Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • BELIEF AND PROFESSION OF IT, ARE ALMOST ALWAYS LIES I do not know what you belie

    BELIEF AND PROFESSION OF IT, ARE ALMOST ALWAYS LIES

    I do not know what you believe. I cannot know. I can only determine judge you by your actions. If you testify to an un-testifiable belief, then you can only lie. If you lie then you have a reason to lie. I can only seek to discover the reason you lie. I cannot distinguish a profession of belief in an un-testifiable lie, from any other lie.

    Belief is irrelevant. Either you imitate thew works of jesus or you are just another liar, fraud, and thief.

    Keep a diary of the actions you make in the service of others for no other reason than the love of others, and the cost to you for having done so.

    If it is not an action, is not in the services of others, is not in the service of other by your personal service to them, then you are a liar and a liar, fraud, and thief, and your claims of Christianity are no different from wearing the uniform of those who did service, when you have not done so, a pretending to equal their honor.

    No. You are just a free-rider. A parasite on other’s labors. A free rider on those few christians who exist, just as a free rider on those few warriors that exist.

    A christian ACTS. Profession of belief, and belief are irrelevant.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:58:00 UTC

  • One cannot possibly claim the unjustifiable is true, since ‘true’ can only mean

    One cannot possibly claim the unjustifiable is true, since ‘true’ can only mean truthful testimony, and testimony requires evidence. Like I said. Liars all hiding behind lies, for the purpose of theft and fraud. There is no god. Only an excuse for jewish, xtian, and muslim lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 01:17:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190075403181932545

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190072792730996737

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190072792730996737

  • Yet as christians demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breakin

    Yet as christians demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade.

    Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 23:18:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190045490877997058

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200

  • The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying

    The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 23:17:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders on Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders on Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017

  • I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, inte

    I also understand that there is value in the freedom from emotional burden, intellectual burden, that the rest of us bear on behalf of Christians, who are nothing but free-riders on Christians ‘free ride’ on our emotional, and mental hard labors.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 23:14:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190044445380694017

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190044005888876544

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190044005888876544

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays I agree that there is value to the faithful in the production of psychological mindfulness from certainty, conformity, under this contract written in fiction. It re-creates the safety of the herd for those who lack agency, by casting submission, conformity, stagnation as heroic.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190044005888876544

  • Judaism to undermine, jewish christianity to weaken, semitic islam to conquer an

    Judaism to undermine, jewish christianity to weaken, semitic islam to conquer and destroy.
    Jewish Marxism to undermine, Jewish postmodernism and Jewish feminism to weaken, Islam and judaism to conquer and destroy.
    You are precisely why they instituted church and state.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 18:35:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189974196446801925

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189973800131190784

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays We would have failed a long time ago like every other christian communist experiment. Law may not be open to interpretation The elegance of semitic deceits is that they are means of suggestion, under which every idiot claims he understands, precisely because he doesn’t.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189973800131190784

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays We would have failed a long time ago like every other christian communist experiment. Law may not be open to interpretation The elegance of semitic deceits is that they are means of suggestion, under which every idiot claims he understands, precisely because he doesn’t.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189973800131190784

  • We would have failed a long time ago like every other christian communist experi

    We would have failed a long time ago like every other christian communist experiment. Law may not be open to interpretation The elegance of semitic deceits is that they are means of suggestion, under which every idiot claims he understands, precisely because he doesn’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 18:33:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189973800131190784

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189973356059201538

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189973356059201538

  • They left the church out of it entirely, because they were trying to escape the

    They left the church out of it entirely, because they were trying to escape the parasitism and corruption of the church and the nobility, to create a middle class empirical commercial majority society. The ‘faithful’ are simply good workers for the project.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 18:30:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189972843330707456

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189972439121432576

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays That’s false of course. They set up this country by the restatement of west-indo-european, germanic, anglo saxon, norman, english, british common law, and stated it in the empirical language of the enlightenment, with nothing more than a nod to deism, given founders were deists.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189972439121432576

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays That’s false of course. They set up this country by the restatement of west-indo-european, germanic, anglo saxon, norman, english, british common law, and stated it in the empirical language of the enlightenment, with nothing more than a nod to deism, given founders were deists.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189972439121432576

  • One cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cann

    One cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious,… https://www.facebook.com/100017606988153/posts/496823167581245/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 16:48:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189947378847158276

  • YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GA

    YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GAINS AND TO PREVENT LOSSES.

    —“But I think you miss the mark somewhat here because heroism is fundamentally not about the material or Darwinian advantages.”—

    Heroism is a means of paying status and opportunity rather than material rewards, in exchange for directing dominance display to the production of commons. those commons may be physical, may be opportunities, may be, normative, may be informational or anything in between.

    So your mistake is failing to grasp that the use of ‘materialism’ as a criticism is an attempt to lie. instead, we seek gains whether material, opportunistic, or informational, and to prevent losses of the same. Because in all things we are simply an extension of the physical laws of the universe, with nothing other than the use of memory to choose optimum opportunities, rather than fae the limits of the physical world in seizing the first opportunity. it is by this vast accumulation of differences using different forms of memory that we capture and resist entropy while the reset of the universe decays.

    If I can get this thru: if you cannot convert an emotion to its underlying economic terms, then you are still talking superstition. It’s pseudoscientific superstition. But it’s superstition. In this example you are still thinking feelings have value, instead of that we evolved to experience positive and negative feelings for having increasing or decreasing assets, in physical (premium), opportunistic(discount), or informational (discount) form.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 13:39:00 UTC