SHALLOW WOMEN ARE JUST OPTION TRADING ON FERTILITY HER: “Women aren’t property,

SHALLOW WOMEN ARE JUST OPTION TRADING ON FERTILITY

HER: “Women aren’t property, we are not “prizes” we are human beings.”

HIM: “Let me take a wild guess and say you’re single.”

HER: “Yes because if my own choice, so this isn’t a drag you think it is.”

ME: You’re mistaken of course. Marriage is a property contract insured by the polity against interference in order to protect the community from single women and impoverished children that steal from the community by moral hazard.

All humans everywhere in all walks of life across all history sort by sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. Female reproductive value is intrinsic and hyperconsumptive. Male reproductive value must be earned by production.

The fact that you can state otherwise is a privilege created by men’s innovations in order to compete in the market for status that allows them access to the most desirable females. This is evident in selecting pressure, especially in the Europeans given female Sexual Dimorphism

So never make virtue signal claims when you don’t know the science. It just means you’re a useful idiot for the enemy of civilization under the pretense that you’re doing anything other than signaling non-aggression to give yourself more social economic and political options.

Meanwhile, you’re just consuming attention as a means of measuring your maximum consumption and returns on your present genetics and fertility.

Shallow women are boring.

(Very few humans aren’t bots.)