Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE VALUE NEUTRAL EXPRESSION OF THE FEMALE AND MALE BRAINS We can just as easily

    THE VALUE NEUTRAL EXPRESSION OF THE FEMALE AND MALE BRAINS

    We can just as easily categorize the female brain and the male brain instead as breadth(experience, children)-first vs depth(time, environment)-first. When the paradigm you use is the high cost of brains, and high returns on brains, neural economy; division of reproductive, productive, and cognitive labor; economics of (returns on) cooperation; voluntary cooperation as calculation of group optimums; and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality as limits; and retaliation and altruistic punishment as preservation of returns on cooperation then you no longer are the victim of intuition and animal instinct, and no longer criticize how people feel, think, or want – only whether they negotiate and cooperate truthfully and reciprocally – and that wanting others to feel, think and want on your terms is merely searching for an unearned discount.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 08:06:00 UTC

  • THE VALUE NEUTRAL EXPRESSION OF THE FEMALE AND MALE BRAINS We can just as easily

    THE VALUE NEUTRAL EXPRESSION OF THE FEMALE AND MALE BRAINS

    We can just as easily categorize the female brain and the male brain instead as breadth(experience,children)-first vs depth(time,environment)-first. When the paradigm you use is the high cost of brains, and high returns on brains, neural economy; division of reproductive, productive, and cognitive labor; economics of (returns on) cooperation; voluntary cooperation as calculation of group optimums; and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality as limits; and retaliation and altruistic punishment as preservation of returns on cooperation then you no longer are the victim of intuition and animal instinct, and no longer criticize how people feel, think, or want – only whether they negotiate and cooperate truthfully and reciprocally – and that wanting others to feel, think and want on your terms is merely searching for an unearned discount.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-18 08:05:00 UTC

  • THE TEN COMMANDMENTS VS EUROPEAN TRADITIONAL LAW DEMONSRATE THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD

    THE TEN COMMANDMENTS VS EUROPEAN TRADITIONAL LAW DEMONSRATE THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD OF DECEIT.

    Notice that the ten commandments say one may not steal. It does not say one may not free-ride, externalize costs, or steal. But european traditional law is complete not ‘convenient’: it says one may not free ride, externalize, or steal.

    Notice that the ten commandments say one may not bear false witness. They do not say one may not lie. But European traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one may not lie – period.

    Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about withholding or obscuring information, about “cheating”, about “baiting into hazard”. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’: it says one must warranty one’s words and deeds against withholding or obscuring information, “cheating”, and “baiting into hazard”.

    Notice that the ten commandments say nothing about preventing others from free riding, externalizing, fraud, lying, thieving, harm. But european traditional law is complete, not ‘convenient’. It requires we insure by defense, of both the private and common, or we are equally to blame.

    Notice that Jewish law says one must treat jews reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. Notice that islamic law says one may only treat muslims reciprocally but may treat non-jews ir-reciprocally. But european traditional law is complete – it grants everyone the same sovereignty. It grants local control to locals. And It prevents externalizing of costs. Non-itegration is a cost. Evangelism and conversion is a crime. Practice that externalizes no costs is no one’s business.

    So, this is how the Abrahamic method of deceit operates on high trust european minds, by stating very clear half truths that prohibit the obvious and trivial, but by doing so license the subtle, and egregious – it’s moral hand-waving to distract you.

    The Abrahamic technique of false promise, hiding behind moral pretense, under cover of plausible deniability, defended by sophistry is as ADVANCED a method of DECEPTION against high trust european people, as REASON, EMPIRICISM, and SCIENCE are a method of falsification of the ignorance, error, bias, and deceits of low trust non-european people

    Once you see it you can’t unsee it. You see it everywhere. In ever sentence.

    Everything the enemy says is that sounds anything like truth is always and everywhere a half truth obscuring a lie – or it wouldn’t be said.

    The only problem we face is our own religion is still infected with pilpul and dogma when imitating Jesus’ love and presuming god’s love is all that is necessary. There is nothing else to be said. Christianity asks us to create a universal family by extending familial love to all that we can possibly do so in good conscience. In doing so, we create the optimum extended high trust, and trustworthy family.

    This is the common person’s version of Hellenic, Italic, Germanic civilization’s political strategy in the language of the weak, women and children.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-17 10:25:00 UTC

  • Why Is Richmond a Perfect Opportunity for Starting the Revolution?

