Form: Mini Essay

  • كلمة الله مكتوبة في نسيج الكون. لا يذكر البشر. تقول كلمة الله: هذه قوانين فيزيائ

    كلمة الله مكتوبة في نسيج الكون. لا يذكر البشر. تقول كلمة الله: هذه قوانين فيزيائية. هذه قوانين طبيعية. هذه قوانين تطورية. إذا لم تطيعهم ، فستعاني وتتدهور وتختفي. لا يوجد دين يطيع هذه القوانين. لذلك ، لا يوجد دين يطيع كلمة

    الله. وكذب جميع الأنبياء. فقط أرسطو لا يكذب.

    “The word of God is written in the fabric of the universe. It does not mention humans. God’s Word says: These are physical laws. These are natural laws. These are evolutionary laws. If you do not obey them, you will suffer, deteriorate and disappear. There is no religion that obeys these laws. Therefore, there is no religion that obeys the word of God. And all the prophets lied. Only Aristotle does not lie.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 08:29:00 UTC

  • This is Childhood’s End. The Prevention of the Second Abrahamic Dark Age: the co

    This is Childhood’s End. The Prevention of the Second Abrahamic Dark Age: the conversion of the false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by supernaturalism to pseudosciences of boas, marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denial.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 03:07:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271277962931945473

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein @bariweiss @thomaschattwill @kmele @ConceptualJames @EricRWeinstein @Ayishat_Akanbi @cvaldary @JonHaidt @MsMelChen @mcmoynihan @MattWelch @shadihamid @ZaidJilani @sullydish @jessesingal @kittypurrzog

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271277036519272450


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @BretWeinstein @bariweiss @thomaschattwill @kmele @ConceptualJames @EricRWeinstein @Ayishat_Akanbi @cvaldary @JonHaidt @MsMelChen @mcmoynihan @MattWelch @shadihamid @ZaidJilani @sullydish @jessesingal @kittypurrzog I’ve been working on restoring our law, constitution, our culture, and preventing another Abrahamic dark age for almost twenty years. I was right about 2001, 08, 14, 17, and 20. The only thing I got wrong was how long it took for Pols realize China was conducting total war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1271277036519272450

