COVID: YES, JUSTICE GORSUCH IS RIGHT.
During the entire fiasco, I never claimed to know anything other than what the initial genome data said, what the illness and fatality demographic data said, just how much non-science was masqurading as science in pursuit of grant money and… https://twitter.com/AP/status/1659703119855464451
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-20 14:47:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659933871901745153
THE ANCIENT WAR FOR CONTROL OF US
I don’t know anything about Curtis, but woke is just the most recent revision of the abrahamic sequence: Judaism(Separatist) > Christianity(Submissive inclusive) > Islam(Aggresive Exclusive) in the ancient world. And Marxism(Class) >… https://t.co/OZM4zQgFC8
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-20 10:07:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659863369216671744
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659859804557574144
Jewish thinking is cognitively and emotionally female, seeks the universal rather than particular, only accounts for a subset of costs, evades investment in commons, profits from capture of commons, socializing losses, privatizing commons, is irreciprocal, is an ethical double standard, is verbal rather than mechanical, maximizes special pleading, free riding, specializes in professions that unproductive but maximize rent seeking, and especially asymmetric risk and bait into hazard, all at the expense of host populations which generally rebel.
But we let it happen. The question is why. The bigger question is that given this is female behavior in general, why we tolerate female antisocial behavior in the first place (cancel culture)? But, we do, and there is some odd correlation between our tolerance for female behavior and out tolerance for jewish behavior – both are seditious and selfish against our common interests. But we tolerate it. Well, we do so because women produce our children. that’s not true of resident outgroups.
I realize that if you write in german you’ve been even more indoctrinated than the rest of western europe. But some of us have to figure out how to solve the problem of jewish integration to prevent even more repetitions of the past. However at 50% outmarriage its happening organically. Even if the feminine cognition remains after outbreeding.
Reply addressees: @ReeSven @jialaowai @KeithWoodsYT
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-15 08:57:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658033957902905346
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658029844809105408
I am not arguing against free speech whatsoever.
I’m arguing that people are not honest and moral and that most speech consists of either manipulation or deception or fraud – we simply justify it.
So, I’m explaining that there are rational incentives. for both the state and the population. The state could act immorally – but so can the people, or at least some segment of them.
The most common examples are:
(a) Popular Lying by saying “they’re shooting people” or “there is a bomb threat at x locations” where x locations favor one party or candidate or another.
or
(b) State Lying by denying they’re oppressing voters, closing voting stations, rigging votes or election places.
The question isn’t free speech. It’s free truthful speech. And when both the people and the state lie (Turkey is a low trust country), then we can either choose to risk by leaving the channel for mass communication open for all or closed for all, given that both the state and the people are incentivized to lie.
For all practical purposes, elections are not restitutable (reversible) except through revolt or civil war. As such all peoples must make a deliberate choice which risk to take given that both sides lie.
FWIW: your virtue signaling that we call ‘getting on your high horse’ is just lying that your side’s incentives to lie cheat and steal elections are any different from the other sides. This is a wonderful privilege each moral bias happily grants itself despite the evidence.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @zeyburay @TheSilentOG @elonmusk @krassenstein @mattyglesias
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 18:35:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657816993536278529
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657803680626638851
1. Because politicians demonstrate tragedy of the commons and monarchies preserve and increase common capital. (owners vs renters)
2. Because political systems fail due to the iron law of oligarchy, the tendency to develop corruption, and the tendency of people to be self-victims of fashions of the age – so under rule of law of the natural law the monarchy serves as the judge of last resort, and the monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the rule of law of natural law.
3. Look at countries with monarchies vs those without and the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of monarchies.
(a) hans hoppe’s “Democracy the God that Failed”
Reply addressees: @thedualMan
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 09:42:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657682675711320065
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657672789644681216
STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF ALL BEHAVIOR FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES?
If we construct our proofs (arguments) from first principles, then those properties we use to describe causality are consistent across the physical, biological, sentient, cooperative, and institutionally cooperative scales.
It’s this consistency across domains that falsifies false, and half-truth claims that cause error, bias, or deceit by suggestion, association, inference, deduction.
This is why we work with such precise terms in P-Law: Every word we use we define as an ordinal measure of a spectrum (dimensions), constructed from first principles that survive falsification by tests of consistency across domains, forming and equilibrium between limits, between (-)demand, (=) persistence, (+) supply, and (!=) collapse.
It’s not obvious to readers or even those following us that everything we say is constructed from the first principle of differences in charge that equilibrate sufficiently sustainable energy capture to resist decay back into the quantum background – and from there into entropy by expansion of space.
We’re just as strictly constructing our proofs as math, but by ordinal rather than cardinal terms, specifically because cardinality isn’t a meaningful measure when there is no reducible quantity, only triangulation of more than less than equal to(marginally indifferent) and not equal to(marginally different).
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 15:00:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657400397517017094
WHY DO BOTH SEXES NEED MOTHER UNTIL AGE NINE, AND BOTH SEXES NEED FATHER AFTER AGE NINE?
(answer here)
It’s not boys that require fathers; it’s girls. And a lot of these girls who are broken are so because of a lack of paternal reinforcement of self-regulation and discounting of others’ opinions, accusations or bias.
