Curt Doolittle

Form: Mini Essay

  • MALE AND FEMALE DIFFERENCES IN EXTERNALIZATION Relationships require we learn th

    MALE AND FEMALE DIFFERENCES IN EXTERNALIZATION

    Relationships require we learn the difference between hearing, listening, considering, and what’s worth discussing. Most human speech consists of thinking out loud, and trust relationships let us do so safely. Much speech is just anger, frustration, or joy release. 😉

    We don’t think of our verbal expressions of emotional release in high-trust circumstances as necessary, and as necessary for cognitive computation but it is – it’s running a test of a theory of the intuition, on terms the intuition can undrestand and adapt to. This is PROFOUND.

    Women are more able to process emotions this way but less able to regulate them. Men are more able to regulate their emotions but less able to process them. This is one of the primary utilities of intersexual cooperation in high trust we call relationships (or marriage).

    This is why women chatter and emote endlessly – to use other women for regulation of internal expressions of what might result in antisocial behavior, and why men use fire gazing, trash talking, and other loyalty signals for the same reason.

    Pehaps the most ironic aspect of male and female differences is the female as generalist with ability but unwillingness to adapt, and the male specialist with willingess but inability to adapt.

    God is a comedian of sorts. 😉
    He forces us to compute evolution by cooperation.

    So again, the universe HAS to equilibrate any difference, because every body form works with the same problem of energy production and application. So all male and female differences consist of TRADE OFFS. For any difference discover the trade off between male and female.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-18 15:13:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107123181418408122

  • THE TRIVIAL MATHEMATICS OF HUMAN FUTURE There are three macro properties to civi

    THE TRIVIAL MATHEMATICS OF HUMAN FUTURE

    There are three macro properties to civilizational differences in evolutionary computation:

    1. The demographic composition and more importantly the absolute number of the smart fraction in relation to the rest.
    2. The group strategy and institutions.
    3. The political policies.

    These three factors determine the civilizational advantage and therefore self-determination of a people – and of the world as a consequence.

    Ergo:

    1. selection by soft market eugenics
    2. natural law and “perfect government”,
    3. policy of total evolutionary war vs the red queen.

    ~4. There is one property hitherto unseen, and only beginning to emerge in the scholarship, and that is that ‘autists invent everything of marginal difference’. This means that sexual dimorphism AND neoteny are required for competitive advantage in evolutionary computation. This is our advantage over east asians. And perhaps why together we are as ‘compatible’ as are men and women.

    As far as I know the geological clock gives us between 10k and 50k years in addition to the 100K we have had now. I other words by that rough estimate our window is 2/3 complete. The population growth is collapsing b/c postwar anti-eugenics but too slow vs resource exhaustion.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 18:17:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107106917967404658

