FAILS WERE SYSTEMIC FOR HOLLYWOOD 1 – Family ‘heroic’ (child, daughter, father,) does not play in western civ since we are the least familial and clannish people. It feels ‘trivial’ and effeminate – not heroic. The plot would have been fine without all the sentimentality. Playing up the desire for replicant reproduction would have been enough plot – and heroic, deep, and meaningful. The personalization of the plot trivialized it. 2 – Bringing in (a) tie into Kurt Russell’s “Soldier” (trashlands), and (b) Harrison Ford’s ‘still around’ (desert lands), (c) child workers (Thunderdome and variations), were trite, forced, and took the audience out of context – just to appreciate the painting of the scenery rather than the story. The story was just fine as rainy urban noir, with the main story arc of the lead and the girl-bot all that was needed. Another shot breaker – the police offices were environmentally tight, leading to weak shots in tight scenes. 3 – Add the woke chick-washing and woke brown-washing, and the absence of ‘men-with-chests’ other than Bautista, Even casting Gosling was a men-without-chests casting. Not exactly Achilles – which is what the role demanded. Gosling, Armas, Hoeks, Wright, and Leto delivered flawless performances – given the absence of men with chests. It only stretched suspension of disbelief a little more. 4 – The end fight scene is as bad as the bridge scenes in the most recent tragic terminator – ridiculous, forced, and unbearably unbelievable. By the time you get there you just can’t wait to be over because it so staged, forced, unbelievable, and unrelated to the plot. 5 – That movie could have been produced for a 100M budget (or less) and made good money with customers paying for repeat showings. Keep the production quality. Cut it down. Focus the story. Fine. The market for those things is endless. But we’d need to recreate the studio system to produce them with regularity the way Blumhouse produces cheap fare audience eat up. The upmarket is there. It’s just not there for this ‘reach’. BR’82 is in my top five of all time. But I didn’t walk out of 2049. I did feel like it though. And I felt depressed at the lost opportunity before I reached the parking lot. VERDICT? (a) denis was a bad choice – he blew off the world the original movie had created (b) studio interference clearly evident – to try to get a blockbuster by ‘piling shit on’ (c) no one trusting the material and the actors to carry what could have and should have been a love story and noir. ALSO; almost guaranteed Denis will repeat his failure with 2048 on Dune for the exact same reasons. He can make a simple film look like Lawrence of Arabia, but he cannot make a Lawrence of Arabia or a blade runner. He doesn’t have the chops for it. you need balls of steel, dominance off the charts, OCD and IQ for those works of art and he doesn’t have them.
Form: Mini Essay
-
It’s a Good Trade. God and Caesar Have Worked for Two Thousand Years.
I state that Christianity (the imitation of Jesus, the extension of kinship love, the abandonment of responsibility for that which is out of one’s control, the self-image, self confidnce, mindfulness, and polity that results) is scientifically the optimum solution for any religion or polity. But maintaining faith requires genetic bias to empathy over reason. And I know that by teaching the stoic method of the same virtues we would achieve the same for the secularist Christians who can’t use empathy over reason (analytical). So while I state that the result of Christian indoctrination produces an optimum good – at last within one’s Ethno-group. I also state that the Abrahamic method of scripture (pilpul, theology) teaches lying – which is in evidence whenever scripture is used for argument. Those statements are both true. They are true today in commerce, in mixed-faith/secular Christian groups, in education, court, in politics, in economics, in science. So deliver unto caesar and we will deliver unto the Christian god. But we do not compromise on truth. We only trade loyalty. If that is not enough then it doesn’t matter. There are enough of us, and enough Christians willing to do the trade, and those that are not worthy of it – and they are objectively, by god’s and man’s law immoral for not doing so. And that’s just how it has to be if we are to win. The center and even the right have openly discussed that Christians are naturally leftists, and enable leftists, and always have, and that only the overreach of the Marxists drove Christians to the aristocratic conservatives (classical liberals and secular Christians), and that his alliance has been harmful, not helpful to the conservatives and to the country. My job is to solve problems. This is the optimum POSSIBLE solution to the problem. I really do appreciate your advice. I hear you. But it is no longer possible for the majority to believe in fundamentalism (that scripture is truth rather than wisdom literature). For most of us, we believe in god, we take Jesus as our prophet, but we know the difference between true wisdom and faith. And we cannot be made to do what the fundamentalists do. And the fundamentalists are powerless because their leadership has chosen fundamentalism over pragmatism and is incapable of executive function in the modern world – so Christians are stuck with us who are. It’s a good trade. God and Caesar have worked for two thousand years.
