Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE PROBLEM OF CRITICAL MASS NECESSARY TO ORGANIZE WN= Local and rejects others,

    THE PROBLEM OF CRITICAL MASS NECESSARY TO ORGANIZE

    WN= Local and rejects others, a claim of injustice in the face of opposition that says we are unjust ourselves.

    Ethnonationalism = Global and helps others, and is a claim of moral righteousness for all people solving the parasitism upon all people by the world elites.

    1 – sovereignty and self-determination is a global strategy to defeat cosmopolitan globalism that like monotheism seeks to deprive us of our identities and self-determination producing regressive results we have seen across time. globalism is dysgenic and devolutionary and produces a small number of elites, maximizes parasitic bureaucracy, and vast power difference, that forces people into tribalism, then to familism, and the non-production of trust and commons.

    2 – ethnonationalism, especially in small homogenous states, is the optimum social and political order because it limits conflict and competition within, favors investments in commons within while providing national adaptation to markets externally.

    3 – Europeanism, in Rule of law of Natura Law is a statement of science, that Europeans discovered the optimum order but had to pay high self-discipline costs for it, converting the entire society to a military family the way east Asians did a bureaucratic family.

    4 – Ethnic Europeans have the same natural right to self-determination and self-government as all peoples. There is no value to political scale. and the Jewish and globalist effort is to create globalist scale to deprive ethnic groups of self-determination.

    5 – My mission is to fight for self-determination, custom commons and continuous evolution of all people so that they no longer suffer under (comforting) false promises and deceits. No more lies means no more poverty being left behind and suffering.

    “Truth is enough.”, “self-determination”, “Leave Eachother Alone”, “we want to be left alone”

    Those five points sell.

    CONVERSELY

    1 – NS is a hateful position for producing authoritarianism not rule of law, and simply repeating past problems and failures. I’s worse that colonialism because historically it says harm other people.

    2 – WN is a selfish position that has no plan and is unactionable, and will cause the world to rebel against it. It’s a superiority claim, because it to everyone else means a return to European colonialism and warfare, not ‘leave us alone’.

    3 – EN is a moral position – a moral high ground. self-determination is. the science of it is.

    4 – Patriotism is a moral and empirical position, to serve the near-religious nature of our constitution as natural law 0 which is effectively both a scientific, legal, and religous(divine) document. This is a bravery movement. A heroic one.

    5 – CivNat (under Europeanism) is just cowardice in the face of the enemy, that leaves the door open for incrementalism that the left excels at. It’s a virtue-signaling position. It’s just choosing slow suicide in exchange for maintaining the status quo.

    6 – Xianity is universalist, not nationalist. It’s a globalist program. Loyalty to faith before people, before nation, is just a demand that real men do the historical work of the martial aristocracy and defense while xians stay home and maintain house. “Xianity was given to man to tolerate god’s laws, and the aristocracy’s imposition of them until those who were to week and meek, could be evolved into aristocracy and follow gods laws as well. Xianity is therapy for agrarian peasants that has become an addiction, and failed to modernize now that almost none of us are self-sustaining farmers, in the hard work of farming.

    PROBLEM

    The problem is policing low agency and boys in WN, NS from satisfying their frustration by dominance expression that is self-defeating. And instead, getting them on mission so that they feel empowered by inclusion in a plan of action rather than rebelling in small easily defeated teams where they feel they have dominance expression and control.

    Organization is the problem. And the only legitimacy that will unite the factors into organization is critical mass and a plan, so that each faction doesn’t stay mired in spinning in search of agency and wins that cannot be achieved without large numbers.

    So critical mass is the problem that prevents organization.

    So critical mass requires something actionable and believable.

    I know what to do, but we need a political leader that doesn’t need to hide behind a mask or helmet to make it happen.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 10:17:00 UTC

  • OUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IS PRODUCTION OF HIGH TRUST COMMONS – NO ONE ELSE CAN

    OUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IS PRODUCTION OF HIGH TRUST COMMONS – NO ONE ELSE CAN DO IT

    1. Sorry, but white competitive superiority is real because we can create commons and no one else can – including the Asians, the Indians, and the Jews. That’s why people want proximity to whites – we create the intangibles that they can’t. We do it with rule of law of natural law.

    2. This is what’s escaping the political discourse. We make it possible for others to prosper. Because they can’t do it on their own. Why? Only Europeans practice truth before face regardless of the cost, and we raise generations for high investment in, and duty to the commons, not kin.

