Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • THE ADVANTAGE OF EUROPEAN DIMORPHISM VS EAST ASIAN NEOTENY I tended to make the

    THE ADVANTAGE OF EUROPEAN DIMORPHISM VS EAST ASIAN NEOTENY

    I tended to make the mistake that the Chinese being the most neotenous with the same basic IQ advantage would have the most potential, but we’re less neotenic but more dimorphic and I didn’t account for the adaptive utility of dimorphism vs the east asians – hard lesson.

    This is a recent revelation that I’ve only come to understand as I write about how the universe computes evolutionary potential. The sex differences increase computational potential, just as neotenic evolution increases it. I just didn’t see the relation.

    This is why whites and asians are socially and politically compatible and whites and asians are both ‘incompatible’ with less neotenically evolved peoples.

    Neoteny: Wolf->Dog. Meaning ‘delay and minimize sexual maturity giving more time for neurological development under childhood behavioral flexitility.

    Dimorphic: Female vs Male Body Plan.

    Europeans are teh most dimorphic. (Hence the value of our women)
    E. Asians are the most ‘evolved’ by neoteny. Phjysical, mental, social.

    Then Europeans
    Then South Eurasians
    Then Africans
    Then Old africans (Austronesians, Khoi-San)

    Europeans conquer and become assimilated. Indians conquer and stagnate. Chinese conquered and domesticate. Muslims conquer, undermine, destroy. Jews undermine and let Muslims in to destroy. Gypsies just steal and consume. Africans can’t organize to do anything.

    We are wrong. Chinese are right. Fascists were right. Sorry. Just is.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-09-06 18:07:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106886049110182051

  • The History of European Civilization in 600 Words

    ​ @james smith Ancestral north eurasians. Counter clockwise rotation (climate). hybridization of the spectrum of European hunter gatherers. neolithic european civilization. Anatolian Farmer migration. Hunter gatherer reconquest. Indo European migration and incremental conquest from spain to china. These people diverged into the south (italo-celtic) the central (germanic) and the eastern (balto-slavic) populations. They spread in all directions from the top of the black sea, counter clockwise into greee and anatolia. Their political system was the result of their steppe origins: pirates, and the only possible government for pirates: contractualism. Which we call democracy and rule of law – for the aristocracy. These IE group’s tradition, law, political strategy, surviving in written history only as the Spartans, evolved under the Athenians due to trade, reaching high point under the Athenians. The Romans invented bureaucracy and the administrative state. The romans over-expanded into the middle east as had the greeks, and discovered the same problem – IQ84, low trust, divrse tribal people cannot be as cheaply organized as IQ 100 high trust relatively homogenous europeans. And so the cost of administration per person was too high, despite the ‘addiction’ of north African food production (like we have with china in industrial goods today.). The romans had committed a near genocide against the celts who were cousins, and metalworkers, and competitors. This opened space for rotation of the germanics from the north across the south. The romans could not defeat them. And Christianity like woke today, was an appealing cult for the women and underclasses, who could be governed by cults but not by reason law and duty to one another. In other words, homogenous european rome could not maintain the culture of heterogenous roman empire, nor could it recreate it after the invasion and plauges. However, the group strategy of the Celtics, germanics-scandinavians, and balto-slavics was the same as the group strategy of the itals of rome, and the dorians(?) of Greece. So greece and rome provided new technology that’s affordable with waterborne traide that wasn’t available on the continent, but didn’t alter the group strategy of the west indo europeans that was relatively homogenous across the european plain. We can give our technology to India and china and Africa and the middle east but they still retain their group strategies and largely retain their religions. All our status networks (values) are embedded in that group strategy normst traditions and values. The European group strategy, the strategy of pirates, steppe raiders, vikings, and world conquering europeans is the same: an aristocracy that through force of arms, reciprocally insures the self determination by self determined means by demand for sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, and thereby limiting us adversarial markets in all aspects of life, at the cost of the suppression of the reproduction of the unfit to share that burden. It’s the last phrase that terrifies the world who are unfit for that burden. And that burden is the price of rule of law, and the sovereignty, reciprocity, and self determination that result from it. That is the 5000 years of strategy that unites the european people. And it explains the rate of development of the european people versus all other peoples combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, interrupted only by semitic Christianity and the dark ages of superstition and ignorance they created by the destruction of the arts, letters, and culture – the technology – of greco roman civilization, and impose mandatory illiteracy and ignorance on our people by force of arms. This is the social order that innovates, adapts, and evolves fatser than all other civilizations combined. Worse, it’s the only social order that didn’t fail stagnate or decline by 800ad. The Great Filter is the underclass.

