If you want to see what a revolution looks like and 30M dead bodies then that’s what it will take.
Never happen.
The court can in fact deny stacking the court is constitutional (it is). 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-02 16:33:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653437577410510852
Reply addressees: @RepAdamSchiff
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653148073714139138
The only interesting problem is why did the anglos alone survive the centuries of warfare against the natural common concurrent law of prohibition on authority, requiring responsibility, resulting in individual sovereignty as the reward for the responsibility for the defense of the private and common.
Betham tried it.
The French (Catholics) succeeded.
The jews have always practiced it and they are the only other people of law in the sense we mean it – even if it is not natural, moral, or ethical law. But it is this obsession with law that makes the jews and the west the primary producers of ideas.
Reply addressees: @Lunca92
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:25:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653088151013933075
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653086711100981254
The only interesting problem is why did the anglos alone survive the centuries of warfare against the natural common concurrent law of prohibition on authority, requiring responsibility, resulting in individual sovereignty as the reward for the responsibility for the defense of the private and common.
Betham tried it.
The French (Catholics) succeeded.
The jews have always practiced it and they are the only other people of law in the sense we mean it – even if it is not natural, moral, or ethical law. But it is this obsession with law that makes the jews and the west the primary producers of ideas.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:25:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653088151139696641
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653086711100981254
The truth is the truth whether or not I would be judged fit or unfit. I can accept the truth regardless of face or cost, You can’t. The question is why can’t you? Why do you need to lie?
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:21:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653087329630797852
Reply addressees: @alexlammyman @vonGuda @PaoloShirasi @kareem_carr
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653086605341519873
Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but instead a legislative device for the conduct of the (unjust) civil war and reparations and reconstruction thereafter, and as such should be repealed (we do so in our reforms) – as usual, the text without the context is easily interpreted as other than it means. “All words are measurements recorded as measurements at the time of their writing.” We don’t get to put our fingers on the ‘legal activism scale’.
–“The primary purpose of this provision was to ensure the federal government’s commitment to repaying the debts incurred during the Civil War while simultaneously preventing the payment of any debts or claims associated with the Confederacy or slaveholders. By doing so, it helped to protect the financial stability of the United States and prevent any political or legal attempts to undermine the Union’s efforts during the Civil War.
In summary, Section 4 of the 14th Amendment aimed to reaffirm the legitimacy of the public debt incurred by the United States during the Civil War, deny any financial claims from the Confederacy or slaveholders, and strengthen the financial foundation of the country during the Reconstruction Era.”–
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:11:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653084777686220821
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653036193347502080
Aside from the fact that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, but instead a legislative device for the conduct of the (unjust) civil war and reparations and reconstruction thereafter, and as such should be repealed (we do so in our reforms) – as usual, the text without the context is easily interpreted as other than it means. “All words are measurements recorded as measurements at the time of their writing.” We don’t get to put our fingers on the ‘legal activism scale’.
–“The primary purpose of this provision was to ensure the federal government’s commitment to repaying the debts incurred during the Civil War while simultaneously preventing the payment of any debts or claims associated with the Confederacy or slaveholders. By doing so, it helped to protect the financial stability of the United States and prevent any political or legal attempts to undermine the Union’s efforts during the Civil War.
In summary, Section 4 of the 14th Amendment aimed to reaffirm the legitimacy of the public debt incurred by the United States during the Civil War, deny any financial claims from the Confederacy or slaveholders, and strengthen the financial foundation of the country during the Reconstruction Era.”–
Reply addressees: @William68332190 @briangeraghty2 @pearlythingz
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 17:11:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653084777560391707
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653036193347502080
The problem with ‘false witness’ is that the entirety of the Abrahamic religious spectrum is predicated on claims of false witness, while the entirety of western empiricism is predicated on testifiable witness.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:59:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652689013105479686
Reply addressees: @ForTheLifeofTr1 @anderstegn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652687276659335169
Pearl;
The alternative to withdrawing the vote is to give women a separate house of government so that men and women would have to agree on domestic policy the way the house (population) and senate (territories) have to agree today. And reserve international policy to men.
This is consistent with the use of multiple houses of government (parliaments, parleys) for each class, (monarchy-state, nobility-regions, ministers-businesses, and church-labor, family), given that the classes have different interests. The result is a marketplace for the production of commons.
The fundamental differences between the sexes are (a) the female basis to predict and value emotions in time, and the male bias to predict and value systems of outcomes over time, and (b) the feminine bias to status by hyperconsumption without responsibility vs the male bias for status by capitalization and responsibility. Or in simple economic terms: Female Demand and Male Supply. (Which is what you face every day.)
Politics is a game of scale over time. And it’s clear from the evidence women are under-interested, under-informed, and vote emotionally, and are the swing vote that determines the outcome of elections. This causes the politicians to pander to women’s emotions and the short-term experiential interests of women, at the cost of the polity as a whole.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:53:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652687635133988869
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652613911185686531
Pearl;
The alternative to withdrawing the vote is to give women a separate house of government so that men and women would have to agree on domestic policy the way the house (population) and senate (territories) have to agree today. And reserve international policy to men.
This is consistent with the use of multiple houses of government (parliaments, parleys) for each class, (monarchy-state, nobility-regions, ministers-businesses, and church-labor, family), given that the classes have different interests. The result is a marketplace for the production of commons.
The fundamental differences between the sexes are (a) the female basis to predict and value emotions in time, and the male bias to predict and value systems of outcomes over time, and (b) the feminine bias to status by hyperconsumption without responsibility vs the male bias for status by capitalization and responsibility. Or in simple economic terms: Female Demand and Male Supply. (Which is what you face every day.)
Politics is a game of scale over time. And it’s clear from the evidence women are under-interested, under-informed, and vote emotionally, and are the swing vote that determines the outcome of elections. This causes the politicians to pander to women’s emotions and the short-term experiential interests of women, at the cost of the polity as a whole.
Reply addressees: @pearlythingz
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:53:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652687634982920194
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652613911185686531
Or we could say that such things as the ten commandments and Noahide law are the minimum interpersonal morals and that natural law assists us in scaling them down for precision and up for scale.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:38:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652683905944748032
Reply addressees: @anderstegn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652683217114214400