-
It’s a Good Trade. God and Caesar Have Worked for Two Thousand Years.
I state that Christianity (the imitation of Jesus, the extension of kinship love, the abandonment of responsibility for that which is out of one’s control, the self-image, self confidnce, mindfulness, and polity that results) is scientifically the optimum solution for any religion or polity. But maintaining faith requires genetic bias to empathy over reason. And I know that by teaching the stoic method of the same virtues we would achieve the same for the secularist Christians who can’t use empathy over reason (analytical). So while I state that the result of Christian indoctrination produces an optimum good – at last within one’s Ethno-group. I also state that the Abrahamic method of scripture (pilpul, theology) teaches lying – which is in evidence whenever scripture is used for argument. Those statements are both true. They are true today in commerce, in mixed-faith/secular Christian groups, in education, court, in politics, in economics, in science. So deliver unto caesar and we will deliver unto the Christian god. But we do not compromise on truth. We only trade loyalty. If that is not enough then it doesn’t matter. There are enough of us, and enough Christians willing to do the trade, and those that are not worthy of it – and they are objectively, by god’s and man’s law immoral for not doing so. And that’s just how it has to be if we are to win. The center and even the right have openly discussed that Christians are naturally leftists, and enable leftists, and always have, and that only the overreach of the Marxists drove Christians to the aristocratic conservatives (classical liberals and secular Christians), and that his alliance has been harmful, not helpful to the conservatives and to the country. My job is to solve problems. This is the optimum POSSIBLE solution to the problem. I really do appreciate your advice. I hear you. But it is no longer possible for the majority to believe in fundamentalism (that scripture is truth rather than wisdom literature). For most of us, we believe in god, we take Jesus as our prophet, but we know the difference between true wisdom and faith. And we cannot be made to do what the fundamentalists do. And the fundamentalists are powerless because their leadership has chosen fundamentalism over pragmatism and is incapable of executive function in the modern world – so Christians are stuck with us who are. It’s a good trade. God and Caesar have worked for two thousand years.
-
THE TRADE: FAITH AND LAW We make a deal with Christians: loyalty to the law in e
THE TRADE: FAITH AND LAW
We make a deal with Christians: loyalty to the law in
exchange for loyalty to the faith. If that’s good enough, then
that’s all we both need. If that isn’t good enough then they’re of no use anyway. Because we can no longer believe than christians can stop.
The mind of god is written in the law of the universe:
The Physical Laws: realism, naturalism, and the physics.
The Natural Law: Reciprocity and Testimony.
The Evolutionary Law: Eugenics and Transcendence.
Europeans are the only people to discover, adapt to, and apply all the laws of the universe. And this is the reason for the rapid evolution of europeans in the bronze, iron, and steel ages – and the failure of others who stagnated or declined.
THE NATURAL LAW IS SIMPLE:
Reciprocity in display word and deed: The Productive, Truthful, Warrantied, Exchange, free of imposition of costs upon others.
OUR LAW IS SIMPLE:
We do reciprocity: Trades.
We don’t do concessions.
We don’t do submission.
Ever
The Primacy of Man
The Sovereignty of Men.
Reciprocity Between Men.
Viking Ethics. 🙂
And Gods Laws.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 19:47:00 UTC
-
INVESTMENT WITHOUT DEMAND FOR AGENCY by James Dmitro Makienko The core of our pr
INVESTMENT WITHOUT DEMAND FOR AGENCY
by James Dmitro Makienko
The core of our problem was that we thought that through educating slaves, most women and the underclass they will somehow achieve aristocracy, without reciprocally demanding that they increase their agency.
Without agency, slaves will a) remain slaves b) think of advancing as owning their own slaves c) evade responsibility for their actions.
The underclass in its majority does not want to get out of the underclass – we can only manage it so that they do not impose a cost and be a burden for the rest of the society.
Occasionally some members of the underclass will develop agency on their own and lift themselves up – just like some aristocracy will squander their parents’ inheritance, and one day wake up in a dung heap behind tavern, and live unhappily in the gutters everafter.