  • The Female and Jewish Method of Warfare as The Cause of Western Decline

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKjSvIQg05E The touchy topic of the female method of anti social behavior, scaled up to political warfare, and the Ashkenazi use of the female method of warfare. This is a very important, but difficult discussion I try to handle with as little ‘blame’ as possible. SUMMARY OF THE VIDEO 1. We’re all bots – we don’t know why we do what we do. 2. We’re all running cultural software we don’t understand – it’s a group evolutionary strategy, expressed as a group organizing strategy, expressed as metaphysical presumptions. 3. We biologically adapted to that software over the millennia 4. That software biases the male (European) vs the Female (Jewish) group strategies. 5. This is the maximum adaptive difference possible for human beings because sex differences are the maximum difference in human beings interests. 6. European civilization, precisely because it’s a trifunctional market for competing elites(Tolerance) is an OPEN society – the ONLY open society – and makes it possible for the Female and Jewish method of conflict to be weaponized. 7. Female Enfranchisement, Jewish Immigration, and The Frankfurt school migration to (Jewish Stronghold) New York, invited the female method of anti-social behavior, and war into the USA, where the failure of marxism to weaponize the underclass, could be used to weaponize the black class, women, and then to immigrate vast numbers of equal hostiles. 8. We allowed a competing completely inverse and hostile feminine elite, and enfranchised their natural genetic audience of women into economy and polity, without equally suppressing the female method of anti-social behavior in our laws and institutions. 9. The result was the Marxist – Neo-Marxist – Pomo – anti-male feminist – anti-white, anti-male PC-Woke – Anti west , Anti-white, Anti Male, Anti European, Anti-Indo European – Dysgenic, Devolutionary, Hyperconsumptive – Undermining, Deconstructive, female strategy loose. 10. This has resulted in the repetition of the Jewish-Christian-Female destruction of the Mediterranean civilization, and the resulting dark age, as well as the Muslim reformation of Christianity into the destruction of Levantine, Egyptian, North African, Persian, Anatolian, Byzantine, Balkan, Northwest Indian Civilizations – as the most destructive force in human history. Worse than the great plagues. 11. This is a relatively easy fix because the common law previously prohibited the female method of social superpredators’ warfare from use within. 12. So P-Law completes the evolution of European linguistic, rational, behavioral, social, economic, political, and juridical science, and allows us to equally suppress the female method of anti-social behavior and its institutionalization as warfare against European institutions of cultural production. 13. Preventing another dark age of ignorance, superstition, and decline. And our fall as the sequence of Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy, have succeeded in so many other civilizations, by weaponizing the bottom against the middle with false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe.   INDEX: WARM UP TOPICS 0:18 Quality of Discourse 0:24 The Law 0:29 Global Alienation THE FEMALE AND ASHKENAZI METHOD OF WARFARE 0:31 Intro 0:36 Emneties 0:40 Bots 0:42 Circles of Competency 0:48 Bots 0:49 Male and Female patterns of warfare 0:52 strategies 0:57 Antisocial behavior 1:06 female warfare 1:15 Learned selfishness 1:20 Pull to generate polities based upon biases 1:25 Civilizational differences; metaphysics explained 1:29 India 1:32 Who to copy 1:33 women into the franchise 1:35 the modern state and the folley of equality 1:39 King of the Hill Games 1:45 Religion/Scripture v. Theology 1:49 Wisdom, Love and Religion 1:54 Social Constructionism 1:58 Wars against truth 2:04 Rent seeking religion 2:05 The Germanization of Christianity 2:07 Feminine style of warfare 2:13 female escalation 2:20 war vs social capital 2:29 Angry 2:35 Ticket to Moscow 2:39 preservation of separatism 2:43 Genetic, Cultural and Political continuity 2:49 Prevention of criminality 2:48 incremental suppression of female method of warfare 2:54 closure

