DON”T DEMONSTRATE YOUR INCOMPETENCE BY PUNCHING RIGHT.
You’re punching against what you understand as trivial violations in loyalty or solidarity, because it’s all you have the intellectual capacity of doing. And because it’s the only thing others with the same limited intellectual capacity will respond to. What you aren’t doing is punching against the enemy and then defending yourself – because you lack the intellectual capacity and knowledge to defend yourself.
When you punch at Cantwell you’re jerking off. You would fold under pressure from the system. Everyone does. You would out people on your side who had undermined you. Everyone does. If you don’t t hink so you’re too inexperienced in the real world of real consequences to have an opinion.
You can punch at and Peterson (soyboys) for counter signaling ethnocentrism – despite the science says it’s the optimum. You can punch Molyneux (potential men) if he overstaps into denial. But punching Others for not taking the next step is just stupid. They are just a sales funnel for slowly dragging people into the fold.
I punch against ideas. I punch at specific libertarians and christians in general terms because they are allies of our ((())) ancient enemy. I try to avoid the punching right as much as possible unless someone punches me first.
Britain’s cline is northwest to southeast from celtic to scandinavian to german, very much like india’s cline from northwest to southeast is caucasian to dravidian.
This is somewhat difficult to state with clarity in my opinion because the migratory peoples were largely germanic(R1a/b) with a mixture of Nordics I1 (northern proto europeans).
However, culturally, germanic (land) and scandinavian(sea) differences evolved due to adaptation to territory.
So in this sense west scandinavians are and were a german nordic mixture, east scandinavians (nordics), while continentals german, and east continentals slavic, with continuous grading between them. Britain certainly appears west eurasian (culturally celt), scandinavian (germanic continental and nordic mixture), and germanic continental.
However IMO the empire divorced the british from germanic culture, whether german or french, and created something quite new. This culture failed at home in the UK after the collapse, and the country is struggling to choose between empire, german, and scandinavian group strategies.
Meanwhile scandinavians are committing suicide faster than the rest of us combined.
http://expand-your-consciousness.com/autistic-teenager-higher-iq-einstein-path-noble-prize/THE NEXT STEP IN EVOLUTION IS HERE. WE MUST REORGANIZE TO EXPLOIT IT. THE NEXT STEP IN HIGH INVESTMENT PARENTING.
My view is that autistics (like me) are the next step in neoteny, and that this next step in our ‘evolution’ require an additional leap in high investment parenting, just like homo-sapiens required an additional leap in high investment parenting.
“LIfe Skills” are a female code word for “don’t leave us behind in evolutionary development”. The feminine mind fears leaving behind, the masculine mind fears not running ahead.
Women demonstrably infantilize generations at every opportunity.
Our next revolution in government is to undo the damage done by women’s infantilization of the polity, economy, and civilization, by eliminating the artificial construct we call childhood, and adding 15 years back to our productive development, and participation.
My grandmother knit and sold mittens by the time she was four. Children were usually employed (particularly girls) by ages of five or six. Boys began their trades at seven. Boys commended ships at the age of twelve. Generals at the age of 14. We are graduating people from college with 100K in debt that don’t understand compound interest, basic economics, or the natural inequality of peoples – all because of the demands of women to ‘maintain influence and control’ – because they naturally lack the ability to do so by dominance in competition.
GOVERNMENT UNDER PROPERTARIANISM, NOT PROPERTARIAN GOVERNMENT. (AND THE ABSOLUTIST QUESTION)
(core)
Propertarianism consists of a methodology for producing truthful, rational, reciprocal, commensurable fully accounted speech that all but prohibits error, bias, deceit, and fraud. And the application of that method to the scope of human knowledge, producing a universal vocabulary and grammar commensurable across all disciplines.
With this methodology, applied to law, you can produce arguments, constitutions and bodies of law, that are fully commensurable, fully accounted, and prohibit error, bias, deceit, and fraud.
With these arguments, constitutions, and bodies of law you can produce any form of government – you just must do so truthfully with full accounting and transparency.
