Form: Argument

NO THE FOUNDERS DIDN’T FAIL, THE CHURCH FAILED – REPEATEDLY – JUST AS IT IS FAILING TODAY. WE ARE TRYING TO RESTORE OUR RELIGION IF ONLY IN DEFENSE

‪One cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them.

The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge

The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it.

So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence.

Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. *Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form.*

Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them.

So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement.

Christians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning.

The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches.

Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world.

We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world.

I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints).

Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched.

You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.