, and wars), culling those underclasses, (f) the political problem we face is financialization of the economy in addition to bureaucratic rents, (both of which are fixable by market means. (g) Marx-Boas-Freud-Cantor-Adorno(et al) proposed an underclass monopoly, while Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, a Middle Class, while Foucault, Derrida, Rorty a Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle, while Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin a Feminist, and Strauss-Neocons a Political/Military upper class monopoly. The left proposes MONOPOLIES (a herd) and the right proposes MARKETS (packs).

    3) FASCISM, NAZIISM, NATIONALISM – Naziism like all Fascism was providing an alternative to (Bolshevik) World Communism. It was the most successful implementation of the original French Proposition. Peterson knows this just as any scholar knows this.

    We are still fighting this warfare of Nationalism (A Market of Polities) and Globalism ( Monopoly Polity). and we have just complete a century of that test.

    (a) Each attempt by the globalists has failed, and (b) each attempt by the nationalists has eventually succeeded. We are currently in the last phase, under which we will restore nationalism worldwide and return to state-capitalism (fasicsm) most of which will be ethnocentric, and some which will not – and will devolve in to indian, muslim, african, and south american poverty.

    Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)

    -vs-

    Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) FAILED

    The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up.

    -The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science-

    Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique:

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:19:00 UTC