Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • CONSERVATIVES DON’T KNOW WHAT MADE THE WEST GREAT —‘How is it that the ‘conser

    CONSERVATIVES DON’T KNOW WHAT MADE THE WEST GREAT

    —‘How is it that the ‘conservative’ mouthpieces of our day gain such popularity among the rank and file yet NEVER put forth an actionable solution that could get us out of the ditch that we got ourselves into. They only seem vigilant in conserving their own demise.”—@BullfrogBoxer

    Because they don’t know what made the west great.

    The answer is that the enlightenment project that conservatives base their moral claims upon, is incompatible with the reasons for western success: adaptation to physical, natural, evolutionary laws: rule of law under them, and the eugenics that results.

    Democracy was poison. The truth is incompatible with the promise. It’s a false promise, and a contradictory one.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-16 17:56:00 UTC

  • True Christianity? Define it. 😉

    Christianity is what anyone who claims he’s Christian says it is. The beauty of Christianity is that it functions by saying nothing specific and accomplishing it’s goals wth false promise of the unwarrantable, and by suggestion that one understands when one only empathizes. So every Christian thinks something different, ever faction thinks of Christianity differently, and none of them can falsify one another because there is nothing testable in it. You can make an excuse for anything. This is useful because all of us have different emotional needs to satisfy our sense of our status in relation to others. This is why Christian devotion increases as ability decrease. The best you can say is that one is relieved of status pressure, because one is relieved of real-world achievement, because one is relieved of the struggle of education, and as such one is relieved of the effort of adaptation. This is accomplished by the promise of ‘salvation’ (meaning forgiveness of your guilt), if you live by the word of Jesus Christ (exhaustive forgiveness for their failures). How many ChristiansChrist have there been? One. Everyone else just does the best he can. This is why xians are the underclass and everyone walks on them world wide. But, it allows the aristocracy to build a high trust society with good Christian laborers. Only if the Christian laborers show up to fight the enemy on occasion, and do their ruthless pagan best. What offends you is that I’m so precisely correct you can’t stand it.

    Certainly a cynical take and one that completely ignores the large number of very learned men who practiced real Christian devotion. Not to mention that the Holy Bible is an unchanging text, so differences are a matter of practice rather than doctrine. And those differences exist in any religion that you care to mention. Lack most absolute claims, this one doesn’t hold to scrutiny.

    The bible is not an unchanging text. It’s changed constantly over time. The Illiad is an unchanging text. A lot of very learned men practice islam and marxism – both are deadly. Explain to me the foundations of christianity. What premises does it all derive from. I can list them. You know palm reading, numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, legal interpretation, are use the same technique, right? And that Christianity is dependent upon this technique? That marxist dialectic is dependent upon this technique? that this technique is how you use suggestion and social construction to create deception that justifies (excuses) anything? If you have to choose between the greek literature and the jewish literature, which do you choose and why? Given that Jewish literature gave us dark ages and 1B dead, and that new Jewish literature of Marxism, socialism, neomarxism, feminism, postmodernism, and political correctness, so far have produced 100M dead and cost us the loss of some or most civilizations of the modern age. And given that european literature grants te primacy of man, the primacy of life, the joy of life, and man’s transcendence over the limitations of the universe. And given that European reason has dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, filth, starvation, disease, early death, and victimization by nature – why would you read death cults that make false promises that have produced such cancerous ends? I mean, why do you read Jewish literature of death cult that results in addiction to falsehood, rather than European literature that has been the primary source of benefit to mankind? I mean, 1. Islam => Islamism; 2. judaism=>Communism, neo-marxism, and feminism. 3. Christianity =>Socialism, Postmodernism and Political Correctness; Same crime against mankind by false-promise in different dress? What is the difference between baiting people into usury and gambling in the present world, and baiting people into drug and alcohol use and addiction, and baiting people into death cults with the promise of life after death, in exchange for undermining western civilization’s truth, reason, science and natural law – the civilization that DISCOVERED gods laws of the physical, natural, and evolutionary universe – and in doing so discovered that the jewish literature is in fact, the anti-god, anti-life, ant-truth. What kind of sick twisted person ‘believes’ in such obvious lies with such obvious destructive effects?

