Form: Mini Essay

  • Understanding the European vs Semitic Conflict Provides More Value than Criticism and Complaint:

    (Rabbi Reuven is a beautiful human being, great teacher, and a wise man.) [A] bit of explanation helps us understand each other: Evolution(or God) has only so many tools with which to alter the behavior of peoples. First among them is neoteny – what we call domestication. Or Self Domestication. This provides us with reason and agency over our impulses. The second is gender differences in instinct, intuition, and cognition – which are dramatic. The third is eugenic reproduction – or what the jews have achieved through upward redistribution of reproduction to the verbal, and out-casting those who fail. And what europeans have achieved through upward redistribution of reproduction to the Martial and Political, and limiting the reproduction of those who fail. This is the reason for Ashkenazi, European, and East Asian separation from the rest of the world: for one reason or another, we have been more successful at eugenics, by limiting and reducing the size of our underclasses. The difference between our strategies is that jews carry a higher genetic load from small numbers, in exchange for limiting cognitive dimorphism, thereby providing males with female cognitive abilities in the verbal. The science has explained Ashkenazi excellences, as well as european. The east asian is quite different because while Ashkenazi retain learning ability through life, europeans slightly less so, asians much less so, and other peoples far less so. So both cognitive dimorphism and neoteny have given us all slightly different variations in competitive excellences. This has created an interesting world:

    [table id=2 /]

    Women parasitically consume the productivity of men in exchange for reproduction of male’s offspring. Europeans prosper and control our destiny because we produce commons. (Production). Jews prosper but do not control their destiny because they profit by the taking of others’ commons. (Parasitism) But there is no benefit to be had from ‘marriage’ with the Jews. I tell a joke. It is, that Jews are all hyperconsumption, hypergamous women trying to constantly upgrade husbands on civilizational scale, and surprised when the men punish them for cheating. This is a bit of humor. But it is true. The only solutions to our old conflict are separation, integration, or cooperation, where cooperation is possible by incrementally extending our european laws to prohibit the industrialization of parasitism. Then good Jews will stay, and bad Jews will leave. The Jews are not innocent. There is every evidence in every country at every time in history, that the jews have prospered by operating as an organized crime family for the purpose of extracting from the commons of host peoples, and using their prosperity (like women) to undermine the host peoples. Why do europeans never learn the cost of our tolerance? Why do the chosen never learn the cost of their ‘immorality’ (profiting from undermining)? Because neither males nor females understand what they do. We do what we intuit as good. But these are two extremes of intuition. They are opposites. And these intuitions are only good if we compromise like men and women compromise in marriage. But the Jews do not compromise because it requires integration OR reformation of jewish religion and law to conform to high trust european ethics and morality that prohibit externalities (impositions of costs upon others or the commons). This would prohibit most of the profit jews make from undermining the host civilization through complaint and criticism (Critique), [T]he crisis in western civilization today is the product of invasion by eastern european secular Jewish intellectuals undermining western civilization from within by the use of the Abrahamic Technique of Fraud: False Promise, Baiting in to Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Under Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Given Western Tolerance for Individual Choice (Sovereignty), to Undermine the Markets between the Classes by False Promise of Outcome Equality using Pseudoscience (Boas, Marx, Freud, Adorno) and Sophism (Derrida), the way the Jews, Christians, and Muslims destroyed the ancient world by False promise of Life after death using Supernaturalism and Sophism. The last Semitic Big Lies cost us a thousand year dark age and a billion dead, and every great civilization of the ancient world, was reduced to ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia. The Semitic Big Lies of the present age, have cost us 100M people under communism alone, have brought the west to the brink of civil war, and the reorganization and restoration of the historical balance of powers because of the ‘big lies’ will undoubtably cost us many many millions if not billions more. The Europeans are merely fools. When Alexander crossed the Bosphorus to punish the Persians for their invasions, and sought like all others in the orient to obtain profits from the taxation of trade routes, particularly in tin (bronze), between the continents – he infected western man with semitic supernaturalism and authoritarianism. The Romans repeated the folly. And the byzantines destroyed europe by the forcible conversion of a Rome overwhelmed by Barbarians. Thankfully northern europe eventually replaced mediterranean trade with atlantic trade and ended the value of the historical overland trade routes across eurasia. Combined with the reintroduction of Aristotle (who is the European People’s equivalent of a Prophet), They could produce enough wealth once again to restore european independence from oriental trade routes, and return to their foundations of competing by technological innovation despite smaller numbers. But. Europeans have reformed. It’s time for you. No More Complaints. No More False Promises. No More Lies. No More Baiting into Hazard No More Profiting from harming the commons. No More Undermining the host civilization. No More Parasitism Survive by Production. Or go home to the lands we have restored to you. We paid for you. Dearly. We are not hostile to you. But we are no longer tolerant of your crimes. Because once a crime is understood it can be outlawed. And if outlawed we can live together in peace. And otherwise can be punished until we live in peace. So. Learn from your mistakes. Or ‘Never Again” will be “Yet Again” and this time, it will be even worse than the last. I never err. Ever. Cheers


