Form: Mini Essay

  • ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA –“I’d like to see you make a post on

    ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA

    –“I’d like to see you make a post on pædophilia. You smash every issue and I think this deserves attention. It’s not a waste of your time if you’re educating the whole following, not just me.”—

    Thanks for asking. This isn’t really a difficult question. And I might have to edit this abit for additional clarity, but here it is:

    –The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla.–

    WHEREAS

    1. Definition

    … a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

    … b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.

    The criteria therefore is:

    … i) obsessive or exclusive interest

    … ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age.

    … iii) by those 16 years of age or older

    … iv) and at least five years older.

    2. Limits

    These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:

    … a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.

    … b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.

    … b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.

    … c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.

    … d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.

    … e) natural experimentation between pubescents.

    … f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.

    … g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.

    3. Evidence

    … a) consumption of child pornography

    … b) obsession in attention, speech, collection

    … b) molestation

    … c) co-morbidity

    … … deficits in response inhibition,

    … … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.

    … … failed lateralization (ie: the’re feminine)

    … … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)

    4. Causes

    “Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)

    … a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)

    … b) developmental trauma (Trigger)

    … c) brain trauma (Trigger)

    5. Incurability

    The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.

    AND WHEREAS;

    … a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity

    … b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm

    … d) Externality – produces vast externalities

    … d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible

    … e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court:

    … … Because the Law must:

    … … … Provide restitution

    … … … Provide punishment

    … … … Prevent repetition or expansion

    THEREFORE;

    It is the judgment of the law that:

    1. Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.

    2. Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution

    3. To those incapable of self defense,

    4. And unable to engage in reciprocity,

    5. Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defense of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.

    AND THEREFORE;

    Pedophiles who signal risk, by:

    … a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking)

    … b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography

    … c) molestation

    … d) association with one another

    … e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above

    Shall be permanently removed from the population by:

    … i) death by burning for molestation

    … i) death by hanging for all other violations

    … ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps)

    And;

    Whereas;

    … i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm;

    Therefore;

    … i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence.

    … ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence.

    AND WHEREAS, CONVERSELY ;

    1. false accusation is:

    … a) harmful to the accused

    … b) exposes the accused to risk of death

    … c) produces vast externalities whether or not true

    … d) is closed to restitution

    THEREFORE

    … a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution. ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused.

    –This is the Law–

    –March 19, 2019–

    –COMMENTS–

    by James Fox Higgins

    The beauty of this piece of law is that:

    Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely.

    So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society.

    If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:16:00 UTC

  • JUDGING A RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, OR IDEOLOGY —There are good people everywhere.

    JUDGING A RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, OR IDEOLOGY

    —There are good people everywhere. But it’s not the good people we worry about. it’s the bad people. And we must if we are honest not measure a philosophy ideology or religion by it’s good but by its bad. Why? because there are good people who will fit into anything anywhere. The question is, how do these philosophies, ideologies, or religions, prohibit their bad people? By these measures, islam and judaism are the most evil religions of all. The reason is that they justify those very desires that all other religions evolved to suppress: lying.—

    (worth repeating)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 01:27:00 UTC

  • THE DEVIL IN THE WORD ‘IS’ AND PROPERTARIANISM One ‘is’ a propertarian the way o

    THE DEVIL IN THE WORD ‘IS’ AND PROPERTARIANISM

    One ‘is’ a propertarian the way one is a doctor, lawyer, engineer or mathematician. It’s a discipline of law. That’s it.

    Where “is = A PRACTITIONER OF A DISCIPLINE”

    One ‘is’ an advocate for a social order or other.

    Where “is = AN ADVOCATE FOR A CLASS PREFERENCE”

    One ‘is’ a member of one religious habituation or other.

    Where ‘is = A SET OF INDOCTRINATED COGNITIVE BIASES”

    Propertarianism is rule of law: Nomocracy (NO-MO’-crah-see)

    Where “is = IDENTITY (equal to).”

    Propertarianism is a formal rule of law that eliminates disinformation in the commons, and particularly the means of abrahamic deception we call baiting, pilpul and critique.

    Where “is = AN ADVOCATE FOR EXPANSION OF INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY TO SPEECH”

    Curt Doolittle ‘is’ an advocate for Nomocracy, Militia, Monarchy, Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, and Shared Returns (dividends) on the Realm (state profits) for western peoples in particular, but for all peoples capable of it.

    Where “is = An ADVOCATE for ARISTOCRACY”

    Curt Doolittle ‘is’ an advocate for policies that produce what we would call national socialism in the original french german and italian ambitions, but by rule of law and market means unlimited by previous failures to understand money and economics as merely information and influence.

