Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • (Still thinking) I don’t think it’s a ‘demographic’ I want to be associated with

    (Still thinking) I don’t think it’s a ‘demographic’ I want to be associated with. I made P as an internationally nationalist movement for the betterment of all peoples, and to end the left’s strategy and methodology forever so that we all could live in harmony under that model. That means if you want any kind of society we should have as many polities as possible so that we can sort into the polities that serve us.

    My target market – the people I want to work for – are good people in the middle and working classes who want to build families, and businesses, and commons and communities.

    I mean, the haters are not people I set out to help or interact with. I thought they were kids but they cross the spectrum. They are not people of character. They are not people I want to know, associate with, or live in proximity to. They are so mad at the world they cause their own defeat – and they never ever learn.

    So given that these people, like their idol Hitler, demand emotional symbolism over rational pragmatism, then the strategy of producing a complete solution for political and military restoration is off the table. They can’t be helped. And they are cancer for anyone who tries to help them.

    So I’ll include the military strategy along with the political solution, and I’ll change the constitutional composition to be more generic and universally applicable.

    So P is a method that helps everyone. And I’m happy if people in every faction use my work to produce whatever homeland that they want. And as I’ve said before I will help any group that wants to use P no matter how crazy the homeland they desire.

    But I don’t want anything to do with these people. So let a thousand leaders bloom for a thousand nations to bloom.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-08 08:28:00 UTC

  • Tests require sincerity, to return sincere answers. sincere answers are the only

    Tests require sincerity, to return sincere answers. sincere answers are the only good data. Good data is the only data to take action upon.

    I ran tests. Via positiva (aggression) via negativa (withdrawal) but not via-apologia (submission).

    The fact that my greatest supporters can’t tell what I”m doing is just evidence I’m getting better at it. But at some point y’all will be thinking the same way and out ahead of me and it won’t work any longer. Which will be yet another victory for us all. 😉

    I want to congratulate Gary Knight for being the only person who saw what I was doing and cheered me on via PM. 😉 (which you can see in his comments).

    Again. Eventually, I won’t get away with it. And at that time you’ll all have graduated. Because you’ll be thinking ahead of me not behind.

    Lessons learned. Move forward. 😉

    Huhua!

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-07 11:24:00 UTC

  • OK. 😉 I had to understand. I ran tests to understand. The tests must be sincere

    OK. 😉

    I had to understand. I ran tests to understand. The tests must be sincere to work. Now I understand. 😉

    Lessons learned for next time are simple and next time just needs to be soon.

    Core people are in. Non-core people still want something. Haters are man-boys. There are a lot of man boys. Man boys are the loud voices, and men are the silent. We need political organization or chart normal nonsense, leadership at local levels to represent the ideas. We should have meetings and parties not events.

    This lets me be ‘mystical’ and they have to attack ideas rather than me. Next event soon. First step is decorum, ritual, sacredness, loyalty. Second is to bait BLM or Antifa into a failure. People will step up to defend the investment. We need a ritual sacrifice so to speak.

    Major thing I can’t get yet is positioning: is how to shame the man-boys like shaming the Christians, into manhood. I’ll figure it out. But they are definitely vulnerable to it.

    So it’s all good. 😉

    Sorry for stressing you with the event and aftermath but in two weeks it won’t matter other than photos of me where my clothes are soaked right through, stomach is bloated, and teetering on the verge of heat exhaustion. lol. (which I find charming honestly.)

    Revolution comes.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-07 10:53:00 UTC

  • SORRY WE DIDN’T DEFUSE THIS STUPID SH-T YESTERDAY So many people, so many real m

    SORRY WE DIDN’T DEFUSE THIS STUPID SH-T YESTERDAY

    So many people, so many real men of brains ability and passion, so much camaraderie, so much loyalty and band of brotherhood, so much excitement, so many meetings. So much education and discussion. It was wonderful. We faced a challenge in the streets, deescalated, overdid it in the heat and got a bit ill so we went to lunch and cooled off. We kept going all afternoon. At 4pm we did a round table of interviews at the conference room. After yet another dinner together we all gathered at a campground had a cookout because no restaurants could fit us all – and with some 18 year old single malt excellence. I completely lost my voice. And we crashed.

    So until I woke up this morning I wasnt really able to respond to the furor and really didn’t even understand how anyone could think we should do anything differently. But I guess if you weren’t there and are looking to recreate the failures of cville – fighting the last war – which is tiresome but understandable.

    Thus is why we need adults in the room. Men of maturity to parent petulant boys lacking male role models or mentors to teach them how men organize for politics and war.

    Our strategy is the moral high ground until the enemy has none, and we either achieve negotiate settlement or have the moral license with the majority of our own to take action at scale. And yes I know how to take that action.

    So we need y’all to stop playing into the left’s hands and get on board with the only possible solution by the only adults who have one.