    (archive)  

    EUROPEAN: Male Cognitive Elites:     Physical/Political Superpredators.. 
    SEMITIC:  Feminine Cognitive Elites: Verbal/Social Superpredators
    
    European = Masculine Paternal...Sovereign.......Hierarchical
    Semitic = Feminine...Maternal...Authoritarian...Equalitarian,
    
    European = Militaristic (physical), Expansionist,..Commons Producing
    Semitic = .Undermining (social), Diasporic, ...... Commons Consuming
    
    European = Technological(physical)..Testimony..Decidability
    Semitic =  Supernatural (verbal)....Opinion....Reasonableness
    
    European = Reciprocal.....Universal High Trust
    Semitic =  Voluntary......Ingroup High/Outgroup Low Trust
  • Only European Peoples have dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of supersti

    Only European Peoples have dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, suffering, disease, child mortality, early death, freedom from heat and cold, and the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to life, and are the only people dragging us kicking and screaming once again to the stars, lest this earth decide once again to interrupt all life with catastrophe and death.

    HOW?

    1 – A Universal Militia Regardless of Cost

    2 – Excellence and Heroism Regardless of Cost

    3 – Duty and Commons Regardless of Cost

    4 – Truth and Oath Regardless of Cost

    5 – Promise and Contract Regardless of Cost

    6 – Sovereignty and Reciprocity Regardless of Cost

    7 – The Natural Law and Jury Regardless of Cost

    8 – Wherein every man a soldier, sheriff, judge, and his own legislator, of his own demonstrated interests.

    9 – And as a result – the only possibility for social organization is Voluntary Markets in: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, war.

    10 – Producing A Power distribution of Law(truth), A Pareto distribution of Assets, A Nash distribution of Rewards.

    11 – In a voluntary organization of production distribution and trade

    12 – Together producing the fastest possible means of human adaptation to circumstances;

    13 – Including the continuous evolutionary production of Human Agency (human capital);

    14 – By the domestication of man by market eugenics,

    15 – And as a result, the direction of surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples of returns produced therefrom;

    16 – Including the unique high trust society;

    17 – And the informational, scientific, technological, medical, economic, social, political, and military benefits therefrom.

    18 – Yielding a genetic distribution free of the burden of underclass consumption, and the costs of their organization, administration, and care.

    Anyone can copy european peoples if you copy our eugenics long enough that you can copy our judges and our laws.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-14 14:01:00 UTC

  • KARL POPPER’S DEMARCATION PROBLEM IS SOLVED. As far as I know (and this is my ar

    KARL POPPER’S DEMARCATION PROBLEM IS SOLVED.

    As far as I know (and this is my area of specialization), western success in science, technology, medicine, and economics was due to the transfer of our legal tradition (by Aristotle to Bacon to Hume to Hayek), and the failure of our philosophers to understand that transfer.

    So, the demarcation in law between testifiability and fiction, is legal due diligence (falsification). Man can perform due diligence against every dimension perceivable by man: categorical consistency (identity), internal consistency (logical), operational consistency (existential possibility), external consistency (empirical), rational consistency (rational choice), reciprocal consistency (rational choice between parties in cooperation), completeness (full accounting within stated limits), warrantied by possibility of restitution.

    In other words, the demarcation between science and non-science is falsificationary, and not only the test of falsifiability, but due diligence against falsehood in all dimensions perceivable by man.