    Where “is = AN ADVOCATE FOR NATIONAL SOCIALIST POLICIES IN THE FACE OF ONGOING AUTOMATION”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 12:13:00 UTC

  • THE LIMITS TO OUR EXISTENCE by Tim Beckley-Spillane We’ve produced more objectiv

    THE LIMITS TO OUR EXISTENCE

    by Tim Beckley-Spillane

    We’ve produced more objective truth than any other people – and with it more value than any other. In the process we’ve created incredible demand.

    So we’ve demonstrated to all, including the most parasitic of all, that we have much to give, and have convinced ourselves, perhaps more than any other, that our means of productivity are inexhaustible.

    They aren’t.

    Our triumphs in art, science, and civilization and the universal demand created by them have made us overconfident and the gods have chosen to impose a natural limit on our ascent.

    We’re now forced to choose oblivion if not godhood prematurely, or to return to the earth as a wiser people, to regain strength, to remind ourselves of the sources of our greatness, and, in time, to launch from the greater heights of our cumulative achievement free of the costs that others would gladly impose.

    The production of truth, the source of our greatness, of course, requiring transcendence of our subjectivity.

    Or, to express the idea in less romantic prose, we produce truth, which requires a maximal objectivity. The world is right to expect this of us. But the production of truth is costly and the benefits, though great, are limited. So we need to be discriminating in both our our expenditures and the distribution of benefits they produce, and for this, subjectivity is required.

    We’re the only people on the planet expected to transcend our own subjectivity.

    But we can’t afford to any longer.

    —“Tim Beckley-Spillane:

    Do we need to be discriminating? Yes.

    Does it require subjectivity?

    No. It requires reciprocity.

    Excellent articulation. I just think OBJECTIVE ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

    “—Bryan Nova Brey

    We need to be discriminating in how we spend our resources in the production of value and in the distribution of value produced, because those resources are limited. We demonstrate subjective preferences when we make discriminations of the kind in markets. Reciprocity allows us to calculate our subjective interests. Because interests conflict, objectivity in such matters isn’t possible, is it?

    A problem we’re still dealing with today is that we attempted to transcend our subjectivity and universalize our preferences. We need to content ourselves with the pursuit of that which is subjectively beneficial for us. And to the extent that our relationships with others are reciprocal, those benefits can be shared. Let me know where you disagree.

    —“From what I can tell we (Propertarians) are descriptive and objective. We define law via negativa. How groups of people prescribe, subjectively and via positiva is up to market competition. Seems to be the completion of the intention of the Founding Fathers.”—Bryan Nova Brey


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 11:53:00 UTC

  • LESSONS FROM GENGHIS KHAN The first question of outgroup politics: —“If I and

    LESSONS FROM GENGHIS KHAN

    The first question of outgroup politics:

    —“If I and mine CAN exterminate you, then why should I and mine NOT exterminate you? At present since you are a threat, it is rational to exterminate you. Therefore we need a reason NOT to exterminate you. What is that reason”— Emissary of Genghis Khan.

    THE FIRST QUESTIONS OF PHILOSOPHY?

    1. Philosophy (choice) why not commit suicide?

    2. Ethics (choice) why not commit murder?

    3. Politics (choice) why not commit genocide?

    Without first answering these questions, you cannot answer all questions upon which those answers depend.

    Rather than engage in a conversation under pretext, simply ask the question “Why do I not at least TRY for murder or genocide if this means more for me and mine?”

    Cooperation is only valuable until it is not.

    Tolerance is only valuable until it is not.

    Otherwise, genocide, and seizure of assets are superior options.

    Ergo, this is the reason to ‘cooperate’ reciprocally.

    ALWAYS START ANY DEBATE BY ASKING “WHY NOT END YOU FOR FUN AND PROFIT?”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 11:12:00 UTC

  • Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/55398535_774999656194897_5801455774043

    Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/55398535_774999656194897_5801455774043471872_n_10157050580442264.mp4 Religion gives advice – wisdom literature.

    Politics gives law

    Science gives truth

    If your religion contains law, it is not religion but politics.

    If you worship your politics it is still politics.

    Your law is either compatible with natural law or it is not.

    Their laws are not compatible with natural law

    Their religions are not religions but politics.

    As politics they are acts of war.

    As acts of war they may and must be fought as war.

    There is only one enemy in the world today amoung all civilizaed peoples.

    It is the great lie of abraham and all that descended from him.

    We have been at war since the persians invaded the aegean.

    We have been at war since the greeks crossed into mesopotamia.

    We have been at war since the romans crossed into the levant.

    There is only one enemy for the rest of the world.

    it is the cancer that drives world conflict.

    And it has for more than two thousand years.Jim CatreTechnically philosophy gives truth. Science just gives certainty.Mar 16, 2019, 12:22 PMHimmi HassanBilal Kad قلت لك هبييل شويةMar 16, 2019, 4:09 PMReligion gives advice – wisdom literature.

