Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE CONTEXT OF THE NEXT CHRISTIAN RECONCILIATION WITH THE LAWS OF GOD, NATURE, A

    THE CONTEXT OF THE NEXT CHRISTIAN RECONCILIATION WITH THE LAWS OF GOD, NATURE, AND MAN

    — “Enlist the Christian cognitively masculine by appealing to their interest in Truth. Many of them are alpha males suppressed by sophistry of Tolerance. They are ready for Reformation in which Tolerance has been knocked down as a totem.” —

    Freedom Of Religion
    (a) the freedom of religion clause has failed the test of Judaism and Islam (b) religion is a method of warfare on behalf of a group evolutionary strategy. (c) prohibiting religions that are acts of war is a necessity not preference. (d) natural law = non-false religion.

    In other words (a) natural law(as in P-law) isn’t opinion philosophy or theory -its the endpoint of science, unifying the sciences (b) as such if there is a god natural law is the word and law of god (c) as such we can outlaw any religion contrary to that law – w/o mandating one.

    The Abrahamic Religions are predicated on social construction of falsehoods by an agreement to lie and deny in order to eliminate falsifying feedback.This is the worst ‘mind virus’ in human history, and Judaism, Islam, Marxism-Pomo-PC/Woke-Anti-West are the evolution of disease.

    The way out of the problem for Xians is (a) Jesus was the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish prostitute (b) his message was European(Roman) not Semitic, (c) it was wrapped in Abrahamic deceit as by the Semitic people, to undermine the Epic Cycle – the ‘bible’ of Europeans. And the original meaning – which was to give the underclasses the solution to the problem of god’s laws that were discovered by the European peoples: the universe is hostile. It’s a furnace to forge us from beasts to gods. And Jesus came to tell us how to tolerate it: Love.

    We know this Abrahamic deceit is wrapped around the message of love because the Abrahamic deceit is equally wrapped around Judaism Xianity and Islam, as well as marxism postmodernism pc-woke and anti-whiteness.

    Abrahamic deceit is the work of the Devil if there is one, and Abraham was the Devil or his prophet. Why? It’s a work of seduction by half-truth, false unwarrantable unredeemable promise that baits the hazard of violating God’s laws: Seduction Into addiction by Comforting Lies.

    Our European history then and the struggle between Europeanism(Aryanism) and Christianity is an artificial conflict created by the followers of Abraham to undermine our people. God shows us faces. The Aristocratic(warrior) face of Achilles, and the Mother(loving) face of Jesus.

    As far as I know, knowing what I know, unifying science, logic, law, philosophy, and theology into a single consistent coherent correspondent paradigm, vocabulary, logic, and grammar, this is the long sought unification and it proves that church theorists were right: natural law.

    … continued here …
    http://54.221.1.41/the-context-of-the-next-christian-reconciliation-with-the-laws-of-god-nature-and-man/

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-23 13:28:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106805678621730573

  • WHO ARE YOU AND HOW DO YOU EXIST? IT”S PRETTY SIMPLE REALLY “You” are a stack of

    WHO ARE YOU AND HOW DO YOU EXIST? IT”S PRETTY SIMPLE REALLY

    “You” are a stack of hierarchically recursive memory on top of pulsing sensors – each layer increasing the duration of time, detecting changes in the layer beneath, integrating memory at the same level, and passing predictions to the next layer. ‘Slow’ chemistry makes it work.

    “You” emerge from this hierarchy, but can only introspect (look backward into) what the competition between predictions in that hierarchy of memory wins your attention by providing the greatest returns on ‘acquisition’ of something – even if it’s just rest.

    “You” however, as you most deeply intuit yourself, in your first state of awareness, consists of a tiny rapid cycle of memory in your brain stem ‘feeling’ homeostasis, demanding information from your thalamus – that is absolutely ‘You’ – with only a few seconds of memory itself.

    “You” then (and this is important) are a tiny agent in the dark, in silence, ignorant, memoryless, and desperate, trying to survive by maintaining your body’s homeostasis over an increasing radius of time, with just a few levers to work with,
    It’s either terrifying or beautiful.

    (Unfortunately, this isn’t an analogy, or a theory, but life experience by involuntary ‘scientific’ experimentation because a certain combination of asthma, dehydration, and nervous system during cancer caused me to lose and regain consciousness veeeery slowly and repeatedly.)