There is no ideal form of government because different forms of government are more or less suitable to different demographic distributions, degrees of neoteny, states of cooperative (middle class) development, and more or less suitable to times of war, peace, and windfalls.
There is however, an optimum system of government for european peoples, and any other peoples who wish to produce european standards of life, because this form of government provides the greatest limitation on rents, greatest incentive for production distribution and trade, and the greatest adaptability to change, greatest rates of innovation, and the greatest shared rewards (commons) because of all of the above.
That system of government consists in:
A Federation (nomocracy).
Of Nation States.
Under Rule of Law:
…Federally Limited to material conflicts between polities.
…Locally unlimited production of commons.
…Each Administered by an Independent Judiciary.
And Defended by:
…A Universal militia
…In Regimental Orders
…And a Cadre of Professional Warriors.
And either Limited Monarchy:
…A Hereditary Monarchy
…A Professional Cabinet
…Houses of Juries by Class (assent, veto)
…Privatized Bureaucracies
Or Narrowly Participatory Monarchy:
…A Hereditary Monarchy (assent, veto)
…A Professional Cabinet
…Houses as a Market between Classes (market)
…Privatized Bureaucracies
Or Broadly Participatory Monarchy:
…A Hereditary Monarchy (assent, veto)
…A Professional Cabinet
…Virtual Houses as a Market between Classes (market)
…Privatized Bureaucracies
With each state producing commons suitable to the interests and desires of the people.
I work under the model of progressive decline in sovereignty given ability to organize. The lesson of the soviet model is that
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53055587_10157018941932264_1430632320439681024_o_10157018941927264.jpg OUR WOMEN HAVE KILLED US
—“The west has a case of pathological altruism – self-destructive charity based on a narcissistic personality type and an addiction to dopamine.”–JWarren Prescott
Except it’s only because women do, and women vote. White men haven’t voted for suicide. OUR WOMEN HAVE.
THE WHITE MALE USA IS RED.Phill KnyspelThis is the problem with democracy. Politicians are always seeking new demographics to represent when they inevitably alienate the people were previously representing.
They gave women the right to vote and look at the mess they have caused. Now in my own country they want to lower the minimum age to vote.
I am half expecting in 30 years time they will be looking to give dogs and cats the right to vote hahahahaFeb 28, 2019, 5:10 PMGöran Dahl”Nature has given women so much power that the law has very wisely given them little.” – Samuel JohnsonFeb 28, 2019, 5:13 PMAlex KnepperWhite women vote RepublicanFeb 28, 2019, 5:20 PMPaul ListerNot the single or liberal ones.Feb 28, 2019, 5:21 PMAlex KnepperOr the young ones, but if we’re *just looking at ‘white women’ as a whole…yup, they do vote majority-RepublicanFeb 28, 2019, 5:21 PMThorvlad WotensonLimit voting to a function of the militia, problem solved.Feb 28, 2019, 5:27 PMMartin ŠtěpánAgain, not pathological. It’s maladaptive altruism.Feb 28, 2019, 5:44 PMGiego CaleiroThe description of the west is basically me in a nutshell.
Pathological altruism on a narcissistic dopamine freak.
And yet here I stand by your side.
The solution isn’t less Altruism but more.. the solution is to stop being altruistic only in space and be altruistic in time.
Most people will stop their altruistic impulses on their feelings, a few go as far as africa.
But the correct reasoning is to think of the full history of the universe, and maximize good that way.
If technology will save us that means reading Nick Bostrom.
If evolution is the only way and technology won’t change us dramatically, as I’ve argued, the solution is to make the Mormon patriarchy anti fragile.Feb 28, 2019, 5:49 PMGreg Hamiltonbut at nothing like the voting ratio of other groups.
