Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • There Is Only One Law

    Jan 28, 2020, 11:21 AM There is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative as prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: as demands – that is the contribution of christianity. The Pagan European command of paternalism to domesticate humans from slaves to serfs to freemen, and if possible to citizens and sovereigns. And the monotheistic resistance to domestication by the extension of kinship love to non kin. The original christianity was just another peasant rebellion against better people wanting to domesticate half human animals. The byzantine compromise was a practical solution to the greco roman empire’s loss of wealth and military power: like communism a false promise of reward in the next world, instead of economic reward after a revolution – neither of which is possible. Eventually, we germanized christianity and made it into something decent. It took a long time to undo the horror and corruption of the catholic church. Eventually the Orthodox preserved the ritualism without the politics. Eventually adam smith wrote down ethics in scientific terms, hume the human mind in scientific terms, and slowly we have dragged ourselves kiking and screaming to restore the two thousand years we lost to semitic underclass dark ages of resistance to mans domestication transcendence, and eugenic evolution. So it is possibly true that that the extension of kinship love to non kin is a good thing. It is possibly true that piety for those lacking agency and ability is a good thing. It is better however that we limit the extension of love to kin groups; and that we substitute loyalty to one another rather than piety to a false god.

  • There Is Only One Law

    Jan 28, 2020, 11:21 AM There is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative as prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: as demands – that is the contribution of christianity. The Pagan European command of paternalism to domesticate humans from slaves to serfs to freemen, and if possible to citizens and sovereigns. And the monotheistic resistance to domestication by the extension of kinship love to non kin. The original christianity was just another peasant rebellion against better people wanting to domesticate half human animals. The byzantine compromise was a practical solution to the greco roman empire’s loss of wealth and military power: like communism a false promise of reward in the next world, instead of economic reward after a revolution – neither of which is possible. Eventually, we germanized christianity and made it into something decent. It took a long time to undo the horror and corruption of the catholic church. Eventually the Orthodox preserved the ritualism without the politics. Eventually adam smith wrote down ethics in scientific terms, hume the human mind in scientific terms, and slowly we have dragged ourselves kiking and screaming to restore the two thousand years we lost to semitic underclass dark ages of resistance to mans domestication transcendence, and eugenic evolution. So it is possibly true that that the extension of kinship love to non kin is a good thing. It is possibly true that piety for those lacking agency and ability is a good thing. It is better however that we limit the extension of love to kin groups; and that we substitute loyalty to one another rather than piety to a false god.

  • We Are the Gods We Imagined.

    Jan 28, 2020, 12:33 PM There is only one testimony of Jesus of nazareth and it is summarized in his sermon on the mount. There is only one gospel that I know of, and that is Mark, the rest are copies, and they are very likely fictions. It is likely that Mark’s is a fiction as well. It does not matter. Myths are made to serve a purpose and the authors of this myth like all other myths that survive, succeeded. As for gods, the only gods are the archetypical characters we imagine that represent our tribe, nation, or race’s warrior in the battle of our group’s competition against other tribes, nations, and races. There are however laws of the natural universe, and the natural law of man. Europeans chose a god that obeyed these laws. The Chinese came close second. Everyone else failed. And the semites institutionalized the art of lying instead – the most human, most harmful, and least divine of the religions developed by each civilization. All that matters is that a jew, exposed to the thought of the greeks, romans, and Persians, whose people were conquered by Rome, and who the romans were depriving of their money changing, and were using the scam on their own people, rebelled against all of them in order to find some sort of cohesion and solace for the third world ghetto (sh-t hole country) that was Israel. And by using him as a victim-hero others created a new religion of undermining not only the jewish establishment but the empires. Christianity does not matter – at all. the most we can argue is that if we fully secularize Jesus’ teaching, we end with exhaustive forgiveness as a means of maximizing the opportunity for peaceful cooperation, and forgiveness as incentives for those of weak temperament and negative experience, to slowly reciprocate that forgiveness and trust. That is all. Church matters. Religion is an excuse for the psychological returns on church service. Religion’s community, ritual, oath feast, and myth (history) matter. We have our history. Our Heroes. Our Saints. Our Civilization, our Cultures, our Literature, Law and our Science. There is no reason for lies any longer. Tell the Truth. We are Europeans We are the gods we imagined. We know the law of the gods: The laws of nature and the natural law of men. The rest are ours to make.