    3. Every other polity other than Japan and South Korea failed. And even those Confucian societies don’t practice truth before face – they just avoid lying at all costs. Secondly, travel the world. Listen to what people talk about. European minds ‘think differently’ – about commons.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-13 13:49:00 UTC

  • TUCKER CARLSON IS RIGHT – THERE IS NO POLITICAL SOLUTION I’ll publish the strate

    TUCKER CARLSON IS RIGHT – THERE IS NO POLITICAL SOLUTION

    I’ll publish the strategy soon – probably on audio.

    Find men you respect to use it.

    Start before the election.

    And … Win before spring.

    Our strategy will work. It will absolutely, positively, work.

    Our solution will work – it’s in our declaration, and amendments to the constitution.

    It includes:

    Economy: It restructures the economy to give priority to families, in labor, working, and middle classes, and restores the possibility of single-income families.

    Education: It restructures education for the present age without the obstacles of the present bureaucracy.

    Truth in Politics: It restores defamation regardless of harm. It ends academic, political, economic, and media lying to the public, by requiring treatment of speech in public, to the public, in matters public, satisfies the same requirements as court testimony.

    Law: It restores rule of law, improves it, ends legislation from the bench, and makes it invulnerable.

    Society: as we have seen elsewhere in the world, it establishes the country as a European civilization under European traditions and European rule of law

    Self Determination: It allows easy secession of suburban and rural areas into new states leaving city-states to have their own culture without imposing it on the rest.

    The plan requires 10-100K men show up to win. I prefer Patriots not WN/NS. But if WN/NS show, it requires silence by WN/NS. Because the enemy will (as WN/NS just did) make political negotiation impossible. We have to capture the narrative with moral high-ground, and wn/ns ruin it just by talking.

    But the men need men to lead them who speak their language.

    I can do my part rather easily. Negotiation with the enemy doesn’t bother me. (Obviously)

    … Win Before Spring

    What will it cost?

    How do you count your entire race, entire civilization if you don’t. that’s more than any fight would cost.

    The threat is tens of millions.

    Since it’s an offer of settlement,

    The settlement is “very few” – if any.

    … Win Before Spring

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-13 13:01:00 UTC

  • P-LAW IS FOR EVERYONE (from twitter) OUR POSITION ON USA, RACE, AND GOVERNMENT W

    P-LAW IS FOR EVERYONE

    (from twitter)

    OUR POSITION ON USA, RACE, AND GOVERNMENT

    While there are minor physical differences, the only material POLITICAL difference between the races is the historical geographic pressure on the group’s underclass and its resulting size relative to the middle class. This ratio determines the group’s success of pareto-organization (hierarchy) of an economy that can compete in the world market.

    But people demonstrate ingroup priority in politics and all life: marriage, neighborhood, generating different political demands. Whites and Asians demographic distributions are more successful in advanced market civilizations dependent on individual productivity using written communication, logic, calculation, protocols, machines, and technology.

    Therefore people with different demographic distributions require different economic structures, and costs to those economic structures, and they can’t politically mix without conflict since the needs of a population 4–50% able to compete in market civ, and one that 80-90% can, are polar opposites. And burning your own consumption and reproduction in favor of political competitors makes people angry (Very).

    Add to that the uncomfortable truth that sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by the degree of neoteny AND demographic distribution, and you end up with the predictable hierarchy of races and subraces that is evident across the world.

    Therefore while the USA is a continental empire, we are better off with the original design of the country, as an imitation of Historical Europe, with a lot of small states each customizing the production of state services for people with common needs and common interests, and cooperating by the markets rather than perpetual conflict in politics.

    We can still maintain the services of the federal (continental) government by in state, military, treasury, benefits, and dispute between states, but devolve the federal government from creating a ‘globalist’ order here in the states with the same resulting conflict as worldwide.

    This will end the political conflict and drastically reduce power distance between the people an the government. It will generate harmony, It will allow every possible mixture of people and ever possible political model, and states will compete to sere people, but still live within their economic means.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 18:00:00 UTC

