Jan 26, 2020, 8:33 AM (from mythology to theology, theology to philosophy, philosophy to science, science to propertarianism.) Like most people you are used to moral, philosophical (rational and frankly sophomoric) argument from those thinkers. These methods merely confirm what you intuit. They don’t do anything to falsify what others intuit differently. P is falsificationary, and so far, impossible to refute (just as is bounded rationality and rational choice). In other words, I don’t do work that makes you feel good or sells you, I explain why the left lies and how they lie and how to write the law so that they can’t engage in lying, fraud, and misrepresentation. Unfortunately, one of the casualties of that effort is the sophomoric nonsense from the Tribe’s second attempt at conquering western civlization: marx-communism-socialism, Trotsky-neoconservatism, rand/rothbard-libertarianism, Friedman-feminism, and derrida-postmodernism. And the other casualty (unfortunately) is judaism, christianity, and islam, all of which make use of the same technique of deception – of which you are a rather obvious victim. Now, if you’re used to literary moralizing (sophism) then transitioning to a formal operational via-negativa logic isn’t going to be easy for you. And it’s to be expected that it’s hard. If you have studied physics or economics or law it’s easier. If you know the philosophy of science it’s easier. If you know mathematics reasonably well it’s easier. But you need at least one of those things as an anchor for me (or others) to start from, otherwise we have to start in kindergarten so to speak and that’s not fair because it’s too much work. Once you know the grammars we can teach you testimony. Once you know testimony we can teach you property in toto. then we can teach you eprime, complete sentences, in operational language using all of the above. Then we can move on to acquisitionism, compatibilism, class structure by the three means of coercion. Somewhere along that series you will get it. And you will never be the same again. Because everything in the world of psychology, sociology, politics and war becomes trivially clear.
Form: Mini Essay
-
Why Is P a Shift in Your Thought?
Jan 26, 2020, 8:33 AM (from mythology to theology, theology to philosophy, philosophy to science, science to propertarianism.) Like most people you are used to moral, philosophical (rational and frankly sophomoric) argument from those thinkers. These methods merely confirm what you intuit. They don’t do anything to falsify what others intuit differently. P is falsificationary, and so far, impossible to refute (just as is bounded rationality and rational choice). In other words, I don’t do work that makes you feel good or sells you, I explain why the left lies and how they lie and how to write the law so that they can’t engage in lying, fraud, and misrepresentation. Unfortunately, one of the casualties of that effort is the sophomoric nonsense from the Tribe’s second attempt at conquering western civlization: marx-communism-socialism, Trotsky-neoconservatism, rand/rothbard-libertarianism, Friedman-feminism, and derrida-postmodernism. And the other casualty (unfortunately) is judaism, christianity, and islam, all of which make use of the same technique of deception – of which you are a rather obvious victim. Now, if you’re used to literary moralizing (sophism) then transitioning to a formal operational via-negativa logic isn’t going to be easy for you. And it’s to be expected that it’s hard. If you have studied physics or economics or law it’s easier. If you know the philosophy of science it’s easier. If you know mathematics reasonably well it’s easier. But you need at least one of those things as an anchor for me (or others) to start from, otherwise we have to start in kindergarten so to speak and that’s not fair because it’s too much work. Once you know the grammars we can teach you testimony. Once you know testimony we can teach you property in toto. then we can teach you eprime, complete sentences, in operational language using all of the above. Then we can move on to acquisitionism, compatibilism, class structure by the three means of coercion. Somewhere along that series you will get it. And you will never be the same again. Because everything in the world of psychology, sociology, politics and war becomes trivially clear.
-
Education Reform
Jan 26, 2020, 11:54 AM
- Restore Grammar(imitating), Logic(understanding), Rhetoric(Speaking) – Add Propertarianism (truth, ethics, morality) as well as the grammars and lying.
- Restore the Epic Cycle (the indo european expansion, the matter of Greece and Rome, the matter of Germanics),
Add the and the Evolution of our Religions - Restore Art History – Add scientific, Technological, and Economic, political, and military History (repeating)
- Add money, accounting, banking, interest, and investing, micro and macro economics as early as possible.