  • We Are the Gods We Imagined.

    Jan 28, 2020, 12:33 PM There is only one testimony of Jesus of nazareth and it is summarized in his sermon on the mount. There is only one gospel that I know of, and that is Mark, the rest are copies, and they are very likely fictions. It is likely that Mark’s is a fiction as well. It does not matter. Myths are made to serve a purpose and the authors of this myth like all other myths that survive, succeeded. As for gods, the only gods are the archetypical characters we imagine that represent our tribe, nation, or race’s warrior in the battle of our group’s competition against other tribes, nations, and races. There are however laws of the natural universe, and the natural law of man. Europeans chose a god that obeyed these laws. The Chinese came close second. Everyone else failed. And the semites institutionalized the art of lying instead – the most human, most harmful, and least divine of the religions developed by each civilization. All that matters is that a jew, exposed to the thought of the greeks, romans, and Persians, whose people were conquered by Rome, and who the romans were depriving of their money changing, and were using the scam on their own people, rebelled against all of them in order to find some sort of cohesion and solace for the third world ghetto (sh-t hole country) that was Israel. And by using him as a victim-hero others created a new religion of undermining not only the jewish establishment but the empires. Christianity does not matter – at all. the most we can argue is that if we fully secularize Jesus’ teaching, we end with exhaustive forgiveness as a means of maximizing the opportunity for peaceful cooperation, and forgiveness as incentives for those of weak temperament and negative experience, to slowly reciprocate that forgiveness and trust. That is all. Church matters. Religion is an excuse for the psychological returns on church service. Religion’s community, ritual, oath feast, and myth (history) matter. We have our history. Our Heroes. Our Saints. Our Civilization, our Cultures, our Literature, Law and our Science. There is no reason for lies any longer. Tell the Truth. We are Europeans We are the gods we imagined. We know the law of the gods: The laws of nature and the natural law of men. The rest are ours to make.

  • GSRRM Is Also a The Tool of Psychopaths

    Jan 28, 2020, 1:03 PM by James Dmitro Makienko The tools listed in GRRSM and the extended version can be all described as being “a part of” female cognitive manipulation. These techniques are also common to sociopaths and narcissists. Techniques not mentioned include framing – “if you are X therefore you must do Y (baiting into hazard) which is not in your interest (no full disclosure of costs), but in the interest of manipulator (irreciprocity)” – example “If you are a christian you must accept transsexuals because of compassion and sermon-of-the-mount christ saying judge ye not…” Another technique is derailing the topic, so that you are not stating your point clearly and not arguing what you are saying and respond emotionally – and people don’t remember your point but remember that you’re an angry person who had a really long argument with someone. The response to that is to call out the manipulator on manipulation, and restate your point. And keep doing this over and over until they stop.

    (CD: ^Yep, state their technique, return to central argument, repeat, until you exhaust them.) Edit

