Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • “Q: 5 +1 * 10 = ?”— This category of math ‘tests’, is not a test of intelligen

    —“Q: 5 +1 * 10 = ?”—

    This category of math ‘tests’, is not a test of intelligence but of a weakness in mathematical grammar that makes the reader fall back to the order of operations when the sentence is malformed. The correct form is (1×10)+5. or 5+(1×10), gracefully failing to 5 + 1 * 10 if malformed.

    Almost seemingly complex questions of philosophy are nothing more than a failure to fully expand idiomatic speech into well formed sentence beginning with “I promise that …”.

    The lower your patterning the more likely you are to see this trick. The higher your patterning (not discreetly seeing the individual glyphs of the text) the more likely you are to miss it. And that is all.

    Tricks don’t test intelligence.

    They insult it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 20:54:00 UTC

  • MORE ON METAPHYSICS ….the idea of ‘proven’ is something I think is meaningless

    MORE ON METAPHYSICS

    ….the idea of ‘proven’ is something I think is meaningless – instead: “remove all reasonable doubt”. Because nothing can be ‘proven’ other than tautologies because nothing is premise-independent other than tautologies. Therefore as far as I know, the question is only one of reasonable doubt.

    And given that only demonstrated preference shows us what one in fact ‘believes’ rather than ‘signals’ including ‘signaling to the self’, only tests of action with skin in the game tell us – even if we desperately want to be honest – what is in fact ‘true’.

    Ergo, as far as I know, there is only one physics, and one metaphysics (most parsimonious paradigm) and many false physics(paradigms) and many false metaphysics (paradigms) we can use to describe the physical. And the only metaphysics we can determine we are not signaling (lying) to ourselves and others about is that of ACTION.

    All else is fiction.

    Anyway. That’s my understanding.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-19 10:25:00 UTC

  • Contra Jewish Excuse Making

    [M]y people (anglicans) have a higher average IQ than the ashkenazi but a narrower distribution. We are the upper class of the Anglos. What Ashkenazim (Half europeans, not others) produce is a wider distribution with many more outliers above 140 (2-4x), which is the difference between 11 and 14 dist’s. And outliers are more valuable in information processing. England had the same as ashkenazi IQ by 1790 (via lynn) but the industrial revolution has been doing to the west what it is now doing to chinese advantage, which is inverting rates of reproduction between the classes which will very shortly eliminate east asian advantage everywhere but korea and japan. The question isn’t the disproportionate achievements of jews AFTER INTEGRATION into western civilization’s aristotelianism in exchange for ending deprivation from asset participation, it is why, the most literate population in the past 1500 years achieved absolutely NOTHING for mankind in that period while even under semitic deception (abrahamic religion) the west achieved more with fewer outliers – and the jews NOTHING. In other words, why is it that jews are helpful to economies, but destructive to polities, happily undermine and destroy their social orders, and are continually cast out or worse, and such a huge literature (suppressed postwar) existed that they should be expelled from decent civilization for their continued crimes? Jews produced nothing of civic value. Nothing. No art. No literature, No science. No technology. No engineering, No architecture. No nation. No polity. No Civilization – nothing except a record of being the most immoral and despised people on earth? Why? When and if the jews have this reformation they will cease being jews and that is the jewish conundrum. Because false promise, baiting into moral hazard, pilpul (what you are arguing with at the moment), critique (marxists, postmodernist, libertarians, neocons) cherry picking and straw manning will not be possible. We look in the mirror and acknowledge our errors and try to guide the world into not repeating ours. What do your people do? Very shortly we will outlaw the use of solving for volition and reasonableness regardless of externality,. rather than truth, reciprocity and externality, false promise; outlaw baiting into moral hazard, pilpul and critique and force involuntary warranty of all the above. This will cause everyone regardless of tradition or cult out of businesses dominated by those which profit from such uses of deceit (pornography, gambling, entertainment, media, advertising, commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics), and once it is no longer possible to use the abrahamic technique my suspicion is that many jews whose incomes depend upon it will migrate to those territories where such parasitism against the people is possible. I don’t care what cult, race, tribe, gender, age group someone belongs to but the invention of organized lying by the rabbinical jews by incorporating greek idealism into egyptian and babylonian legend will be suppressed in our law. And every single person regardless of race, gender or creed will be accountable for his speech once again. and gossiping rallying shaming, ridicule in absence of argument will be met as it had always been with physical retaliation. We can tolerate it from our women, but not from the enemy who organizes with every intent to destroy us. It took me awhile to understand the means of parasitism and I had to put a few of your families in prison to do so, but I did learn how it works, how it evolved, and how to end it. So do not make excuses. I don’t make excuses for exterminating the natives, or the error of alexander crossing the bosphorus, or the celtic genocide, or the termination of west africa’s first empire, or the fragmentation and plundering of india, or the selling of drugs into china or bringing gunboats to japan. These were immoral acts and completely unnecessary – had we followed china’s strategy of building a wall we would have been better off. So, don’t make excuses for being tossed out of so many countries for your peopl”s malfeasance. Because it was earned. Many times over.