The single largest group that votes outside their race demographics is white women.Feb 28, 2019, 5:54 PMMartin ŠtěpánBut giving women the vote and many privileges under the guise of equality was the case of maladaptive altruism in itself, I’d say. More specifically, maladaptive gynocentrism.Feb 28, 2019, 6:07 PMJWarren PrescottThis is why open border libertarians drive me up the fucking wall… It you want to perpetuate a population of red squirrels, don’t import gray squirrels.Feb 28, 2019, 6:15 PMMicah Pezdirtzas you said earlier, women (cognitive females) fulfill consumptive roles. they will consume. calling it destruction only addresses part of the equation. i also see a failure to produce regulation on that consumption. the real destruction affected the institutions (we did or didnt know we even had) that did produce those regulations.Feb 28, 2019, 6:20 PMJay Schmitt”Republican” doesn’t mean anything.Feb 28, 2019, 6:24 PMAlex KnepperIt means SOMETHINGFeb 28, 2019, 6:25 PMJay SchmittThank you. It’s time for men to stop beating themselves up. Focus instead on changing the popular conception of the rights and obligations of women. Women should be considered failures if they have fewer than two children. We need to shame them every chance we get. Call them what they are: useless freeloaders. Especially focus on “career women”.Feb 28, 2019, 6:28 PMMicah Pezdirtzinter-female control tactics (RRGSM) is not the only possible effective strategy. if we stop there, they will drag us down to their level and beat us with experience 😂Feb 28, 2019, 6:34 PMJay SchmittTime for some Scarlet Letter sheeeiiit.Feb 28, 2019, 6:44 PMPaul TrippOnly 48% of white women are killing us.Feb 28, 2019, 6:57 PMEdmund BlackadderProblem is more white men voted for their suicide than anyone else. Hell, there isn’t a suicidal way to vote if you aren’t white.Feb 28, 2019, 7:14 PMEdmund BlackadderThere’s a statically significant disparity between the way white women vote, and the way non-white women vote. You know this, so what are you trying to say?Feb 28, 2019, 7:17 PMBerti FritzEquality they fall for. Tool to our and our Women’s destruction and demise.Feb 28, 2019, 7:18 PMMarshal KhanI like to apologize for my fellow blacks for being this low IQ.Feb 28, 2019, 7:34 PMDuje DanteDo you even know the 14 words ?Feb 28, 2019, 7:35 PMSam Andrastekhttps://youtu.be/rWWfPWdbPC8Feb 28, 2019, 7:42 PMChristopher M MatthewsRepeal the 19th, make voting property owning males only.Feb 28, 2019, 7:44 PMJay SchmittNAXALT isn’t an argument.Feb 28, 2019, 7:51 PMJay SchmittLol at all the cucks trying to deflect blame to men.Feb 28, 2019, 7:51 PMAndrew ClaytonLiberalism is a false messiah and could well be part of the Fermi paradox. Just when you thought your “progressive” civilization was making leaps and bounds into the future, the systemic destabilizing effects of liberalism kick in, and BANG! You’re back in another dark age.
What pisses me off is the boomer-conservative delusion that they’re winning the hearts and minds of minorities by offering leniency. It’s just as expensive, and playing by their opponent’s rules. Pathetic.Feb 28, 2019, 8:09 PMAndrew ClaytonI should qualify that. It’s universal liberalism that’s the problem. Bounded liberalism can, and did, work wonders.Feb 28, 2019, 8:14 PMLan KenCiara ReedFeb 28, 2019, 8:34 PMRyan WilliamsChristopher M Matthews repeal of the 19th is the minimum standard of political seriousnessFeb 28, 2019, 8:42 PMAnthony RobinsonThorvlad Wotenson the Starship Troopers solution…Feb 28, 2019, 9:46 PMThorvlad WotensonAnthony Robinson lol the constitutional solution.Feb 28, 2019, 9:47 PMCristoforo Giuseppe BartoliniMarshal Khan You got Ben Carson and Thomas Sowell so you’re good.Feb 28, 2019, 10:58 PMJames BuckinghamSo half the population should not be entitled to a vote just because they don’t agree with you? That is not how democracy works mate, infact what you are suggesting is one part of the textbook definition of fascismFeb 28, 2019, 11:00 PMAndrew SpivakWomen hate you until they need you. Once they no longer need you, they’ll hate you again. It’s the spirit of Lilith and nothing can change it.Feb 28, 2019, 11:43 PMAldo HushiColleges and big cities are a bigger problem.