  • True Christianity? Define it. 😉

    Christianity is what anyone who claims he’s Christian says it is. The beauty of Christianity is that it functions by saying nothing specific and accomplishing it’s goals wth false promise of the unwarrantable, and by suggestion that one understands when one only empathizes. So every Christian thinks something different, ever faction thinks of Christianity differently, and none of them can falsify one another because there is nothing testable in it. You can make an excuse for anything. This is useful because all of us have different emotional needs to satisfy our sense of our status in relation to others. This is why Christian devotion increases as ability decrease. The best you can say is that one is relieved of status pressure, because one is relieved of real-world achievement, because one is relieved of the struggle of education, and as such one is relieved of the effort of adaptation. This is accomplished by the promise of ‘salvation’ (meaning forgiveness of your guilt), if you live by the word of Jesus Christ (exhaustive forgiveness for their failures). How many ChristiansChrist have there been? One. Everyone else just does the best he can. This is why xians are the underclass and everyone walks on them world wide. But, it allows the aristocracy to build a high trust society with good Christian laborers. Only if the Christian laborers show up to fight the enemy on occasion, and do their ruthless pagan best. What offends you is that I’m so precisely correct you can’t stand it.

    Certainly a cynical take and one that completely ignores the large number of very learned men who practiced real Christian devotion. Not to mention that the Holy Bible is an unchanging text, so differences are a matter of practice rather than doctrine. And those differences exist in any religion that you care to mention. Lack most absolute claims, this one doesn’t hold to scrutiny.

    The bible is not an unchanging text. It’s changed constantly over time. The Illiad is an unchanging text. A lot of very learned men practice islam and marxism – both are deadly. Explain to me the foundations of christianity. What premises does it all derive from. I can list them. You know palm reading, numerology, astrology, scriptural interpretation, legal interpretation, are use the same technique, right? And that Christianity is dependent upon this technique? That marxist dialectic is dependent upon this technique? that this technique is how you use suggestion and social construction to create deception that justifies (excuses) anything? If you have to choose between the greek literature and the jewish literature, which do you choose and why? Given that Jewish literature gave us dark ages and 1B dead, and that new Jewish literature of Marxism, socialism, neomarxism, feminism, postmodernism, and political correctness, so far have produced 100M dead and cost us the loss of some or most civilizations of the modern age. And given that european literature grants te primacy of man, the primacy of life, the joy of life, and man’s transcendence over the limitations of the universe. And given that European reason has dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, filth, starvation, disease, early death, and victimization by nature – why would you read death cults that make false promises that have produced such cancerous ends? I mean, why do you read Jewish literature of death cult that results in addiction to falsehood, rather than European literature that has been the primary source of benefit to mankind? I mean, 1. Islam => Islamism; 2. judaism=>Communism, neo-marxism, and feminism. 3. Christianity =>Socialism, Postmodernism and Political Correctness; Same crime against mankind by false-promise in different dress? What is the difference between baiting people into usury and gambling in the present world, and baiting people into drug and alcohol use and addiction, and baiting people into death cults with the promise of life after death, in exchange for undermining western civilization’s truth, reason, science and natural law – the civilization that DISCOVERED gods laws of the physical, natural, and evolutionary universe – and in doing so discovered that the jewish literature is in fact, the anti-god, anti-life, ant-truth. What kind of sick twisted person ‘believes’ in such obvious lies with such obvious destructive effects?