  • SUMMARY: He Who Can Destroy a Thing, Controls a Thing. Truth is Enough

    Jan 28, 2020, 2:44 PM THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM (important) (core) GSRRM is a form of avoidance by conflating disapproval with falsehood. It uses escalating means of shaming in order to achieve with disapproval what is true but they cannot tolerate. SOPHISM or PILPUL is a tool of distraction and deception. In general it relies on uses of GSRRM, Idealism (abstractions), plus loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, to (a) create a paradigm (b) that overloads your reason (b) and uses suggestion (c) to force you to appeal to your intuition (d) thus causing you to substitute your value judgements (e) thus creating a false impression of agreement, when the speaker has the opposite intentions in mind: deceit. Why? All communication requires we listen to a series of symbols that suggest a story of anything from a name to an epic narrative. At some point we understand (synchronize) with the speaker, and then either we or the speaker or both perform due diligence to warranty that we do not misunderstand. Sophism uses this period of suggestibility to cause you to fill in the blanks with information that corresponds to what the speaker says, but not to reality or any future reality. These systems fool you into falsehood. FALSE PROMISE, or SEDUCTION to avoid a reciprocal trade. (repeat that a few times so you grasp it). A false promise or seduction so that you will pay a cost and the other party will not. FICTIONALISM improves on SOPHISM but relying on telling more complex stores that undermine and overload the limits of the three human cognitive faculties: 1) the physical, 2) the logical, and the 3) emotional. The three techniques are 1) the magic-pseudoscience physical spectrum – the domain of pseudoscience, 2) the ideal-surreal rational spectrum- the domain of philosophy and 3) the supernatural-occult emotional spectrum – the domain of theology. These systems of deception offer discounts (false promises) of truthfulness and comprehension. They bait you into falsehood. CRITIQUE is a form of undermining by GSRRM, SOPHISM, and FICTIONALISM and then pointing out imperfections, or straw manning imperfections that are not there, exaggerated, irrelevant or meaningless, and not providing a superior competitive solution that can be compared. These systems undermine competing truthfully stated systems of thought. BAITING INTO HAZARD is a form of profiting from the use of the above techniques to profit from others error, fault, or failure of your engineering. Seduction and Usury are the canon examples. ABRAHAMISM combines all, and adds baiting into hazard, with false and unwarranted or unwarrantable promise as a means of profiting from undermining the host polity. If you understand this, you will have given names to the techniques of the enemy. The adoption of the female strategy of undermining males.

    By use of GSRRM as a substitute for solutions – usually to avoid payment, bearing of cost, or engaging in exchange. By the use of SOPHISM as a substitute for argument and reason. By the use of FALSE PROMISE to avoid an exchange. By the use of FICTIONALISMS to create more elaborate false promises. By the use of Critique to Undermine existing or proposed solutions without offering one that is viable. By the use of Abrahamism to combine all of these into a strategy for undermining host civilizations.Judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken islam to destroy civilization and reduce it to dysgenic ignorance and poverty. Marxism to foster conflict between classes with a monopoly underclass. Postmodernism to foster conflict between science and fictionalisms – and to undermine western civilization by undermining truth merit and markets. Feminism to foster conflict between the genders and destroy the family. Politicalcorrectness to suppress the truth. The enemy wants control they cannot manage like females want control they cannot manage if they have it. They follow the intuition of the herd. Conversely, we live in packs (families). We want no one to have control. We build a civilization without control. We built a civilization of markets and the resulting uncertainty. And we find joy in it. And we rescued mankind from ignorance with it. Aristotelianism, Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Logic, Testimony(Truth), History, Economics, Natural Law, Technology, Science, Mathematics and the Natural Eugenics of Markets between the classes to evolve man into the gods europeans imagined, while reveling in our achievements all the way to the heavens we will create.He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.Truth is a weapon.It has always been our weapon.Take it from this forge.Wield it.Win.