  • A Concise Overview of the Propertarian Revolution

    Our project should be called “The Traditional Law of the European People in Formal Logic”. Or “The Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Reciprocity”. Or “Adversarialism” which is our operating principle. Or “Sovereigntarianism” because our european group strategy is uniquely dependent upon individual sovereignty. Or even “The Formal Logic of Scientific Testimony” because it has more to do with testimony – truthful speech –  which is of greater import during the age of information, than writing law of physical things which has been all but settled science for centuries.   But because we began our work on ethics, using the law of tort  (meaning trespass) we call ‘property’ we are stuck with the brand name “Propertarianism” So, to minimize confusion,  we generally use “P, P-Law, P-logic, P-ethics”. Central Thesis 1) The scientific method does not prescribe what to do to discover knowledge. It prescribes what you must do in order to claim you testify about your findings, rather than opine, narrate, fictionalize, or engage in fraud and deceit. So, the scientific method consists of using due diligence such that you can warranty you speak truthfully, and free of error, bias, wishful-thinking, and deceit.  This project  (P-Law or Strictly Constructed Natural Law) completes the scientific method by using a methodology to produce a universally commensurable value neutral language of testimony across all human knowledge and expression, a grammar to compose it, and logic to apply to it, and the ‘checklist’ for doing so. This is the principle innovation of the system. A methodology, the resulting language, and logic for testing the truthfulness and reciprocity of display, word(speech), and deed(action). Everything else is explanation and application. And that explanation and application is as illuminating in explanatory power in the fields of language, psychology, and sociology, as was the scientific revolution in the physical world, and the Darwinian revolution in the biological world. We traditionally divide the sciences into the formal (math and logic), physical (the physical sciences), and the Human( cognitive-psychological and social). Underneath the covers P-law is a formal logic, just like a programming language. And it’s about as hard to learn as an advanced programming language, with law and economics thrown in. But ordinary folk have no understanding of the law (to keep them ignorant). Ordinary people have no understanding of economics (to keep them ignorant). They have no understanding of genetics (to keep them ignorant). They have no knowledge of comparative history (to keep them ignorant). And you don’t need to know the proof of the pythagorean theorem to use bits of string to mark out the corners of a new patio or deck. But even if we provided that education, if the law conforms to that body of knowledge, then you don’t need to understand how to program, write and argue law, and perform economic analysis. You only need to understand your rights and obligations.  And that is a pretty easy thing to do. So we emphasize ordinary folk simply understand the Rights and Obligations. Origins Europeans, during the indo european expansion, discovered, quite by accident, how to organize civilization with the least divergence from physical, natural and evolutionary laws. We embedded this organizational strategy in our law such that it’s survived over four thousand years, and even survived invasion by a hostile alien religion of submission. Europe lacked the flood river valleys and the imperial armies that they supported, the people retained the aristocracy and militia, the law and contract, in competition with a submissive faith. So, thankfully, despite her efforts, the church could never achieve power to displace the martial aristocracy and our rule of law. People may mouth faith but they demonstrate adherence to military command and rule by law. And the group evolutionary strategy in that law produced rapid evolution of our people genetically, culturally, informationally, and institutionally in the ancient world and the modern world, and we dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, crippling wear, early death and victimization by a nature all but hostile to life by that strategy. And all other peoples blame us for adapting to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, which exposes their falsehoods and failings, and which leaves them behind, in a sexual, social, economic, political, and military universe where they cannot compete without costly reforms. If you can sell people a false promise, (the left, religion) you can bait them into behavior over a few generations.  If you control the state and education you can indoctrinate them into behavior over a generation or so.  But if you want to change  behavior rapidly, and reorganize law, government, institutions, and society quickly, you must use the only known means of reorganizing populations: the law. After a short period of adaptation and some limited confusion behavior that conforms to the law works through the various sectors of society producing the desired outcomes (and some undesired.) Our Goals Our project seeks to reform the Constitution and the Law by amendments, preserving the state as a going concern, to create a market (court) for the reversal of: 1) The industrialization of propaganda, sophistry, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, pseudo-economics, and pseudo-history,; 2) The present repeat of the fall of Rome, and; 3) The present expanding dark age of ignorance and deceit. Each of those was developed by, and is maintained by, the Jewish counter-reformation against the scientific, darwinian, industrial, and technological age, using Boaz and Freud to undermine rational analysis of behavior and incentives, marxism to destroy class cooperation, and neo-marxism to destroy culture, values, aesthetics, and history, Postmodernism to destroy truth, Human Biodiversity Denial to undermine our Genetic, Cultural, and Institutional advantages, Political Correctness and Shouting Down to prevent spread of refuting truths and force conformity to norms. Because these false promises were used to undermine Western Civilization’s foundations of Adversarialism: continuous adaption, invention, and evolution by natural selection by use of adversarial markets in everything, using heroism and excellence, individual sovereignty and reciprocity, truth before face and duty before self, natural law of tort and jury, resulting in rule of law absent authority and markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and warfare, resulting in self sufficiency, the nuclear family, and the resulting trifunctionalism (competing elites in military, legal, and religious classes), with and the natural eugenic suppression of underclass (unfit) reproduction by those markets, with the proceeds from surpluses directed to the production of the high returns on commons, resulting in the most rapidly adaptive and evolutionary civilization invented by man. And we plan to restore western civilization, in the greatest redistribution of wealth to the laboring, working, and middle classes since the Roman Reforms, and create a second Renaissance, and the next scientific, technological, social, economic, and political revolution. And by doing so, to restore western civilization’s transcendence of man in to the gods we imagined. Our Recommendations 1) We can use this language, grammar, and logic to write law to reform our constitution by explicitly stating the european strategy in it, repairing six holes in it, another three errors made after it, and a few misunderstandings we have of it. And then to specifically enumerate all our rights and obligations of reciprocity in display, word, deed, defense, and alienation.  