  • Black Problems in America are fixable – and Easily – But Only With Truth before Face: No more lies.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHGt733yw3g FRAMING THE DISCUSSION 1) It’s obvious how little understanding of both economics (returns on time), and the use of economic reasoning (Gary Becker) for understanding psychological and sociological questions. If you don’t understand rule of law, how European thought differs from the rest of the world because of our long history of rule of law, or that economics is the logic of measurement of our success or failure at rule of law of natural law, then you won’t understand why Europeans were so successful in a few centuries in the bronze, iron, and steel ages at dragging mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and violence – more so than all other civilizations combined. 2) The decline in European ‘sensemaking’, or ‘European empirical and rational thought’ is evidence in the generational differences in this roundtable. It’s painfully obvious that the loss in European sense-making (decidability) is generational and a result of the anti-empirical (pseudoscientific) movement in the academy. The older two parties in this discussion are the most deflationary and empirical, and the younger the least (and of course this tends to be the case whenever you add women to a conversation), Although ( I don’t know the name of the man in the bottom right but he’s very talented). 1) Instead of driving people to European rule of law independent of race, culture, and background, Brett Weinstein is trying to drive the conversation to demand a Jewish model of identity from another polity, when Jewish separatist identity and sense-making, and poly-logical ethics, is what is the source of Jewish prosecution throughout history. The Jewish model of thought is the origin of the left’s model of thought, and it’s foundation as the denial of physical laws (scarcity, entropy), natural laws (a division of labor, and reciprocity), and evolutionary laws (self-domestication, and preventing regression to the mean), and a narrative tradition of blaming others’ adaption to those laws as ‘oppression’ rather than ‘necessary domestication’. So, he’s claiming a) peoples were oppressed rather than domesticated, b) that scarcity is hoarded or solvable (one of the three false promises of the left). c) that man isn’t marginally different in the possibility of survival in a market civilization under continuous selection pressure as demand for ability increases in proportion to productivity, d) that different rates of maturity produce differences in agency, higher dominance expression in the absence of achievement by merit, and differences intolerance for conformity because of those instincts, and e) the primary difference between races is that humans ALWAYS demonstrate ingroup preference in all walks of life, but that our demographic distributions vary widely from ashkenazi, east asians, western europeans, caucasians, iranics, semitics (afro-asiatics), indo-iranians, Subsaharan africa and the pacifics. Whites and east asians killed off their lower classes in great numbers. They didn’t evolve superiorities. Europeans did it by manorialism, and chinese did it through credit and beheading. The credit method of the Chinese is doing it to American whites today. 2) Demand for reparations will simply force white disenfranchised to claim that the cause of their condition is the use of black people by the left to undermine our rule of law, our economy, and our norms and traditions – and they will (they are already) demanding reparations from blacks (and soon from jews) for damage to cities, culture, politics, rule of law, and civilizations. Most of us know that this present crisis is a result of the postwar Jewish socialist movement to resist integration and to force the issue by using blacks as lever. We know that the 60’s were orchestrated by them, including black relocation that destroyed the black family. That this movement evolved from Marxism (class disharmony), to cultural marxism (social disharmony), to Derrida’s postmodernism (social construction of deceit) for identity disharmony, to Friedan anti-male destruction fo family by creating disharmony. 2) Had segregation maintained in place, the black community would have continued to form its own elites, it’s own capital, its own middle class, it’s now ethics, and themselves to congratulate for it, and because ‘white behavior’ is just ‘high trust, everyone is a customer, commercial behavior, under rule of law’. When, because white rule of law and commerce doesn’t care about your color, only that the commons is an extension of the court, the church, and commerce, and NOT an extension of your living room, lawn, or neighborhood – which is what annoys white people most of all – black’s continuous disrespect for the commons. The problem would have solved itself out of natural self-interests on the part of all parties. So instead of continuing the path to integration into an advanced, rule of law, commercial, commons-producing, high trust, high-self regulation, polity and the rewards that come from it, the black community was baited by the Jewish left into self-destruction and continues to wallow in it, while white people just wish black people ‘would behave like civilized people’. Training a subpopulation takes about three to four generations. And by buying into the Jewish attempt to bring the bolshevism of Russia to the USA the black community was defeated and used to undermine our nation because it undermined our demand for integration into those commercial norms. 3) Solving the behavioral problem requires black elites, capital, and polities where black people can earn self-respect despite evolutionary differences in our rates and depts of maturity. Solving the economic problem requires the same so that whites don’t drive up local prices and keep blacks in a permanent underclass. We are not going to be able to deny the reality that about half the black population is all but unemployable except in low-status jobs that confirm their position in the social and political hierarchy. And we cannot deny that this problem will only accelerate as technology continues its downward pressure on wages. and as the world economy continues erasing western technological, financial, economic, and military, advantage. In fact, the only advantage white people have today is their rule of law and their high trust commons. That’s it. The rest has been redistributed to the world. Hence the white nationalist movement to protect the only asset that provides us a competitive advantage: A gorgeous, peaceful, demanding, high trust commons reduces demand for private production and income. Instead of having to produce income to consume, whites determined how to produce commons that could be shared – at the cost of developing far higher self-control. And it is these commons that others want to join as much as the economy that results from them. But every single individual from every group that fails to integrate destroys the ability to produce and maintain those commons. So… we have an integration problem. That’s the problem. The postwar Jewish attempt to end European soft eugenics using markets, to end forced integration so that Jews didn’t have to integrate, to create the myth of a multicultural society rather than one of continuous integration, to use blacks to provoke moral hazard from whites, destroy integration, destroy the civilization by immigration, and to destroy the black community as a means of destroying western civilization caused this set of consequences. It’s not hard to fix the present problems. These problems are fixable. It’s not hard to correct it for all of us – If we stop lying about it. So, no more lies. Truth before face. Truth regardless of the costs. Prosecution of those who bait us into hazard with false promises. We either fix it or we enter the second dark age created by false promise. We have to end the great lies of the Jewish left: the nature of man, the malleability of man, the potential of man, the false promise of unlimited growth as the end of scarcity, and the false promise that man is oppressed, and the generation of hatred European people as a proxy for hating god, under the lie that the laws of nature and nature’s god are European man’s design, rather than European man’s discovery and application. The discovery and application of those laws which produced all those benefits which mankind envies – and why Europeans have dragged undomesticated animal man of all races, out of ignorance superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, continuous violence and warfare, and the victimization by nature in a brief period of geological, solar, and galactic peace – which appears to be singular rarity in our galaxy. No more lies.