    And this brings us to where else Popper failed: cost. Philosophers generally work in sets, and the law, engineering in operations, and while sets are largely verbal constructs free of cost, action, operations, engineering, science, law and economics include costs. This is why there is a high correlation between moralizing and philosophy, and a high correlation between science and law. Because moralizing does seeks general rules regardless of cost, and sciences and law seek general rules including costs.

    Why does this matter? Popper never performed a study of scientific research, he just used reason to state that choices in scientific investigation was undecidable. But it’s demonstrably false. the problem in scientific exploration like any form of action (engineering), is that as distance from human scale increases either smaller or larger, the costs of investigation increases, and as such we pursue the information we can afford to. And this turns out to be the optimum means of investigation. And this corresponds to the physical and human world’s behavior: nature must take the least cost action possible, and humans do as well – as long as we make a full accounting of causes (incentives).

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-11 09:58:00 UTC

  • Some of us are capable of profound things, and achieve them. Others are not – be

    Some of us are capable of profound things, and achieve them. Others are not – because they cannot imagine doing them. Why? Because they cannot imagine getting a core of others to follow them. Why? Because they have no strategy, no plan, and lack the knowledge to do so. Study Mao.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-10 17:45:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204457216092385282

    Reply addressees: @DfeatPropaganda

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1204456853159198720


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DfeatPropaganda It’s interesting when people make claims without evidence. How did Mao do it? Your Errors: Because you don’t understand you assume others don’t. Because you don’t know how to “Mao” assumes others don’t. Because you don’t know how to CAUSE the collapse, you assume others don’t.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204456853159198720


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DfeatPropaganda It’s interesting when people make claims without evidence. How did Mao do it? Your Errors: Because you don’t understand you assume others don’t. Because you don’t know how to “Mao” assumes others don’t. Because you don’t know how to CAUSE the collapse, you assume others don’t.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1204456853159198720

  • Just as the byzantines and Turks of the middle east used higher trust European m

    Just as the byzantines and Turks of the middle east used higher trust European military mercenaries, European kings used lower trust Jews as tax and credit mercenaries. In most of Europe Jews were the property of the monarchy and under its protection.

    Ancestors of all People are criminal and immoral by our present standard, but it is their labor though the suppression of criminality and its replacement with trade industry and technology that made our present privilege possible.

    Read Benjamin Goldberg for Jews allying with the state against the people. Read Solzhenitsyn for Jewish specialization in crimes of baiting into hazard: alcohol, prostitution, gambling on credit, and loans at usurious prices so that land could be seized and resold – and refusal to engage in ‘honest’ work despite regard crown grants of land.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-09 10:52:00 UTC

  • —“Q: WHY DO OUR BRAINS CONSTRUCT TWO OPPOSING EXPLANATIONS?”— (repost from fall

    —“Q: WHY DO OUR BRAINS CONSTRUCT TWO OPPOSING EXPLANATIONS?”—

    (repost from fall 2018)

    Question: “Why have our marvelous brains formulated two diametrically opposite explanations?”

    Answer: Cognitive Division of Labor: Predator (action, dominance, science) — vs.– Prey (mindfulness, submission, religion).

    Problem: Demand for mindfulness increases with uncertainty. Post tribal life removes resource uncertainty at the cost of social uncertainty (female herd equality, male pack hierarchy). Scale increases uncertainty. Production cycles decrease availability of positive reinforcement (status signals, fitness signals). Consumerism buys signals, at cost of increase in isolation. Diversity (market polity) increases isolation.

    Choices:

    (a) Personal Rituals: Stoicism (Self Authoring) > Sophism (Philosophy) > Pseudoscience (“Church of TED, Marxist Economics”) > Religion (Old Age) > Magic (New Age) > Occult (literature – post-reason).

    (b) Social Rituals: Hunting > Sport > Commerce > Civic Groups and Clubs > Politics > Religion (academy, media, cult) > Fringe Movements (outcasts) > Occult (‘escapists’).

    What’s the Underlying Problem? Neural Economy. (Physical Economy(Stress), Emotional Economy (Stress), Neural Economy(stress)).

    Regularity provides certainty and decreased neural cost.

    Plenty provides personal decrease in neural cost but increase in cost of collective coherence, consistency, correspondence, and (frame) decidability.

    In other words, manageable neural cost provides anti-fragility (mindfulness) and suppressed neural cost (infantilization) increases fragility.