Aside from eliminating confusion, conflict, misrepresentation , and abuse, of court, law, and legislation, this will restore our past prohibitions on defamation, expand the present common prohibitions on false commercial speech, and extend all prohibitions on commercial speech to political speech: that speech in public, to the public, in matters public – and doubly so if for profit or income. This will end the state, academy, media, entertainment, advertising conspiracy of common interest in the destruction of our civilization from within. As a result it will dramatically remove falsehoods, from all walks of life, in particularly the jewish counter-revolution against western civilization from within by the false promises of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws using the pretense of the equality of man, the malleability of man, and unlimited wealth from  unlimited growth.  (This will include seditious alien universalist religions, ideologies, philosophies, literatures, propaganda, and lies.) 2) In addition, the same way land reforms were made multiple times in the european past, it will perform a vast redistribution to from the financial class, political, and media class to the laboring, working, middle, and upper middle class, and away from the political, bureaucratic, academic, media, and financial classes that have profited from the undermining of, culture-cide of, civilization-cide of, and genocide of, our people. I’ll ask you not to jump to conclusions based on the little information provide here, but for those with some knowledge of economics, it will mean a) the expansion of liquidity by direct distribution to citizens by debit cards, instead of credit expansion using the financial and banking system; b) giving all citizens treasury accounts and treasury credit accounts. And treasury credit accounts will be at zero interest on capital (not consumption) goods: appliances, cars, houses. The nationalization of all debt, including mortgage, credit card, and pensions, and allocation to those accounts. The nationalization of the insurance industry using the same model. the implementation of the Singapore model of medical and retirement insurance.  The re-privatization of the medical industry. The end of income taxes on the laboring classes and earlier retirement for them. 3) In addition, we recommend universities must carry student debt themselves; they must absorb the debt of anyone dropping out before the end of the second year; they must financially separate teaching from researching; the professors must be put in control minimizing the bureaucracy (restoring the original Oxford/Cambridge model); they can only use student loans for STEM+L courses. Students, Teachers, and Administrators are subject to prosecution and prohibition from public speech as well as teaching in any form, for violating the prohibition on Sedition by False Promise using marxist, postmodernist, feminist, denialist revisionism. The best professors (lectures) will and grad students (questions and grading) will be paid to run the very blest classes (Lectures) in every high school and library in the country for a tiny fee. Why? There is no evidence of learning in the academy. The number of ‘meaningful’ or ‘hard’ degrees has remained roughly constant since the 60’s. The immigrant students are used as cheap research labor for the research professors at the expense of the vast majority of students. And universities are largely hedge funds that happen to teach a bit as a consequence. Instead of being a minor advantage to a minority, college like Catholic Indulgences, a hundred thousand dollar debt, delaying and suppressing reproduction, has become a means for sorting people out of the workforce, and a degree functions as what amounts to indoctrination, and bribe for admission to the workforce. 4) We recommend in addition, the restoration of the original american experiment as an alliance of european states, for the sole purpose of defense, trade, credit, dispute resolution, and prevention of defection of states to hostile powers, with devolution of all  other powers to the states – dramatically reducing power distance.  This would end the majority of the federal government, eliminate the presidency in favor of a prime minister, eliminate the house of representatives, and replace the standing senate with the governors of the states, and replace majoritarianism (legislation) with treaties of the commons (contracts between states). We also recommend the (forcible) conversion of blue cities to city states with limited free-city status. And the ability to form new states without existing state permission with no less than 300k people. We restore voluntary disassociation as well as association which allows people to sort as they wish. All states would issue their own passports, with the military and  the few federal employees having rights of access for the purpose of their duties. There is a lot more to it but that’s ending lies, ending financial and political predation, restoring the laboring, working, and middle classes, restoring the civil society, and insulating the european civilization from undermining by immigrants seeking to colonize rather than adapt, are what people care about. The “Book” I am, we are, working on is structured as a legal prosecution. It’s over one thousand pages at present and will be much longer when the remaining sections are edited and included. Most of those pages constitute our era’s equivalent of the Federalist Papers, and then it culminates in a new Declaration of Reformation, and Amendments to the Constitution that would achieve both constitutional, legal, and policy ends.  Plus the threat if we do not settle. And the rather extreme outcome we will enforce if we must fight.  This constitution seeks to fix everything. In that sense it ‘turns it up to eleven’ in some cases. This means that we can compromise on a lower standard, but if we do compromise on a lower standard, at least we know what we’re costing ourselves.  I’m not hung up on those details. I’m more interested in the rescue of, survival of, and flourishing of our people and our civilization. To learn about the errors in the original constitution: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/06/10/welcome-to-the-next-american-revolution-2/ The European Group Strategy https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/06/09/the-european-group-strategy/ The Abrahamic Method of Civilizational Destruction https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/19/the-explanation-of-abrahamism/ -Cheers