  • The History of European Civilization in 600 Words

    ​ @james smith Ancestral north eurasians. Counter clockwise rotation (climate). hybridization of the spectrum of European hunter gatherers. neolithic european civilization. Anatolian Farmer migration. Hunter gatherer reconquest. Indo European migration and incremental conquest from spain to china. These people diverged into the south (italo-celtic) the central (germanic) and the eastern (balto-slavic) populations. They spread in all directions from the top of the black sea, counter clockwise into greee and anatolia. Their political system was the result of their steppe origins: pirates, and the only possible government for pirates: contractualism. Which we call democracy and rule of law – for the aristocracy. These IE group’s tradition, law, political strategy, surviving in written history only as the Spartans, evolved under the Athenians due to trade, reaching high point under the Athenians. The Romans invented bureaucracy and the administrative state. The romans over-expanded into the middle east as had the greeks, and discovered the same problem – IQ84, low trust, divrse tribal people cannot be as cheaply organized as IQ 100 high trust relatively homogenous europeans. And so the cost of administration per person was too high, despite the ‘addiction’ of north African food production (like we have with china in industrial goods today.). The romans had committed a near genocide against the celts who were cousins, and metalworkers, and competitors. This opened space for rotation of the germanics from the north across the south. The romans could not defeat them. And Christianity like woke today, was an appealing cult for the women and underclasses, who could be governed by cults but not by reason law and duty to one another. In other words, homogenous european rome could not maintain the culture of heterogenous roman empire, nor could it recreate it after the invasion and plauges. However, the group strategy of the Celtics, germanics-scandinavians, and balto-slavics was the same as the group strategy of the itals of rome, and the dorians(?) of Greece. So greece and rome provided new technology that’s affordable with waterborne traide that wasn’t available on the continent, but didn’t alter the group strategy of the west indo europeans that was relatively homogenous across the european plain. We can give our technology to India and china and Africa and the middle east but they still retain their group strategies and largely retain their religions. All our status networks (values) are embedded in that group strategy normst traditions and values. The European group strategy, the strategy of pirates, steppe raiders, vikings, and world conquering europeans is the same: an aristocracy that through force of arms, reciprocally insures the self determination by self determined means by demand for sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, and thereby limiting us adversarial markets in all aspects of life, at the cost of the suppression of the reproduction of the unfit to share that burden. It’s the last phrase that terrifies the world who are unfit for that burden. And that burden is the price of rule of law, and the sovereignty, reciprocity, and self determination that result from it. That is the 5000 years of strategy that unites the european people. And it explains the rate of development of the european people versus all other peoples combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, interrupted only by semitic Christianity and the dark ages of superstition and ignorance they created by the destruction of the arts, letters, and culture – the technology – of greco roman civilization, and impose mandatory illiteracy and ignorance on our people by force of arms. This is the social order that innovates, adapts, and evolves fatser than all other civilizations combined. Worse, it’s the only social order that didn’t fail stagnate or decline by 800ad. The Great Filter is the underclass.

  • SHALLOW WOMEN ARE JUST OPTION TRADING ON FERTILITY HER: “Women aren’t property,

    SHALLOW WOMEN ARE JUST OPTION TRADING ON FERTILITY

    HER: “Women aren’t property, we are not “prizes” we are human beings.”

    HIM: “Let me take a wild guess and say you’re single.”

    HER: “Yes because if my own choice, so this isn’t a drag you think it is.”

    ME: You’re mistaken of course. Marriage is a property contract insured by the polity against interference in order to protect the community from single women and impoverished children that steal from the community by moral hazard.

    All humans everywhere in all walks of life across all history sort by sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. Female reproductive value is intrinsic and hyperconsumptive. Male reproductive value must be earned by production.

    The fact that you can state otherwise is a privilege created by men’s innovations in order to compete in the market for status that allows them access to the most desirable females. This is evident in selecting pressure, especially in the Europeans given female Sexual Dimorphism

    So never make virtue signal claims when you don’t know the science. It just means you’re a useful idiot for the enemy of civilization under the pretense that you’re doing anything other than signaling non-aggression to give yourself more social economic and political options.

    Meanwhile, you’re just consuming attention as a means of measuring your maximum consumption and returns on your present genetics and fertility.

    Shallow women are boring.