    The problem we face satisfaction of demand for predatory ( consumption, acquisition, opportunity, signals/status) vs prey ( consumption, insurance, certainty, not-sticking-out/equality).

    Markets (Economy) in everything: Unfortunately we have constructed a cognitive model of monopoly under both universalist abrahamic religion, justificationary philosophy, universal democracy, legislation (rather than tort law), and constructivist mathematics (and positivist logic).

    Despite the fact that the uniqueness of western civilization’s ‘salvation’ of mankind from superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, endemic violence, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature – was the product of anti-monopoly “Markets in All Walks of Life” under individual sovereignty, tort law of reciprocity, evidentiary (testifiable) truth regardless of cost to face, status, dominance, or competence hierarchy, duty of the commons regardless of station, decision jury, judge and rule of law, leaving the only remaining method of cooperation “as markets in all aspects of life” that resulted in our innovations of reason, empiricism, and science.

    Ergo, between religion, philosophy, (and that counter-empiricism we call the ‘enlightenment’ and it’s capture of power) democracy, followed by the revision of monopoly Abrahamic Monotheism( judaism, christianity, and islamism), that we call Marxism(Pseudoscience), Socialism(Monopoly Property), Postmodernism (monopoly sophism), and Feminism (monopoly female control vs compromise familial control) – we repeated the same process as the ancient era (resulting in the destruction of every civlization of the ancient world) and attempted in the current era to undermine (destroy) that social order that made our salvation from natural condition possible: non-monopoly markets of competition (calculation) using discovery by trial and error at the cost of soft eugenics (suppression of the reproduction of those who force burden by moral hazard onto others).

    The questions are one of knowledge and one of choice. Lacking knowledge one cannot make a choice. Possessing knowledge what choice does one (or all) make?

    The answer is divided between the predator and pack’s preservation, or the prey and herd’s submission. 😉

    Maybe that will add to the discourse. 😉

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-08 14:34:00 UTC

  • WILL FUTURE ECONOMIES DEPEND ON SOCIALIST GOVERNMENTS, AS TECHNOLOGY MAKES HUMAN

    WILL FUTURE ECONOMIES DEPEND ON SOCIALIST GOVERNMENTS, AS TECHNOLOGY MAKES HUMAN LABOUR REDUNDANT?

    (repost from 2017)

    Good Question, but You Might Not Like the Answer

    Socialism means central management of property and production. Socialism is dead. It cannot exist, ever, any more than communism or anarchism can exist – for obvious reasons, that I won’t go into here.

    Almost the entire world works on a mixed economy. A mixed economy means that private property, money, and prices are used to provide calculability, planning, and incentives for individuals, yet the proceeds of their unequal productivity are captured, and redistributed.

    The means of this redistribution varies from the investment in research, in industry, and infrastructure, to the subsidy of retirement, unemployment, general income, and the provision of health care and justice, military and defense.

    the uncomfortable truth is that the lower classes (dumber, more impulsive people, with lower industriousness) are far more costly than people who are intelligent, thoughtful, and industrious can compensate for, so the countries that are the most advanced and have the highest redistribution are those that have eliminated their underclasses through attrition during the middle and late middle and early modern ages. In other words, the best way to increase your wealth and unemployment is to force one or zero children to people who require redistribution.

    Moreover: There are limits to energy consumption available on the planet.

    Moreover: There are limits to productivity using energy available on the planet.

    Moreover: Humans are *extremely* expensive organisms.

    SO:

    THE OPTIMISTIC VERSION:

    We impose worldwide one or zero child policy on those people who cannot engage in fruitful employment and over about four generations raise the median ability of humanity about one standard deviation, eliminating most demand. Meanwhile we impose a law that says that any job that CAN be done by a human without repetitive stress injury, shall be done by a human. And that would solve most of the problems.

    THE STATUS QUO VERSION

    Since that would be untenable for the third world the vast majority of their populations being ‘surplus humans’, and impolitic for the first world, given that the state is empowered by women and the lower classes through voting I expect what will occur is no change, until the existing system of credit collapses (which should occur somewhere in the next generation if not this one.) And we will

    THE SCARY VERSION

    The vast importing of underclasses into the civilized world in order to attempt to compensate for the impossibility of maintaining these levels of redistribution in a world that is no longer economically and institutionally backward, nor pervasively superstitious and illiterate, will reverse 3500 years of reduction of the underclasses, and reduce all but say the japanese and Han chinese to worldwide malthusian poverty, since it is DIFFERENCES that make productivity possible.