  • A Concise Overview of the Propertarian Revolution

    Our project should be called “The Traditional Law of the European People in Formal Logic”. Or “The Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Reciprocity”. Or “Adversarialism” which is our operating principle. Or “Sovereigntarianism” because our european group strategy is uniquely dependent upon individual sovereignty. Or even “The Formal Logic of Scientific Testimony” because it has more to do with testimony – truthful speech –  which is of greater import during the age of information, than writing law of physical things which has been all but settled science for centuries.   But because we began our work on ethics, using the law of tort  (meaning trespass) we call ‘property’ we are stuck with the brand name “Propertarianism” So, to minimize confusion,  we generally use “P, P-Law, P-logic, P-ethics”. Central Thesis 1) The scientific method does not prescribe what to do to discover knowledge. It prescribes what you must do in order to claim you testify about your findings, rather than opine, narrate, fictionalize, or engage in fraud and deceit. So, the scientific method consists of using due diligence such that you can warranty you speak truthfully, and free of error, bias, wishful-thinking, and deceit.  This project  (P-Law or Strictly Constructed Natural Law) completes the scientific method by using a methodology to produce a universally commensurable value neutral language of testimony across all human knowledge and expression, a grammar to compose it, and logic to apply to it, and the ‘checklist’ for doing so. This is the principle innovation of the system. A methodology, the resulting language, and logic for testing the truthfulness and reciprocity of display, word(speech), and deed(action). Everything else is explanation and application. And that explanation and application is as illuminating in explanatory power in the fields of language, psychology, and sociology, as was the scientific revolution in the physical world, and the Darwinian revolution in the biological world. We traditionally divide the sciences into the formal (math and logic), physical (the physical sciences), and the Human( cognitive-psychological and social). Underneath the covers P-law is a formal logic, just like a programming language. And it’s about as hard to learn as an advanced programming language, with law and economics thrown in. But ordinary folk have no understanding of the law (to keep them ignorant). Ordinary people have no understanding of economics (to keep them ignorant). They have no understanding of genetics (to keep them ignorant). They have no knowledge of comparative history (to keep them ignorant). And you don’t need to know the proof of the pythagorean theorem to use bits of string to mark out the corners of a new patio or deck. But even if we provided that education, if the law conforms to that body of knowledge, then you don’t need to understand how to program, write and argue law, and perform economic analysis. You only need to understand your rights and obligations.  And that is a pretty easy thing to do. So we emphasize ordinary folk simply understand the Rights and Obligations. Origins Europeans, during the indo european expansion, discovered, quite by accident, how to organize civilization with the least divergence from physical, natural and evolutionary laws. We embedded this organizational strategy in our law such that it’s survived over four thousand years, and even survived invasion by a hostile alien religion of submission. Europe lacked the flood river valleys and the imperial armies that they supported, the people retained the aristocracy and militia, the law and contract, in competition with a submissive faith. So, thankfully, despite her efforts, the church could never achieve power to displace the martial aristocracy and our rule of law. People may mouth faith but they demonstrate adherence to military command and rule by law. And the group evolutionary strategy in that law produced rapid evolution of our people genetically, culturally, informationally, and institutionally in the ancient world and the modern world, and we dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, crippling wear, early death and victimization by a nature all but hostile to life by that strategy. And all other peoples blame us for adapting to the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, which exposes their falsehoods and failings, and which leaves them behind, in a sexual, social, economic, political, and military universe where they cannot compete without costly reforms. If you can sell people a false promise, (the left, religion) you can bait them into behavior over a few generations.  If you control the state and education you can indoctrinate them into behavior over a generation or so.  But if you want to change  behavior rapidly, and reorganize law, government, institutions, and society quickly, you must use the only known means of reorganizing populations: the law. After a short period of adaptation and some limited confusion behavior that conforms to the law works through the various sectors of society producing the desired outcomes (and some undesired.) Our Goals Our project seeks to reform the Constitution and the Law by amendments, preserving the state as a going concern, to create a market (court) for the reversal of: 1) The industrialization of propaganda, sophistry, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, pseudo-economics, and pseudo-history,; 2) The present repeat of the fall of Rome, and; 3) The present expanding dark age of ignorance and deceit. Each of those was developed by, and is maintained by, the Jewish counter-reformation against the scientific, darwinian, industrial, and technological age, using Boaz and Freud to undermine rational analysis of behavior and incentives, marxism to destroy class cooperation, and neo-marxism to destroy culture, values, aesthetics, and history, Postmodernism to destroy truth, Human Biodiversity Denial to undermine our Genetic, Cultural, and Institutional advantages, Political Correctness and Shouting Down to prevent spread of refuting truths and force conformity to norms. Because these false promises were used to undermine Western Civilization’s foundations of Adversarialism: continuous adaption, invention, and evolution by natural selection by use of adversarial markets in everything, using heroism and excellence, individual sovereignty and reciprocity, truth before face and duty before self, natural law of tort and jury, resulting in rule of law absent authority and markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and warfare, resulting in self sufficiency, the nuclear family, and the resulting trifunctionalism (competing elites in military, legal, and religious classes), with and the natural eugenic suppression of underclass (unfit) reproduction by those markets, with the proceeds from surpluses directed to the production of the high returns on commons, resulting in the most rapidly adaptive and evolutionary civilization invented by man. And we plan to restore western civilization, in the greatest redistribution of wealth to the laboring, working, and middle classes since the Roman Reforms, and create a second Renaissance, and the next scientific, technological, social, economic, and political revolution. And by doing so, to restore western civilization’s transcendence of man in to the gods we imagined. Our Recommendations 1) We can use this language, grammar, and logic to write law to reform our constitution by explicitly stating the european strategy in it, repairing six holes in it, another three errors made after it, and a few misunderstandings we have of it. And then to specifically enumerate all our rights and obligations of reciprocity in display, word, deed, defense, and alienation.  