  • The Female and Jewish Method of Warfare as The Cause of Western Decline

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKjSvIQg05E The touchy topic of the female method of anti social behavior, scaled up to political warfare, and the Ashkenazi use of the female method of warfare. This is a very important, but difficult discussion I try to handle with as little ‘blame’ as possible. SUMMARY OF THE VIDEO 1. We’re all bots – we don’t know why we do what we do. 2. We’re all running cultural software we don’t understand – it’s a group evolutionary strategy, expressed as a group organizing strategy, expressed as metaphysical presumptions. 3. We biologically adapted to that software over the millennia 4. That software biases the male (European) vs the Female (Jewish) group strategies. 5. This is the maximum adaptive difference possible for human beings because sex differences are the maximum difference in human beings interests. 6. European civilization, precisely because it’s a trifunctional market for competing elites(Tolerance) is an OPEN society – the ONLY open society – and makes it possible for the Female and Jewish method of conflict to be weaponized. 7. Female Enfranchisement, Jewish Immigration, and The Frankfurt school migration to (Jewish Stronghold) New York, invited the female method of anti-social behavior, and war into the USA, where the failure of marxism to weaponize the underclass, could be used to weaponize the black class, women, and then to immigrate vast numbers of equal hostiles. 8. We allowed a competing completely inverse and hostile feminine elite, and enfranchised their natural genetic audience of women into economy and polity, without equally suppressing the female method of anti-social behavior in our laws and institutions. 9. The result was the Marxist – Neo-Marxist – Pomo – anti-male feminist – anti-white, anti-male PC-Woke – Anti west , Anti-white, Anti Male, Anti European, Anti-Indo European – Dysgenic, Devolutionary, Hyperconsumptive – Undermining, Deconstructive, female strategy loose. 10. This has resulted in the repetition of the Jewish-Christian-Female destruction of the Mediterranean civilization, and the resulting dark age, as well as the Muslim reformation of Christianity into the destruction of Levantine, Egyptian, North African, Persian, Anatolian, Byzantine, Balkan, Northwest Indian Civilizations – as the most destructive force in human history. Worse than the great plagues. 11. This is a relatively easy fix because the common law previously prohibited the female method of social superpredators’ warfare from use within. 12. So P-Law completes the evolution of European linguistic, rational, behavioral, social, economic, political, and juridical science, and allows us to equally suppress the female method of anti-social behavior and its institutionalization as warfare against European institutions of cultural production. 13. Preventing another dark age of ignorance, superstition, and decline. And our fall as the sequence of Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy, have succeeded in so many other civilizations, by weaponizing the bottom against the middle with false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe.   INDEX: WARM UP TOPICS 0:18 Quality of Discourse 0:24 The Law 0:29 Global Alienation THE FEMALE AND ASHKENAZI METHOD OF WARFARE 0:31 Intro 0:36 Emneties 0:40 Bots 0:42 Circles of Competency 0:48 Bots 0:49 Male and Female patterns of warfare 0:52 strategies 0:57 Antisocial behavior 1:06 female warfare 1:15 Learned selfishness 1:20 Pull to generate polities based upon biases 1:25 Civilizational differences; metaphysics explained 1:29 India 1:32 Who to copy 1:33 women into the franchise 1:35 the modern state and the folley of equality 1:39 King of the Hill Games 1:45 Religion/Scripture v. Theology 1:49 Wisdom, Love and Religion 1:54 Social Constructionism 1:58 Wars against truth 2:04 Rent seeking religion 2:05 The Germanization of Christianity 2:07 Feminine style of warfare 2:13 female escalation 2:20 war vs social capital 2:29 Angry 2:35 Ticket to Moscow 2:39 preservation of separatism 2:43 Genetic, Cultural and Political continuity 2:49 Prevention of criminality 2:48 incremental suppression of female method of warfare 2:54 closure

  • THE MOST IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE EUROPEANS CAN GAIN TODAY Just what I expected. I la

    THE MOST IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE EUROPEANS CAN GAIN TODAY
    Just what I expected. I lay it all out … and crickets. 😉