    Or don’t and we will continue without you. Because really? You are your own worst enemies.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-05 15:09:00 UTC

  • BLOCKCHAIN, CRAIG WRIGHT, APPLIED, THE FUTURE —-“Craig S Wright ( #CraigIsSato

    BLOCKCHAIN, CRAIG WRIGHT, APPLIED, THE FUTURE

    —-“Craig S Wright ( #CraigIsSatoshi ) strikes me as in the same vein of genius as you but everyone says he’s just a fraud. Can you confirm he does indeed wear the mark?”—$HOBOSPICES @h0b0spic3s

    I can’t say because I don’t have the relevant knowledge of him. I can and do compare myself to certain public intellectuals who work on problems of similar scale – and each of us varies in approach according to background, personality and cognitive bias.

    I’ll tell you something unpopular: I don’t really think much of the blockchain technology for the simple reason that proof of work is an uneconomic means of solving what is better solved by simply paying for the upfront cost of transactional technology that does the same thing.

    The ledger makes possible fractional shares, which is the logical step in the evolution of fiat currency, corporate shares, shares in debt, etc. And cuts out the middle man. The idea that it is going to insulate us from the government is a dream for children. Never happen.

    For this reason (ignoring physical laws) I would not put him in the same category as other thinkers. I would however put us both in the same category of technologists. Although I would rate him far higher than myself. I only use tech to solve what’s really social science.

    —“Thank you Curt, I’ve always thought that CSW’s idea of blockchain to be different, in that his design ethos is to be compatible and even complementary to law thereby not trying to avoid government. I had hoped it could be helpful to P in this way (I pray for once you have Err’d)”—

    Don’t misinterpret me. I’ve said the same thing continuously since at least ’14: the technology converted from proof of work, to monolithic transactions will allow the development of a perfect portfolio of currencies, and use of interest in ALL ASSETS as a medium of exchange.

    Moreover, I and others have proposed all accounting systems be modified to this technique so that money substitutes can be tracked throughout the full lifecycle, providing the accounting information we lack to understand the state of economies.

    So (a) end proof of work, making ordinary monolithic transaction systems like banking today, (b) limit the minimum fractional value of a share before ‘writing down’.(c) allow rolling up of fractions into new shares.

    I mean it’s fantastic.

    It will also all but destroy the stock market with a frictionless, fee-less system. Which I like even more. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 13:33:00 UTC

  • THE ABYSS IS A CHALLENGE OR A HORROR – WE MUST CHOOSE The universe will eventual

    THE ABYSS IS A CHALLENGE OR A HORROR – WE MUST CHOOSE

    The universe will eventually compute everything that can be eventually computed by the universe. And the defeat of entropy serves the purpose of increasing computation. If the universe calculates nothing more than the defeat of entropy, then anything and everything that can be computed will be. Man is the result of a rare computation. man’s reason accelerates the computation of the defeat of entropy. We are another step in advancing computation of that which can be computed by the accumulated defeat of entropy. This knowledge is humbling for men of weakness and a challenge to men of will. The last most humbling and terrifying knowledge we must face is the rapidity with which the great filter approaches, and that failing to transcend our existence will pass unnoticed by any that follow -if any follow at all.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 13:21:00 UTC

  • TRUTH BEFORE FACE Truth! That truth we call testimony, and warranty with our hon

    TRUTH BEFORE FACE

    Truth!

    That truth we call testimony, and warranty with our honour.

    Truth-before-face.

    That Truth regardless of the cost to self, others or the powers that be.

    Only European man discovered testimonial truth, and the achievements of our logic, sciences, and arts are the result of its application.

    Only European man had the heroism, courage, and will, to speak testimonial truth-before-face, regardless of the cost to ourselves, others, or the powers that be.

    Only European people had the heroism, courage, and will to institutionalize testimonial truth before face in all walks of life.

    And only European people earned the fruits of the high cost of testimonial truth before face.

    Where in Christendom can we speak the truth before face?

    Nowhere but here. And because our government conspires with the enemy, and has become our enemy, we shall soon lose it here.

    Europe, Mother England, Canada, Australia, have lost truth before face regardless of cost.

    We have no rule of law. We have no equal protection under the law. We have no truth before face.

    It’s up to us.

    We few.

    We happy few.

    We band of brothers

    We alone who earn a greater share of honour.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-01 19:16:00 UTC

  • MONUMENTS AND WAR Monuments are claims on territory, Castles, Courts and Parliam

    MONUMENTS AND WAR

    Monuments are claims on territory, Castles, Courts and Parliaments claims on Rule. And Temples and Churches are claims on the People.

    … Monuments say I own this land. Castles Courts and Parliaments say I rule this land. Temples and Churches say I control these people.

    Removing monuments is a claim of conquest of territory; occupying castles courts, and parliaments, a claim on rule. Building or destroying temples and churches claims on the conquest of people.

    … Removing monuments says I conquered this land. Occupying castles, parliaments, or courts, says I conquered Government. Building or destroying temples or churches, says I conquered these people.