Aside from eliminating confusion, conflict, misrepresentation , and abuse, of court, law, and legislation, this will restore our past prohibitions on defamation, expand the present common prohibitions on false commercial speech, and extend all prohibitions on commercial speech to political speech: that speech in public, to the public, in matters public – and doubly so if for profit or income. This will end the state, academy, media, entertainment, advertising conspiracy of common interest in the destruction of our civilization from within. As a result it will dramatically remove falsehoods, from all walks of life, in particularly the jewish counter-revolution against western civilization from within by the false promises of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws using the pretense of the equality of man, the malleability of man, and unlimited wealth from  unlimited growth.  (This will include seditious alien universalist religions, ideologies, philosophies, literatures, propaganda, and lies.) 2) In addition, the same way land reforms were made multiple times in the european past, it will perform a vast redistribution to from the financial class, political, and media class to the laboring, working, middle, and upper middle class, and away from the political, bureaucratic, academic, media, and financial classes that have profited from the undermining of, culture-cide of, civilization-cide of, and genocide of, our people. I’ll ask you not to jump to conclusions based on the little information provide here, but for those with some knowledge of economics, it will mean a) the expansion of liquidity by direct distribution to citizens by debit cards, instead of credit expansion using the financial and banking system; b) giving all citizens treasury accounts and treasury credit accounts. And treasury credit accounts will be at zero interest on capital (not consumption) goods: appliances, cars, houses. The nationalization of all debt, including mortgage, credit card, and pensions, and allocation to those accounts. The nationalization of the insurance industry using the same model. the implementation of the Singapore model of medical and retirement insurance.  The re-privatization of the medical industry. The end of income taxes on the laboring classes and earlier retirement for them. 3) In addition, we recommend universities must carry student debt themselves; they must absorb the debt of anyone dropping out before the end of the second year; they must financially separate teaching from researching; the professors must be put in control minimizing the bureaucracy (restoring the original Oxford/Cambridge model); they can only use student loans for STEM+L courses. Students, Teachers, and Administrators are subject to prosecution and prohibition from public speech as well as teaching in any form, for violating the prohibition on Sedition by False Promise using marxist, postmodernist, feminist, denialist revisionism. The best professors (lectures) will and grad students (questions and grading) will be paid to run the very blest classes (Lectures) in every high school and library in the country for a tiny fee. Why? There is no evidence of learning in the academy. The number of ‘meaningful’ or ‘hard’ degrees has remained roughly constant since the 60’s. The immigrant students are used as cheap research labor for the research professors at the expense of the vast majority of students. And universities are largely hedge funds that happen to teach a bit as a consequence. Instead of being a minor advantage to a minority, college like Catholic Indulgences, a hundred thousand dollar debt, delaying and suppressing reproduction, has become a means for sorting people out of the workforce, and a degree functions as what amounts to indoctrination, and bribe for admission to the workforce. 4) We recommend in addition, the restoration of the original american experiment as an alliance of european states, for the sole purpose of defense, trade, credit, dispute resolution, and prevention of defection of states to hostile powers, with devolution of all  other powers to the states – dramatically reducing power distance.  This would end the majority of the federal government, eliminate the presidency in favor of a prime minister, eliminate the house of representatives, and replace the standing senate with the governors of the states, and replace majoritarianism (legislation) with treaties of the commons (contracts between states). We also recommend the (forcible) conversion of blue cities to city states with limited free-city status. And the ability to form new states without existing state permission with no less than 300k people. We restore voluntary disassociation as well as association which allows people to sort as they wish. All states would issue their own passports, with the military and  the few federal employees having rights of access for the purpose of their duties. There is a lot more to it but that’s ending lies, ending financial and political predation, restoring the laboring, working, and middle classes, restoring the civil society, and insulating the european civilization from undermining by immigrants seeking to colonize rather than adapt, are what people care about. The “Book” I am, we are, working on is structured as a legal prosecution. It’s over one thousand pages at present and will be much longer when the remaining sections are edited and included. Most of those pages constitute our era’s equivalent of the Federalist Papers, and then it culminates in a new Declaration of Reformation, and Amendments to the Constitution that would achieve both constitutional, legal, and policy ends.  Plus the threat if we do not settle. And the rather extreme outcome we will enforce if we must fight.  This constitution seeks to fix everything. In that sense it ‘turns it up to eleven’ in some cases. This means that we can compromise on a lower standard, but if we do compromise on a lower standard, at least we know what we’re costing ourselves.  I’m not hung up on those details. I’m more interested in the rescue of, survival of, and flourishing of our people and our civilization. To learn about the errors in the original constitution: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/06/10/welcome-to-the-next-american-revolution-2/ The European Group Strategy https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/06/09/the-european-group-strategy/ The Abrahamic Method of Civilizational Destruction https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/19/the-explanation-of-abrahamism/ -Cheers