This is a natural cycle for refreshing the elite.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 16:10:00 UTC
-
The European Mistake Began with False Promises
1) The false promise of an Aristocracy of Everyone: The false pretense of aristocratic oppression of the classes rather than continuous domestication and evolution of man, like plants, beasts, metals he had domesticated before he domesticated himself. 2) The false promise of the nature of man – man is amoral: practical and must be. The false promise of the malleability of man: man is no different from any other domesticated beast and no more malleable – the best we can do is create incentives to deny him the negative leaving him to survive by the positive. The false promise of the equality of man in ability, potential, and circumstance 3) The false promise that we were free from physical (cost – scarcity), natural (cooperative-competitive), and evolutionary (inequality – the red queen) laws of the universe, to which western man, his thought, his customs, his traditions, his institutions, his laws, had uniquely adapted, and his unique religion of pagan tragedy that lionized man for the burden of those laws – laws that are not those of a benevolent universe or benevolent creator. The primacy of man over god and nature because he sought to transcend them by his intelligence, cunning, and his labors, by bending the universe to his will, and making an Eden of it – despite the hostility of God and universe to the transcendence of man into gods. His Christian religion that promised the opposite – a benevolent god and universe – in exchange for obedience to the aristocracy, and their continuation of continuous transcendence of man. But in the main; 1) Democracy as via positiva director rather than via-negativa Jury for funds and policy; ensuring that quality policy cannot succeed, and an eternal battle for rent-seeking. 2) Failure to add houses for classes as the economy expanded, thus creating the inverse of Aristocracy (rule by the worse) – instead of our tradition of aristocracy with houses for the classes to prevent abuses of the economy that made our transcendence possible. 3) Failure to restore our traditional religion (mindfulness, tragedy) upon the exposure of the Christian religion, and leaving the majority without one, and Christians desperate to preserve the false promise, while the aristocratic world that parented them, and made their world, collapsed – turning them into third worlders who lack that aristocracy – causing the inevitable consequences: demise. 4) The failure to assist in the transcendence of Germany on land as we had Britain on sea, and Russia in Anatolia, and as such, the subsequent the destruction of the colonial program by which we profitably sought to unite the world and drag it kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, suffering, and death, and leaving a wake of chaos behind us. The looting of the British empire rather than its restoration after the war. The failure to domesticate china – all errors of Christianity, not Aristocracy. 5) The failure to continue the pre-war eugenic program, false demonization of an enemy over his use of it, in order to compel the people to sacrifice in war. The costly inability to restore that program and the tradition of the continuous domestication of man afterward. And the west’s total abandonment of that tradition by the tolerance for immigration that had reversed his thousands of years of evolution – thus ending the speciation of Europeans from the rest of man, and the european transcendence of himself, and man, into gods he imagined. The core? We believed our own lies. We are never free of those laws, we merely continuously struggle against them – they are the instructions of the universe, and the universe’s god, and Heroism and Tragedy the Only Religion of a people that does not fail to transcend the beast man. Every other civilization failed to discover and apt to those laws – they LACK THE COURAGE TO DO SO. Only western man had the courage. none other. But the middle that rules under commercial democracy was not aristocracy (parent, paternal), but adolescent or feminine, seeking customers, approval, and love rather than achievement. Not aristocratic and pagan but Christian and hedonist. We stopped being the agents of the universe and the universe’s god’s laws of physical, natural, and evolutionary law, because commerce, finance, and government extraction were more profitable, and we lit the kindling when we allowed pandora to accept from her electoral box – for she is dysgenic in her heart, and her instinct is to undermine the gods at all times. That is why. (I can probably do better with a dozen revisions or so but that’s pretty close)
-
The European Mistake Began with False Promises
1) The false promise of an Aristocracy of Everyone: The false pretense of aristocratic oppression of the classes rather than continuous domestication and evolution of man, like plants, beasts, metals he had domesticated before he domesticated himself. 2) The false promise of the nature of man – man is amoral: practical and must be. The false promise of the malleability of man: man is no different from any other domesticated beast and no more malleable – the best we can do is create incentives to deny him the negative leaving him to survive by the positive. The false promise of the equality of man in ability, potential, and circumstance 3) The false promise that we were free from physical (cost – scarcity), natural (cooperative-competitive), and evolutionary (inequality – the red queen) laws of the universe, to which western man, his thought, his customs, his traditions, his institutions, his laws, had uniquely adapted, and his unique religion of pagan tragedy that lionized man for the burden of those laws – laws that are not those of a benevolent universe or benevolent creator. The primacy of man over god and nature because he sought to transcend them by his intelligence, cunning, and his labors, by bending the universe to his will, and making an Eden of it – despite the hostility of God and universe to the transcendence of man into gods. His Christian religion that promised the opposite – a benevolent god and universe – in exchange for obedience to the aristocracy, and their continuation of continuous transcendence of man. But in the main; 1) Democracy as via positiva director rather than via-negativa Jury for funds and policy; ensuring that quality policy cannot succeed, and an eternal battle for rent-seeking. 