- Convert the teaching of math from symbolic an sets to operational so that far more people are able to grasp it. Restore high repetition work loads in mathematics (asian method)
- Restore competitive teaching and separate the boys and girls.
- Restore overlapping age groups so students are subject to repetition. (one room method)
- Restore divisions of classes into students of similar abilities learning at similar rates.
- Add teachers following students through the years (Finnish method)
- Restore the combination of physical, verbal, and recitation in groups as technique during the grammar years. (Simon says method)
- Restore competitive physical activity as a daily requirement.
- Restore military discipline and corporal punishment until high school (zero tolerance). Add parental punishment and parental classrooms. Add forcible sterilization for failure.
- Reform the dietary recommendations to limit carbohydrates and sugars to the absolute minimum.
- Privatize all schools under the ownership of teachers. Restore catholic and protestant schools.
- Develop standardized tests that measure progress in the above including personality, intelligence, and current state of knowledge.
- Restore the German method of apprenticeship throughout.
- Seek to reduce school hours, especially morning hours, beginning at age 14, and split between working (apprenticeship) and schooling.
- Eliminate homework wherever possible.
(tag: education )
-
Education Reform
Jan 26, 2020, 11:54 AM
- Restore Grammar(imitating), Logic(understanding), Rhetoric(Speaking) – Add Propertarianism (truth, ethics, morality) as well as the grammars and lying.
- Restore the Epic Cycle (the indo european expansion, the matter of Greece and Rome, the matter of Germanics),
Add the and the Evolution of our Religions - Restore Art History – Add scientific, Technological, and Economic, political, and military History (repeating)
- Add money, accounting, banking, interest, and investing, micro and macro economics as early as possible.
- Convert the teaching of math from symbolic an sets to operational so that far more people are able to grasp it. Restore high repetition work loads in mathematics (asian method)
- Restore competitive teaching and separate the boys and girls.
- Restore overlapping age groups so students are subject to repetition. (one room method)
- Restore divisions of classes into students of similar abilities learning at similar rates.
- Add teachers following students through the years (Finnish method)
- Restore the combination of physical, verbal, and recitation in groups as technique during the grammar years. (Simon says method)
- Restore competitive physical activity as a daily requirement.
- Restore military discipline and corporal punishment until high school (zero tolerance). Add parental punishment and parental classrooms. Add forcible sterilization for failure.
- Reform the dietary recommendations to limit carbohydrates and sugars to the absolute minimum.
- Privatize all schools under the ownership of teachers. Restore catholic and protestant schools.
- Develop standardized tests that measure progress in the above including personality, intelligence, and current state of knowledge.
- Restore the German method of apprenticeship throughout.
- Seek to reduce school hours, especially morning hours, beginning at age 14, and split between working (apprenticeship) and schooling.
- Eliminate homework wherever possible.