  • Sure. I’ll debate an anarchist. What’s the topic?

    My debate with any anarchist would consist of a series of asks for the content of a constitution (contract) of terms, how such a polity could be brought into being; and how it would survive competition for trade, population, territory, and control. This invariably results in the anarchist avoiding the questions, making false or wishful claims about human nature and behavior, and counterfactual claims about history. I don’t need ‘exposure’. So would this involve wasting my time, and require me to back a naive, intellectually dishonest opponent into a corner, thus only exacerbating my reputation as ‘a meanie’, or would, once (deterministically) falsified the opponent retreated into ‘well it would be nice’, or ‘one can hope at sometime it’s a possibility’?

  • I’m Not Anti Christian – but Which Christianity Are We Talking About?

    I’m not anti christian in the pure sense. I distinguish between the teachings of Jesus, the cult of Saul of tarsus, the bible, christian theology, catholic dogma, and the institutions of the churches. And the entire european corpus of myth, literature, philosophy, history, law, science, and mathematics that is otherwise vastly superior. The only thing that helped Europe was the teaching of Jesus that gave those of low status and women a political voice – a house of government – in the church. The rest: “Paulianity”, “Theology”, and “Churchianity” and “Dogma” are downright evil. My bible consists of the Jeffersonian Bible, the Epic Cycle of Greece and Rome, the Works of the Stoics and Epicureans, The Works of Aristotle, and the works of the Physical, Natural and Evolutionary Laws. But I acknowledge that the simplest of those messages, is that of Jesus, and that is enough for common folk. For those of us who have grater ability and agency, we require the works of those who demonstrated agency – not submission. When Rome brought law, administration, roads, and commerce into the primitive peoples of the middle east, they felt they were being left behind by a new radical way of life, new knowledge, new technology that they could not compete with it or in it. While they endured tolerating the abuses of middle eastern people upon one another – eve their own – they at least understood how to survive under those conditions. But when faced with the ancient world’s equivalent of the european age of sail, the primitive people of the middle east, like all those aware of being left behind, turned to innovation by Luddism – regression. Doubling down on a backward past. No there is nothing good in christianity that was not in roman culture before, other than that the new religion provided an organized underclass opposition in supernatural, theocratic political form to the empirical state, to undermine the state, undermining loyalty to roman civilization, and undermine the roman project, which was dependent upon the roman way of ‘baiting’ of people to evolve from slaves, to freemen, to citizens, to sovereigns – climbing the ladder of agency and status. Had Christians simply integrated Jesus into the state religion as the romans suggested it wouldn’t have been a problem. The underclasses could have had a path to self respect and civic virtue. But no. They used christianity to undermine. They had to destroy that civilization and stop people from climbing the ladder of agency that was the strategy of european domestication of man, and instead, drag people back to the bottom with superstition and ignorance and false promise. The purpose of christianity in the ancient world, like marxism-postmodernism-feminism in the modern, is to resist the continuous domestication and evolution of man from superstitious ignorant beast, into heroic agency. It is to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, woven by the hand of god into the fabric of the universe for all to see – and that any man who states otherwise has been not a prophet but a deceiver and a fraud.