  • Black Problems in America are fixable – and Easily – But Only With Truth before Face: No more lies.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHGt733yw3g FRAMING THE DISCUSSION 1) It’s obvious how little understanding of both economics (returns on time), and the use of economic reasoning (Gary Becker) for understanding psychological and sociological questions. If you don’t understand rule of law, how European thought differs from the rest of the world because of our long history of rule of law, or that economics is the logic of measurement of our success or failure at rule of law of natural law, then you won’t understand why Europeans were so successful in a few centuries in the bronze, iron, and steel ages at dragging mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and violence – more so than all other civilizations combined. 2) The decline in European ‘sensemaking’, or ‘European empirical and rational thought’ is evidence in the generational differences in this roundtable. It’s painfully obvious that the loss in European sense-making (decidability) is generational and a result of the anti-empirical (pseudoscientific) movement in the academy. The older two parties in this discussion are the most deflationary and empirical, and the younger the least (and of course this tends to be the case whenever you add women to a conversation), Although ( I don’t know the name of the man in the bottom right but he’s very talented). 1) Instead of driving people to European rule of law independent of race, culture, and background, Brett Weinstein is trying to drive the conversation to demand a Jewish model of identity from another polity, when Jewish separatist identity and sense-making, and poly-logical ethics, is what is the source of Jewish prosecution throughout history. The Jewish model of thought is the origin of the left’s model of thought, and it’s foundation as the denial of physical laws (scarcity, entropy), natural laws (a division of labor, and reciprocity), and evolutionary laws (self-domestication, and preventing regression to the mean), and a narrative tradition of blaming others’ adaption to those laws as ‘oppression’ rather than ‘necessary domestication’. So, he’s claiming a) peoples were oppressed rather than domesticated, b) that scarcity is hoarded or solvable (one of the three false promises of the left). c) that man isn’t marginally different in the possibility of survival in a market civilization under continuous selection pressure as demand for ability increases in proportion to productivity, d) that different rates of maturity produce differences in agency, higher dominance expression in the absence of achievement by merit, and differences intolerance for conformity because of those instincts, and e) the primary difference between races is that humans ALWAYS demonstrate ingroup preference in all walks of life, but that our demographic distributions vary widely from ashkenazi, east asians, western europeans, caucasians, iranics, semitics (afro-asiatics), indo-iranians, Subsaharan africa and the pacifics. Whites and east asians killed off their lower classes in great numbers. They didn’t evolve superiorities. Europeans did it by manorialism, and chinese did it through credit and beheading. The credit method of the Chinese is doing it to American whites today. 2) Demand for reparations will simply force white disenfranchised to claim that the cause of their condition is the use of black people by the left to undermine our rule of law, our economy, and our norms and traditions – and they will (they are already) demanding reparations from blacks (and soon from jews) for damage to cities, culture, politics, rule of law, and civilizations. Most of us know that this present crisis is a result of the postwar Jewish socialist movement to resist integration and to force the issue by using blacks as lever. We know that the 60’s were orchestrated by them, including black relocation that destroyed the black family. That this movement evolved from Marxism (class disharmony), to cultural marxism (social disharmony), to Derrida’s postmodernism (social construction of deceit) for identity disharmony, to Friedan anti-male destruction fo family by creating disharmony. 