  • J. Dean on Purity

    The right values purity by association, but it’s not necessarily tied to self-worth. For instance, old-time Christians as you find here in the bible belt have a strong belief that self-worth or love of self is wrong, that we are all sinners and thus fall short of the glory of God. I would say instead that we are flawed because we are all subject to our survival instincts, and when we act in the interests of our survival we do not know what the ultimate consequences will be. Only an all-seeing perspective, that sees across all time and space could determine that, and none of us have that perspective because we are human. Christianity explained this by the concept of original sin. The problem is that it focused on shame, but shame is probably linked to the disgust response, which helps us survive, so it’s hard to separate it. The disgust response triggers us to shame the bad thing and make it go away. Shame triggers us to question what we could do differently, which can have some utility but also may inhibit action. Shame motivates us to act, but it takes a fair bit of mindfulness not to get mired in it. People who view themselves as shameful have a false self-image, and often become very self-righteous. It’s difficult to unravel that. Self-image, even when it is accurate, tends to limit perspective. It’s no accident that our language uses the word right, or rite, in multiple ways. In righteousness we claim the moral authority or the right to act, in the good faith that we may do what is right. We may not know with certainty what is good or right, but we can identify what is bad or wrong. Rites of purity cleanse the bad. As the saying goes, cleanliness is next to godliness. The aim of being godly is to widen perspective, to let go of the singularity of ego. It’s hard let go when your sense of value or worth is invested in the ego. And it’s hard to let go of ego because it is fundamental to your survival, and we face continual threats to survival. The ideal of purity is the removal of threats, which we all know is impossible, but purity rituals allow us to escape the ego by negating the threat. And ultimately we all want to escape the ego which is why humans are so prone to addiction. Purity helps us feel like we can survive a threat and feel closer to something eternal. Cancel culture is basically a purity ritual. It works well for people like the Amish. Do they do it because it helps them feel like they are good people? Maybe that’s a side effect, but it seems more like they use shunning because it preserves their culture. You have done great work of explaining how people with different and competing strategies threaten each other. Maybe you misunderstood how strongly the right would perceive a threat in your actions, and why.

  • J. Dean on Purity

    The right values purity by association, but it’s not necessarily tied to self-worth. For instance, old-time Christians as you find here in the bible belt have a strong belief that self-worth or love of self is wrong, that we are all sinners and thus fall short of the glory of God. I would say instead that we are flawed because we are all subject to our survival instincts, and when we act in the interests of our survival we do not know what the ultimate consequences will be. Only an all-seeing perspective, that sees across all time and space could determine that, and none of us have that perspective because we are human. Christianity explained this by the concept of original sin. The problem is that it focused on shame, but shame is probably linked to the disgust response, which helps us survive, so it’s hard to separate it. The disgust response triggers us to shame the bad thing and make it go away. Shame triggers us to question what we could do differently, which can have some utility but also may inhibit action. Shame motivates us to act, but it takes a fair bit of mindfulness not to get mired in it. People who view themselves as shameful have a false self-image, and often become very self-righteous. It’s difficult to unravel that. Self-image, even when it is accurate, tends to limit perspective. It’s no accident that our language uses the word right, or rite, in multiple ways. In righteousness we claim the moral authority or the right to act, in the good faith that we may do what is right. We may not know with certainty what is good or right, but we can identify what is bad or wrong. Rites of purity cleanse the bad. As the saying goes, cleanliness is next to godliness. The aim of being godly is to widen perspective, to let go of the singularity of ego. It’s hard let go when your sense of value or worth is invested in the ego. And it’s hard to let go of ego because it is fundamental to your survival, and we face continual threats to survival. The ideal of purity is the removal of threats, which we all know is impossible, but purity rituals allow us to escape the ego by negating the threat. And ultimately we all want to escape the ego which is why humans are so prone to addiction. Purity helps us feel like we can survive a threat and feel closer to something eternal. Cancel culture is basically a purity ritual. It works well for people like the Amish. Do they do it because it helps them feel like they are good people? Maybe that’s a side effect, but it seems more like they use shunning because it preserves their culture. You have done great work of explaining how people with different and competing strategies threaten each other. Maybe you misunderstood how strongly the right would perceive a threat in your actions, and why.

  • “The right fails over purity that exceeds loyalty. That’s why the right has fail

    —“The right fails over purity that exceeds loyalty. That’s why the right has failed for generations. Loyalty (outward) must always be superior to purity (inward). So I’m going to make it a side mission to grind this into right-wing awareness until it’s shameful to purity spiral. I’m going to make purity spirals the new effeminacy. Because that’s what it is. Men who go ‘eek!’—

    Before I understood this I was blaming it on christianity. But it’s a failure to learn to detatch from vicarious experience and become an independent male actor. I think xianity probably reinforces it. But the cause is a failure to develop agency.

    —

    Explanation by J. Dean

    The right values purity by association, but it’s not necessarily tied to self-worth. For instance, old-time Christians as you find here in the bible belt have a strong belief that self-worth or love of self is wrong, that we are all sinners and thus fall short of the glory of God.