  • I’m Not Anti Christian – but Which Christianity Are We Talking About?

    I’m not anti christian in the pure sense. I distinguish between the teachings of Jesus, the cult of Saul of tarsus, the bible, christian theology, catholic dogma, and the institutions of the churches. And the entire european corpus of myth, literature, philosophy, history, law, science, and mathematics that is otherwise vastly superior. The only thing that helped Europe was the teaching of Jesus that gave those of low status and women a political voice – a house of government – in the church. The rest: “Paulianity”, “Theology”, and “Churchianity” and “Dogma” are downright evil. My bible consists of the Jeffersonian Bible, the Epic Cycle of Greece and Rome, the Works of the Stoics and Epicureans, The Works of Aristotle, and the works of the Physical, Natural and Evolutionary Laws. But I acknowledge that the simplest of those messages, is that of Jesus, and that is enough for common folk. For those of us who have grater ability and agency, we require the works of those who demonstrated agency – not submission. When Rome brought law, administration, roads, and commerce into the primitive peoples of the middle east, they felt they were being left behind by a new radical way of life, new knowledge, new technology that they could not compete with it or in it. While they endured tolerating the abuses of middle eastern people upon one another – eve their own – they at least understood how to survive under those conditions. But when faced with the ancient world’s equivalent of the european age of sail, the primitive people of the middle east, like all those aware of being left behind, turned to innovation by Luddism – regression. Doubling down on a backward past. No there is nothing good in christianity that was not in roman culture before, other than that the new religion provided an organized underclass opposition in supernatural, theocratic political form to the empirical state, to undermine the state, undermining loyalty to roman civilization, and undermine the roman project, which was dependent upon the roman way of ‘baiting’ of people to evolve from slaves, to freemen, to citizens, to sovereigns – climbing the ladder of agency and status. Had Christians simply integrated Jesus into the state religion as the romans suggested it wouldn’t have been a problem. The underclasses could have had a path to self respect and civic virtue. But no. They used christianity to undermine. They had to destroy that civilization and stop people from climbing the ladder of agency that was the strategy of european domestication of man, and instead, drag people back to the bottom with superstition and ignorance and false promise. The purpose of christianity in the ancient world, like marxism-postmodernism-feminism in the modern, is to resist the continuous domestication and evolution of man from superstitious ignorant beast, into heroic agency. It is to deny physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, woven by the hand of god into the fabric of the universe for all to see – and that any man who states otherwise has been not a prophet but a deceiver and a fraud.

  • The Great Filter Is Here – It’s up To Us.

    Money, like all capital, stores time. Stored time can be used to influence others. Liquidity of stored time reduces the opportunity and transaction costs. Labor has almost no value. It is rapidly approaching zero. The problem is even worse that you think. I probably understand the foundations of cooperation (economics) as well or better than anyone living. I don’t think you understand. Its on the scale of the development of speech and multi-part tools. We are rapidly speciating and leaving ‘labor’ behind like we did neanderthals. In fact, the tragedy is the western unification of the world over the past four hundred years, that interfered with existing speciation, and has the chance -now- of reversing european evolution. The Great Filter is obvious: ‘failing to leave behind those who must be left behind’. The value of in-groups is that we don’t need to leave our own behind. but we cannot outbreed or allow invasion by those who do. Thats what happened in India and the middle east. What serious economist has done an analysis on RBE? None. Why? It’s not worth the time. Communism v999. Do you have any idea how large the catalog of pseudoscientific economic proposals is? It’s in the heap. We must build institutions and processes for the humans we have. The Genghis Khan Test of Philosophical Priors:

    1. What is the first question of philosophy? Why not commit suicide?
    2. The first question of ethics? Why should I not kill you and take your things?
    3. The first question of politics? Why should me and mine not kill you and yours and take your things, women, and land?

    I know the latest science as well or better than anyone living. And it’s just the opposite. The marxist, neo-marxist, postmodernist false promise of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary law, via pseudoscience of the malleability of man and the promise of endless growth. Haven’t you killed 100M people already with your false promises? Your pseudosciences, sophistries, denials, and deceits? No? I know. You can’t help it. It’s a genetic defect. You’re burdened with female cognitive bias, of conflation of desirable with truth, undesirable with falsehood. And to make it worse, you’re burdened with Dunning Kruger confidence, just as is the entire left. So between the two, the instincts that evolved so that women would continue to invest in their children regardless of cost, causes you to pursue infantile ideas b/c they’re desirable. Grow up. This is Childhood’s End.