2) Had segregation maintained in place, the black community would have continued to form its own elites, it’s own capital, its own middle class, it’s now ethics, and themselves to congratulate for it, and because ‘white behavior’ is just ‘high trust, everyone is a customer, commercial behavior, under rule of law’. When, because white rule of law and commerce doesn’t care about your color, only that the commons is an extension of the court, the church, and commerce, and NOT an extension of your living room, lawn, or neighborhood – which is what annoys white people most of all – black’s continuous disrespect for the commons. The problem would have solved itself out of natural self-interests on the part of all parties. So instead of continuing the path to integration into an advanced, rule of law, commercial, commons-producing, high trust, high-self regulation, polity and the rewards that come from it, the black community was baited by the Jewish left into self-destruction and continues to wallow in it, while white people just wish black people ‘would behave like civilized people’. Training a subpopulation takes about three to four generations. And by buying into the Jewish attempt to bring the bolshevism of Russia to the USA the black community was defeated and used to undermine our nation because it undermined our demand for integration into those commercial norms. 3) Solving the behavioral problem requires black elites, capital, and polities where black people can earn self-respect despite evolutionary differences in our rates and depts of maturity. Solving the economic problem requires the same so that whites don’t drive up local prices and keep blacks in a permanent underclass. We are not going to be able to deny the reality that about half the black population is all but unemployable except in low-status jobs that confirm their position in the social and political hierarchy. And we cannot deny that this problem will only accelerate as technology continues its downward pressure on wages. and as the world economy continues erasing western technological, financial, economic, and military, advantage. In fact, the only advantage white people have today is their rule of law and their high trust commons. That’s it. The rest has been redistributed to the world. Hence the white nationalist movement to protect the only asset that provides us a competitive advantage: A gorgeous, peaceful, demanding, high trust commons reduces demand for private production and income. Instead of having to produce income to consume, whites determined how to produce commons that could be shared – at the cost of developing far higher self-control. And it is these commons that others want to join as much as the economy that results from them. But every single individual from every group that fails to integrate destroys the ability to produce and maintain those commons. So… we have an integration problem. That’s the problem. The postwar Jewish attempt to end European soft eugenics using markets, to end forced integration so that Jews didn’t have to integrate, to create the myth of a multicultural society rather than one of continuous integration, to use blacks to provoke moral hazard from whites, destroy integration, destroy the civilization by immigration, and to destroy the black community as a means of destroying western civilization caused this set of consequences. It’s not hard to fix the present problems. These problems are fixable. It’s not hard to correct it for all of us – If we stop lying about it. So, no more lies. Truth before face. Truth regardless of the costs. Prosecution of those who bait us into hazard with false promises. We either fix it or we enter the second dark age created by false promise. We have to end the great lies of the Jewish left: the nature of man, the malleability of man, the potential of man, the false promise of unlimited growth as the end of scarcity, and the false promise that man is oppressed, and the generation of hatred European people as a proxy for hating god, under the lie that the laws of nature and nature’s god are European man’s design, rather than European man’s discovery and application. The discovery and application of those laws which produced all those benefits which mankind envies – and why Europeans have dragged undomesticated animal man of all races, out of ignorance superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, continuous violence and warfare, and the victimization by nature in a brief period of geological, solar, and galactic peace – which appears to be singular rarity in our galaxy. No more lies.

