Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • Baiting Into Hazard Works by Suggestion vs The Founders on Inalienabilty Under Natural Law

    Jan 27, 2020, 5:54 AM BAITING INTO HAZARD WORKS BY SUGGESTION VS THE FOUNDERS ON INALIENABILTY UNDER NATURAL LAW Inalienability means you can’t give up certain rights even ifyou want to, because by doing so you give up obligations to others. This means that the cowardly, weak, unable, and those lacking agency can defect and destroy ‘natural rights under natural law’. —“John Mark discusses lying to the public in his videos. but web search manipulation and subconscious/subliminal programming is much more vague. deceiving ppl by encouraging people to put themselves in harms way is discussed, like for example the message to give up your 2A rights, but what if that encouragement is subtle and subliminal? are you familiar with how it works in advertising?”—Brian Avran It’s called (a) false promise (b) baiting into hazard. And there is a reason why the tribe specializes in comedy, script writing, gossiping, and undermining, INSTEAD of offering a competitive solution. Edit

  • Baiting Into Hazard Works by Suggestion vs The Founders on Inalienabilty Under Natural Law

    Jan 27, 2020, 5:54 AM BAITING INTO HAZARD WORKS BY SUGGESTION VS THE FOUNDERS ON INALIENABILTY UNDER NATURAL LAW Inalienability means you can’t give up certain rights even ifyou want to, because by doing so you give up obligations to others. This means that the cowardly, weak, unable, and those lacking agency can defect and destroy ‘natural rights under natural law’. —“John Mark discusses lying to the public in his videos. but web search manipulation and subconscious/subliminal programming is much more vague. deceiving ppl by encouraging people to put themselves in harms way is discussed, like for example the message to give up your 2A rights, but what if that encouragement is subtle and subliminal? are you familiar with how it works in advertising?”—Brian Avran It’s called (a) false promise (b) baiting into hazard. And there is a reason why the tribe specializes in comedy, script writing, gossiping, and undermining, INSTEAD of offering a competitive solution. Edit

  • No Skin in The Game – No Complaint

    Jan 27, 2020, 5:55 AM by Mathew Smith Hand wringing conservatives are Crypto-liberals, all of them. They all want someone to do the heavy lifting for them, and they won’t be satisfied until they’re instantly gratified. I would have been there in a heartbeat if I had the means, so I did the next best thing, sharing John’s videos in groups that may not have heard of him before. I plant seeds where opportunities arise (“Oh, you hate Politician X? Wouldn’t it be nice if they could be sued for lying?” <~~this is a great hook btw) and I’ve dedicated a couple livestreams going over the basics of P. I do what I can, although I’m not the most eloquent speaker. Bringing complaints without offering a solution is just a waste of everyone’s time.Keep up the good work, sir. (CD: Hugs Brother)

  • No Skin in The Game – No Complaint

    Jan 27, 2020, 5:55 AM by Mathew Smith Hand wringing conservatives are Crypto-liberals, all of them. They all want someone to do the heavy lifting for them, and they won’t be satisfied until they’re instantly gratified. I would have been there in a heartbeat if I had the means, so I did the next best thing, sharing John’s videos in groups that may not have heard of him before. I plant seeds where opportunities arise (“Oh, you hate Politician X? Wouldn’t it be nice if they could be sued for lying?” <~~this is a great hook btw) and I’ve dedicated a couple livestreams going over the basics of P. I do what I can, although I’m not the most eloquent speaker. Bringing complaints without offering a solution is just a waste of everyone’s time.Keep up the good work, sir. (CD: Hugs Brother)