  • The Great Filter Is Here – It’s up To Us.

    Money, like all capital, stores time. Stored time can be used to influence others. Liquidity of stored time reduces the opportunity and transaction costs. Labor has almost no value. It is rapidly approaching zero. The problem is even worse that you think. I probably understand the foundations of cooperation (economics) as well or better than anyone living. I don’t think you understand. Its on the scale of the development of speech and multi-part tools. We are rapidly speciating and leaving ‘labor’ behind like we did neanderthals. In fact, the tragedy is the western unification of the world over the past four hundred years, that interfered with existing speciation, and has the chance -now- of reversing european evolution. The Great Filter is obvious: ‘failing to leave behind those who must be left behind’. The value of in-groups is that we don’t need to leave our own behind. but we cannot outbreed or allow invasion by those who do. Thats what happened in India and the middle east. What serious economist has done an analysis on RBE? None. Why? It’s not worth the time. Communism v999. Do you have any idea how large the catalog of pseudoscientific economic proposals is? It’s in the heap. We must build institutions and processes for the humans we have. The Genghis Khan Test of Philosophical Priors:

    1. What is the first question of philosophy? Why not commit suicide?
    2. The first question of ethics? Why should I not kill you and take your things?
    3. The first question of politics? Why should me and mine not kill you and yours and take your things, women, and land?

    I know the latest science as well or better than anyone living. And it’s just the opposite. The marxist, neo-marxist, postmodernist false promise of freedom from physical natural and evolutionary law, via pseudoscience of the malleability of man and the promise of endless growth. Haven’t you killed 100M people already with your false promises? Your pseudosciences, sophistries, denials, and deceits? No? I know. You can’t help it. It’s a genetic defect. You’re burdened with female cognitive bias, of conflation of desirable with truth, undesirable with falsehood. And to make it worse, you’re burdened with Dunning Kruger confidence, just as is the entire left. So between the two, the instincts that evolved so that women would continue to invest in their children regardless of cost, causes you to pursue infantile ideas b/c they’re desirable. Grow up. This is Childhood’s End.

  • No Anarchism Is a Fantasy, Rule of Law Is Not

    —“Which kind of Anarchist are we talking about? There’s many varieties, though the most common, and commonly associated with the term, are Anarcho-Communists. The mental gymnastics required to create such an oxymoron as the combination of something that relies on the existence of a totalitarian government, and a total absence of government, makes it pretty obvious why it fails so damned always. Anatcho-Capitalists, of which I am a former supporter of, are extremely similar to Propertarians in many regards.”— Anon

    It doesn’t matter. All humans universally demonstrate the minimum moral constraint that they can get away with. People come together in proximity to reduce opportunity costs making the disproportionate returns on a division of labor possible. The state evolves universally to suppress local parasitism, centralize costs, in exchange for the reduction of transaction and opportunity costs. The use of taxation (fees for suppression free riding, socialization of losses, consumption of commons, parasitism and predation) to produce investments in the returns on commons (infrastructure, parks, etc) allows markets (polities) to compete with other polities for people, families, trade, investment, and those ‘top’ people who produce private excellences (mansions, shops) that as a consequence increase the returns on those commons. The only ‘anarchy’ is in the ‘borderlands’ where one benefits from free riding on the productivity of those markets but doesn’t pay the cost of behavioral, economic, tax, political, conformity to the standards of those commons. Thats why the Russians moved the jews into the pale. Thats where anarchic ‘ethics’ if you want to call them that, come from. Women depend on men, men depend on each other, and together they depend on the organization provided by court, military, and state. But anarchists, like children, like women, are oblivious to the fact that men are required to create their choices, just like anarchist require states to create their anarchies. That is why anarchies of any kind always exist in borderlands as subjects of states and empires. States tolerate borderlands because ‘border people’ give the state plausible deniability for territorial possession (keeping territorial stock in inventory) without bearing a cost of investment in commons political organization, or even much defense. Anarchic polities cannot compete to hold territory (scarce inventory) in competition with commons producers, since the returns on commons like the returns on cooperation and trade, are disproportionately advantageous. In other words, you can’t have commons for free. If you want anarchy you’re left with Alaska, Siberia, and the south pole at present. And it will only get worse.