    So when we say ‘Consciousness Emerges’ it means consciousness emerges from the increasing scope of time produced by the slow electrochemistry of the recursive, cumulative, hierarchy of memory we call our ‘brains’. We differ because of our bodily needs for homeostasis(regulation).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-23 13:15:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106805625390001662

  • Ergo, I am a materialist, not necessarily an atheist. The Universe, God, and a p

    Ergo, I am a materialist, not necessarily an atheist. The Universe, God, and a powerful enough AI would be identical systems of computation. We are only now sophisticated enough to comprehend this possibility. Lastly it is useful to anthropomorphize those laws for comprehension.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-19 22:25:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1428483162091425798

    Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889 @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1428482268801155078

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FedorLives1889 @Lord__Sousa (FWIW, I believe and act as if gods exist. My understanding of God is the Laws of the Universe (algorithm). Of gods is that they’re emergent from the universe and exist only as information. Of spirit is the algorithm evolved for every different object (in the loosest terms).)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1428482268801155078

  • THE FEMININE MIND IS THE WEAK LINK IN ANY ATTEMPT AT EQUALITY I notice that syst

    THE FEMININE MIND IS THE WEAK LINK IN ANY ATTEMPT AT EQUALITY

    I notice that systematizing, evidence, testimonial truth, inequality, responsibility, and self-determination, and paying the high cost of self-determination are a white male cognitive bias evolved over 5000 years.

    And that neuroticism, wishful thinking, magical thinking, seeking alignment and non-conflict, consensus before truth, preference before truth, face before truth, fear of inequality, fear of responsibility, and fear of self-determination, are the female norm.

    And they’re norms of the less evolved civilizations. This is why less evolved civilizations are poorer, have lower trust, with lesser commons, and even worse governments.

    Moreover, we now have the evidence that the WASPs were right, and that women, because of the traits listed above, are even more unfit for politics than men are for infant and child care.

    And as such, we have learned that we spent 50K years developing institutions to control externalization of male behavior by directing aggression and competition to the production of commons.

    But we allowed women into the franchise without legally controlling female behavior to an equal degree, thereby letting loose the third destruction of western civilization – because women are the weak link in the civilizational chain due to their instincts resulting in stagnation dysgenia or decline.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-18 14:45:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106777669566281565

  • Fundamentalism Is Limited to First-Order Claims

    FUNDAMENTALISM IS LIMITED TO FIRST-ORDER CLAIMS
    No I’m not anti-christian so to speak, I’m anti-Abrahmism.
    — “Some atheists claim that religion is a comfort to simple minds too weak to tolerate a world without God, but perhaps I wonder if it is the other way around. Perhaps atheism is a comfort to those minds too fearful of what the existence of God would entail.” —
     
    Well, we have the science. Religiosity is determined by the demand for empathy over systematizing. And the reasons for this are simple neural economy of in utero developmental differences. Smarter people tend to be system thinkers, so the same emotional need is filled differently.
     
    — “I could tell you that eyes are just the result of sense organs evolving over time. That wouldn’t then suggest that they don’t actually see anything.” —
     
    Technically speaking eyes don’t ‘see’ they just sense information. ‘Seeing’ requires the organization of that information into edges, textures, fragments, objects, spaces, and boundaries into a model to predict where muscles can move our bodies – that happens in the brain.
     
    — “Way to miss the point. You can describe the activity any way you like.” —
     
    Not missing the point, but making one over your head, that others will recognize: the three categories of fictionalism (deceit by pseudoscience(magic) pseudo reason(sophistry) and supernaturalism(occult)) make use of that method of argument-substitute, and Abrahamism teaches it.
     
    I told you it was over your head. 😉 All deceit is constructed from the same set of techniques that use ambiguity(vs identity), grammatical tolerance, incomplete sentences(vs testable transactions) to suggest relations by analogy that they cannot testify to (and do not exist).
     
    So for example the liars paradox isn’t. It’s a lie created by design using an incomplete statement that violates the grammatical law of continuous recursive disambiguation. Idiomatic speech relies heavily on suggestion vs description. Languages differ in precision. Cultures do too.
     
    And because cultures do too, cultures are more vulnerable to an index between aggregate (normative) intelligence, institutional evoluton, the precision of language. So English > German > Russian > Hindu > Semitic > Sinic differences in context vs precision.
     
