Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T. I separate the catholic church as a poli

    EITHER YOU ACT LIKE JESUS OR YOU DON’T.

    I separate the catholic church as a political organization, from belief in the supernatural and occult, from christianity as a system of alien myths and dogmas, from imitating person jesus regardless of the primitivism of words attributed to him, from the general need for simple people to escape the continuous judgement of self and others in a world where doing so by some standard other than selfishness is non rational.

    What we call ‘christian’ is a semitic political religious dogma taught by a greek bureaucracy over an aryan social religious relationship between peoples and the world.

    One is a member of the christian system of behaviors because he behaves more like other christians than he does members of every other rious order – not because what he thinks or believes. Otherwise all of christianity is false.

    These are empirical statements – not justificationary statements.

    Either you act in practice under the accumulated behaviors of our aryan, roman, greek, and semitic systems of thought, or you don’t. The degree with which you fantasize about it is merely a statement of your demand to insulate yourself from counter signaling by others.

    Which is the reason for religion: counter-signaling our alienation with some form of mindfulness as our relative value to the polity decreases with political scale.

    This is merely true.

    God and the universe are one and the same. Jesus told us one set of rules that make us more compatible with the universe, and therefore god. These rules are the optimum ingroup social order. There is none other.

    1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.

    2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.

    3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,

    4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    If you practice these rules then you are acting in concert with the universe and god such that no other set of practices will produce a superior end for you or others.

    That’s just the science of it all.

    I don’t need woo woo. I am not afraid of my station in relation to others. I do not fear my betters – I welcome them.

    The laws of the universe are the origin of truth aboutt hat universe. The natural law of human cooperation consists of reciprocity and the teachings of jesus.

    Neither set of rules is complicated.

    They are just so simple that they leave us no means of deceit by which to lie to ourselves or others.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 17:17:00 UTC

  • GET OVER THE NAP. IT MEANS YOU’RE A USEFUL IDIOT No. NAP looks like another semi

    GET OVER THE NAP. IT MEANS YOU’RE A USEFUL IDIOT

    No. NAP looks like another semitic (abrahamic, marxist, libertarian, postmodern) pretense to reciprocity and rule of law, that (a) does not require reciprocity be earned, (b) retains the semitic means of deceit by fraud by omission enabling blackmail, enabling conspiracy, (c) (d) continuing the semitic method of baiting well meaning fools into hazard thru piplup and deceit.

    NAP is to Reciprocity as Labor Theory of Value is to Subjective Value, and as money proper is to money substitutes – it’s another fraud.

    Other things may look like reciprocity. But they are not. They are all substitutes for reciprocity because they are means of circumventing reciprocity. So since they are all worse than reciprocity, one must answer the question why one seeks something less than reciprocity, and as such why one seeks to preserve means of irreciprocity.

    I mean, we know why our ancient enemy wants to preserve irreciprocity – to preserve parasitism upon the productive people.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 16:44:00 UTC

  • Teaching people GRAMMAR so that they can DECODE speech is not the same as teachi

    Teaching people GRAMMAR so that they can DECODE speech is not the same as teaching people to speak exclusively in decoded speech.

    We have been teaching people grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy since the medieval era.

    Written speech is more rigorous than spoken. contract language more rigorous than written. P-speech more rigorous than contract. And the purpose of this speech is to construct law that is not open to ‘interpretation’ and therefore closed to ‘legislation from the bench’.

    —“In my experience one only need set about resolving oneself to use honest and clear wording to express one’s points/stance while being as factually based as possible. “—

    And so what’s the difference other than a formal method for doing so that also defends against error, and bias? And how would I hold you accountable for speaking honestly without some method for testing your speech – rather than just depend on your OPINION as to whether you speak honestly.

    What you MEAN is that you don’t want to be forced to learn how to do such a thing. And you don’t want such a thing embodied in law, because you don’t want to be accountable for your words.

    Right?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 17:13:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53507053_10157045175782264_108167938

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53507053_10157045175782264_1081679387419475968_o_10157045175777264.jpg All personality systems are trying to describe underlying biological traits expressible as physical differences in brain structure and production.

    All of them are ‘partly correct’.

    http://www.psychologycharts.com/big-five-personality-traits.htmlLan KenWhat’s the take away?Mar 12, 2019, 3:43 PMCurt DoolittleAll personality systems are trying to describe underlying biological traits expressible as physical differences in brain structure and production.Mar 12, 2019, 3:44 PMLan KenCurt Of course. Then we’d see certain personality groups in certain populations.Mar 12, 2019, 3:44 PMCurt DoolittleWe do. They concentrate in three foci:

    1 – feminine consumptive (Female)

    2 – libertarian predictive (ascendant male)

    3 – male conservative (establishedmale)

    really. It’s so fking obvius and so painful that we just spent a century with marxist and postmodern ((())) pseudoscience.Mar 12, 2019, 3:47 PMJWarren PrescottFor a system or a model to have value scientifically, it must have predictive capabilities or it’s of no value.