2) Failure to add houses for classes as the economy expanded, thus creating the inverse of Aristocracy (rule by the worse) – instead of our tradition of aristocracy with houses for the classes to prevent abuses of the economy that made our transcendence possible. 3) Failure to restore our traditional religion (mindfulness, tragedy) upon the exposure of the Christian religion, and leaving the majority without one, and Christians desperate to preserve the false promise, while the aristocratic world that parented them, and made their world, collapsed – turning them into third worlders who lack that aristocracy – causing the inevitable consequences: demise. 4) The failure to assist in the transcendence of Germany on land as we had Britain on sea, and Russia in Anatolia, and as such, the subsequent the destruction of the colonial program by which we profitably sought to unite the world and drag it kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, suffering, and death, and leaving a wake of chaos behind us. The looting of the British empire rather than its restoration after the war. The failure to domesticate china – all errors of Christianity, not Aristocracy. 5) The failure to continue the pre-war eugenic program, false demonization of an enemy over his use of it, in order to compel the people to sacrifice in war. The costly inability to restore that program and the tradition of the continuous domestication of man afterward. And the west’s total abandonment of that tradition by the tolerance for immigration that had reversed his thousands of years of evolution – thus ending the speciation of Europeans from the rest of man, and the european transcendence of himself, and man, into gods he imagined. The core? We believed our own lies. We are never free of those laws, we merely continuously struggle against them – they are the instructions of the universe, and the universe’s god, and Heroism and Tragedy the Only Religion of a people that does not fail to transcend the beast man. Every other civilization failed to discover and apt to those laws – they LACK THE COURAGE TO DO SO. Only western man had the courage. none other. But the middle that rules under commercial democracy was not aristocracy (parent, paternal), but adolescent or feminine, seeking customers, approval, and love rather than achievement. Not aristocratic and pagan but Christian and hedonist. We stopped being the agents of the universe and the universe’s god’s laws of physical, natural, and evolutionary law, because commerce, finance, and government extraction were more profitable, and we lit the kindling when we allowed pandora to accept from her electoral box – for she is dysgenic in her heart, and her instinct is to undermine the gods at all times. That is why. (I can probably do better with a dozen revisions or so but that’s pretty close)
-
THE EUROPEAN MISTAKE BEGAN …. WITH FALSE PROMISES 1) The false promise of an a
THE EUROPEAN MISTAKE BEGAN …. WITH FALSE PROMISES
1) The false promise of an aristocracy of everyone: The false pretense of aristocratic oppression of the classes rather than continuous domestication and evolution of man, like plants, beasts, metals he had domesticated before he domesticated himself.
2) The false promise of the nature of man – man is amoral: practical and must be. The false promise of the malleability of man: man is no different from any other domesticated beast and no more malleable – the best we an do is create incentives to deny him the negative leaving him to survive by the positive. The false promise of the equality of man in ability, potential, and circumstance
3) The false promise that we were free from physical (cost – scarcity), natural (cooperative-competitive), and evolutionary (inequality – the red queen) laws of the universe, to which western man, his thought, his customs, his traditions, his institutions, his laws, had uniquely adapted, and his unique religion of pagan tragedy that lionized man for the burden of those laws – laws that are not those of a benevolent universe or benevolent creator.
The primacy of man over god and nature because he sought to transcend them by his intelligence, cunning, and his labors, by bending the universe to his will, and making an eden of it – despite the hostility of god and universe to the transcendence of man into gods.
His christian religion that promised the opposite – a benevolent god and universe – in exchange for obedience to the aristocracy, and their continuation of continuous transcendence of man.
But in the main;
1) democracy as director rather than jury for policy;
2) failure to add houses for classes as the economy expanded, thus creating the inverse of aristocracy (rule by the worse) – instead of our tradition of aristocracy with houses for the classes to prevent abuses of the economy that made our transcendence possible.
3) failure to restore our traditional religion (mindfulness, tragedy) upon the exposure of the christian religion, and leaving the majority without one, and christians desperate to preserve the false promise, while the aristocratic world that parented them, and made their world, collapsed – turning them into third worlders who lack that aristocracy – causing the inevitable consequences: demise.