    SUMMARY OF THE VIDEO

    1. We’re all bots – we don’t know why we do what we do.
    2. We’re all running cultural software we don’t understand – it’s a group evolutionary strategy, expressed as a group organizing strategy, expressed as metaphysical presumptions.
    3. We biologically adapted to that software over the millennia
    4. That software biases the male (European) vs the Female (Jewish) group strategies.
    5. This is the maximum adaptive difference possible for human beings because sex differences are the maximum difference in human beings interests.
    6. European civilization, precisely because it’s a trifunctional market for competing elites(Tolerance) is an OPEN society – the ONLY open society – and makes it possible for the Female and Jewish method of conflict to be weaponized.
    7. Female Enfranchisement, Jewish Immigration, and The Frankfurt school migration to (Jewish Stronghold) New York, invited the female method of anti-social behavior, and war into the USA, where the failure of marxism to weaponize the underclass, could be used to weaponize the black class, women, and then to immigrate vast numbers of equal hostiles.
    8. We allowed a competing completely inverse and hostile feminine elite, and enfranchised their natural genetic audience of women into economy and polity, without equally suppressing the female method of anti-social behavior in our laws and institutions.
    9. The result was the Marxist -> Neo-Marxist -> Pomo -> anti-male feminist -> anti-white, anti-male PC-Woke -> Anti west , Anti-white, Anti Male, Anti European, Anti-Indo European -> Dysgenic, Devolutionary, Hyperconsumptive -> Undermining, Deconstructive, female strategy loose.
    10. This has resulted in the repetition of the Jewish->Christian->Female destruction of the Mediterranean civilization, and the resulting dark age, as well as the Muslim reformation of Christianity into the destruction of Levantine, Egyptian, North African, Persian, Anatolian, Byzantine, Balkan, Northwest Indian Civilizations – as the most destructive force in human history. Worse than the great plagues.
    11. This is a relatively easy fix because the common law previously prohibited the female method of social superpredators’ warfare from use within.
    12. So P-Law completes the evolution of European linguistic, rational, behavioral, social, economic, political, and juridical science, and allows us to equally suppress the female method of anti-social behavior and its institutionalization as warfare against European institutions of cultural production.
    13. Preventing another dark age of ignorance, superstition, and decline. And our fall as the sequence of judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy, have succeeded in so many other civilization, by weaponizing the bottom against the middle with false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-11 15:35:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107083632212906927

  • Origins of differences in Jewish and European Law

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-YIhdDLD78 Abramson (All): Great series. FYI: Origin of European legal oddities is the first principle of European civilizational law: individual sovereignty. Meaning these are outlets to circumvent the problem of the absence of discretionary authority, where the exercise of any authority violates the first principle of the law and produces an incentive for retaliation against the authority. Unlike the river valley civilizations, where production, defense, policing, taxation and administration could be concentrated, Europeans couldn’t produce equal political efficiency given the territory. So it took Mediterranean trade, Lotharingian trade routes, north sea trade, and Atlantic trade to pay the higher cost of political organization. Conversely, Jewish homogeneity and interdependence for survival made possible by the absence of responsibility for territorial conquest, domestication, and defense allowed the formation of collective and judicial authority without undermining the production of internal order. So, Europeans had the opposite organizing problem that originated in the west Indo-European development of a universal militia funded by families. In simplistic terms, the origin of European civilization is that of entrepreneurial warriors who merged horse, bronze, and wheel on the steppe, then used the superiority of that social and military order to conquer most of Eurasia despite the absence of centralized productivity made possible by the river valleys of the flood river civilizations. We see this in the universal consistency of the means by which pirates organize: democratic government, a division of power, and the ‘corporation’ of warriors. Or in trivial terms “conquerors and colonizers require different organizing principles to domesticate territory and people prior to the organization of production and trade. The ‘entrepreneurship of violence’ necessary for such conquest, colonization, and domestication produces a different shareholder agreement from that of the traders that follow them. We can see the limit of the hierarchy of these organizations failing in the steppe, desert, and arctic for the same reason. An analogy to the three bears. Only certain territories favor certain organizing principles. And it explains why the steppe and desert produced the waves of the conquest of river civilizations that caused the low trust civilization of the middle east by the constant rotation of power. And conversely the higher trust Indians, next higher trust of east Asians, and the highest trust of north europeans. In other words, we are all the product of our geography combined with path dependency of our founding people’s organizing principles. It’s kind of beautiful in retrospect.