    All models are constructs for the purpose of accurizing and optimizing those predictive capabilities. The better the model, the better one is at planning and developing.Mar 12, 2019, 4:17 PMGeorge CarvlinIt’s specialization vs utilityMar 12, 2019, 4:22 PMNick’s ReasonThere is a YT channel dedicated to Myers Briggs and they are going as far as attempting to map the MBTI to peoples morphology too. Effectively a form of Constitutional Psychology / Somatoypes.

    It’s an interesting hypotheses. Though, it would be extremely difficult to study with modern scientific rigor because of the sheer number of confounding variables.Mar 13, 2019, 4:04 AMNick’s Reasonhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWWwQlDFnYbX_dgDP8lJ09AMar 13, 2019, 4:05 AMNick’s Reasonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mEDb5A_hN0Mar 13, 2019, 4:36 AMAll personality systems are trying to describe underlying biological traits expressible as physical differences in brain structure and production.

    All of them are ‘partly correct’.

    http://www.psychologycharts.com/big-five-personality-traits.html

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 15:38:00 UTC

  • You know, the IE religions were exceptional, producing western paganism, india’s

    You know, the IE religions were exceptional, producing western paganism, india’s hinduism and buddhism. And while I prefer far eastern Confucian, Dao, Ritual, and Ancestor worship for ‘ant colony’ people, and prefer western naturalism: aristotelian, philosophical, sport, Pagan (Heroes) Heathen (Ancestors and Nature), for our heroic people, what sticks out when you study world religions is that while the zoroastrians were trying to ally people under an ideal, the only peoples that invented evil and evil religions were the Semitic. Yet the worst possible religion is nothing but a network of lies to DEFEAT occupy and consume the great civilizations.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-09 10:52:00 UTC

  • DIVISIVE? DIVISIVE? STUPIDITY IS WHAT’S DIVISIVE (the answer to the right) I wor

    DIVISIVE? DIVISIVE? STUPIDITY IS WHAT’S DIVISIVE

    (the answer to the right)

    I worked to save my people from that false promise of liberty, and its baiting into moral hazard, by our ancestral enemy, under rothbardian libertinism. I was divisive in attacking rothbard and less so mises and hoppe.

    But I didn’t punch right unless someone punched me first. Although, I have to confess when I felt the fascists were going to continue to us down after C-ville, I more than considered it – and rightly so.

    Next, the New Right Wing Postmodernists came after me – seeking attention. Then Spencer came out with a quip, and then The Woo Woo Christians felt emboldened and rallied, and now the fascists are laying ground once again.

    There is zero reason to talk about me. There is zero reason for infighting between:

    – Fascists (rule of man by inspiration),

    – Nomocrats: Rule of Law by science, and;

    – Christians (Rule of Priests by woo woo).

    If you want to criticize rule of law, rule of man, or rule of ‘religion’ then do so. I do. But then, if you personalize that attack by taking on ‘one of the right’ rather than the general rule, you’re just a click-seeking attention-whore, doing the right a disservice.

    These are the three ancestral classes of our elites:

    1. Warriors, Soldiers (Masculine Defense),

    “Those who Fight (Father)”

    -and-

    2. Judges and Governors(Cooperation), Burghers, Business, Farmers

    “Those who Work (Brother)”

    -and-

    3. Priests and Public Intellectuals (Feminine Consumption)

    “Those Who Pray (Educate, Mother)”

    And we use our three classes of elites to our advantage and we keep them incompetition to ensure that we can use each as needed.

    At present all three classes: Fascists (Dominant Force ), Nomocrats (Practical Trade) and the Religious (Submissive Resistance) all all searching for a solution given that the Right Has Failed.

    Now, I’m pretty sure that y’all got nuthin, because (a) there is no fascist leader of any ability and there won’t be until fascism is re-articulated in adult language, (b) religion of the christian type only survived as a wife to the aristocracy – and islam is winning the war of ‘monopolies’, And at present, christianity is past its expiration date – because without operational means of governing an educated population it’s irrelevant and relegated to either the bible belt, or providing comfort to the outcast and underclass in the rest of the country.

    So only a fascist or a group of nomocrats are possible, and christianity has to simply pick one or both to bet on because christians have no answer – and frandkly appear ‘cucked’ and perhaps the source of current ‘cuckery’.

