Form: Argument

Christianiy was used to subdue the european peoples and drive them into ignoranc

Christianiy was used to subdue the european peoples and drive them into ignorance instead of roman literacy and prosperity. We survived christianity, and we only survived it by converting it into a folk religion.

We only survived it. Nothing more.

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 18:32:06 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188886173911007232

Reply addressees: @natrolleon

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188885864425746439

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188885864425746439

October 28, 2019
So you know I am right, tha I speak the truth. But you engage in disapproval and

So you know I am right, tha I speak the truth. But you engage in disapproval and rejection because you lack an argument, and use the cognitively female technique of denial, ridicule, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, rallying, and gossiping to obscure your fraud and deceit. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 18:09:02 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188880365009756160

Reply addressees: @GregCampNC @fryskefilosoof

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188877476656832512

IN REPLY TO:

@GregCampNC

@fryskefilosoof @curtdoolittle Your bigotry is boring. Run along now.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188877476656832512

October 28, 2019
In other words, if you want the benefit of the commons, then you may not impose

In other words, if you want the benefit of the commons, then you may not impose costs upon those who produce and depend on those commons, where the institution of property is itself a commons produced by reciprocal exchange of defense of that commons.

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 16:41:16 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188858280543752194

Reply addressees: @natrolleon

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188858073944854528

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@natrolleon Can you give an example? I’m saying that we always and everywhere suppress parasitism by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity using the court under the natural law of reciprocity that we call tort, and the system of measurement of tort we call property.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188858073944854528

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@natrolleon Can you give an example? I’m saying that we always and everywhere suppress parasitism by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity using the court under the natural law of reciprocity that we call tort, and the system of measurement of tort we call property.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188858073944854528

October 28, 2019
Rights to not exist in nature. Only possibilities. We MAKE rights.We can only ma

Rights to not exist in nature. Only possibilities. We MAKE rights.We can only make negative rights,because we can only refrain equally not DO equally. We can construct PRIVILEGES (not rights), in a polity. And we can grant the right of SUIT if those privileges or rights violated.

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 15:21:19 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188838159448236037

Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188832661315489792

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188832661315489792

October 28, 2019
Because the only reason it is preferable to let anyone live, be free of deportat

Because the only reason it is preferable to let anyone live, be free of deportation, free of enserfment,free of slavery, free of imprisonment, is if you do not impose costs upon the interests of others. And if you cannot conform to a life free of parasitism then its self defense.

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 15:17:57 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188837313364873216

Reply addressees: @Gyeff

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188834241016221696

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188834241016221696

October 28, 2019
Demarcation between animal and human is agency, not consciousness. Consciousness

Demarcation between animal and human is agency, not consciousness. Consciousness provides the possibility of agency, but not its achievement. So either one raises one’s children from animal, to domesticated animal, to human, or one fails. One can fail genetically or parentally.

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 12:58:55 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188802323113545729

Reply addressees: @thanos_pope

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188800176963624960

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188800176963624960

October 28, 2019
There is no such thing as selflessness. There is no human action that I know of

There is no such thing as selflessness. There is no human action that I know of that isn’t buying something. All human action can be reduced to economic statements. That doesn’t mean doing good doesn’t feel good. Its’ a good thing

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 02:35:20 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188645394781298688

Reply addressees: @OfSalamis

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188645033668481024

IN REPLY TO:

@OfSalamis

@curtdoolittle Haha, I just had to address that little point at the very start of your tweet about no evidence of altruism or selflessness. I want it known that there’s realistically two options for anonymous acts of charity: it’s either real selflessness, or selfishness just to get to heaven.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188645033668481024

October 28, 2019
There is no evidence of selflessness or altruism that I know of. As far as I kno

There is no evidence of selflessness or altruism that I know of. As far as I know we are buying evidence of non-threatening status, options on futures, self doubt reduction, or virtue signaling. We are buying something every time. But yes, Forbearance(Tolerance) and charity wins.

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 02:05:38 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188637921458438144

Reply addressees: @OfSalamis

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188579984283176960

IN REPLY TO:

@OfSalamis

@curtdoolittle Selfishness vs selflessness.

One is violent and/or parasitic, whereas the other can build relationships and communities simply and efficiently, if given a little bit of sense and restraint on just how altruistic one can be. Can’t build if you give all away.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188579984283176960

October 28, 2019
Conversely, if nothing may ascend if the court determines it’s irreciprocal, if

Conversely, if nothing may ascend if the court determines it’s irreciprocal, if you can take anything to court that is irreciprocal, then what can you imagine can be imposed upon you except the prevention of your free riding on that which you obtain direct or indirect gains?

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 20:10:28 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188548540093599749

Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188547921308016640

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays It’s easier if we take an example you would object to.
For example, if you can vote/veto on anything, or vote your economic contribution on anything, or you can vote an equal proportion or proportional division of revenue generation, for anything, then how is that not a market?

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188547921308016640

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays It’s easier if we take an example you would object to.
For example, if you can vote/veto on anything, or vote your economic contribution on anything, or you can vote an equal proportion or proportional division of revenue generation, for anything, then how is that not a market?

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188547921308016640

October 27, 2019
It’s easier if we take an example you would object to. For example, if you can v

It’s easier if we take an example you would object to.
For example, if you can vote/veto on anything, or vote your economic contribution on anything, or you can vote an equal proportion or proportional division of revenue generation, for anything, then how is that not a market?

Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 20:08:01 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188547921308016640

Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188520798455291904

IN REPLY TO:

@directdemocrac7

@curtdoolittle @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Sorry Curt I can’t see an answer to that question in your tweets.
I’m not sure I can see how an Act of parliament can ever be a contract.
Who are the 2 (or more) parties to the contract?
Govt & People?
If so, how is consent obtained from people?

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188520798455291904

October 27, 2019