    Politics gives law

    Science gives truth

    If your religion contains law, it is not religion but politics.

    If you worship your politics it is still politics.

    Your law is either compatible with natural law or it is not.

    Their laws are not compatible with natural law

    Their religions are not religions but politics.

    As politics they are acts of war.

    As acts of war they may and must be fought as war.

    There is only one enemy in the world today amoung all civilizaed peoples.

    It is the great lie of abraham and all that descended from him.

    We have been at war since the persians invaded the aegean.

    We have been at war since the greeks crossed into mesopotamia.

    We have been at war since the romans crossed into the levant.

    There is only one enemy for the rest of the world.

    it is the cancer that drives world conflict.

    And it has for more than two thousand years.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 16:25:00 UTC

  • GENERATION JONES 55-65: TECH+DEINDUSTRIALIZATION AND THE FAILURE OF THE MARXIST

    GENERATION JONES 55-65: TECH+DEINDUSTRIALIZATION AND THE FAILURE OF THE MARXIST SOCIALIST PROGRAM

    When I was in high school we had the oil crisis, the evaporation of the postwar advantage, the fall if iran, near zero chance of employment out of college, and the conversion of marxism-socialism to postmodernism (lying).

    Gates, Jobs, and Ellison, Halloween, Star Wars, Alien, Blade Runner, Indiana Jones, Neuromancer

    —“Generation Jones is the social cohort of the latter half of the Baby boomers to the first years of Generation X. The term was first coined by the author Jonathan Pontell, who identified the cohort as those born from 1954 to 1965 in the U.S. who came of age during the oil crisis, stagflation, and the Carter presidency, rather than during the 1960s, but slightly before Gen X. Other sources place the starting point at 1956 or 1957. Unlike older baby boomers, most of Generation Jones did not grow up with World War II veterans as fathers, and for them there was no compulsory military service and no defining political cause, as opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War had been for the older boomers. … The name “Generation Jones” has several connotations, including a large anonymous generation, a “keeping up with the Joneses” competitiveness and the slang word “jones” or “jonesing”, meaning a yearning or craving. It is said that Jonesers were given huge expectations as children in the 1960s, and then confronted with a different reality as they came of age during a long period of mass unemployment and when de-industrialization arrived full force in the mid-late 1970s and 1980s, leaving them with a certain unrequited “jonesing” quality for the more prosperous days of the past. “—

    —“Originally, GenJonesers were mistakenly lumped in with Boomers because of their mutually high birth rates. But generations stem from shared formative experiences, not head counts. Over time, the original mistaken Boomer Generation definition has become widely discredited, with many top experts now embracing Generation Jones as a distinct generation. These experts underline the importance of distinguishing between the post-WWII demographic boom in babies versus the cultural generations born during that time. Jonesers were born between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s, with the exact birth years varying from nation to nation. In the U.S. and most Western countries, the birth years most often used for GenJones are 1954-1965. Extensive research has shown dramatic differences between the collective

    personality traits of Boomers versus Jonesers.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 13:06:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54143001_10157049778027264_715083809

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54143001_10157049778027264_7150838097905713152_n_10157049778022264.jpg YES THIS IS WHAT WAR LOOKS LIKE FROM HERE ONWARD – LIKE IT HAS FOR MOST OF HISTORYMicah PezdirtzIslamo-arab conflict with Europeans coming up on 1,300 years but give people a generation of relative peace they forget everythingMar 15, 2019, 9:52 AMStephen ThomasI have no problem shooting state dogs when things go hot and shutting down infrastructure.

    Random civilians? That solves nothing and hurts the cause.Mar 15, 2019, 9:54 AMLyndon ShayneStephen Thomas terrorMar 15, 2019, 9:57 AMCurt Doolittle”never again”Mar 15, 2019, 12:55 PMCurt Doolittlestephen, unfortunately you are wrong. it causes faster acceleration than any other method.Mar 15, 2019, 12:56 PMJohn KellyCurt Doolittle You cannot justify this Curt. NOBODY salivates for this explosion point more than I but to wipe out an entire congregation (in time of peace) is blood lust for the sake of the inevitable. But we must not put this guy on a pedestal. It does not gain moral support from those we need. It is an attack on innocents during worship. It Will embolden the left to confiscate rifles as the President has in NZ already, it is rumored.

    This is a Charlottesville event. UNWINNABLE morally and spiritually and tactically. If it was a grooming gang or a terrorist cell many would be okay. But this was a fail in all accept accelerationism.Mar 16, 2019, 3:53 AMAndy UjkuVery well said MicahMar 16, 2019, 9:26 AMHaley HardingJohn Kelly Do the Israelis target the specific Palestinians that send rockets into their country? No they target the entire ethnic group

    This is tribal warfare. Get over it

    You might want to check the comments of every song he played on YouTube to see how much support this guy hasMar 16, 2019, 4:49 PMEric BestJohn Kelly nobody offered justification. It’s besides the point.