Women can’t be attracted to men who are good for them if (a) they don’t know what it means, and (b) they can’t self-regulate female impulses (c) they can’t self-regulate against conformity – especially to female behavior when women lack children and express their hyper-empathizing hyperconsumption, hyper-status seeking, hypergamy and instability instead.
Women evolved all these ‘hyper-traits’ to extend her emotions and nervous system over a passel of fragile offspring, just as men developed hyperphysical, mechanical, and political traits for organizing a non-fragile polity for the benefit of women and children.
Men have no need for status and responsibility without responsibility for women and children.
Women demand irresponsibility, hyperattention, and hyperconsumption, hyper status, and hypergamy UNLESS they are responsible for children.
The sexes, always and everywhere are mirror images of one another. Always and everywhere.
All human differences in biases and preferences originate in sex differences in sensation, perception, prediction, valuation, cognition, and intersocial relation.
The differences in male female brains are well understood despite postwear pseudoscientific suppression by the activist left.
Feminine prey bias, empathizing in time, seeking competition by accumulating attention, redistribution, conducting offense by gossiping rallying saming and undermining, and seeking status through evasion of responsibility for commons, accumulating resources of others, displaying hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
-vs-
Masculine predator bias, systmatizing over time, seeking competition by accumulating skills, allies, influence and resources, conducting offense by demonstration of competency in physical, political, or conceptual achievement, gaining status by responsibility for commons.
Humans domesticated one another. The singular direction of human evolution over the past 130k years is just neoteny: domestication syndrome that trades lowering aggression for extending development, producing increasing self regulation and resulting opportunity for cooperation.
Otherwise we’re still the great ape underneath.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 19:00:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657098328394326078
WHY DOESN’T PORTUGAL HAVE A HIGH TRUST POLITY?
Portugal is Latin, not Germanic, and was infected by the Muslim conquest of Spain, after recovery, was a long time under the church, outside the Lotharingian trade route from Italy to the north sea, outside the manorialism of the Hajnal line, outside the Hanseatic league, outside the protestant reformation, like Spain predatory in colonization, and so outside the west germanic and anglo development of the modern rule of law state, late to industrialization, early to the seduction of communism and socialism.
That said, they do pretty well, have not fallen into the reproductive collapse of the absolute nuclear family, nor excess immigration to compensate. And they’ll get there within a generation or three. Why? The internet’s mass access to information was more effective than all previous revolutions at inspiring the public other than the industrial.
Christians hate this, but the longer a people were under the church, the lower the trust of the population. The church was far more corrupt than any secular government today by orders of magnitude, and Russian and Chinese propaganda has nothing on the church. The Jews may have invented it in the middle east, but Europeans using religion were really happy to use lying and propaganda to take unearned credit, evade responsibility for demonstrated crimes, and to profit like an organized crime syndicate whenever possible.
Christianity isn’t alone. Jewish and Islamic irreciprocal ethics, wither jewish organized crime against the commons, and Islamic organized warfare against all more advanced civilizations, combined with mandatory ignorance is even worse than church corruption.
Not that Chinese and russian desperate attempts to preserve pre-industrial imperialism for the benefit of single class against the interest of the people, is any better.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @BeedrillHive @heimbergecon
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 18:37:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657092687516909570
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657078397091078144
The rate of East Asian and Jewish outbreeding is high because cross-breeding with Europeans in general produces an equal or superior status – largely because it’s occurring in more educated classes. At present rates asians will be fully admixed with europeans in the USA within the century. I’m not sure how reliable they are but 50+ percent of jews marry outside their religion. (Which the Jewish community is aware of and concerned about).
Reply addressees: @diegocaleiro
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 16:56:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657067190560980992
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657020238838353923
So contrary to the christian dogma, our founders were men of the enlightenment empiricism and reason who understood the common people needed their religion yet saw the organized church as hostile to the people.
The uniquenss of the anglosphere and america is that we are bound by rule of law of the natural law – and left behind the corruption of the aristocracy, the church, and the lazy indolent peasantry.
Reply addressees: @GEsenhourn @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-12 13:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657008958857420802
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657003679046680576
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I am a jeffersonian christian, in that jesus was a philosopher only able to speak in the language and logic of his location and time, and the church was a politica system that sought to bring cheap semitic rule by superstition where costly european rule by reason – an aristocatic method – was ‘challenging’ to bring to the wider word of vast underclasses made worse by the prosperity the aristocacy had created giving slaves, underclasses and women the relative safety and choice that for the first time ’empowered’ them at least a little bit.
So I am loyal to the truth: the laws of nature. Christianity despite it’s church nonsense and superstition does inform us how to produce a higher trust society more prepared for economic prosperity by treating everyone as a customer – of cooperation. It’s utility-bearing but not true.
This means I am opposed to hostile religions, and tolerant of christian superstition of the peasantry. But I am and always will be aristocracy: sovereignty, liberty, and freedom, under rule of law insured by force of arms. As such my loyalty is to the people regardless of their weakness or folly.
And, the duty of the peasantry, as jesus counseled, is to be loyal to the aristocracy in matters of reality (the state).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1657003679046680576