  • Contra Jewish Excuse Making

    [M]y people (anglicans) have a higher average IQ than the ashkenazi but a narrower distribution. We are the upper class of the Anglos. What Ashkenazim (Half europeans, not others) produce is a wider distribution with many more outliers above 140 (2-4x), which is the difference between 11 and 14 dist’s. And outliers are more valuable in information processing. England had the same as ashkenazi IQ by 1790 (via lynn) but the industrial revolution has been doing to the west what it is now doing to chinese advantage, which is inverting rates of reproduction between the classes which will very shortly eliminate east asian advantage everywhere but korea and japan. The question isn’t the disproportionate achievements of jews AFTER INTEGRATION into western civilization’s aristotelianism in exchange for ending deprivation from asset participation, it is why, the most literate population in the past 1500 years achieved absolutely NOTHING for mankind in that period while even under semitic deception (abrahamic religion) the west achieved more with fewer outliers – and the jews NOTHING. In other words, why is it that jews are helpful to economies, but destructive to polities, happily undermine and destroy their social orders, and are continually cast out or worse, and such a huge literature (suppressed postwar) existed that they should be expelled from decent civilization for their continued crimes? Jews produced nothing of civic value. Nothing. No art. No literature, No science. No technology. No engineering, No architecture. No nation. No polity. No Civilization – nothing except a record of being the most immoral and despised people on earth? Why? When and if the jews have this reformation they will cease being jews and that is the jewish conundrum. Because false promise, baiting into moral hazard, pilpul (what you are arguing with at the moment), critique (marxists, postmodernist, libertarians, neocons) cherry picking and straw manning will not be possible. We look in the mirror and acknowledge our errors and try to guide the world into not repeating ours. What do your people do? Very shortly we will outlaw the use of solving for volition and reasonableness regardless of externality,. rather than truth, reciprocity and externality, false promise; outlaw baiting into moral hazard, pilpul and critique and force involuntary warranty of all the above. This will cause everyone regardless of tradition or cult out of businesses dominated by those which profit from such uses of deceit (pornography, gambling, entertainment, media, advertising, commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics), and once it is no longer possible to use the abrahamic technique my suspicion is that many jews whose incomes depend upon it will migrate to those territories where such parasitism against the people is possible. I don’t care what cult, race, tribe, gender, age group someone belongs to but the invention of organized lying by the rabbinical jews by incorporating greek idealism into egyptian and babylonian legend will be suppressed in our law. And every single person regardless of race, gender or creed will be accountable for his speech once again. and gossiping rallying shaming, ridicule in absence of argument will be met as it had always been with physical retaliation. We can tolerate it from our women, but not from the enemy who organizes with every intent to destroy us. It took me awhile to understand the means of parasitism and I had to put a few of your families in prison to do so, but I did learn how it works, how it evolved, and how to end it. So do not make excuses. I don’t make excuses for exterminating the natives, or the error of alexander crossing the bosphorus, or the celtic genocide, or the termination of west africa’s first empire, or the fragmentation and plundering of india, or the selling of drugs into china or bringing gunboats to japan. These were immoral acts and completely unnecessary – had we followed china’s strategy of building a wall we would have been better off. So, don’t make excuses for being tossed out of so many countries for your peopl”s malfeasance. Because it was earned. Many times over.

  • OF COURSE YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN – AMONG OTHER THINGS —I’m a Christian because I

    OF COURSE YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN – AMONG OTHER THINGS

    —I’m a Christian because I need tradition and morality some kind of way….[that i can intuit rather than calculate like law, engineering, chemistry or math, because intuition is almost always better with complexity of human life than reason.]—Monica Marquez

    I’m a Christian because history and science tell me that despite all the falsehood, lies, and propaganda, that the rules that are those values taught by our heathen, aryan, christian, and militia traditions are what has made western civlization more successful than the rest, by continuous improvement of our truthfulness and trustworthiness with one another, and the radical difference in the velocity of cooperation compared to other civilizations, and the radical velocity of innovation and adaptation, and the radical difference in quality of life that results from it.