  • Origins of differences in Jewish and European Law

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-YIhdDLD78 Abramson (All): Great series. FYI: Origin of European legal oddities is the first principle of European civilizational law: individual sovereignty. Meaning these are outlets to circumvent the problem of the absence of discretionary authority, where the exercise of any authority violates the first principle of the law and produces an incentive for retaliation against the authority. Unlike the river valley civilizations, where production, defense, policing, taxation and administration could be concentrated, Europeans couldn’t produce equal political efficiency given the territory. So it took Mediterranean trade, Lotharingian trade routes, north sea trade, and Atlantic trade to pay the higher cost of political organization. Conversely, Jewish homogeneity and interdependence for survival made possible by the absence of responsibility for territorial conquest, domestication, and defense allowed the formation of collective and judicial authority without undermining the production of internal order. So, Europeans had the opposite organizing problem that originated in the west Indo-European development of a universal militia funded by families. In simplistic terms, the origin of European civilization is that of entrepreneurial warriors who merged horse, bronze, and wheel on the steppe, then used the superiority of that social and military order to conquer most of Eurasia despite the absence of centralized productivity made possible by the river valleys of the flood river civilizations. We see this in the universal consistency of the means by which pirates organize: democratic government, a division of power, and the ‘corporation’ of warriors. Or in trivial terms “conquerors and colonizers require different organizing principles to domesticate territory and people prior to the organization of production and trade. The ‘entrepreneurship of violence’ necessary for such conquest, colonization, and domestication produces a different shareholder agreement from that of the traders that follow them. We can see the limit of the hierarchy of these organizations failing in the steppe, desert, and arctic for the same reason. An analogy to the three bears. Only certain territories favor certain organizing principles. And it explains why the steppe and desert produced the waves of the conquest of river civilizations that caused the low trust civilization of the middle east by the constant rotation of power. And conversely the higher trust Indians, next higher trust of east Asians, and the highest trust of north europeans. In other words, we are all the product of our geography combined with path dependency of our founding people’s organizing principles. It’s kind of beautiful in retrospect.

  • I love all people who are intellectually honest and willing to pay the cost of t

    I love all people who are intellectually honest and willing to pay the cost of truth and reciprocity. I simply love my people more because we are most adapted to and most suited to it at scale. It’s not complicated. I’ve lived in ethnically homogeneous polities and there are zero circumstances where ethnically homogeneous polities do not produce superior commons, and superior quality of life, if they reduce the scale of the underclass, through meritocratic reproduction. Other peoples can’t do it unless their numbers are kept in the single digits of the population, and those single digits are limited to those capable of contributing to the professional class. Everyone else deprives the young and old of useful work in the contribution to the commons, which in turn leaves only hyperconsumption as a means of status and mindfulness.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 20:39:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107073499391151776

  • On Sabine Hossenfelder’s Role and its Extension.

    Thoughts for fellow supernerds…. SIMPLE VERSION: Due to limitations in technology, physicists are using mathematical physics (ideal) not material physics (real). Dark Matter is the name of an unknown variable in their mathematics. It’s not a physical(real) but a mathematical reference (ideal). This is something Sabine says less directly on a regular basis. Why? Because she’s half-solving the problem of ‘mathiness’ (beauty, simplicity) in physics by saying that this simplicity and elegance are a failed project. But she’s not saying that mathematics as currently practiced is insufficient given the information available from experimentation. Why? Because her correct understanding of science (testimony) consists of limiting us to testifiable observables. And our observables are only presently mathematically testifiable. MORE COMPLEX VERSION: Operating under the assumption that mass produces all gravity, then there is mass that we cannot observe that produces that gravity. OR there is a problem with our understanding of gravity (more likely). OR space doesn’t curve, is flat, and some other phenomenon is causing gravity (probably the most likely). General evolving consensus is that while there is funding to be gained by keeping the public excited, it’s increasingly clear that einstein-bohr produced a mathematical description of phenomena, but the theory that narrates causality is wrong. And that our mathematical physics is relying on formula insufficient for the description of observable outcomes. OPEN QUESTION: (from my position of admitted ignorance) If mass consists of displacement of the quantum field (assumption), and gravity is described as a product of mass, then why would not displacement of the aggregate displacement of the quantum field produce the equivalent of mass without the need for particles? EXPLANATION (Explanation: I specialize in the sources and consequences of human ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading-and-framing, fictions, fictionalism, deceit, and denial, including the problems in math and logic. IMO at present, the evidence suggests that we are indeed ‘lost in math’ as Sabine says. But we are lost in math because we are lost in categorization and presumption, under the primary error that Einstein-bohr succeeded rather than failed, leading future generations to use the same methodology – when it was that methodology of ‘pictures’ that made Einstein err, and publish before empirical mathematicians like Hilbert solved the underlying problem of causality. In other words, some early successes providing half truths produce consequential errors preventing future discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution. Or as Popper said, there are sources both of knowledge AND of ignorance. This is the reason we must disambiguate between mathematical idealism (language and analogy), and computation and physics (reality and actions). This is the origin of our errors. We failed to institutionalize Babbage and prevent the failures of philosophy, logic, mathematics, and as a consequence, …. physics.. once the initial source of ignorance in Einstein Bohr had been created, by the half-truth that conflated description with causality. (It’s possible I can improve on this narrative). In a perfect world, we would run a competition with an extraordinary financial prize, for the physical description of physics, explained by mathematics, instead of the mathematical description of physics in the absence of the physical description of physics that we use today. This would ‘correct’ the physics ‘industry’. All organizations and industries follow rational incentives. Ours appear to be wrong.)