    (Very few humans aren’t bots.)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-31 22:47:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106853175807822544

  • (to Charles Murray from elsewhere) : Yes, and something else we see in personali

    (to Charles Murray from elsewhere) :

    Yes, and something else we see in personality testing vs IQ testing: that life differences emerge in modeling(space, time, prediction) not knowledge and calculation. And by seeking homogeneity in IQ testing they’ve eliminated what ‘matters’ in life’s market competition.

    This started with ‘classes’ then ‘girls’ then ‘minorities’ but what’s occurring is an incremental academic Harrison-Bergeron effect as this process is as self-reinforcing as was Chinese bureaucratic and Islamic intellectual calcification, stagnation, and regression.

    So this effect is endemic, and illustrates ‘be careful what you measure’. By seeking to measure the invariant properties of individuals regardless of sex, race, or class, we have created a measure of exceptionalism in marginal competitive indifference – devolution.

    This consequence emerges because evolutionary differences in competitiveness are due to differences in sex, race, and class. And those differences are not computational, nor calculative, but predictive beyond the limits of computation and calculation.

    The evolutionary ‘edge case’ is the one that cannot be computed or calculated but only predicted by increases in intuition that have not been reducible to irregularities expressible by language, calculation, or computation.

    This effect explains why post-hoc rule of law by common law, entrepreneurship, a childhood of adversarial competition, adversarial markets in all aspects of life, resulting hierarchies, produce natural distribution of abilities, rapid innovation and adaptation.

    So like many civilizations before us that have failed we have disconnected the relationship between what we are testing, and the lifetime results we expect from those tested: surviving the unrelenting eternal war against man, nature, evolution and an uncaring universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-29 15:00:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106840011690926691

  • WHY THE UNFIT HATE WHITENESS: BLAMING WHITES FOR LAWS OF NATURE Europeans invent

    WHY THE UNFIT HATE WHITENESS: BLAMING WHITES FOR LAWS OF NATURE

    Europeans invented ‘whiteness’ (science, truth before face, testimony, confession) at the expense of continuous self domestication, thereby forcing everyone into adversarial (evolutionary) markets for survival, thus continuing natural selection (evolution).

    Whiteness is ‘hard’ because it means (a) truth before face regardless of cost (b) responsibility for self-determination by self-determined means (c) responsibility for policing capital (d) Its the most emotionally, psychologically costly strategy. (e) IT’S EUGENIC AS HELL

    Whiteness is eugenic because it continues natural selection by market competition under rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth before face – and that means that the vast majority of the planet cannon adapt to ‘whiteness’. Why?…

    Because in order to form a Pareto hierarchy of self-organizing people you a population with the adaptive ability parallel to the rate of technological innovation. In other words, you need a median IQ (meaning the cognitive rate of adaptation) greater than 100.

    Europeans innovated, adapted, evolved, and yes, self domesticated, faster than all other civilizations combined. In fact, all other civilizations failed to progress by 800ad despite agrarianism – because they failed to constrain the underclass and instead ‘fed’ off them.

    Ergo “Whiteness” is just ‘NOT LYING’ about the laws of the universe in order to avoid the cost of genetically pacifying the underclass sufficiently that they can maintain adaptative evolution in the short window of time the planet has afforded us the opportunity.

    The world is unfit for whiteness. it’s rational to rebel against whiteness. Just as it is natural for those capable of ‘whiteness’ to rebel against those who would prevent further continuos recursive evolution and the rate of innovation it entails.

    So, Whiteness = Science = Laws of the Universe = Maximization of innovation, adaptation, evolution at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the unfit (underclass).

    STOP LYING THAT ALL YOU’RE DOING IS REBELLING AGAINST THE UNIVERSE AND BLAMING WHITE PEOPLE WHO ADAPT TO IT.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-29 13:28:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106839653427024503

  • WOO WOO IS PERSONALLY CHEAP BUT CONSEQUENTIALLY EXPENSIVE I avoid all woo woo li

    WOO WOO IS PERSONALLY CHEAP BUT CONSEQUENTIALLY EXPENSIVE

    I avoid all woo woo like the plague. Instead I explain how and why our perception of the spiritual exists, why it’s an externality (illusion), and why we find comfort in that illusion. And why some groups use it a lot some less and some not at all.

    Now, that doesn’t mean that people don’t need to satisfy the behavioral demand that woo woo serves. It’s that there are a spectrum of methods of satisfying it – and the least woo woo are the most expensive – which is why underclasses favor cheap methods, and elites promote them.