4) The failure to assist in the transcendence of Germany on land as we had Britain on sea, and Russia in Anatolia, and as such, the subsequent the destruction of the colonial program by which we profitably sought to unite the world and drag it kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, suffering, and death, and leaving a wake of chaos behind us. The looting of the British empire rather than its restoration after the war. The failure to domesticate china – all errors of Christianity, not Aristocracy.
5) The failure to continue the pre-war eugenic program, false demonization of an enemy over his use of it, in order to compel the people to sacrifice in war. The costly inability to restore that program and the tradition of the continuous domestication of man afterward. And the west’s total abandonment of that tradition by the tolerance for immigration that had reversed his thousands of years of evolution – thus ending the speciation of europeans from the rest of man, and the european transcendence of himself, and man, into gods he imagined.
The core? We believed our own lies. We are never free of those laws, we merely continuously struggle against them – they are the instructions of the universe, and the universe’s god, and Heroism and Tragedy the Only Religion of a people that does not fail to transcend the beast man. Every other civlization failed to discover and apt to those laws – they LACK THE COURAGE TO DO SO. Only western man had the courage. none other.
But the middle that rules under commercial democracy was not aristocracy (parent, paternal), but adolescent or feminine, seeking customers, approval and love rather than achievement. Not aristocratic and pagan but christian and hedonist.
We stopped being the agents of the universe and the universe’s god’s laws of physical, natural, and evolutionary law, because commerce, finance, and government extraction were more profitable, and we lit the kindling when we allowed pandora to accept from her electoral box – for she is dysgenic in her heart, and her instinct is to undermine the gods at all times.
That is why.
(I can probably do better with a dozen revisions or so but that’s pretty close)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 10:19:00 UTC
-
The Ashkenazi aren’t smart because they’re Jewish,
The Ashkenazi aren’t smart because they’re Jewish, but because they’ve inbred with Europeans, were forced through population bottlenecks due to repeated crimes against host people, used the most eugenic reproduction on earth, shed the bottom, reduced cognitive dimorphism to female. So “All Ashkenazi are Cognitively Female” explains their group strategy. They “work hard and complain” (gossip). And like females worldwide, excel at undermining dominance hierarchies until the host people are destroyed. This is the instinctual profitable strategy of the female. So just as homosexuality is an in-utero defect, the “Jewish Problem” is their initial group strategy, their culture and institutions to advance that strategy, and their genetic adaptation to fit that strategy. So their harms cover causal the spectrum instinct > interest > choice. European thought is unique for reasons we are beginning to understand – and likewise, Europeans have evolved to fit our strategy. But there are only two thought leaders in the world: Europeans (Masculine Strategy) and European Jews (Feminine Strategy). We Make. They undermine. This explains why Jews were able to start the Abrahamic program and why the Abrahamic program in the ancient and modern worlds is the same except supernatural vs pseudoscientific. But we can stop it: we extend criminality to baiting into hazard with unwarrantable false promise. There is a very interesting relationship between the failure of the jews to achieve anything of note other than masking an organized crime family as a religion – no arts, no science, no technology, nothing – despite their literacy. Yet Europeans lifted mankind out of primitivism in just a few centuries in the ancient and modern worlds.
-
The Ashkenazi aren’t smart because they’re Jewish,
The Ashkenazi aren’t smart because they’re Jewish, but because they’ve inbred with Europeans, were forced through population bottlenecks due to repeated crimes against host people, used the most eugenic reproduction on earth, shed the bottom, reduced cognitive dimorphism to female. So “All Ashkenazi are Cognitively Female” explains their group strategy. They “work hard and complain” (gossip). And like females worldwide, excel at undermining dominance hierarchies until the host people are destroyed. This is the instinctual profitable strategy of the female. So just as homosexuality is an in-utero defect, the “Jewish Problem” is their initial group strategy, their culture and institutions to advance that strategy, and their genetic adaptation to fit that strategy. So their harms cover causal the spectrum instinct > interest > choice. European thought is unique for reasons we are beginning to understand – and likewise, Europeans have evolved to fit our strategy. But there are only two thought leaders in the world: Europeans (Masculine Strategy) and European Jews (Feminine Strategy). We Make. They undermine. This explains why Jews were able to start the Abrahamic program and why the Abrahamic program in the ancient and modern worlds is the same except supernatural vs pseudoscientific. But we can stop it: we extend criminality to baiting into hazard with unwarrantable false promise. There is a very interesting relationship between the failure of the jews to achieve anything of note other than masking an organized crime family as a religion – no arts, no science, no technology, nothing – despite their literacy. Yet Europeans lifted mankind out of primitivism in just a few centuries in the ancient and modern worlds.