Also married white women matched their white husbands in voting patterns.
So stay out of worthless degrees and cities, and get wifed up young.Mar 1, 2019, 1:02 AMTrevor BrightmanIts all about demographicsMar 1, 2019, 1:07 AMJohn JonesHow different would things be if they always ‘red’?
I dare say the trajectory would be the same but things would just move slower.
Mainstream conservatism only ever holds its ground.Mar 1, 2019, 1:49 AMCaduceus MercuriusIt’s how democracy was originally conceived of, and practiced for many hundreds of years: voting rights restricted to male citizens, usually of a certain minimum financial status.
We are simply commenting on the disastrous effect of the relatively recent introduction of universal suffrage, and how those effects became even worse with the degradation of women into single mothers and barren feminists.Mar 1, 2019, 2:37 AMCaduceus MercuriusBesides, this is not merely a matter of disagreement. The last election was about whether US Whites should be replaced by non-White immigrants, yes or no. A vote for the Democrats was (and still is) a vote in favor of population replacement i.e. genocide. A vote for Trump was essentially a vote for preserving the USA as a White majority country.
If the wall is not built and Trump loses the next round of elections, THEN there will be a rise of actual Fascism, with an actual dictator leading the resistance and reconquest of North America.Mar 1, 2019, 2:48 AMRobert RichboroughMar 1, 2019, 3:26 AMMartin ŠtěpánImagine defending democracy with universal suffrage in 2019…Mar 1, 2019, 4:18 AMJames GuzmanI doubt it, the Republicans are killing us just as much as the Democrats.Mar 1, 2019, 5:54 AMThomas AndrewAmerica needs to boost white birth rates or its going to be in a 1 party system pretty soon.Mar 1, 2019, 7:47 AMAlba RisingThe right-wing Asian ally is a total myth.Mar 1, 2019, 9:45 AMJames BoweryMake participation in the public square a requirement that the appeal of last resort in dispute processing be a mutual hunt between individuals in Nature, providing primitive tools and weapons. Death penalty for refusing a challenge if one has declared one’s self eligible for participation in the public square. Sure, some women and old men would continue to so declare, but they’d be a lot more circumspect about parasitic castration of the young men, upon whose grace depends the wall separating civilization from chaos.Mar 1, 2019, 10:28 AMRichard HallMarshal Khan Apology accepted.Mar 1, 2019, 11:42 AMRichard HallDuje DanteMar 1, 2019, 11:43 AMJay SchmittWomen don’t marry young unless they are barred from higher education and career opportunities.Mar 1, 2019, 1:29 PMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes 👀👀Mar 1, 2019, 6:04 PMCharlie Eddleston-HaynesThomas Norgate dare you to enter this proposition at debate soc 😂😂😂Mar 1, 2019, 6:09 PMDurdy Harry(((Political correctness))) is why we are here. The words “Sexism” and “Racism” and “Fascism” should be words equivalent to “nature” and “science”, not “evil” or “wrong”. Fascism fixes what Democracy causes. It’s that simple. The threat of losing freedom(speech & guns) now comes from past men allowing anyone other than white male land owners to vote. A land owner has already shown himself to be capable of independence and intelligence. Most women are irrational mentally and physically weak. They can be persuaded by emotions over rational thought. “A kid died, let’s give up our guns” is what the ignorant, ‘caring’ mother says. Now, they want to kill the babies. This is where their freedom leads. The minorities that end up here are of low IQ, and those that are of high IQ are indoctrinated by globalist liberalism and/or are just taking productivity away from their original homeland. White males have the highest rate of suicide. This chart just shows why that is more true than ever. WE HAVE NEVER been so willing to let ourselves be invaded and taken over. White men who voted for women’s rights have suicided us all with them. White men who fought for minorities have ‘suicided’ us all with them. It is war when people want to force their speech on you, limit your speech and thought, and rob you of your ability to defend yourself. It is no longer an election(Democracy), it is a battleground. Everyone is Fascist on a battleground. Anyone who hasn’t figured all of that out isn’t paying attention.Mar 1, 2019, 6:46 PMCristoforo Giuseppe BartoliniMen exist to protect women from themselves.Mar 1, 2019, 7:59 PMTom Ramboi dOnT sEe ColOrMar 1, 2019, 11:11 PMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes the BDE for thatMar 2, 2019, 3:21 AMCharlie Eddleston-HaynesThomas Norgate pure BDE requiredMar 2, 2019, 3:27 AMAlex RobinsonIs the implication here that only white men should vote, or are smart? If not, what is?Mar 2, 2019, 9:20 AMEthan Tricebasically already is. Only difference between a Jeb or Hillary presidency would have been the tax rate and some rhetoricMar 2, 2019, 6:31 PMHenrik JohnsenMar 2, 2019, 10:46 PMJacob BastionIt needs a lot more than just a boost to white birth-rates :|Mar 3, 2019, 9:59 PMJacob BastionI get so triggered when I see American’s advocate for more Asian migration, you may as well beg to be taken over. You trade obvious violence for white collar crime, corruption, scamming. Higher level of competition / dominance. CCP subversion.