(tag: education )
-
It”s Not Christianity Its how Its Argued
Jan 26, 2020, 12:30 PM
—“Has anyone ever noticed that it isn’t Christianity that is the problem? But the Marxist infection of X. It’s the cancer that high trust cultures are prone to. … Yeah, wrong subtopic. It’s hard to say, because Abrahamic religions seem to want to be, at least start out as high trust but quickly degenerated by something power hungry, and/or angry at a slight.”—Anne Summers —“Yes. the problem is xianity is conveyed by the same method so how can we get rid of the marxist axis without it affecting xianity unless we convert xianity to secular scientific terms?”—CurtD —“It’s hard to say whether Christianity is salvageable. God did not try to salvage either paganism or Judaism. There is no telling what the next covenant will be. It’s like trying to read the early parts of the “Voluspa” and trying to decide which gods will survive. Or reading the OT and trying to figure out what God has in store. The Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only at dusk.”—Don Miguel
Neolithic European Farmers ……………> Pre-Germanic Nordic ……………> Megalithic Atlantic ……………> Central? Aryanism (Sky Father, Sun God) ………..> East ……………> Indo Iranian > Zoroastrianism >… ……………> Indo Indian > Hinduism > Buddhism ………..> West ……………> North: ?? > Germanic Thor > Germanic Odinism ……………> Central: Germanic Celtic ……………> South: Greco-Latin-Roman Judaism > ……………> Christianity > Protestantism > American Xianity ……………> Islam > Islamic Fundamentalism. ………….. > Marxism > cultural Marxism > Postmodernism > anti-western feminism > Political Correctness > Denialism
-
It”s Not Christianity Its how Its Argued
Jan 26, 2020, 12:30 PM
—“Has anyone ever noticed that it isn’t Christianity that is the problem? But the Marxist infection of X. It’s the cancer that high trust cultures are prone to. … Yeah, wrong subtopic. It’s hard to say, because Abrahamic religions seem to want to be, at least start out as high trust but quickly degenerated by something power hungry, and/or angry at a slight.”—Anne Summers —“Yes. the problem is xianity is conveyed by the same method so how can we get rid of the marxist axis without it affecting xianity unless we convert xianity to secular scientific terms?”—CurtD —“It’s hard to say whether Christianity is salvageable. God did not try to salvage either paganism or Judaism. There is no telling what the next covenant will be. It’s like trying to read the early parts of the “Voluspa” and trying to decide which gods will survive. Or reading the OT and trying to figure out what God has in store. The Owl of Minerva spreads its wings only at dusk.”—Don Miguel
Neolithic European Farmers ……………> Pre-Germanic Nordic ……………> Megalithic Atlantic ……………> Central? Aryanism (Sky Father, Sun God) ………..> East ……………> Indo Iranian > Zoroastrianism >… ……………> Indo Indian > Hinduism > Buddhism ………..> West ……………> North: ?? > Germanic Thor > Germanic Odinism ……………> Central: Germanic Celtic ……………> South: Greco-Latin-Roman Judaism > ……………> Christianity > Protestantism > American Xianity ……………> Islam > Islamic Fundamentalism. ………….. > Marxism > cultural Marxism > Postmodernism > anti-western feminism > Political Correctness > Denialism
-
I”m Doing What I Said I Would Do – Albeit Slowly
Jan 26, 2020, 3:17 PM
—“What is your Response to people now 24 who said they knew about you since they were 12 but you accomplished nothing? (not my opinion) What is your response to the same nihilists who say the Virginia rally accomplished nothing and the grassroots rights will sit around as their country gets overtaken by the left as their rally was meaningless?”—
Well, let’s see. I started a site in 09. I went public in 12-13. Eli is the only person I know of that’s been with me that long. Hmm… So it’s possible I guess. What does accomplished nothing mean? What was I supposed to have accomplished? I set out to produce a value neutral language of ethics and politics; then to express the history of my people in those terms; then to create a constitution of natural law; and I promised a set of deliverables: (a) a moral license (b) a set of demands, (c) a plan of transition, and (d) a means of insurrection. And I said I would only take a leadership role if other leadership didnt emerge. I’m either doing or have done all those things. Just over a year ago we started the institute on one hand, and john’s videos on revolution on the other. We have about a dozen people capable of using or building upon P. if we double that we’ll have the number I was shooting for, and if we get to 100 we’ll have certainly achieved our goals. Conversely, what has anyone else done except bring us the catastrophe of c’ville, get deplatformed, and learned the painful lesson I warned them about in ’16 when they went down the identitarian message, rather than revolution and rights messages? Where are all those people now? Their toast. What did Hoppe or Rothbard or the Mises institute or CATO do? Absolutely nothing. What about the Conservatives? Nothing. Why? Thy had the wrong f—king answer. There is only one solution and that is war. And there is only one way of avoiding war, and that is to make the horror of it so certain that the other side prefers to separate rather than lose two thirds of its numbers. Y’all want to move mountains on impulse. You’re filled with rage and fear. You’re first movers like me. But you are not strategic planners like me. I am an engineer. I’m doing what I said. And the Overton window is moving at exactly the rate I predicted it would. We will get our revolution when there is the least resistance from our own. And that will be shortly. Go read about the IRA and about Mao, and then study what ISIS did to fund itself. I think shit thru. That’s why I take time. And if other leadership emerges that’s fine with me. Someone just has to do it. I don’t need it. I can be happy with one woman, a computer, a sports car, and a few friends. The only reason I do this is because I love my people, it needs doing, and everyone else is doing it even worse than I am.