    It’s actually a tragedy, in that (a) the church failed to produce an Augustine or Aquinas in response to Darwin, Maxwell et all, given that the scholastics had nearly united laws of nature natural law and catholic mythology (b) the Marxist, neo-Marxists, pomo, woke cult WON.
     
    And worse, that you idiots can’t comprehend that trend, and are ignorant of the coherence of the laws of nature, natural law, economics, and evolution = and worse aren’t taught grammar, logic, rhetoric, and grammatical suppression of the cognitive biases.
     
    And worse, you are ignorant of the fact that while Jesus increasingly appears to be a fictional character in the Semitic mythicist tradition consisting of combined wisdom literature from Egyptian and Persian traditions, that “Jesus” solved the problem of cooperation at scale.
     
    If one ‘sciences’ Christian ethics (not dogma) it is the ‘scientific’ solution to the prisoner’s dilemma of trust development in a heterogeneous polity – and requires training since it is contrary to all human instincts.
     
    The consequences? (a) reduce familism and tribalism, (b) prepare people for middle-class ethics (trade), (c) provide a means for the lower classes to find status in Indo-European civilization which treats the lower classes as domesticated animals – integrating them into society.
     
    So I don’t mind that you’re an ignorant peasant that obsesses about nonsense if the consequence is that you behave as the ‘programmers’ intended you to behave. I only mind when you use Abrahamic deceit to pretend intellectual status instead of the social moral status it produces.
     
    As such Abrahamic theology is just wisdom literature that tells you how to behave. This is a first-order wisdom. It does not tolerate second-order deduction, induction, or abduction. It is not a system of reason or science, it is a system of analogy. To say otherwise is lying.
     
    I like to share knowledge and understanding with those capable of using it. You are just a tool that provides a frame for the distribution of that knowledge. You don’t matter other than that you’re a foil. This is why you have no meaning in life and your religion is dying.

  • Fundamentalism Is Limited to First-Order Claims

    FUNDAMENTALISM IS LIMITED TO FIRST-ORDER CLAIMS
    No I’m not anti-christian so to speak, I’m anti-Abrahmism.
    — “Some atheists claim that religion is a comfort to simple minds too weak to tolerate a world without God, but perhaps I wonder if it is the other way around. Perhaps atheism is a comfort to those minds too fearful of what the existence of God would entail.” —
     
    Well, we have the science. Religiosity is determined by the demand for empathy over systematizing. And the reasons for this are simple neural economy of in utero developmental differences. Smarter people tend to be system thinkers, so the same emotional need is filled differently.
     
    — “I could tell you that eyes are just the result of sense organs evolving over time. That wouldn’t then suggest that they don’t actually see anything.” —
     
    Technically speaking eyes don’t ‘see’ they just sense information. ‘Seeing’ requires the organization of that information into edges, textures, fragments, objects, spaces, and boundaries into a model to predict where muscles can move our bodies – that happens in the brain.
     
    — “Way to miss the point. You can describe the activity any way you like.” —
     
    Not missing the point, but making one over your head, that others will recognize: the three categories of fictionalism (deceit by pseudoscience(magic) pseudo reason(sophistry) and supernaturalism(occult)) make use of that method of argument-substitute, and Abrahamism teaches it.
     
    I told you it was over your head. 😉 All deceit is constructed from the same set of techniques that use ambiguity(vs identity), grammatical tolerance, incomplete sentences(vs testable transactions) to suggest relations by analogy that they cannot testify to (and do not exist).
     
    So for example the liars paradox isn’t. It’s a lie created by design using an incomplete statement that violates the grammatical law of continuous recursive disambiguation. Idiomatic speech relies heavily on suggestion vs description. Languages differ in precision. Cultures do too.
     
    And because cultures do too, cultures are more vulnerable to an index between aggregate (normative) intelligence, institutional evoluton, the precision of language. So English > German > Russian > Hindu > Semitic > Sinic differences in context vs precision.
     
    It’s actually a tragedy, in that (a) the church failed to produce an Augustine or Aquinas in response to Darwin, Maxwell et all, given that the scholastics had nearly united laws of nature natural law and catholic mythology (b) the Marxist, neo-Marxists, pomo, woke cult WON.
     
    And worse, that you idiots can’t comprehend that trend, and are ignorant of the coherence of the laws of nature, natural law, economics, and evolution = and worse aren’t taught grammar, logic, rhetoric, and grammatical suppression of the cognitive biases.
     