    If one comes upon a territory or its institutions or its people with conquest rather than accommodation, then one comes by way of war.

    And the only response to war regardless of means is war.

    And in the absence of laws of war, there are no laws of war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-01 18:26:00 UTC

  • WHY OUR LAW IS UNIQUE (SPEECH) This! (holds up a fisted document) It is five tho

    WHY OUR LAW IS UNIQUE

    (SPEECH)

    This! (holds up a fisted document) It is five thousand years old. It is the record of our birth.

    It is the natural law. The natural law, the natural law of sovereignty, reciprocity, and testimony. It is our law. it is the law of the European peoples. It is the traditional common law by which we constrain our actions and resolve our disputes.

    It is not the work of man. It is the work of nature and nature’s god. And it is written by the hand of nature and natures god in the fabric of the universe. It was discovered by Europeans – by accident. And we discovered, adapted to, and applied it, like we discovered and applied all other laws of nature and nature’s god.

    The failure to discover and adapt to, and apply this natural law of man, like physical laws and the evolutionary laws, is the reason all other civilizations stagnated declined or failed.

    Our constitution, like mother England’s before us, creates a government of rule of law, by the natural law, that constraints ur actions,, and constructs our commons, that adjudicates our differences.

    No other people upon this earth live under this law. Even mother England lives under the sovereignty of parliament, not sovereignty of law.

    For no other people is The Natural law, and the natural law alone, sovereign. And no other people individually and collectively sovereign because of it.

    So all other people are ruled by men.

    But us. We Americans. We few. We happy Few

    All others failed.

    All others failed to remain sovereign.

    Because all others failed to retain the arms necessary for the preservation of their sovereignty.

    And all others failed to understand that this law, the natural law, is not a law of choice, but of necessity.

    It is the law of nature, the law of cooperation, and the law of evolution.

    But we were weak. Or Nieve. Or too full of Christian tolerance. or too wanting of virtue signals of our superiority.

    So instead of the low cost of continuous policing

    … of our sovereignty, our law, our rule of law,

    … … our constitution and the institutions that result,

    we must pay a high cost

    … of war of correction.

    And with that war we must restore rule of law by that natural law and the sovereignty and self-determination of our people, so that we may continue our discovery adaption to and application of the laws of nature and nature’s god not for us and ours, but for all our people across our civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-01 15:16:00 UTC

  • Blade Runner 2049 Failure Explained

    FAILS WERE SYSTEMIC FOR HOLLYWOOD 1 – Family ‘heroic’ (child, daughter, father,) does not play in western civ since we are the least familial and clannish people. It feels ‘trivial’ and effeminate – not heroic. The plot would have been fine without all the sentimentality. Playing up the desire for replicant reproduction would have been enough plot – and heroic, deep, and meaningful. The personalization of the plot trivialized it. 2 – Bringing in (a) tie into Kurt Russell’s “Soldier” (trashlands), and (b) Harrison Ford’s ‘still around’ (desert lands), (c) child workers (Thunderdome and variations), were trite, forced, and took the audience out of context – just to appreciate the painting of the scenery rather than the story. The story was just fine as rainy urban noir, with the main story arc of the lead and the girl-bot all that was needed. Another shot breaker – the police offices were environmentally tight, leading to weak shots in tight scenes. 3 – Add the woke chick-washing and woke brown-washing, and the absence of ‘men-with-chests’ other than Bautista, Even casting Gosling was a men-without-chests casting. Not exactly Achilles – which is what the role demanded. Gosling, Armas, Hoeks, Wright, and Leto delivered flawless performances – given the absence of men with chests. It only stretched suspension of disbelief a little more. 4 – The end fight scene is as bad as the bridge scenes in the most recent tragic terminator – ridiculous, forced, and unbearably unbelievable. By the time you get there you just can’t wait to be over because it so staged, forced, unbelievable, and unrelated to the plot. 5 – That movie could have been produced for a 100M budget (or less) and made good money with customers paying for repeat showings. Keep the production quality. Cut it down. Focus the story. Fine. The market for those things is endless. But we’d need to recreate the studio system to produce them with regularity the way Blumhouse produces cheap fare audience eat up. The upmarket is there. It’s just not there for this ‘reach’. BR’82 is in my top five of all time. But I didn’t walk out of 2049. I did feel like it though. And I felt depressed at the lost opportunity before I reached the parking lot. VERDICT? (a) denis was a bad choice – he blew off the world the original movie had created (b) studio interference clearly evident – to try to get a blockbuster by ‘piling shit on’ (c) no one trusting the material and the actors to carry what could have and should have been a love story and noir. ALSO; almost guaranteed Denis will repeat his failure with 2048 on Dune for the exact same reasons. He can make a simple film look like Lawrence of Arabia, but he cannot make a Lawrence of Arabia or a blade runner. He doesn’t have the chops for it. you need balls of steel, dominance off the charts, OCD and IQ for those works of art and he doesn’t have them.