    So as far as I know we need a fascist (strong man leader), nomocracy (rule of law by which to govern a complex polity), and christians as a block to move the body faithful out of a condition of failure.

    It takes all three.

    However, the only means of governing a polity is and always will be law and economic information, because they are the ONLY POSSIBLE MEANS of operating a polity of greater scale than a village congregation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-08 09:59:00 UTC

  • NOPE NOPE —“Curt: What would (….) in a propertarian society?”— PROP IS A M

    NOPE NOPE

    —“Curt: What would (….) in a propertarian society?”—

    PROP IS A METHOD.

    Propertarianism is a methodology, consisting of a set of methodologies, a set of definitions, and a set of arguments, that produce a commensurable language, complete the scientific method, and embody that scientific method into rule of law.

    What you do with that law is wide open – it just has to be transparent, and it will prohibit all sorts of lying in public about whatever order you have.

    P-law is extremely facist out of the box – it is extremely nationalistic, and extremely intolerant, and especially intolerant of our ancient enemy’s means of deceit. And It is very hard to engage in malfeasance under P-Law since it is simply too profitable for individuals to report criminals for fun and profit. It is a ruthless system of government for enemies of the productive people. It has no mercy for enemies foreign or domestic.

    FOR MY PEOPLE

    My focus has been on correcting the United states first, and the other european states second.

    I recommend, for my people, and my people alone, because my people alone appear capable of it:

    0 – An independent judiciary of the natural law

    1 – A militia of all able bodied men in the regimental model, attached to a ‘church’/’school’. A standing army of professional warriors, and citizen employees of the military who are inducted in emergencies, since an increasing scope of military work is technical and administrative.

    2 – A Hereditary Monarchy with a professional cabinet

    3 – Virtual Houses of Governors, Industry, Business, Labor, and Family(homeowners). Where house members are selected randomly from the population, to provide assent or dissent to proposals by the monarchy in the raising and use of taxes. And where all houses must ‘pass’ (ascend).

    4 – A near prohibition on bureaucracy; all government service “at the pleasure of the monarchy”; and a prohibition on pensions for public servants.

    5 – My understanding is that this would provide all the benefits of fascism without the need for a dictator-character and the attendant risk. Even then, there is no reason a monarch cannot appoint such a person as did the romans, in times of crisis or need.

    FLIPPED INCENTIVES

    This produces a very different set of incentives since everyone is always and everywhere accountable for everything.

    MIDDLE CLASS IS HARD TO BEAT

    Monarchies appear to run better governments until they cannot. They cannot when the commercial complexity reaches the point of choosing limited investments from a host of possible investments. In this case the middle class appears to do well UNTIL they start socializing losses and privatizing the commons or engaging in arbitrage against the long term interests of the people.

    FEDERATION

    Any number of these monarchies can be federated under a supreme court of the natural law, just as the church federated the monarchies under church ‘license’ – the principle value of the court and the church being the ‘delegitimization’ of a ruler or a government, there by sanctioning the people and neighbors to replace that ruler, in the european tradition. This would, I expect, be rare, since royal families are extremely intolerant of family members who risk their status – and often make them ‘disappear’.

    My preference (Fantasy) would be to restore the anglo empire, and the germanic (Holy roman) empire, and to complete the intermarium and end the conflict of the 20th century brought about by ((())) the enemies of our people under the banner of world communism and the destruction of our peoples.

    FOR OTHER PEOPLES

    For other peoples I recommend a flexible system of government not terribly different from the Roman and English:

    – Fascism (Generalship) for time of war or conflict.

    – Monarchies with professional cabinets as long as possible

    – Adding Houses of government as via negativa juries when too large. These juries must only approve/deny raising of funds by the monarchy (cabinet).

    – If for some reason some semblance of democracy is necessary (it isn’t, but it may be impossible to avoid it for pragmatic reasons) I recommend virtual houses for each of the classes and genders, where classes trade in a market rather than pass legislation by majority rule. Where resources are either equally or proportionally distributed. Then posting proposals for x months, then using a lottery (Greece) rather than politicians to select the juries (houses), then allowing the juries to conduct business (trade)

    In other words, there is no ‘propertarian society’ per se other than all those societies run under rule of law by natural law.

    So….

    You can ask me questions of natural law – ‘what would the law say about ????’

    You can ask me about different political orders: “what order, or what would you recommend for ????”

    You can ask me what constitution I’d recommend for america or germany, or england or poland etc. “what would you recommend for????”

    You can ask me what I’ve put in the working constitution.

    As long as they are under natural law they are ‘propertarian’.