    And worse, you are ignorant of the fact that while Jesus increasingly appears to be a fictional character in the Semitic mythicist tradition consisting of combined wisdom literature from Egyptian and Persian traditions, that “Jesus” solved the problem of cooperation at scale.
     
    If one ‘sciences’ Christian ethics (not dogma) it is the ‘scientific’ solution to the prisoner’s dilemma of trust development in a heterogeneous polity – and requires training since it is contrary to all human instincts.
     
    The consequences? (a) reduce familism and tribalism, (b) prepare people for middle-class ethics (trade), (c) provide a means for the lower classes to find status in Indo-European civilization which treats the lower classes as domesticated animals – integrating them into society.
     
    So I don’t mind that you’re an ignorant peasant that obsesses about nonsense if the consequence is that you behave as the ‘programmers’ intended you to behave. I only mind when you use Abrahamic deceit to pretend intellectual status instead of the social moral status it produces.
     
    As such Abrahamic theology is just wisdom literature that tells you how to behave. This is a first-order wisdom. It does not tolerate second-order deduction, induction, or abduction. It is not a system of reason or science, it is a system of analogy. To say otherwise is lying.
     
    I like to share knowledge and understanding with those capable of using it. You are just a tool that provides a frame for the distribution of that knowledge. You don’t matter other than that you’re a foil. This is why you have no meaning in life and your religion is dying.

  • THE CHOICE: REFORMATION, RECONSTITUTION, SECESSION OR CIVIL WAR? Yes of course I

    THE CHOICE: REFORMATION, RECONSTITUTION, SECESSION OR CIVIL WAR?

    Yes of course I’m a supporter, advocate for, and evangelist for the Texas secession movement. That’s because Texas is the optimum strategic wedge from which to achieve success in any solution on the spectrum – whether policy, reformation, reconstitution, or separation.

    THE (J)LEFT HAS DESTROYED THE (E)MODERN WORLD
    Pax-Americana like Pax Romana has trained a dependent world on an empire that can no longer afford to police trade.

    The New Reality: To survive A Nation Requires:
    … 1) Military Strength,
    … 2) Defensible Geography,
    … 3) Economic Productivity with
    … 4) the ability to Feed Yourselves.
    Almost no one at all has this. No one (except us, turkey, japan, and argentina)

    BY INTENTIONALLY UNDERMINING THE WEST, THE (J)LEFT HAS DOOMED THE REST (Just like they did in Rome)There are very few nations that can either survive, or maintain standards of living without British->American ‘meritocratic’ insurance of rule of law, finance, transport, and trade.

    WE CAN CONTAIN THE (J)LEFT PROBLEM.
    We can do it with rule of law, the right laws, and incentives. It’s not like I’m advocating punishment (although it’s deserved) but to reform a ‘failed people’ that is the enemy of civilization and human survival, in the act of defending ourselves.
    (P-Law.)

    STRATEGICALLY, THE TRADITIONAL, CHRISTIAN, RULE OF LAW, “RIGHT” CAN’T LOSE A CIVIL WAR. We are vulnerable to the illusion that verbal warfare against institutions of cultural production is only viable as long as it’s insulated from physical warfare against those undermine them.

    The problem for all pro-European-American Civilization movements, is seeking a specific IDEAL end result, rather than obtaining the influence and eventual power to negotiate a POSSIBLE end result across our Civilizational spectrum (Rule of Law, Economics, Family, Religion).

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-09 14:47:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106726717330306613

  • VIA IMPERIUS: If I have to put it to you as simply as I can: no movement starts

    VIA IMPERIUS:

    If I have to put it to you as simply as I can: no movement starts from Twitter. This is the land of charlatans and procrastinating fools.

    You might lose your 20s down a rabbit hole with irresponsible leaders not setting you on a path that observes all developmental considerations.

    Small pond status maximization. That is every tweet you’re seeing and the motive of every tweet. Be careful becoming just as much the mode of what you and they all pretended to hate.

    What we see today with the DR is a bottom 25 percentile Twitter tribe that sells books less successfully than Harry Potter fan fiction.

    The 60s and 70s movements didn’t come that close to being that relevant, but they still were functional activists.

    It’s a lifestyle movement of Twitter posing, with the spicy possibility of being unpersoned at no greater effect. Clown faceCowboy hat face

    You know the DR is all performative when how they resolve and process conflict are exactly the same as the corporate culture they pretend to be opposing.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-04 14:29:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106698334795879496

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.