    I would say instead that we are flawed because we are all subject to our survival instincts, and when we act in the interests of our survival we do not know what the ultimate consequences will be. Only an all-seeing perspective, that sees across all time and space could determine that, and none of us have that perspective because we are human.

    Christianity explained this by the concept of original sin. The problem is that it focused on shame, but shame is probably linked to the disgust response, which helps us survive, so it’s hard to separate it. The disgust response triggers us to shame the bad thing and make it go away. Shame triggers us to question what we could do differently, which can have some utility but also may inhibit action. Shame motivates us to act, but it takes a fair bit of mindfulness not to get mired in it.

    People who view themselves as shameful have a false self-image, and often become very self-righteous. It’s difficult to unravel that. Self-image, even when it is accurate, tends to limit perspective.

    It’s no accident that our language uses the word right, or rite, in multiple ways. In righteousness we claim the moral authority or the right to act, in the good faith that we may do what is right. We may not know with certainty what is good or right, but we can identify what is bad or wrong. Rites of purity cleanse the bad. As the saying goes, cleanliness is next to godliness.

    The aim of being godly is to widen perspective, to let go of the singularity of ego. It’s hard let go when your sense of value or worth is invested in the ego. And it’s hard to let go of ego because it is fundamental to your survival, and we face continual threats to survival.

    The ideal of purity is the removal of threats, which we all know is impossible, but purity rituals allow us to escape the ego by negating the threat. And ultimately we all want to escape the ego which is why humans are so prone to addiction. Purity helps us feel like we can survive a threat and feel closer to something eternal.

    Cancel culture is basically a purity ritual. It works well for people like the Amish. Do they do it because it helps them feel like they are good people? Maybe that’s a side effect, but it seems more like they use shunning because it preserves their culture.

    You have done great work of explaining how people with different and competing strategies threaten each other. Maybe you misunderstood how strongly the right would perceive a threat in your actions, and why.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-11 21:33:00 UTC

  • UPDATE ON STRATEGY —“Our movement consists of a proposed system of rule of law

    UPDATE ON STRATEGY

    —“Our movement consists of a proposed system of rule of law that advocates reform. Specifically: expanding property rights to include the collective rights logically implied by the existence of commons; expanding perjury into public spaces with more specific definitions of falsehoods; and limiting laws to those that are reciprocal and non-parasitic in nature so that we are limited to exchanges and compromises instead of majority dictate. We combine those legal reforms with economic reforms that restore the primacy of the family and laboring, working, and middle classes. The rest is about how best to achieve implementation which is open to debatae.”— Stephen Wells

    P is an intellectual movement (and an upper class one at that) trying to branch into a political movement, to mobilize and make use of the (constantly failing) anti-intellectual right that is an underserved political demographic.

    And yes it’s difficult. But John showed it can be done. It’s just having the content and doing the quality of marketing. If we got big enough, created a political party, then he could abandon the helmet, and he would have been our political frontman, and a good one. He’d make a great politician.

    Our focus on building a political movement, especially one that would control the dialog, instead of a “gossip” movement (which is everyone else on the internet) means we aren’t looking for attention and clicks, we’re looking to educate and accumulate ONLY those people that will show up on a medium that is cheap (free) but is crowded with people who only want attention (clicks). so as john said, the “Good People” are too few in relation to the “Bad People”. But it’s the only ‘cheap’ game in town so it’s the vehicle we’re forced to use.

    The reason for an ‘event’ is that it ‘breaks the fourth wall’ so to speak and converts an internet movement into a real-world movement. That’s all that we needed. And it would have been fine, because we handled the crisis on the ground, and in the eyes of the media and the anti-right institutions, we succeeded. But since I don’t have a purity sense, I didn’t understand the online Purity Spiral and certainly didn’t anticipate that the ‘gossip’ crowed would come after us so much so that they’d undermine political success in the field, for their OWN optics.

    In retrospect, 1 – I should have put our plan out to everyone there even if it would leak to the enemy. 2 – We should have had our talking points ready, and rehearsed those talking points with everyone who attended so that they stayed on policy and didn’t bring up inflammatory nonsense. (That was our first takeaway that night). 3 – We also didn’t vet people individually, and there was a crossover with the 2A group so we didn’t realize that there were nitwits in our group that would do something stupid and fall for the leftist bait. You can’t do that. It’s ok if I do something stupid – I can always blame it on being a nerd or autistic, or clueless. It’s not ok if participants do. 4 – We have to get across that Optics are for the enemy (smoke), not for our own (confidence). Our ONLY optics are silence and military stoicism (non-reaction, acting as one). That’s the only optic that matters. 5 – Our message is policy not identity. We get an identity as a product of policy. our policy is for everyone. we benefit from it like everyone else.