  • SUMMARY: He Who Can Destroy a Thing, Controls a Thing. Truth is Enough

    Jan 28, 2020, 2:44 PM THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM (important) (core) GSRRM is a form of avoidance by conflating disapproval with falsehood. It uses escalating means of shaming in order to achieve with disapproval what is true but they cannot tolerate. SOPHISM or PILPUL is a tool of distraction and deception. In general it relies on uses of GSRRM, Idealism (abstractions), plus loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, to (a) create a paradigm (b) that overloads your reason (b) and uses suggestion (c) to force you to appeal to your intuition (d) thus causing you to substitute your value judgements (e) thus creating a false impression of agreement, when the speaker has the opposite intentions in mind: deceit. Why? All communication requires we listen to a series of symbols that suggest a story of anything from a name to an epic narrative. At some point we understand (synchronize) with the speaker, and then either we or the speaker or both perform due diligence to warranty that we do not misunderstand. Sophism uses this period of suggestibility to cause you to fill in the blanks with information that corresponds to what the speaker says, but not to reality or any future reality. These systems fool you into falsehood. FALSE PROMISE, or SEDUCTION to avoid a reciprocal trade. (repeat that a few times so you grasp it). A false promise or seduction so that you will pay a cost and the other party will not. FICTIONALISM improves on SOPHISM but relying on telling more complex stores that undermine and overload the limits of the three human cognitive faculties: 1) the physical, 2) the logical, and the 3) emotional. The three techniques are 1) the magic-pseudoscience physical spectrum – the domain of pseudoscience, 2) the ideal-surreal rational spectrum- the domain of philosophy and 3) the supernatural-occult emotional spectrum – the domain of theology. These systems of deception offer discounts (false promises) of truthfulness and comprehension. They bait you into falsehood. CRITIQUE is a form of undermining by GSRRM, SOPHISM, and FICTIONALISM and then pointing out imperfections, or straw manning imperfections that are not there, exaggerated, irrelevant or meaningless, and not providing a superior competitive solution that can be compared. These systems undermine competing truthfully stated systems of thought. BAITING INTO HAZARD is a form of profiting from the use of the above techniques to profit from others error, fault, or failure of your engineering. Seduction and Usury are the canon examples. ABRAHAMISM combines all, and adds baiting into hazard, with false and unwarranted or unwarrantable promise as a means of profiting from undermining the host polity. If you understand this, you will have given names to the techniques of the enemy. The adoption of the female strategy of undermining males.

    By use of GSRRM as a substitute for solutions – usually to avoid payment, bearing of cost, or engaging in exchange. By the use of SOPHISM as a substitute for argument and reason. By the use of FALSE PROMISE to avoid an exchange. By the use of FICTIONALISMS to create more elaborate false promises. By the use of Critique to Undermine existing or proposed solutions without offering one that is viable. By the use of Abrahamism to combine all of these into a strategy for undermining host civilizations.Judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken islam to destroy civilization and reduce it to dysgenic ignorance and poverty. Marxism to foster conflict between classes with a monopoly underclass. Postmodernism to foster conflict between science and fictionalisms – and to undermine western civilization by undermining truth merit and markets. Feminism to foster conflict between the genders and destroy the family. Politicalcorrectness to suppress the truth. The enemy wants control they cannot manage like females want control they cannot manage if they have it. They follow the intuition of the herd. Conversely, we live in packs (families). We want no one to have control. We build a civilization without control. We built a civilization of markets and the resulting uncertainty. And we find joy in it. And we rescued mankind from ignorance with it. Aristotelianism, Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Logic, Testimony(Truth), History, Economics, Natural Law, Technology, Science, Mathematics and the Natural Eugenics of Markets between the classes to evolve man into the gods europeans imagined, while reveling in our achievements all the way to the heavens we will create.He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.Truth is a weapon.It has always been our weapon.Take it from this forge.Wield it.Win.

  • The Conflict That’s Impossible to Resolve.

    Jan 29, 2020, 10:43 AM CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire. Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire: experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards. Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood). What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both. All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood. The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic, social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs. So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.

  • The Conflict That’s Impossible to Resolve.

