While unintuitive, it is possible to produce a formal logic of decidability in t

While unintuitive, it is possible to produce a formal logic of decidability in the law, that will eliminate all but ‘collisions’ of policy, and over time may prevent collisions of policy, thereby constraining the precision of policy, and preventing ‘lawfare’ to circumvent the people and the legislatures. While I’m not sure Scalia himself understood the full meaning of what he was advocating, and while I’m uncertain that it was possible to do so before the cognitive revolution produced by the introduction of programmatic logic, it is at present possible to complete the natural law (science) of decidability, and then test the deviation of that decidability from that ‘optimum’.