  • The European Social Order

    Jan 27, 2020, 9:25 AM THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL ORDER The european social order is consistent from prehistory across all of europe with the variation caused by adaptation of the underlying social order (aristocratic egalitarianism, tripartism, sovereignty) to whatever economy was available. It’s these three civilizational strategies that make it so easy for a middle class, and middle class rule to emerge in european civilization and so hard in so many others. Read more history that’s not the “mythology of rebellion against the indo european aristocracy” because that’s the purpose of a christian > liberal > marxist > postmodernist education and it always has been – resistance. JP Mallory: In Search of Indo Europeans David W. Anthony: The Horse, the Wheel, and Language Eric H. Cline: 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed Karen Armstrong : The Great Transformation John Keegan: A History Of Warfare Victor Davis Hanson: The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece Victor Davis Hanson: The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization. Victor Davis Hanson: The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece Catherine Nixey : The Darkening Age: The Christian(Jewish) Destruction of the Classical World Ramsay MacMullen: Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E Ramsay MacMullen: Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth To Eighth Centuries Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization James C. Russell: The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity Emmet Scott: Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited. Victor Davis Hanson: Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West Victor Davis Hanson: Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture from Salamis to Vietnam The Athenian Constitution Roman Law The Anglo Saxon Codes Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law. Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law. Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty

  • The European Social Order

    Jan 27, 2020, 9:25 AM THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL ORDER The european social order is consistent from prehistory across all of europe with the variation caused by adaptation of the underlying social order (aristocratic egalitarianism, tripartism, sovereignty) to whatever economy was available. It’s these three civilizational strategies that make it so easy for a middle class, and middle class rule to emerge in european civilization and so hard in so many others. Read more history that’s not the “mythology of rebellion against the indo european aristocracy” because that’s the purpose of a christian > liberal > marxist > postmodernist education and it always has been – resistance. JP Mallory: In Search of Indo Europeans David W. Anthony: The Horse, the Wheel, and Language Eric H. Cline: 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed Karen Armstrong : The Great Transformation John Keegan: A History Of Warfare Victor Davis Hanson: The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece Victor Davis Hanson: The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization. Victor Davis Hanson: The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece Catherine Nixey : The Darkening Age: The Christian(Jewish) Destruction of the Classical World Ramsay MacMullen: Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E Ramsay MacMullen: Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth To Eighth Centuries Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization James C. Russell: The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity Emmet Scott: Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited. Victor Davis Hanson: Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West Victor Davis Hanson: Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture from Salamis to Vietnam The Athenian Constitution Roman Law The Anglo Saxon Codes Milsom: Natural History of the Common Law. Plucknett: A Concise History Of The Common Law. Hayek’s: The Constitution of Liberty

  • The Bicameral Mind Is the Result of Two Hemispheres Needing to Time Their Movements

    Jan 27, 2020, 10:10 AM A rather strange bias we see in archaeology tries to explain everything they don’t undrestand as mystical or religious in origin. We watch horror movies and tell campfire stories, and we enthrall each other with suspension of belief and woo woo, but that does not mean we are not eminently practical in real life. While reading the ancients – even though it is very difficult – it’s very clear that they thought as rationally and practically as we do while still ‘going all woo woo’ over the same nonsense. In fact, most letters are pretty tedious and could have been written a century ago. It’s one thing to read the iliad today in translation and another to hear someone recite it in its rhyme and tempo. When you hear that tempo and rhyme you realize that homer whether one person or many, and shakespeare are the same man. The difference that we cannot imagine today is the pervasive violence in everyday life of the ancient world,and how dependent we were upon family structures for mere survival, and how terrifying it was to be left along without their support – ostracization was a death sentence. As for the general bicameral mind, this story has not played out well against the evidence. It’s true that each of us varies in cognitive agency, and we may even say that what differs most between us is agency (or ‘executive function’). It’s true that all language is a means of calculation and the more precise and non-false the terms and complete the linguistic transactions the more we are able to devote the processing power of our frontal cortex to yet another iteration of thought. So it’s more that language and knowledge increase the radius in time, space, population, and permutation of our thinking, just as prices assist us in imputing, and managing our resources and time. But my understanding is that the wooo wooo apparent in ancient myth is just a tool for holding attention under suspension of disbelief so that the narrative is accompanied by sufficient emotional novelty that the story is remembered. That does not mean that a tribe of warriors conducting a raid or a set of 10k bc flint miners were doing or thinking any differently than we are. I am old enough to remember that class of our fellow white men that could not read. They did not think any differently. They simply had less accumulated knowledge, and less confidence in their knowledge. So you know, I don’t buy the whole thing because I see that there are woo woo people and empirical people in every generation across time. As far as I know language will eventually emerge in any creature with sufficient cognitive capacity (neural density in relation to body weight), that has a body that can move through space (because that is the origin of consciousness – spatial modeling). Once you have language it is such a fucking competitive advantage every competitor is screwed. So the bicameral mind is the result of two hemispheres needing to time their movements using the cerebellum. But in our brains the corpus callosum especially in women ensures that the hemispheres are working on concert. The major difference is that men are more longitudinally connected (fast, limited info, and time) and women more horizontally (slow, lots of info, in present moment). And even as such these are only limited biass not complete differences.

