Form: Argument

WHY DO COGNITIVELY FEMININE PEOPLE ENGAGE IN GENETIC, BIOLOGICAL, COGNITIVE, AND SOCIAL SCIENCE DENIAL?
(it’s simple really)

Sex Differences in Prediction of short term experiential empathizing vs Long term conseqential systematizing
RESULTING IN
Feminine Empathizing Magical Wishful Thinking to Evade Responsibility For Conflcit Resolution
-vs-
Masculine Systematizing Practical Empirical Thinking To Take Responsibility for Conflict Resolution
AND
Ethnic differences in cognitive dimorphism by sex bias caused by variation in neotenic evolution combined with social and economic selection pressure by isolation whether geographic or cultural.
THERFORE
Feminine Jewish Empathic Irresponsible Magical Thinking vs
Masculine European Systemizing Responsible Empirical Thinking.

The masculine ‘right’ can imagine the mind of a feminine ‘left’, and but the feminine ‘left’ can’t imagine the mind of the masculine right.

Hence the specialization of the feminine left in harm/care and the weighing of the full spectrum moral factors by the masculine right.

As a conseqence the feminine left seek irresponsibilty through exporting and externalizing all social, economic, political, miltary, and group competitive costs to the masculine right – while claiming they are virtuous rather than evading responsibilty and the costs of responsibility.

The data is overwhelming in support of each of these statements.

This is why we must create scientific, legal and institutional systems to prevent externalization of the consequences of irresponsibility and magical thinking so we maycontinue the western tradition of pursuing individual soverignty by the eradication of authority – meaning the maximization of responsibility of every individual prior to any participation or ‘say’ in the responsibile governance of the polity.

What this means? “Don’t take women (feminine minds) seriously in matters of social, economic, political, and strategic questions becaue they are effectively and conveniently the equivalent of face blind, color blind, tone deaf, and naive to any scale phenomena that requires systematizing and valuation of outcomes over time.

The preware behavioral science of freud, boaz, marx, is all pseudoscience, that has failed every test. The postwar revolt against the darwinian-spencer eugenic movement by mass production of pseudoscience (almost, but not exclusively by jewish authors) using the feminine marxist myth of oppression (vs domestication into responsibilty) is equivalent to the mass production of abrahamic religion by the same means in response the the greek and roman conquest and it’s reliance on reason and empiricism.

Female > jewish > abrahamic > marxist-pomo-woke fraudulent dysgenic devolution
Is the antithesis of:
Male > european > aristotelian > greco-roman-germanic-anglo empirical eugenic evolution that has dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, early death and the victimization of a nature all but hostile to our existence.

Probably over most heads, but this is the ‘science’ underlying everything political.

Why?

Because while genetics largely determine variation in human competency, sex differences in cognition determine all variation in human biases.

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute

Reply addressees: @michaelshermer