I live in Aus, trust me! lolMar 3, 2019, 10:02 PMJacob BastionIf we must have democracy/voting, it at least needs to be limited to the group capable of building / sustaining / protecting our civilization.Mar 3, 2019, 10:07 PMAlex RobinsonJacob Bastion how do you measure that? Net worth?Mar 3, 2019, 10:44 PMRussell PoppWhen the Constitution was written, “we the people” was educated white land owners. It’s time we bring that back; the fore fathers were not dumb.Mar 4, 2019, 12:56 AMAaron Moiler”betrayal” implies they have the same base conception of team tho. We are descended from the males of the groups that won and the females from pretty much all the groups. Unless they are married or their children or themselves are under direct and continuous threat of harm for their skin colour don’t expect solidarity from a statistically typical wxmxnMar 4, 2019, 1:34 AMAaron SparrowJacob Bastion need to stop non white immigration, that’s what is making your graph look like thatMar 4, 2019, 5:20 AMCorey ZantJake MaeniusMar 4, 2019, 10:18 AMAmanda RobinsonYou let us, curt.Mar 4, 2019, 1:58 PMAmanda RobinsonIts too late for that.Mar 4, 2019, 2:05 PMAmanda RobinsonI agree with james, neo cons have given our nation away, and have thrown Americans under the bus.Mar 4, 2019, 2:06 PMThomas AndrewWell we must not give up hope we must fight back somehow or we might as well already be dead.Mar 4, 2019, 2:24 PMBrendan KremsI hope this is satireMar 4, 2019, 2:25 PMJacob BastionYeah => secession. US breaking up into chunks is by far most likely outcome.Mar 4, 2019, 3:15 PMGreg RobertsAlex how about start small, like just be a bet tax payer?Mar 4, 2019, 7:27 PMCorbus AureliusFuq democracyMar 5, 2019, 1:53 PMOUR WOMEN HAVE KILLED US
—“The west has a case of pathological altruism – self-destructive charity based on a narcissistic personality type and an addiction to dopamine.”–JWarren Prescott
The opportunities in a market are limited by the requirement that we not impose costs by externality upon the investments of others causing the loss of capital in territorial, physical, institutional, cultural, normative, informational, familial, and genetic assets.
Markets allow us to create opportunity through proximity – decreasing opportunity costs of time, and thru informational, informal, and formal institutions, and physical infrastructure as a common good – each decreasing opportunity costs of time.These market opportunities are produced as a common good. We can then serve the common good by converting opportunity into exchanges, each of which creates more than it consumes by the service of the coincidence of wants. (time savings).
We create opportunities for temporal compression through the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy, and seize them through the identification of a coincidence of wants, thereby converting the potential for temporal compression into the existential compression of time. And it is through this temporal compression that we, collectively, in increasing scales, constantly reduce the cost of existence, and defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity.
If you understand this you will understand all of human civilization, consists of time saving – and the reason we have achieved what no other creatures have achieved.