  • The Elegance of Christianity’s Satisfaction of Self Worth by Suggestion

    Xianity is universalist, not nationalist. It’s a globalist program. Loyalty to faith before people, before nation, is just a demand that real men do the historical work of the martial aristocracy and defense while xians stay home and maintain house. “Xianity was given to man to tolerate god’s laws, and the aristocracy’s imposition of them until those who were to week and meek, could be evolved into aristocracy and follow gods laws as well. Xianity is therapy for agrarian peasants that has become an addiction, and failed to modernize now that almost none of us are self-sustaining farmers, in the hard work of farming.”

    Christianity is what anyone who claims he’s Christian says it is. The beauty of Christianity is that it functions by saying nothing specific and accomplishing its goals with false promise of the unwarrantable, and by suggestion that one understands when one only empathizes. So every Christian thinks something different, ever faction thinks of Christianity differently, and none of them can falsify one another because there is nothing testable in it. You can make an excuse for anything. Mostly what you make an excuse for is ‘not doing anything’. This is useful because all of us have different emotional needs to satisfy our sense of our status in relation to others. This is why Christian devotion increases as ability decrease. The best you can say is that one is relieved of status pressure, because one is relieved of real-world achievement, because one is relieved of the struggle of education, and as such one is relieved of the effort of adaptation. This is accomplished by the promise of ‘salvation’ (meaning forgiveness of your guilt), if you live by the word of Jesus Christ (exhaustive forgiveness for their failures). How many ChristiansChrist have there been? One. Everyone else just does the best he can. This is why xians are the underclass and everyone walks on them world wide. But, it allows the aristocracy to build a high trust society with good Christian laborers. Only if the Christian laborers show up to fight the enemy on occasion, and do their ruthless pagan best. What offends you is that I’m so precisely correct you can’t stand it.

  • The Elegance of Christianity’s Satisfaction of Self Worth by Suggestion

    Xianity is universalist, not nationalist. It’s a globalist program. Loyalty to faith before people, before nation, is just a demand that real men do the historical work of the martial aristocracy and defense while xians stay home and maintain house. “Xianity was given to man to tolerate god’s laws, and the aristocracy’s imposition of them until those who were to week and meek, could be evolved into aristocracy and follow gods laws as well. Xianity is therapy for agrarian peasants that has become an addiction, and failed to modernize now that almost none of us are self-sustaining farmers, in the hard work of farming.”

    Christianity is what anyone who claims he’s Christian says it is. The beauty of Christianity is that it functions by saying nothing specific and accomplishing its goals with false promise of the unwarrantable, and by suggestion that one understands when one only empathizes. So every Christian thinks something different, ever faction thinks of Christianity differently, and none of them can falsify one another because there is nothing testable in it. You can make an excuse for anything. Mostly what you make an excuse for is ‘not doing anything’. This is useful because all of us have different emotional needs to satisfy our sense of our status in relation to others. This is why Christian devotion increases as ability decrease. The best you can say is that one is relieved of status pressure, because one is relieved of real-world achievement, because one is relieved of the struggle of education, and as such one is relieved of the effort of adaptation. This is accomplished by the promise of ‘salvation’ (meaning forgiveness of your guilt), if you live by the word of Jesus Christ (exhaustive forgiveness for their failures). How many ChristiansChrist have there been? One. Everyone else just does the best he can. This is why xians are the underclass and everyone walks on them world wide. But, it allows the aristocracy to build a high trust society with good Christian laborers. Only if the Christian laborers show up to fight the enemy on occasion, and do their ruthless pagan best. What offends you is that I’m so precisely correct you can’t stand it.