  • On Sabine Hossenfelder’s Role and its Extension.

    Thoughts for fellow supernerds…. SIMPLE VERSION: Due to limitations in technology, physicists are using mathematical physics (ideal) not material physics (real). Dark Matter is the name of an unknown variable in their mathematics. It’s not a physical(real) but a mathematical reference (ideal). This is something Sabine says less directly on a regular basis. Why? Because she’s half-solving the problem of ‘mathiness’ (beauty, simplicity) in physics by saying that this simplicity and elegance are a failed project. But she’s not saying that mathematics as currently practiced is insufficient given the information available from experimentation. Why? Because her correct understanding of science (testimony) consists of limiting us to testifiable observables. And our observables are only presently mathematically testifiable. MORE COMPLEX VERSION: Operating under the assumption that mass produces all gravity, then there is mass that we cannot observe that produces that gravity. OR there is a problem with our understanding of gravity (more likely). OR space doesn’t curve, is flat, and some other phenomenon is causing gravity (probably the most likely). General evolving consensus is that while there is funding to be gained by keeping the public excited, it’s increasingly clear that einstein-bohr produced a mathematical description of phenomena, but the theory that narrates causality is wrong. And that our mathematical physics is relying on formula insufficient for the description of observable outcomes. OPEN QUESTION: (from my position of admitted ignorance) If mass consists of displacement of the quantum field (assumption), and gravity is described as a product of mass, then why would not displacement of the aggregate displacement of the quantum field produce the equivalent of mass without the need for particles? EXPLANATION (Explanation: I specialize in the sources and consequences of human ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading-and-framing, fictions, fictionalism, deceit, and denial, including the problems in math and logic. IMO at present, the evidence suggests that we are indeed ‘lost in math’ as Sabine says. But we are lost in math because we are lost in categorization and presumption, under the primary error that Einstein-bohr succeeded rather than failed, leading future generations to use the same methodology – when it was that methodology of ‘pictures’ that made Einstein err, and publish before empirical mathematicians like Hilbert solved the underlying problem of causality. In other words, some early successes providing half truths produce consequential errors preventing future discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution. Or as Popper said, there are sources both of knowledge AND of ignorance. This is the reason we must disambiguate between mathematical idealism (language and analogy), and computation and physics (reality and actions). This is the origin of our errors. We failed to institutionalize Babbage and prevent the failures of philosophy, logic, mathematics, and as a consequence, …. physics.. once the initial source of ignorance in Einstein Bohr had been created, by the half-truth that conflated description with causality. (It’s possible I can improve on this narrative). In a perfect world, we would run a competition with an extraordinary financial prize, for the physical description of physics, explained by mathematics, instead of the mathematical description of physics in the absence of the physical description of physics that we use today. This would ‘correct’ the physics ‘industry’. All organizations and industries follow rational incentives. Ours appear to be wrong.)