    I am a heathen, an aryan, an aristotelian, a christian and a warrior because this is what it means to be a european – a member of that civilization that dragged humanity kicking and screaming against its will, out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of nature indifferent to our existence, in a universe largely hostile to advanced life.

    Curt Doolittle

    Feb 2019

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 08:15:00 UTC

  • TALKING TO THE GODS THAT EXIST I talk to my god every day. Fairly often. The dif

    TALKING TO THE GODS THAT EXIST

    I talk to my god every day. Fairly often. The difference is that i have a scientific understanding of this god as a sort of low level ‘software’ I consult, and response as intuition or feeling rather than high level software like speech. This knowledge poses no problem for me. It is simply true. And it works. We all share similar versions of this software in every faith that depends upon fictional characters. This software does its job. For some reason the fact that this software is in our physical brains rather than in some imaginary alternate plane or universe seems to be difficult for others. And they would rather believe in magic men with superpowers, than a bit of low level software that we all run at all times and consciously and unconsciously update with new tweaks from one another. I mean… this is how gods, heroes, the dead, actually exist – as information. And once you understand that the universe consist entirely of what we have no better word for than ‘information’, this makes a lot more sense. Over time my ‘god’ has ‘revealed himself’ (meaning transformed into) something between An ancient oak grove, the bodies of my ancestors, Odin, Aristotle, and Aurelius. Because it shares those … similarities. He is a god of my experience and making. And he rarely if ever fails me. So I talk to him all the time whenever I think “what should I do?” about anything meaningful. Then I write down what I think after that and I’m done. Because writing words – making them real – tames the intuition (subconsious).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 16:01:00 UTC

  • WHY MEN WILL FIGHT Men will not fight for christianity. That is evident. Christi

    WHY MEN WILL FIGHT

    Men will not fight for christianity. That is evident. Christian faith is and has been, a pacifier that brings conquest. Yes, men will include christianity in what they will fight for. They will fight primarily for the material restoration of their way of life for them and their children first. and they will fight for altruistic punishment – a high cost of punishing the immoral opposition.

    This is our message and our policy. Those of us who are post-theological, post philosophical, and scientific, and favor our natural religion will not fight for christianity, but we will fight for your freedom to practice.

    There is every evidence men will fight for the material, and simply ‘virtue signal’ everything else as means of cooperation on the optimum POSSIBLE END, not the impossible IDEAL end.

    So we who will fight will do so, and christians are just virtue signaling. There will be only islam extermination and poverty if we lose. There will be christianity, heathanism, philosophy, science, law, the restoration of our civilization, our families, our people, if we win.

    If that is not good enough for you then you don’t matter. You are no better than the enemy.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 13:05:00 UTC

  • CLOSING IN ON METAPHYSICS AS NON-EXISTENT, or simply cogn sci: demarcation betwe

    CLOSING IN ON METAPHYSICS AS NON-EXISTENT, or simply cogn sci: demarcation between observable and experienceable.

    What is metaphysics other than either operational description(existential) or fiction(inexistential)? Why is M not just another scale of physics just as chemistry another scale of atomic states, and atomic states just another scale of particles, and particles just another scale of fundamental forces, and fundamental forces just another scale of information? Sentience and consiousness are just another scale of the physical world in operation. So just as space time is the result of underlying physical reactions, so are experience and consiousness.

    I am getting closer I think to understanding the confusion of those who claim it exists but I still have to agree with those who say it is handwaving.

    AFAIK. the human experience is just a continuation of physics, and all operations and experiences explicable in fairly simple terms the underlying mechanics of which only matter in producing aggregates.

    Metaphysics as far as I know, simply means the ontology(paradigms) of cognitive science at different levels of commensurable operations (scales), just as physics consists of ontologies(paradigms) at different levels of commensurable operations(scales), and I have seen nothing to alter that understanding (even in aristotle) that proposition other than attempts at sophism, pseudoscience, occult, and fraud. And I am absolutely positive that this will persist.

    My understanding of the reason is that different disciplines use incompatible (incommensurable) paradigms (ontologies) and as such people have to fictionalize relations between them.

    However, operatios (analogy to experience no matter how difficult to experience) serves as a universally commensurable system of measurement within and across all scales whether physical or cognitive (or linguistic) and as such M is not a discipline but simply cog sci, and all attempts to say otherwise are simply fictionalisms to compensate for incommensurability generating demand for fictions.