    As a consequence, 1 – we have to target our market and circumvent the nitwit and gossip crowd, by appealing to the ‘good’ and offending (demeaning) the ‘bad’ elements on line. this is a working class elitist and virtue signaling tactic. In other words appeal to virtue, purity, and alienate the “I can’t control myself’ segment of the man-boy population. This is not a mass movement. It’s a 1% movement. We only need the good ones: the ‘renaissance men’ to win.

    (There is more to be said here but I have to go to the grocery store. lol )

    The best negative feedback is to ignore people. There is no technique more effective that ignoring people and repeating the message every time. So, the only value of interacting with other nitwits online is to learn about them or to exploit them as a vehicle to reach the ‘few good people’ who are not using it as a video game. So, the online community is largely is immaterial. It doesn’t affect votes. It doesn’t affect policy. Everyone wants attention because they think if they get 100K or 200K of follows they matter. It doesn’t. It’s entertainment. It doesn’t do anything. Unless you can turn attention into political action it’s just entertainment.

    The problem for the right is a false feeling of being a minority because of ostracization from mainstream information flow. We aren’t a minority. We are a minority in the mainstream information flow because that’s how the enemy conducts war. And the only way to win that is the same way it is in the rest of life: if someone gets in your face, they’ve broken the contract for the non-imposition of force. And so force is the only solution.

    To create our own information flow use Parler and get into our own flow of information. Try to convince Parler to get big enough to duplicate, buy, license Bit Chute tech. Parler has the chance to get big enough that we have a ‘fox news’ equivalent competitor to the enemy. If it gets big enough Parler gets advertisers. Gab could have done the same thing but they focused on investing the wrong feature set, and not enough on performance. So Parler has taken the market. Bitchute is still too hard to use (slow to add content). But this will work eventually. It’s a matter of critical mass.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-10 10:09:00 UTC

  • Because I”m using the founder’s version, rule of law by truth and reciprocity an

    Because I”m using the founder’s version, rule of law by truth and reciprocity and zero tolerance that succeeded, and not the fascist version of heroic leader, arbitrary decisions, and zero tolerance that failed. Leadership must give the people what they need to achieve their ends, not what they want to achieve there ends. Otherwise, leaders wouldn’t be necessary. leaders don’t give permission, that organize people by chainging their frames of reference so that they value a different HOW in order to obtain the desire WHAT. All demogogues are easy to understand and unite behind, but they wear a target on their movements and always fail.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-08 13:57:00 UTC

  • Repeating. I learned a lot from the TRS staff about the consequences of Cville.

    Repeating. I learned a lot from the TRS staff about the consequences of Cville. So I stand by my actions. I made the right choice at the time with the information I had at my disposal and I couldn’t have done anything better. If I had understood what it looked like to you folks sitting at home (versus us sitting there in the aftermath of a crisis) I would have done the same thing except not given them the bullhorn, but given it back to the 2a guys. It’s not complicated. You had your context, we had ours, and with the information I had, I pandered to the enemy to keep peace on the ground rather than repeat Charlottesville, involve cops, lawyers, prosecutors, media, and turn everyone’s lives to shit and debt for purely symbolic reasons so that you folks at home could get an uncle Adolph moment and dopamine hit. I’m not interested in your need for feelings of power. I’m not following the left’s strategy like you are. I’m following the founding fathers because that strategy is expressly licensed in the founding documents, and was the intention of the founding documents that someone like me reform the government if necessary. And so you can want what you want. But I’m not that stupid. And I’m very disappointed in y’all for not getting that, and using leftist cancel culture on me – and really it’s made me lose faith in you too. There is a reason you don’t have leaders or elites. This is why. It’s not worth even trying. Because you want to be at the bottom. And you take everyone down to your level with you. … So we will continue on our mission of appealing to men and women of maturity and agency to seek a political solution by the moral high ground, and to use our proposal to frame the narrative, and use numbers on the ground to control that narrative … until that fails – because given the terms of our proposal only an immoral person could refuse it. And at that point, if civil war must happen, then it will happen from a position of the moral high ground, in pursuit of a solution that maintains the moral high ground. … So since we’re the only adults in the room, I’ll stick with our strategy of adults, for adults, by adults, and you can stick with your roman salutes, Adolph fantasies, WN without solving the problem for others, and continue to fail. But that’s all there is to it. Moving forward.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-08 12:00:00 UTC