-
I”m Doing What I Said I Would Do – Albeit Slowly
Jan 26, 2020, 3:17 PM
—“What is your Response to people now 24 who said they knew about you since they were 12 but you accomplished nothing? (not my opinion) What is your response to the same nihilists who say the Virginia rally accomplished nothing and the grassroots rights will sit around as their country gets overtaken by the left as their rally was meaningless?”—
Well, let’s see. I started a site in 09. I went public in 12-13. Eli is the only person I know of that’s been with me that long. Hmm… So it’s possible I guess. What does accomplished nothing mean? What was I supposed to have accomplished? I set out to produce a value neutral language of ethics and politics; then to express the history of my people in those terms; then to create a constitution of natural law; and I promised a set of deliverables: (a) a moral license (b) a set of demands, (c) a plan of transition, and (d) a means of insurrection. And I said I would only take a leadership role if other leadership didnt emerge. I’m either doing or have done all those things. Just over a year ago we started the institute on one hand, and john’s videos on revolution on the other. We have about a dozen people capable of using or building upon P. if we double that we’ll have the number I was shooting for, and if we get to 100 we’ll have certainly achieved our goals. Conversely, what has anyone else done except bring us the catastrophe of c’ville, get deplatformed, and learned the painful lesson I warned them about in ’16 when they went down the identitarian message, rather than revolution and rights messages? Where are all those people now? Their toast. What did Hoppe or Rothbard or the Mises institute or CATO do? Absolutely nothing. What about the Conservatives? Nothing. Why? Thy had the wrong f—king answer. There is only one solution and that is war. And there is only one way of avoiding war, and that is to make the horror of it so certain that the other side prefers to separate rather than lose two thirds of its numbers. Y’all want to move mountains on impulse. You’re filled with rage and fear. You’re first movers like me. But you are not strategic planners like me. I am an engineer. I’m doing what I said. And the Overton window is moving at exactly the rate I predicted it would. We will get our revolution when there is the least resistance from our own. And that will be shortly. Go read about the IRA and about Mao, and then study what ISIS did to fund itself. I think shit thru. That’s why I take time. And if other leadership emerges that’s fine with me. Someone just has to do it. I don’t need it. I can be happy with one woman, a computer, a sports car, and a few friends. The only reason I do this is because I love my people, it needs doing, and everyone else is doing it even worse than I am.
-
Defense Is Not Substitutable.
Jan 26, 2020, 4:25 PM
—“I was wondering about how the natural law of reciprocity would handle the current divide on gun rights/safety? On one hand, safety is an intangible asset but guns are an asset as well.”—
Defense is not substitutable. One cannot warranty another’s life. Therefore any attempt to deprive others of the right to bear arms is a violation of reciprocity. it’s the most basic of applications of the law. there is nothing to it. “can you warranty my life? No only I can.” “can you warranty the natural law without arms? No. We can warranty others non violation of it.” “can you warranty you will not violate the natural law? You can’t. I can warranty your non-violation of it.” Edit
-
Defense Is Not Substitutable.
Jan 26, 2020, 4:25 PM
—“I was wondering about how the natural law of reciprocity would handle the current divide on gun rights/safety? On one hand, safety is an intangible asset but guns are an asset as well.”—
Defense is not substitutable. One cannot warranty another’s life. Therefore any attempt to deprive others of the right to bear arms is a violation of reciprocity. it’s the most basic of applications of the law. there is nothing to it. “can you warranty my life? No only I can.” “can you warranty the natural law without arms? No. We can warranty others non violation of it.” “can you warranty you will not violate the natural law? You can’t. I can warranty your non-violation of it.” Edit