    Regardless of what economists like to promote the carrying capacity of the planet looks as if the current standards of living cannot be extended to the full population extant.

    That’s my understanding of the choices.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-08 13:40:00 UTC

  • REFORMATION: THE STUDY OF MAN BEFORE AND AFTER PROPERTARIANISM (worth repeating)

    REFORMATION: THE STUDY OF MAN BEFORE AND AFTER PROPERTARIANISM

    (worth repeating)

    Given the Spectrum of : {Neurobiology, Psychology, Sociology, Economics, Evolutionary Strategy, Politics and War}.

    1) Neurobiology: how the brain works: chiefly: it’s biological limits to perception, cognition, memory, knowledge and reason.

    2) Psychology: the study of the brain’s struggle to acquire and inventory, its limits, and its errors (cognitive biases) given the individual’s reproductive strategy.

    3) Sociology: the study of cooperative acquisition by groups: the production of cooperative and normative commons.

    4) Economics: the study of cooperative reproduction, production distribution and trade for the purposes of persistence. The productive commons.

    6) Evolutionary Strategy: The suite of informal(manners, ethics, morals, myths, education), economic (production distribution and trade), and formal (law, politics ) institutions that allow the extant peoples to compete with other extant peoples. The competitive commons.

    5) Politics: the study of organizational institutions for the purpose of producing competitive(group evolutionary strategy), reproductive, productive(economic), normative(institutions) and material commons.

    6) War: the study of the limits of productive cooperation, and the imposition of cooperation, elimination of threats, and elimination of competition.

    Man Acts To Acquire To Survive. Cooperation Is The Most Beneficial Means Action to Acquire. But only if cooperation is non-parasitic. And for cooperation to be non-parasitic it must be: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of externality by the same criteria.

    So, the study of man is the study of man’s acquisition of all that he desires. Man acts to acquire.

    NEUROBIOLOGY

    While we will undoubtedly gain further insights into man, brain and mind, it is unlikely that the Propertarian principles will be falsified – only increased in precision.

    1) that man acts to acquire property en toto,

    2) moral bias is determined by reproductive strategy

    3) specialised moral biases that reflect our reproductive strategies and voluntary cooperation allow us to produce a market for cooperation that functions as an information system making use of the entire spectrum of perceptions in the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy.

    4) language evolved largely to justify actions in the context of cooperation rather than to identify truth propositions. Truth is difficult for us because it is critical. Justification is easy for us.

    PSYCHOLOGY

    Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an ideal) with someone’s thinking (a totalitarian doctrine) we ask what they seek to acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by moral or immoral means. All human behavior can be expressed as interactions between desires for acquisition, the need to negotiate, and moral constraint, and the relative value, or lack of value, of cooperation.

    SOCIOLOGY

    Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an ideal), we ask what the group seeks to acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by moral or immoral means.

    EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY

    Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an idea) we ask what the group seeks ot acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by internally and externally moral, or immoral, means.

    ECONOMICS

    Economics can be studied as the means by which we eliminate frictions (transaction costs) and thereby increase the ease and decrease the risk of cooperation (Austrian Economics), OR economics can bes studied as the means by which we search for extensions of rule of law such that interference in the economy is non-discretionary (Chicago Economics), OR economics can be the means by which we determining the maximum disinformation that we can insert into the economy for the purpose of increasing consumption, and by consumption, employment(Keynesian economics). But we now know that Austrian is the most moral, Chicago at least interferes under rule of law, and Keynesian (saltwater) economics is the means by which we conduct the most deceit.

    POLITICS

    Instead of asking what action is best (monopoly) we ask how individuals can organize into groups to conduct exchanges with other groups, in order to acquire what they wish to by moral or immoral means.

    WAR

    Instead of the empirical falsehood that war is universally bad, war is the only solution to the failure to cooperate on marginally indifferent moral terms, and war is perhaps the most productive effort man can undertake if one group increases the suppression of parasitism of another group, and especially if it creates or improves trade routes. Violence is either the means by which we enact parasitism, or the means by which we eliminate parasitism. If we eliminate, or at least reduce parasitism substantially, then war, like all prosecution of parasitism, is by definition, moral.