We must defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, distance, and scarcity, and we do so through cooperation, and we cooperate through the incremental suppression of the imposition of costs on one another upon life, body, kin, possessions, and interests, in the form of violence, theft, fraud, falsehood, conspiracy, rents and free-riding.
We accomplish this incremental suppression by the demand for a warranty of due diligence for our products(materials), services(actions), and information(speech) and the prosecution, restitution, punishment, ostracization, or execution, of those who circumvent that Warranty of Reciprocity by production, action, or speech.
This leaves us with no option but to participate in voluntary markets under which we limit our productions, actions, and speech to that which consists of productive, fully informed (truthful), warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of cost upon the life, kin, possessions, and interests of others by externality.
This explains why time is the principle asset from which all of human existence emerges through the continuous discounting of time costs through an ever expanding division of labor, with ever expanding suppressions of parasitism.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53121396_10157018500837264_3347680269950779392_n_10157018500832264.jpg MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION)
—“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott
The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”Thomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-HaynesFeb 28, 2019, 2:23 PMMartin ŠtěpánI think depression (at least in males) might be an instict to stop taking up resources if one can’t figure out a functioning strategy to reproduce or otherwise help kin.Feb 28, 2019, 2:34 PMMichael D. AbbottThe decline of marriage and the sexual revolution harmed children and made a joke of our society.
Anyone who won’t admit this is basically a fifteen year old posing as an adult–people need to grow up.Feb 28, 2019, 6:13 PMMartin ŠtěpánMichael D. Abbott People today are disincentivized from growing up. White men are the only ones with any incentive (as well as the highest proclivity) to grow up. And they still receive signals against it from all sides.Feb 28, 2019, 6:17 PMMichael D. AbbottFeb 28, 2019, 6:19 PMMichael D. AbbottHere’s how to talk to a feminist: Fatherhood, marriage, and chivalry are essential to a civilized society, and your infantile promotion of fornication, abortion, fatherlessness, and idiocy harms children. You should be ashamed of yourself.Feb 28, 2019, 6:20 PMMartin ŠtěpánMichael D. Abbott In my experience, here’s how to talk to a feminist: Don’t.Feb 28, 2019, 6:20 PMWill HurtReplace chivalry with honor and you have a stronger statementFeb 28, 2019, 11:55 PMJohn JonesThe items males seek as status symbols; Rolex, Ferrari, Armani, etc are just another mode of consumption.Mar 1, 2019, 1:57 AMScott CameronWhy chivalry? Dalrock blames feminism on chivalry.Mar 2, 2019, 5:35 PMMEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION)
—“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott
The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”
There are strong christians and weak christians; good christians and bad christians; honest christians, and dishonest christians; committed christians and convenient christians.
We represent: the truth, a constitutional reformation, and insurrection to demand it, is terrifying to bad christians.
Why it confronts their insignificance and lack of conviction to do what is required to be significant.
If you won’t fight you are insignificant. You have no conviction only cowardice.
The truth is enough, but you can’t bear it. You can’t bear it because you can’t bear the shallowness of your conviction and the absence of your significance.
The compromise is Truth in Faith and Truth in Law, or defeat of faith.
The compromise is a christian nation or a christian minority.
The compromise is a rule of law monarchy or no strongman.
The compromise is a rule of law nationalism, or predatory socialism.
The compromise is a rule of law market for classes, or pretense of democracy.
We are vulnerable to suggestion when we suspend disbelief when trying to understand another speaker who is narrating a story. (True)
When we empathize with a character in the story we have agency that we do not have when reflecting upon ourselves.(True)
Peterson:
He’s a therapist.
He uses suggestion.
He uses storytelling for suggestion.
He uses archetypes in his stories of suggestion.
He uses archetypes that map to ‘weaknesses’ (challenges)
He began his study with literary psychology.
He supplemented this study of archetypes, literature, literary psychology, with research data.
In and of itself the use of patient listening, compassionate voice, suggestion using archetypes in narrative analogy, that through suspension of criticism and disbelief provide
He works with people in ‘pain’ (suffering).