  • The Problem of Critical Mass Necessary to Organize Victory

    THE PROBLEM OF CRITICAL MASS NECESSARY TO ORGANIZE WN= Local and rejects others, a claim of injustice in the face of opposition that says we are unjust ourselves. Ethnonationalism = Global and helps others, and is a claim of moral righteousness for all people solving the parasitism upon all people by the world elites. 1 – sovereignty and self-determination is a global strategy to defeat cosmopolitan globalism that like monotheism seeks to deprive us of our identities and self-determination producing regressive results we have seen across time. globalism is dysgenic and devolutionary and produces a small number of elites, maximizes parasitic bureaucracy, and vast power difference, that forces people into tribalism, then to familism, and the non-production of trust and commons. 2 – ethnonationalism, especially in small homogenous states, is the optimum social and political order because it limits conflict and competition within, favors investments in commons within while providing national adaptation to markets externally. 3 – Europeanism, in Rule of law of Natura Law is a statement of science, that Europeans discovered the optimum order but had to pay high self-discipline costs for it, converting the entire society to a military family the way east Asians did a bureaucratic family. 4 – Ethnic Europeans have the same natural right to self-determination and self-government as all peoples. There is no value to political scale. and the Jewish and globalist effort is to create globalist scale to deprive ethnic groups of self-determination. 5 – My mission is to fight for self-determination, custom commons and continuous evolution of all people so that they no longer suffer under (comforting) false promises and deceits. No more lies means no more poverty being left behind and suffering. “Truth is enough.”, “self-determination”, “Leave Eachother Alone”, “we want to be left alone” Those five points sell. CONVERSELY 1 – NS is a hateful position for producing authoritarianism not rule of law, and simply repeating past problems and failures. It’s worse than colonialism because historically it says harm other people. 2 – WN is a selfish position that has no plan and is unactionable, and will cause the world to rebel against it. It’s a superiority claim, because it to everyone else means a return to European colonialism and warfare, not ‘leave us alone’. 3 – EN is a moral position – a moral high ground. self-determination is. the science of it is. 4 – Patriotism is a moral and empirical position, to serve the near-religious nature of our constitution as natural law 0 which is effectively both a scientific, legal, and religous(divine) document. This is a bravery movement. A heroic one. 5 – CivNat (under Europeanism) is just cowardice in the face of the enemy, that leaves the door open for incrementalism that the left excels at. It’s a virtue-signaling position. It’s just choosing slow suicide in exchange for maintaining the status quo. 6 – Xianity is universalist, not nationalist. It’s a globalist program. Loyalty to faith before people, before nation, is just a demand that real men do the historical work of the martial aristocracy and defense while xians stay home and maintain house. “Xianity was given to man to tolerate god’s laws, and the aristocracy’s imposition of them until those who were to week and meek, could be evolved into aristocracy and follow God’s laws as well. Xianity is therapy for agrarian peasants that has become an addiction and failed to modernize now that almost none of us are self-sustaining farmers, in the hard work of farming. PROBLEM The problem is policing low agency and boys in WN, NS from satisfying their frustration by dominance expression that is self-defeating. And instead, getting them on mission so that they feel empowered by inclusion in a plan of action rather than rebelling in small easily defeated teams where they feel they have dominance expression and control. Organization is the problem. And the only legitimacy that will unite the factors into organization is critical mass and a plan, so that each faction doesn’t stay mired in spinning in search of agency and wins that cannot be achieved without large numbers. So critical mass is the problem that prevents organization. So critical mass requires something actionable and believable. I know what to do, but we need a political leader that doesn’t need to hide behind a mask or helmet to make it happen.