    THE COMPLETION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT PROJECT

    The study of man prior to Propertarianism and post-Propertarianism is equal to the study of man prior to the enlightenment and after the enlightenment.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-08 08:58:00 UTC

  • LIKE I SAID IT’S CLASS SIZE, ADMIXTURE AND MIGRATION – NO MATTER WHAT GROUP Comp

    LIKE I SAID IT’S CLASS SIZE, ADMIXTURE AND MIGRATION – NO MATTER WHAT GROUP

    Compare:

    FLIGHT FROM FAMINE

    —“Ireland (92) and Scotland (97) also have lower averages, which Prof. Lynn attributes to selective emigration: Men of better-than-average intelligence managed to leave during famines and other crises.”—

    FLIGHT FROM PROSECUTION

    —“Prof. Lynn finds that Israelis have a weighted average IQ of about 95, with figures of 103 for Ashkenazim, 91 for Sephardim, and 86 for Arabs. Jews tended not to breed with the people among whom they lived, but were not completely endogamous. Prof. Lynn attributes intelligence difference between Ashkenazim and Sephardim to admixture from host populations. Ashkenazim in the United States and Britain tend to score in the 107 to 115 range, considerably higher than Israeli Jews. Prof. Lynn suggests that this is because only the more intelligent were able to come west to escape persecution in Russia and Eastern Europe. Emigration has been easier since the creation of Israel, which has been the more recent destination for Ashkenazim.”—

    RETENTION OF EXCEPTIONAL ABILITIES

    —“At the same time, Australian aborigines, with an IQ of 62, score 119 — well above the white average of 100 — on a spatial memory test that requires them to study 20 objects for 30 seconds and memorize their locations. This ability is thought to have evolved in the Australian desert, where hunters must remember even the slightest geographic features, and aborigines have excellent reputations as guides and trackers. This ability is still found in aborigines who have lived in cities for several generations, which suggests it is a genetic trait. Aborigines have quite small brains, but with disproportionately large right hemispheres, which is the area that handles spatial memory.”—

    Note that chimps are frighteningly better at the same kind of task than humans, and put even aborigines to shame. They can remember incredibly complex patterns in short term memory, from just a glance. Our representational ‘memory’ degrades really fast, with a half life of something on the order of half a second.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-07 11:18:00 UTC

  • HYPOTHALAMUS (Regarding drastic difference in women taking ‘the pill’.) (Hypothe

    HYPOTHALAMUS

    (Regarding drastic difference in women taking ‘the pill’.)

    (Hypothesis: the female brain evolved to sustain moods in the care of children, and absent children the female brain does not mature, and in the absence of the reproductive cycle declines. Which is what we see in the data. So without competition boys infantilize and without children girls infantilize – and infantilizing causes behavior in humans similar to caged animals in zoos.)

    WHAT DOES THE HYPOTHALAMUS DO?

    The hypothalamus is a portion of the brain that contains a number of small nuclei (groups of neurons that work to calculate specialized functions). All vertebrate brains contain a hypothalamus. In humans, it is the size of an almond. The hypothalamus links the nervous system to the endocrine system via the pituitary gland and is responsible for the regulation of multiple metabolic processes and other functions of the autonomic nervous system (what you can’t control.

    By synthesizing and secreting certain neurohormones, called Releasing Hormones or Hypothalamic Hormones (messengers), that stimulate or inhibit the secretion of hormones from the pituitary gland, causing your body to react to real or imagined information by translating information for the pituitary gland. Using these messages, the hypothalamus controls body temperature, hunger, important aspects of parenting and attachment behaviors, thirst, fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms.

    The human male and female reproductive cycles are controlled by the interaction of hormones from the hypothalamus and anterior(front of the) pituitary with hormones from reproductive tissues and organs. When the reproductive hormone is required, the hypothalamus sends a hormone to the pituitary. This causes the release into the blood of a hormone (‘follicle-stimulating’) that promotes the formation of ova or sperm, and another hormone (‘luteinizing”) that stimulates ovulation in females and the synthesis of androgen in males.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-12-05 21:23:00 UTC