    In other words fictions produce conflation inflation and opportunity for inductive and deductive error from false premises (ontologies, paradigms), and simply serve as sources of ignorance, fraud, and deceit (Popper).

    Ergo, metaphysics consists simply an extension of physics in the same commensurable language of operations, and there are not multiple metaphysics, just ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion and obscurantism, fictionalism and deceit..

    And I can’t find any alternative explanation. And I’m not at all unique in this understanding. (Van Frassen, McGinn, Thomassen cited in SEP). And the anti-positivist criticism does not hold against falsificationism/critical naturalism – only asks for commensurability across scales, to maintain coherence and parsimony in defense against error, bias, fiction and deceit.

    And I am still stuck with the non-anglo desire for empathy with ontologies (experiencing) rather than objectivity(describing).

    Is this purely cultural or are scandinavian(northern european) peoples genetically different in that we have greater distance (agency) between intuition and cognition.

    AFAIK every problem I have encountered that we call metaphysics is simply a grammatical error. In fact, I’m not sure philosophy exists of much other than grammatical errors (Malformed calculations).

    And this is because language is a system of measurement that is only as useful as grammatical demands (tolerances) allow. And that as a system of measurement the only deflationary and inflationary method of speech is operations.

    While certain philosophers have made this claim and have been attacked, these attacks occur under the fallacy of closure in the system of language itself. Which is a common sophomoric argument in philosophical discourse. The only closure is reality itself in toto.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 12:05:00 UTC

  • CHRISTIANS ARE NATURAL LEFTISTS Christians were always the ally of the left – th

    CHRISTIANS ARE NATURAL LEFTISTS

    Christians were always the ally of the left – there reason for the war against the south, the reason for immigration, the reason for ‘civil rights’. The christians only moved to the ‘right’ once they understood that the state wanted to become the new religion in the franco-jewish-soviet model. Christianity is not nationalist, is not particularist, is not masculine, is not heroic, is not militaristic, expansionary, truthful, sovereign. It’s antithetical to the west: a purely semitic cult. It was the church’s necessity of accommodating the aristocracy that made our people survive christianity and made the claims of something other than destruction of our people possible.

    They are not members of the libertarian or right. Instead, libertarians and the right give ‘nod’ to christians the way men give ‘nod’ to women, and value christianity the way men value women. But Christians are not ‘men’ , nor ‘european’ but simply semitic (female strategy) of resistance, undermining, and dysgenia.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 11:22:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION The law exists so that those with material i

    PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION

    The law exists so that those with material interests (power) preserve the value of cooperation by forcing people into, and limiting them to, the market, and denying them non-market means (within the limits of cost and ability).

    Propertarianism explains how to use this law (logic) to suppress those forms of parasitism that are currently not, because we lacked a means of doing so. In particular (and I have only come to understand this myself over the past few years) it suppresses baiting into moral hazard, which is the general technique of exploitation that is in use. (including your sophism above).

    P it’s purely empirical. “people do this”, “this is why”, “self interest of those with interests”, “where almost all but the marginal cases have interests.”

    You can build any political order with P that you want precisely because it is an algorithmic logic (grammar), as long as you do it truthfully.

    To falsify P would require you falsify rational choice, reciprocity, and self interest. To state you would prefer to built some other form of government no matter how honest or dishonest, productive or parasitic, would still be explicable in P, and peoples’ behavior under it would still be universally expliable with P, because P is not a philosophy (should) but a science (is). It is the science and logic of what we call the psychological, linguistic, social sciences, and political sciences.

    Now you can ‘bitch’ about the fact that I use this logic to advocate for rule of law – the most parsimonious expression of that science – because you like or do not like that particular world (because it would crush ‘creativity in dishonesty’) which means ‘witty people’ have no more utility in their manipulation of others in order to obtain self image, social status, and various forms of influence. But that is the point altogether.

    P is simply ‘true’. What you do it it is a matter of your (power-group’s) preferences. I prefer to crush the abrahamic deceits (baiting into moral hazard by sophisms, pseudosciences, supernaturalisms, and deceits) and to use this to save my people from their lies. Maybe you prefer otherwise.

    But I am fairly sure that the mainstream will prefer my argument and policy recommendations over the alternatives and this lowers their resistance to its implementation relative to your alternatives.

    Again. Please don’t try to be smarter. You aren’t in the first place (even close) and P is quite a superpower – just like reason, empiricism, and science were superpowers before it.

    The more I use P, the better I get at it, the more I understand the revolution in human thought and experience that would be brought about is as great as the previous revolutions provided by western thought (reason, empiricism, science).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 07:47:00 UTC