  • The Bicameral Mind Is the Result of Two Hemispheres Needing to Time Their Movements

    Jan 27, 2020, 10:10 AM A rather strange bias we see in archaeology tries to explain everything they don’t undrestand as mystical or religious in origin. We watch horror movies and tell campfire stories, and we enthrall each other with suspension of belief and woo woo, but that does not mean we are not eminently practical in real life. While reading the ancients – even though it is very difficult – it’s very clear that they thought as rationally and practically as we do while still ‘going all woo woo’ over the same nonsense. In fact, most letters are pretty tedious and could have been written a century ago. It’s one thing to read the iliad today in translation and another to hear someone recite it in its rhyme and tempo. When you hear that tempo and rhyme you realize that homer whether one person or many, and shakespeare are the same man. The difference that we cannot imagine today is the pervasive violence in everyday life of the ancient world,and how dependent we were upon family structures for mere survival, and how terrifying it was to be left along without their support – ostracization was a death sentence. As for the general bicameral mind, this story has not played out well against the evidence. It’s true that each of us varies in cognitive agency, and we may even say that what differs most between us is agency (or ‘executive function’). It’s true that all language is a means of calculation and the more precise and non-false the terms and complete the linguistic transactions the more we are able to devote the processing power of our frontal cortex to yet another iteration of thought. So it’s more that language and knowledge increase the radius in time, space, population, and permutation of our thinking, just as prices assist us in imputing, and managing our resources and time. But my understanding is that the wooo wooo apparent in ancient myth is just a tool for holding attention under suspension of disbelief so that the narrative is accompanied by sufficient emotional novelty that the story is remembered. That does not mean that a tribe of warriors conducting a raid or a set of 10k bc flint miners were doing or thinking any differently than we are. I am old enough to remember that class of our fellow white men that could not read. They did not think any differently. They simply had less accumulated knowledge, and less confidence in their knowledge. So you know, I don’t buy the whole thing because I see that there are woo woo people and empirical people in every generation across time. As far as I know language will eventually emerge in any creature with sufficient cognitive capacity (neural density in relation to body weight), that has a body that can move through space (because that is the origin of consciousness – spatial modeling). Once you have language it is such a fucking competitive advantage every competitor is screwed. So the bicameral mind is the result of two hemispheres needing to time their movements using the cerebellum. But in our brains the corpus callosum especially in women ensures that the hemispheres are working on concert. The major difference is that men are more longitudinally connected (fast, limited info, and time) and women more horizontally (slow, lots of info, in present moment). And even as such these are only limited biass not complete differences.