    Teaching aristotelianism, stoicism (self-authoring), epicureanism (values), and the natural law (ethics and morality) would produce mindfulness. But it’s a lot more work than learning somethign ridiculous like Islam. So we invested heavily in general education (aristotelianism) but we didn’t convert the church from mindfulness by woo woo into mindfulness by training. Buddhism does this but with woo woo. Less woo woo than the abrahamic religions, but it’s still woo woo.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-27 14:18:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106828523678331938

  • EMOTIONS ARE AN ACCOUNTING JOURNAL Let me help you with a fundamental scientific

    EMOTIONS ARE AN ACCOUNTING JOURNAL

    Let me help you with a fundamental scientific truth that like the earth isn’t the center of the solar system or universe, and like Darwinian evolution, is painful:

    All emotions (likes) are just reactions to bearing a cost, preventing a loss, gaining a discount, on Adaptation.

    My point being rather obvious then: that europeanism and all that results from it, is the most emotionally, psychologically, cognitively and behaviorally costly civilization on earth, which is why we adapted faster than all the rest of mankind put together in shorter time.

    This is why chritsianity spread. It made it possible for the women, peasantry, underclass, and slaves to alleviate the stress of their low status, pay the high cost of adaptation of europeanism, and find virtue in the non-harm to the commons, versus the propertied class, the middle class and the martial aristocracy who could use positive affect in order to produce continuous rapid evolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-26 23:18:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106824985500700108

  • GLOBALISM AND COSMOPOLITANISM AS FEMALE CRIME AND WAR All female political biase

    GLOBALISM AND COSMOPOLITANISM AS FEMALE CRIME AND WAR

    All female political biases (globalism) seek reduction of personal, social, political, responsibility for policing and enforcement of adaptation to constraints of scarcity. Female warfare is conducted by undermining (cosmopolitanism) w/ false promise of evading those constraints.

    Females claim their evasion of the cost and responsibility of adaptation is a moral ambition, and because of their dominance in child care men(and women) equally unconsciously pander to them, but it’s not ‘good intentions’ – its behavioral tax evasion.

    Cosmopolitanism consists of pandering to this behavior under moral pretense, but it’s always everywhere an attempt to seize political power by agitating (conflict creation) the bottom against the middle, by claiming evolution scarcity and cost of adaptation are oppressions.

    Again, all these cognitively feminine movements whether local or global, peasant or urban, are ‘lies’ for evasion of responsibility one hand and power on the other. Reality? World economic conditins reflect group differences in underclass constraint of bottom reproduction.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-24 11:23:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106810849046754850

  • THE SIN OF VANITY – THE RIGHT FAILS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO ‘BE RIGHT’ MORE THAN TH

    THE SIN OF VANITY – THE RIGHT FAILS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO ‘BE RIGHT’ MORE THAN THEY WANT TO WIN

    — “Somebody call BLM. We need to get curt to give up his megaphone so he can stroke their egos with “y’all are stronger and have bigger dicks!” —

    –“The real action is in the reaction of the opposition.” — Saul Alinsky

    Be mindful of how you react to your enemy.
    Because they play you for the dumb f–ks you are.
    And they couldn’t play me like they play the dumb f–ks you are.
    And you dumb f–ks didn’t get it.
    Because you’re dumb F–ks.

    I can always tell when I hit a nerve because the Right’s cogfem cockroaches come out of the woodwork to GSRRM. Too bad cockroaches can’t learn that BLM and ANTIFA are bait, not the enemy, and these dumb f—ks take the bait. Every time. The dumb f–k, genetic waste of the Right.

    You’re presuming an equality that doesn’t exist. I was right you were wrong. I’m still right, you’re still wrong. I learned you were a lost cost. You didn’t learn to reform. You still have no leaders, no organization, no strategy, no means, you’re owned, enserfed, exterminated.

    We were the only people who invested in you with any chance of turning you into a viable political movement. You f’ked up. We were your last chance. You’re the fecal matter at the end of your genetic line – and it makes me happy and fulfilled to watch you flail in desperation.

    You aren’t christian if you’re a dumb f–k trying to be right rather than to continuously discover and improve your undrestanding of the law of god, written in the language of god, and the langauge of god is what science seeks to uncover, and it has, and it turns out jesus was right. But he was only half of the message. Jeuss taught us hot to tolerate gods laws. Becuase gods’ law is evolution, and life is a forge which god uses to evolve us such that we can sit at his hand, and share the burden of creation.

    Ego, and Vanity of Being Right is a Sin. The word of god is written throughout ever atom in the universe. It was just a very hard langauge for man to learn to read. And we did a poor job in most of history.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-08-23 14:46:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106805986558920273