    Jan 29, 2020, 10:43 AM CONFLICT: IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO RESOLVE. EUGENIC MERITOCRATIC AND ADAPTIVE VS DYSGENIC EQUALITARIAN AND STATIC For my followers: The P-constitution provides MATERIAL REWARDS at the cost of the media, financial, and political (unaccountable) sectors that have industrialized rent-seeking and baiting-into-hazard in the 20th century. It ALSO provides status – what Reactionaries really desire. Propaganda, pseudoscience, philo-sophism, and religion can all make people aware of opportunity for gain and provide(moral) justification for seizing it. But people seek to acquire: experience, consumption, capital, associations, status – and so political action requires rewards. Our difference: the Right seeks to produce goods, services, information, behavior, human capital, and commons in a majority middle class meritocracy (aristocracy), while the left seeks to extract from the middle to empower the top to redistribute to the bottom (priesthood). What is the unspoken Truth that is the purpose of the entire anti-western postwar movement, as well as the jewish pseudoscientific prewar movement (marx, freud, boas, cantor-bohr, trotsky)? That he right is eugenic and left dysgenic and that democracy is incompatible both. All right left conflict is reducible to group strategy of eugenic families in meritocratic market aristocracy under rule of law of heroism, and dysgenic individuals in equalitarian ant-market pseudoscientific and sophomoric priesthood and discretionary rule of victimhood. The end of the agrarian period also is an end to the agrarian economic, social, political, and military order. The europeans re-united the world and (unfortunately) the races and civilizations while still under the agrarian order. And we no longer have common interests we had under agrarianism. And everything is up for grabs. So we see market demand for re-speciation. And the only way to solve it is to once again, separate and continue to speciate – reversing the promise of the one world order the female, semitic, authoritarian mind seems to desire.