  • Exposing the False Morality of The Fundamentalists with The Truth of Scientific Morality

    Jan 28, 2020, 9:55 AM EXPOSING THE FALSE MORALITY OF THE FUNDAMENTALISTS WITH THE TRUTH OF SCIENTIFIC MORALITY (important)

    —“Without God who cares. Women can lie and men can harass them. There are endless ways for people to be unfair and cruel. Without the conscience that comes with a Christian civilization people will beg for tyranny to live in peace.”—Bill Amy Grady

    If that was true then there would only be one interpretation of christianity instead of hundreds. Astrology, Numerology, and Scriptural Interpretation are the three most common forms of sophistry and deceit. And the jewish method of pilpul (lying by sophistry) was institutionalized by the three ‘books of pilpul’. Instead, there is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative: prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: demands – that is the contribution of christianity. The rest of christianity is lies and parables that offer false promises of unwarrantable rewards, in an impossible life after death to simple illiterate people lacking knowledge of reason, logic, science, economics and mathematics. The Jewish method is expressly evolved for the purpose of profiting from free riding, parasitism upon the dominant males, and undermining using false promise and deceit – by demanding verbal or intellectual skills. The islamic method is the same form of parasitism but depends on blind imitation rather than verbal or intellectual skills. The christian method was just, like communism, a false promise to the underclass, in the semitic war against the european, iranic, egyptian, and north african peoples. There is but one law of life: persistence of that form of organization we call life by the defeat of entropy and capture of energy by doing so – and the only difference between the physical world and the human is that we have memories, and can account for debts and credits between each other with extraordinary precision. And as long as our accounts are in balance with one another, or at least as long as we can foresee our accounts balancing, then we can continue to cooperate and to take risks to cooperate. Truth: you use god as a shield by which you can ignore other humans, fail to compromise with other humans, fail to face your worth to other humans, fail to join the collective efforts of other humans, and instead to descend into self centeredness, self-congratulation, ignorance and obedience like the muslims, all while claiming you are doing good. But you are just the man praying while others do the work: free riding on the efforts and honesty of better men.

  • Exposing the False Morality of The Fundamentalists with The Truth of Scientific Morality

    Jan 28, 2020, 9:55 AM EXPOSING THE FALSE MORALITY OF THE FUNDAMENTALISTS WITH THE TRUTH OF SCIENTIFIC MORALITY (important)

    —“Without God who cares. Women can lie and men can harass them. There are endless ways for people to be unfair and cruel. Without the conscience that comes with a Christian civilization people will beg for tyranny to live in peace.”—Bill Amy Grady

    If that was true then there would only be one interpretation of christianity instead of hundreds. Astrology, Numerology, and Scriptural Interpretation are the three most common forms of sophistry and deceit. And the jewish method of pilpul (lying by sophistry) was institutionalized by the three ‘books of pilpul’. Instead, there is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative: prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: demands – that is the contribution of christianity. The rest of christianity is lies and parables that offer false promises of unwarrantable rewards, in an impossible life after death to simple illiterate people lacking knowledge of reason, logic, science, economics and mathematics. The Jewish method is expressly evolved for the purpose of profiting from free riding, parasitism upon the dominant males, and undermining using false promise and deceit – by demanding verbal or intellectual skills. The islamic method is the same form of parasitism but depends on blind imitation rather than verbal or intellectual skills. The christian method was just, like communism, a false promise to the underclass, in the semitic war against the european, iranic, egyptian, and north african peoples. There is but one law of life: persistence of that form of organization we call life by the defeat of entropy and capture of energy by doing so – and the only difference between the physical world and the human is that we have memories, and can account for debts and credits between each other with extraordinary precision. And as long as our accounts are in balance with one another, or at least as long as we can foresee our accounts balancing, then we can continue to cooperate and to take risks to cooperate. Truth: you use god as a shield by which you can ignore other humans, fail to compromise with other humans, fail to face your worth to other humans, fail to join the collective efforts of other humans, and instead to descend into self centeredness, self-congratulation, ignorance and obedience like the muslims, all while claiming you are doing good. But you are just the man praying while others do the work: free riding on the efforts and honesty of better men.