His work with people in suffering demanded paradigms.
His work with the public is in providing means of ending suffering.
He does not speak in or work with or even acknowledge the existence of truth independent of face, feeling, status, or consequence.
He does not consider, account for, or care about the polity as a system as we who think in history, economics, and law do, except as a family that allows the weak, and suffering to avoid chaos and struggle.
He thinks only of individuals suffering thru life in a society trying to survive. Yet most of us are Aryans, Europeans, Aristocracy, Nietzscheans, and we HAVE agency – we’re not suffering or struggling but WORKING and WORKING to achieve – and in the large part enjoying our WORK. Reveling in it. not fearful of ‘falling behind’ but ‘anxious in getting ahead’.
Because we are Vikings, Hellenes (heroes) Aryans, and Men, and he and his kind are Christians (victims) – and women.
We have failed our men because without the militia in a world of plenty we go soft under the tutelage of those who fear being left behind, struggling, rather than anxious to maximize what we can in our lives, by working.
Life is not just a choice between comedy and tragedy.
it is a choice between victimhood of christians an heroism of aryans.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53004989_10157013266502264_8578855676615327744_n_10157013266492264.jpg THE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?”
Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol
—“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn
You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that:
Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership.
Empirically, Given The Possible Series:
1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense )
3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense)
It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control.
Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means.
In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it.
Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome.
In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females.
The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression.
That is, I think, the argument.
Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.
In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong.
Always and everywhere.
“Veritas Et Violentia”James Dmitro Makienko”Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.”
This just describes muslim/middle east christian women in Canada vs white atheist chicks. When women here were declared “persons” 100 years ago t was originally OK as the existing institutional and reciprocal means from the existing christian (50/50 catholic/ trad protestant) culture worked fine until the 60s when sexual revolutions destroyed it. The value of a patriarchal religion is in getting the women to not spread their legs and forces their emotional nature to follow men and not screw things up in the society.Feb 25, 2019, 11:51 PMCurt Doolittledoesn’t need to be religion, just law, but yes.
Religion is just shitty law, and bad education.Feb 26, 2019, 12:13 AMJames Dmitro MakienkoCurt Doolittle For women religion has some utility. Religion prevents neurotypical (non-autistic) women’s emotions from causing harm by channeling them into healthy sustainable pro-social behavior that. Emotions is what women need to care for infants. If a woman is autistic they are generally bad at caring for infants (just ask my wife), but they have a foot in both rational and emotional worlds. My wife describes it as being a man on the inside but looks like a woman on the outside. She says that non-autistic women are attracted to things like sparkles (she sells jewelry to them), art, beautiful singing etc – just like what can find in a traditional church or a mosque – as well as the community around it. They are moved by the chanting and repetition.The religion prevents women from using GSRRM on society by creating the monopoly of use of GSRRM on women – using gossip (religious myths), shaming (for emotional destructive behavior), rallying (church service), ridicule (thot patrol), moralizing (here is a moral code for you to follow). This monopoly enables men in congregation/society/polity to be in charge of politics/discourse/agency. It enables men to fight and win while keeping women faithful and not spreading legs to an army of invaders from other countries. By removing religion as a tool of redirecting GSRRM in women both politics/economics in today’s west focus on marketing to women.Feb 26, 2019, 12:37 AMCurt DoolittleJames Dmitro Makienko correctFeb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMCurt Doolittlewell done.Feb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMCurt DoolittleIf I get a chance I’ll edit and quote. too late my time. -sleeping.Feb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMJB BurnsIf you are a Chad they will tell you you own it😂Feb 26, 2019, 11:06 AMJoshua NielsenFeb 26, 2019, 8:16 PMPaul OliverI’m pleasantly surprised you’re not getting fb jailed anymore, you must have caught the rats in your friends listMar 1, 2019, 5:26 AMTHE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?”
Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol
—“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn
You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that:
Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership.
Empirically, Given The Possible Series:
1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense )
3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense)
It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control.
Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means.
In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it.
Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome.
In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females.
The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression.
That is, I think, the argument.
Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.
In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong.