  • Civilizational Differences in Strategy and Conflict

    Jan 30, 2020, 9:10 AM (very important) (summary) (Warning: This is the most important subject of our age, but it might trigger (offend) you so please move on if having your sacred cows slaughtered by science is unacceptable.) Pre-marine-trade Europeans like all other peoples didn’t have writing – few people did. Writing requires the evolution of debt-trade and taxation. The population density of territorial regions, the rate of production of territorial areas, and the cost of political control, all inhibit it, which is why the river valleys and the coasts developed writing. The europeans like all people, had oral history. Although it is most interesting that the europeans seem to have invented history as we understand it. The Atlantics, the Mediterraneans, the indo europeans, the beaker people, the Germanics, and certainly the Celts had oral history and had an industry for training their priesthood. The jews had history, and didn’t write it down, because of the prestige of memorizing it (just like europeans), and only wrote it down under advice, question, or command of the greeks. Like the dictionary froze english spelling, writing froze jewish, then christian, then islamic dogma. This isn’t the same for european, Indian, or Chines thought which was advice (wisdom literature) not command (authoritarian literature). Besides the universal lying and face before truth of the semitic tribal peoples, and this authoritarian literature, the middle east developed jewish pilpul and critique (lying) and muslim recitation and stagnation (avoidance of adaptation). The Chinese pursued harmony of their wisdom literature which limited their adaptation, and they followed sun tzu in war by delay and deceit, and their culture followed. The Iranic branch in India (Hindus) could not (as is happening to Americans) rule such a vast population of lower classes, and so chose a corporeal organization of class roles – a military organization familiar to the iranics, replicating the class structure of warriors, priests, and workers, each with different responsibilities. The Chinese had chosen hierarchical family, and europeans had chosen a hierarchical military. The Jewish-Palestinian-Arab semites chose universal resistance to all forms of aristocracy including the Egyptian by the adoption of universal slave resistance as a strategy. This failure to produce a durable military still plagues the jewish- Palestinian and less so Arab (raiding) peoples today. The jews in particular because they have neither the ethical tradition of land holders (and cant hold land) nor the ethical tradition of a working class (who fight) or an ethical tradition of a market between the elites. Which is why we wanted to move all jews to Israel, making a Netherlands of the middle east that may drag the primitive peoples out of authoritarian monopoly slave-resistance into market modernity – AND insulate us from jewish and muslim undermining at the same time. The Chinese strategy of course is to eradicate islam by incremental domestication of the muslim people and prohibiting entry of the jewish people. There is no force in Asia that can compete with Chinese domestication of other peoples. They have been doing it for thousands of years. The Europeans, having conquered the continent by military and technological means, had the pressure of a small population using maneuver, adaptation, technology, and a universal voluntary and therefore entrepreneurial military to produce a hierarchy – and produced as a consequence an entrepreneurial wisdom literature of markets including technology(science), law, philosophy, theology that competed with one another under their only immutable strategy – the sovereignty of the entrepreneurial warrior. Europeans maneuver, adapt, and invent with small number , Chinese resist and defeat by delay and deceive using numbers, semites deceive seduce with false promise and undermine and weaken – and the muslims consume and destroy, and Indians ignore because they are unconquerable by other than a cancer like islam – and get temporarily conquered by every passing malcontent even if they have the most beautiful of cultures and religions for the average person (except for the filth and irresponsibility for the commons). So as usual, when comparing civilizations we don’t disambiguate the truth-telling-empirical races, from the delay and deceive races, from the lying races – which is the entire purpose of my work. Ending abrahamic method of lying by jewish, christian, muslim generation-one theology, and marxism, cultural marxism, postmodern, feminism, denialism, by abrahamic generation-two pseudoscience and sophism. Because lying – especially baiting into hazard and undermining, are (empirically) easier and more profitable, as we can see from financial, insurance, gambling, advertising, media, entertainment, pornography, ad education – all of which allow undermining host peoples by false promise, absent warranty, under claims of plausible deniability of innocence. Which is where the Ashkenazi Jews have specialized: in every single form of profiting by false promise, baiting into hazard, – because that is the group strategy, just like every other group strategy I’ve mentioned above. And this is why the Ashkenazi were the most literate people in Europe but contributed absolutely nothing to thought, politics, law, technology, medicine, science, or arts until baited into the franchise in exchange for adopting european Aristotelian if not christian ethics – and failed. And its why they were kicked out of Egypt and every other host civilization; why they lost their territory and were dispersed, and why they have been systematically removed from every host population once they become intolerable by achieving critical mass of influence on the people and can no longer deny their strategy. This is the scientific basis of the conflict of civilizations including the conflict between jewish and muslim civilizations and EVERY OTHER civlization on this earth. Yet no matter what opportunity every people give the jews and muslims the outcome is the same – neither jews nor muslims adapt. Because that is the nature of their authoritarian monopoly parasitic group strategy: slave resistance that preys on the social and economic orders of aristocratic meritocratic people until they are reduced to genetic, institutional, political, cultural, normative, economic and military ruin – it is the strategy of uncontrolled dysgenic growth used by cancers. And the only ‘cure’ for this method of deceit is the light of truth and the law to punish it in a via-negativa market for the continuous suppression of profit by plausible deniability of accountability. The worst you can say about europeans is that we dragged humanity out of tyranny, rent seeking, free riding, deceit, ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of an uncaring nature – but could have done it better. That’s the worst you can say. That is not the worst we can say for the semitic dark ages and 1billion dead in the ancient world, and 100M dead in just this past century and a half, and we still are not ‘cured’ of this second attempt at another semitic dark age. We have domesticated and Germanicized Christianity – but we must make it impossible for the Jews and Muslims to create another dark age for mankind. My hope is that we cure both physical and informational cancers in this century. And I’m doing my part for the latter by extending the law to prohibit these forms of crime. That is the sole purpose of my work. To prohibit, reverse, and perform restitution for the crimes against civilization by the use of abrahamic methods of deceit- so that we may continue mankind’s transcendence into the gods we imagined. People have very little agency. We are trial and error gene computers with firmware that imitates others, evolving software for no purpose other than negotiation with others – and what little agency we have is determined by the limits of whatever it is we learn by imitation and negotiation. Very, very, few of us transcend the animal from semi-consciousness to consciousness. The result of doing so – is love for man like we love our domesticated animals, pets, and children. “all we can do is help them. we are too few to do much else.”