    If they are not then they are not.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 21:06:00 UTC

  • “THE GOYIM KNOW” Their technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral

    “THE GOYIM KNOW”

    Their technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. It’s not just usury. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard. Instead, it’s every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and crique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional.

    It ends now.

    De-financialization, De-politicization, De-distinformationalization, and restoration of our eugenic group evolutionary strategy in our own self interest.

    It’s easy.

    The law. The most intolerant law ever made.

    With the law we make the extirpation of parasites a for-profit business for every citizen of character

    Propertarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 14:59:00 UTC

  • by Rosenborg Predmetsky Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition o

    by Rosenborg Predmetsky

    Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition of obscenity laws that criminalizes and censors pornography and public display of sexually arousing material, because the catastrophic psychological insecurity created in women by such media is precisely what motivates them to so profoundly resent men that they engage in their sociopathic revaluation of values that privileges the morbidly obese, the ugly, the mutilated, the masculinized, etc.

    Men exist not only to protect women from other men, but also from the ruthlessness of intra-sexual competition between women, and we protect women from other women, because the female underclass lashes out at males when they are made to feel worthless.

    Women have a need to be desired, seen and recognized, and being sexually desirable is one of their main means of doing so. On the one hand, the unnatural supra-normal stimulus generated by the ubiquity of fattening food and a sedentary lifestyle, has caused women to become monstrously ugly, and on the other hand, totally unrealistic portrayals of female beauty causes even the more attractive women to be extremely insecure. So the situation we’re in is *profoundly* unnatural.

    Women need to test men to feel safe and desired, to test their loyalty and desire. But they can never feel safe or desired in our current context, and their reaction to this despair is the kind of despairing rage that is the rough equivalent of a mass incel shooting among men. I think even 2nd wave feminists are actually on to something when they argue that women shouldn’t have to shave their bodies or face.

    Some women will complain that men are stifling their sexual expression. And they are right. But men need to learn to say “no” to women. Cultivating a healthy limiting impulse would lead to much happier men and women alike. Patriarchy, properly understood and implemented, is a necessary precondition for a healthy society because female sexuality is always already as aggressive and dominating as men, just in different ways.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:42:00 UTC

  • TRIVIUM > QUADRIVIUM > PHILOSOPHY Trivium: The Word. Grammar (Primary School – r

    TRIVIUM > QUADRIVIUM > PHILOSOPHY

    Trivium: The Word.

    Grammar (Primary School – repetition), Logic (Middle School – understanding ), Rhetoric (high school – argument)

    -vs-

    Quadrivium: The Number.

    Arithmetic(The Number), Geometry(The Number in Space), Music(in Time) and Astronomy(Motion(Space and Time))

    -vs-

    Philosophy: The Idea

    TODAY

    IMO Propertarianism completes Philosophy with Grammars (Metaphysics), Acquisitionism (Psychology), Compatibilism (Sociology), Propertarianism(Ethics), Natural Law (Politics), adds Group Strategy, and articulates Aesthetics.

    Between the logic of the grammars, the logic of numbers, and the logic of cooperation (P), we have completed the systems of calculation available to the human mind.

    THE EDUCATION IN THE SKILLS OF THINKING

    Together, the trivium and the quadrivium comprised the seven liberal arts (based on thinking skills), as distinguished from the practical arts (such as medicine and architecture).

    Educationally, the trivium and the quadrivium imparted to the student the seven liberal arts (essential thinking skills) of classical antiquity.

    THE TRIVIUM

    Grammar teaches the mechanics of language to the student. This is the step where the student “comes to terms,” defining the objects and information perceived by the five senses. Hence, the Law of Identity: a tree is a tree, and not a cat.

    Logic (also dialectic) is the “mechanics” of thought and of analysis, the process of identifying fallacious arguments and statements and so systematically removing contradictions, thereby producing factual knowledge that can be trusted.

    Rhetoric is the application of language in order to instruct and to persuade the listener and the reader. It is the knowledge (grammar) now understood (logic) and being transmitted outwards as wisdom (rhetoric).

    THE QUADRIVIUM

    The quadrivium (plural: quadrivia ) is the four subjects, or arts (namely arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy), taught after teaching the trivium.

    The quadrivium consisted of arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy. These followed the preparatory work of the trivium, consisting of grammar, logic, and rhetoric.

    The quadrivium was the upper division of the medieval education in the liberal arts, which comprised arithmetic (number), geometry (number in space), music (number in time), and astronomy (number in space and time).

    PHILOSOPHY

    In turn, the quadrivium was considered the foundation for the study of philosophy (sometimes called the “liberal art par excellence”) and theology.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-04 10:48:00 UTC