    [W]HY IS RICHMOND A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY FOR STARTING THE REVOLUTION? Every possible resource. Every possible vulnerability. Every strategic opportunity Proximity to DC but NOT DC. Only NYC and DC are capable of self defense. It’s one thing to conduct a rally, another a demonstration, another a physical conflict …. and quite another a civil war. Once this ball starts it’s not going to stop. Fourth generation warfare is over. Islamists ended the Westphalian Peace. Isis and Mao set stage for all war. Someone is going to get the right twelve people face to face and while antifa is instigating violence, the war will be conducted by a land navy in the red sea, against a few blue islands dependent upon transportation, in the only country evolved exclusively under road transport. The original european method of war, like the current islamic method of war, was raiding. Western man evolved as cattle raiders, marines(greece, rome), vikings, conquerors by sail, pirates, and now air. We are the best people in the world at initiative and maneuver. And while battlefield warfare may in fact ‘be hell’ after the invention of machine gun and artillery, the same is not true for raiding, piracy, and hit and run warfare of attrition. Why? Because it is war for profit. And unstated truth is there is no thrill like hunting man. There will never be a leftist united states. We will compromise by converting blue (left) cities into city states. Otherwise, we will simply let nature take its course once “The Fourth Meal Is Missed” and the liberals discover the true nature of the herds they corralled.

    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image

  • Why Is Richmond a Perfect Opportunity for Starting the Revolution?

    [W]HY IS RICHMOND A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY FOR STARTING THE REVOLUTION? Every possible resource. Every possible vulnerability. Every strategic opportunity Proximity to DC but NOT DC. Only NYC and DC are capable of self defense. It’s one thing to conduct a rally, another a demonstration, another a physical conflict …. and quite another a civil war. Once this ball starts it’s not going to stop. Fourth generation warfare is over. Islamists ended the Westphalian Peace. Isis and Mao set stage for all war. Someone is going to get the right twelve people face to face and while antifa is instigating violence, the war will be conducted by a land navy in the red sea, against a few blue islands dependent upon transportation, in the only country evolved exclusively under road transport. The original european method of war, like the current islamic method of war, was raiding. Western man evolved as cattle raiders, marines(greece, rome), vikings, conquerors by sail, pirates, and now air. We are the best people in the world at initiative and maneuver. And while battlefield warfare may in fact ‘be hell’ after the invention of machine gun and artillery, the same is not true for raiding, piracy, and hit and run warfare of attrition. Why? Because it is war for profit. And unstated truth is there is no thrill like hunting man. There will never be a leftist united states. We will compromise by converting blue (left) cities into city states. Otherwise, we will simply let nature take its course once “The Fourth Meal Is Missed” and the liberals discover the true nature of the herds they corralled.

    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image
    Image

  • Libertarians were not trying to do good.

    [W]e have to remember that Jewish libertarians did not have any better human interests in mind than did Jewish Christians that destroyed the ancient world, or Jewish Marxists or Jewish neocons or Jewish feminists or Jewish postmodernists that seek to destroy this one by the false attribution of conspiracy of evil to the Darwinian market hierarchy of the natural aristocracy, and the suppression of the underclass reproduction so that proceeds can be directed to the expansion of commons, not the expansion of underclass population dependent upon others. They made Rome the enemy in the old world. They made the state first then whites second, the enemy. They made the commons the enemy. When Rome was the greatest peace in history, the state is the means by which we produce our precious commons, and commons are the means by which Europeans obtain their disproportionate advantage. In both cases they are saying ‘turn against your own people’ Libertarianism is an attempt to legitimize the extractive free-rider “ghetto” ethics practiced by Jews in Eastern Europe, that so frustrated the English, Germans, Poles, Ukrainians, and Russians. Only the French have seized their assets in the modern world. (The French seized the Rothschilds assets in France). There is only one source of liberty, and that is rule of law. Free markets are a lie. There is only rule of law.

  • Libertarians were not trying to do good.

    [W]e have to remember that Jewish libertarians did not have any better human interests in mind than did Jewish Christians that destroyed the ancient world, or Jewish Marxists or Jewish neocons or Jewish feminists or Jewish postmodernists that seek to destroy this one by the false attribution of conspiracy of evil to the Darwinian market hierarchy of the natural aristocracy, and the suppression of the underclass reproduction so that proceeds can be directed to the expansion of commons, not the expansion of underclass population dependent upon others. They made Rome the enemy in the old world. They made the state first then whites second, the enemy. They made the commons the enemy. When Rome was the greatest peace in history, the state is the means by which we produce our precious commons, and commons are the means by which Europeans obtain their disproportionate advantage. In both cases they are saying ‘turn against your own people’ Libertarianism is an attempt to legitimize the extractive free-rider “ghetto” ethics practiced by Jews in Eastern Europe, that so frustrated the English, Germans, Poles, Ukrainians, and Russians. Only the French have seized their assets in the modern world. (The French seized the Rothschilds assets in France). There is only one source of liberty, and that is rule of law. Free markets are a lie. There is only rule of law.