  • The Problem of Critical Mass Necessary to Organize Victory

    THE PROBLEM OF CRITICAL MASS NECESSARY TO ORGANIZE WN= Local and rejects others, a claim of injustice in the face of opposition that says we are unjust ourselves. Ethnonationalism = Global and helps others, and is a claim of moral righteousness for all people solving the parasitism upon all people by the world elites. 1 – sovereignty and self-determination is a global strategy to defeat cosmopolitan globalism that like monotheism seeks to deprive us of our identities and self-determination producing regressive results we have seen across time. globalism is dysgenic and devolutionary and produces a small number of elites, maximizes parasitic bureaucracy, and vast power difference, that forces people into tribalism, then to familism, and the non-production of trust and commons. 2 – ethnonationalism, especially in small homogenous states, is the optimum social and political order because it limits conflict and competition within, favors investments in commons within while providing national adaptation to markets externally. 3 – Europeanism, in Rule of law of Natura Law is a statement of science, that Europeans discovered the optimum order but had to pay high self-discipline costs for it, converting the entire society to a military family the way east Asians did a bureaucratic family. 4 – Ethnic Europeans have the same natural right to self-determination and self-government as all peoples. There is no value to political scale. and the Jewish and globalist effort is to create globalist scale to deprive ethnic groups of self-determination. 5 – My mission is to fight for self-determination, custom commons and continuous evolution of all people so that they no longer suffer under (comforting) false promises and deceits. No more lies means no more poverty being left behind and suffering. “Truth is enough.”, “self-determination”, “Leave Eachother Alone”, “we want to be left alone” Those five points sell. CONVERSELY 1 – NS is a hateful position for producing authoritarianism not rule of law, and simply repeating past problems and failures. It’s worse than colonialism because historically it says harm other people. 2 – WN is a selfish position that has no plan and is unactionable, and will cause the world to rebel against it. It’s a superiority claim, because it to everyone else means a return to European colonialism and warfare, not ‘leave us alone’. 3 – EN is a moral position – a moral high ground. self-determination is. the science of it is. 4 – Patriotism is a moral and empirical position, to serve the near-religious nature of our constitution as natural law 0 which is effectively both a scientific, legal, and religous(divine) document. This is a bravery movement. A heroic one. 5 – CivNat (under Europeanism) is just cowardice in the face of the enemy, that leaves the door open for incrementalism that the left excels at. It’s a virtue-signaling position. It’s just choosing slow suicide in exchange for maintaining the status quo. 6 – Xianity is universalist, not nationalist. It’s a globalist program. Loyalty to faith before people, before nation, is just a demand that real men do the historical work of the martial aristocracy and defense while xians stay home and maintain house. “Xianity was given to man to tolerate god’s laws, and the aristocracy’s imposition of them until those who were to week and meek, could be evolved into aristocracy and follow God’s laws as well. Xianity is therapy for agrarian peasants that has become an addiction and failed to modernize now that almost none of us are self-sustaining farmers, in the hard work of farming. PROBLEM The problem is policing low agency and boys in WN, NS from satisfying their frustration by dominance expression that is self-defeating. And instead, getting them on mission so that they feel empowered by inclusion in a plan of action rather than rebelling in small easily defeated teams where they feel they have dominance expression and control. Organization is the problem. And the only legitimacy that will unite the factors into organization is critical mass and a plan, so that each faction doesn’t stay mired in spinning in search of agency and wins that cannot be achieved without large numbers. So critical mass is the problem that prevents organization. So critical mass requires something actionable and believable. I know what to do, but we need a political leader that doesn’t need to hide behind a mask or helmet to make it happen.

  • I don’t hate people. Hate like anger makes you dim. It makes you care about triv

    I don’t hate people. Hate like anger makes you dim. It makes you care about trivialities. You hate people because you think they have agency – and are in control of themselves. But very few of us have agency, and everyone else is running archaic software that needs an upgrade. From my position of agency, the world is full of children running with scissors. And only men of agency, who create institutions to limit the harm people do to one another are capable of teaching them deliberately in education, normatively by saturation, and legally by the threat of punishment. Men of agency need the power to do that. those who lack agency need to fight to give men of agency the power to do that.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 13:04:00 UTC