    You need to realize that the way the people in power think is not how you think. Ideals and moralisms and “the way it should be” is what is offered to you and me, they operate in the realm of what is possible, advantageous, and necessary. There’s nothing they won’t use, take advantage of, or do if they think they can and that it will move their interests forward.Mar 16, 2019, 5:25 PMJohn KellyHaley Harding You aint gona tell a Mick from Chicago about what it is to be tribal. Have you ever curb stomped Muslums before? I have

    But in church in a time of peace?

    If you are for acceleration and retribution, he got that. My point is he chose the wrong target and will only taint our goal at wokeness in our own.

    Our people (normies) are still scared bc they are inside the matrix and cannot comprehend these actions unless there was just action for retaliation. Its vinegar to our moderate cowardly brothers.Mar 16, 2019, 5:48 PMJohn KellyEric Best I see your point and John Mark makes me see it clearer…i don’t like dragging innocents in until its total war. We are not savages.Mar 16, 2019, 5:51 PMEric BestJohn Kelly I don’t like any of this. However, this is the situation that has been forced upon us.Mar 16, 2019, 7:07 PMJohn KellyEric Best My head already knows but heart struggles…Mar 16, 2019, 9:38 PMSerg GioWhatever works to get job done.Mar 18, 2019, 8:22 AMYES THIS IS WHAT WAR LOOKS LIKE FROM HERE ONWARD – LIKE IT HAS FOR MOST OF HISTORY


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 09:43:00 UTC

  • ^I can only speak comfortably with James about christianity because he doesn’t t

    ^I can only speak comfortably with James about christianity because he doesn’t try to weasel me into any position. Most of the time, when christians get me into a discourse they try to make me justify a falsehood. this forces me to retaliate. And I don’t like it. Because I have to attack the faith and that’s not constructive.

    I have a very simple principle: faith is faith, and science is science. In a dispute between faith and science it is science. However, science has nothing to say about faith. Principally because that which drives our faith may be scientifically EXPLICABLE, but it’s not scientifically SATISFIABLE. This is very similar to the mind body problem or the memory experience problem. That is, that there is a great deal of difference between explaining the physics of why we have the experiences we do, and the experience and result of that physics. I don’t find this hard to understand but apparently this is hard for most people to understand.

    This is why I was searching through the online christian leadership – because there aren’t any ‘great thinkers’ out there trying to solve ‘our problem’ which includes the problem of our faith post-darwin and einstein. Most are living in the past but not living in their faith. We must evolve our faith. Evolve it into a militant defensive faith. not one that is dependent upon a pagan aristocracy of arms and armor to provide it with survival.

    I want to restore a militant christianity just as the viking invasions restored a militant christianity, before which europe could not defend herself given the celtic holocaust, the germanic migrations to fill the vacuum, and the roman collapse and germanic and arab migrations to fill the vacuum.

    It may be that the west must always have pagan aristocracy and christian priesthood, and a commercial nobility in constant competition in order not to fall into the failings of each.

    The law is the vehicle. The natural law is compatible with christianity. The question is only whether christians will fight, or if this fight is in the hands of a few pagans who must once again save christianity from islamic and jewish conquest.

    If christians will fight then they are allies of our people. If they will not, then they are allies of our enemy and only pagans and heathens allies of our people.

    Only those who fight matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 18:54:00 UTC

  • James Fox Higgins understands like few others the difference between discussing

    James Fox Higgins understands like few others the difference between discussing what is and what we can, desire to, and should be.

    Everyone else wants me to produce a via positiva ideology philosophy or religion. When all I am doing is producing the law that prevents reconquest of our people if we impose it.

    And I have not had this experience with any other christian thought leader. When we are talk I am free to say “I can only say that this is what is – that this is law. I do not say what should or must outside of that law.” This is my version of humility. I leave the good and preferable, the inspirational and the spiritual to those for whom those things are important.

    For me, I see heathenism (the dead and nature), paganism (social archetypes), christianity ( political ideals), Militia and Martial Participation as (spiritual), and stoic training in mindfulness as components of my religious portfolio. But I am ABLE to do so. Not all of us are able without training. Some are not able to do more than one. it is too much for them.

    My view of our future is of a god (universe) of many faces (archetypes), many levels (scales), and each of us practices a group of rites (debt payments to) the faces of that god we best depend (are indebted to).

    Natural law and jesus’ five rules are identical.

    The ten commandments are simply statements of property.

    —“You cannot derive an “ought” from an “is”… without an “if”.”— James Fox Higgins


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-14 17:43:00 UTC