  • THE 20TH CENTURY ECONOMIES IN CONTEXT – AND HOW TO FIX THEM WITH PROPERTARIANISM

    THE 20TH CENTURY ECONOMIES IN CONTEXT – AND HOW TO FIX THEM WITH PROPERTARIANISM

    You know, they called what we do today “Jewish economics” in the pre-war period because it favored investors at the expense of the middle classes (which in those days just meant ‘families’). Keynes was reading MARX, and just removed all references from his book (the general theory) before publishing. Keynes used mathematics (he was first and foremost a mathematician specializing in probability) to give us his elegant simplification of the economy, but he put no measures in place to control it’s abuse – and of course, and Hayek didn’t refute him, and no one produced a limit, so the government just took ‘presumption of growth from presumption of consumption’ as license to convert Keynes’ explanation of how to get out of postwar crisis with how to maximize spending by pushing risk downstream and consuming all institutional, behavioral, normative, physical, and human capital.

    That limit was a balance sheet, and full accounting of investments and returns. In other words, to maintain the MEASUREMENT that both the GOLD STANDARD and RULE OF LAW had made possible at the cost of inability to react to shocks.

    This isn’t to dismiss his aggregate theory which is, like all economics, hydraulic. And it isn’t to defend the classical theory, which presumes rational actors, rather than bounded rationality within the limits of our frustration budgets. (We used commercial consumption to sedate ourselves during what has been a long period of social disintegration all of which decrease mindfulness and increase stress, create dysfunctional infantilized ‘woke’ children, reduce our commons into barbarism, loneliness and horrors in old age.)

    We spent thousands of years incrementally building rule of law leaving only a markets, and in a century we have destroyed rule of law, markets, and our social, institutional, and worst of all, genetic capital.

    You can’t imagine how much advertising and that evil box in your living room has contributed to destruction of our civilization. But THOUSANDS of thinkers predicted it. The British were right with their BBC – which horrifies the libertarian remnant in me.. But it’s because the left (cognitively female) always and everywhere seeks to create consensus to undermine because it cannot produce and innovate itself. As such the parasite pursues ‘the pulpit’ from whence it conducts it’s false promise, baiting into hazard, as a means of undermining the order and the capital structure of the people who DO produce.

    Now, I have no problem with censorship in the Russian and Chinese and Turkish models, if it’s censorship of GSRRM, baiting into hazard, and advocacy of capital consumption or underclass reproduction or limiting upper class reproduction – all things that affect the balance sheet (capital). But the court must be there to defend the truth, and the law has to tolerate truth regardless of cost. In other words, it has to be ILLEGAL to suppress truthful statements if it’s Illegal to undermine.

    This kind of test wasn’t possible until Propertarianism.

    But it’s possible now.

    And you can’t imagine (I can and it overwhelms me) how different a world would be if we ended all the f—king lying – including the lying of false promise baiting into hazard, and advocacy of consuming capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 15:42:00 UTC

  • WHY ECONOMISTS FAIL TO PROPOSE SUCCESSFUL SOLUTIONS Most economists propose nons

    WHY ECONOMISTS FAIL TO PROPOSE SUCCESSFUL SOLUTIONS

    Most economists propose nonsense solutions that mean more taxes without changing the structure of the economy.

    My proposition is pretty simple and has profound consequences. Stop all lying, baiting into hazard, free riding and parasitism upon the people, and capture those proceeds in the production of PHYSICAL commons.

    THAT IS HOW WE FIX EQUALITY.

    I’m not in favor of equality. Im’ in favor of suppressing parasitism upon the people so that people aren’t rewarded for parasitism and predation and conquest.

    The result is MORE equality for the middle class at the cost of the parasitic media, academy, state, financial and probably marketing and advertising sectors.

    That’s how you fix it.

    What will happen?

    I think sh-t through.

    What will happen is increasing demands for investments that aren’t parasitic, and that leaves accumulating rather than spending down capital.

    Economists work by income statements.

    Citizenry works by balance sheets.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 15:23:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM WITH EFFICIENT MARKETS Agricultural goods, construction, and housing

    THE PROBLEM WITH EFFICIENT MARKETS

    Agricultural goods, construction, and housing are efficient. Is that a good thing? Food other than meat is almost free. Why shouldn’t we drive up the cost of agricultural goods, construction, and ‘materials production’ (steel etc) and housing as the returns we can produce? In other words, at what point are we making things cheaper but making everything more expensive as a consequence?

    I mean, why not repatriate all digital electronic technology, and all medical technology, and at least conversion of raw materials into production goods, and state finance the whole thing? We can. WE aren’t New Zealand. We aren’t a developing nation.

    WE are not making things cheaper. We’re spending down genetic, cultural, and institutional capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-15 15:10:00 UTC