Form: Argument

  • Only Falsehoods Create Complexities

    (don’t get pissed at me for this. it’s true. Truth isn’t always pleasant and the law isn’t always something people are willing to enforce.)

    —“The abortion topic is a paradox and a false equivalency for example. Too complex to boil down to a yes or no.”–Wade Rogers

    [M]mm… I just say it’s undecidable, not because it is complex, but because the only moral thing to be done is not commit the crime of fertility in the first place, creating the undecidable moral hazard. We don’t do the right thing because we don’t want to. But the right thing is to punish the mother. It cannot happen without her conspiracy. So that is the violation of natural law – period. But since we won’t enforce it we convince ourselves that abortion is complicated. No, all lies create complication. The truth is simple.

  • There Is No Theological Sophism that I Cannot Falsify and Translated Into an Attempted Fraud or Theft.

    DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.

    —“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—

    [N]o I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. 😉 Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.

    1. Man can discover and identify (categorize) and name (give name to) sets of constant relations (an identity, referent,).
    2. Man can invent patterns of testing constant-inconstant relations(relations)
    3. Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)

    4. Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.

    5. Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.

    6. Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.

    The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.

  • There Is No Theological Sophism that I Cannot Falsify and Translated Into an Attempted Fraud or Theft.

    DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.

    —“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—

    [N]o I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. 😉 Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.

    1. Man can discover and identify (categorize) and name (give name to) sets of constant relations (an identity, referent,).
    2. Man can invent patterns of testing constant-inconstant relations(relations)
    3. Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)

    4. Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.

    5. Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.

    6. Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.

    The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.

  • “Believing” in force doesn’t tell us much. Demanding we organize to produce forc

    “Believing” in force doesn’t tell us much. Demanding we organize to produce force to defend ourselves from the enemy; to produce commons by common investment by a central state; by private industry; by individuals; with zero tolerance for harms to our people is a good thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:11:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190360790089523202

    Reply addressees: @EmperorInvictus @SandraLeeKoeni2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

  • Hmmm. I ‘believe’ in the use of force, to create a natural hierarchy (aristocrac

    Hmmm. I ‘believe’ in the use of force, to create a natural hierarchy (aristocracy) with zero tolerance for imposition upon the interests of our (or any) people, when we are organized into nation states.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:10:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190360432575483905

    Reply addressees: @EmperorInvictus @SandraLeeKoeni2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187137014359085056

  • I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who u

    I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:44:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190354038006730752

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
    Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
    When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
    Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
    When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238

  • Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard. Unfortunately we let

    Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
    Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
    When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:44:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353978216927238

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530

  • The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marx

    The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:43:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190353628860694530

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190352047998029824

  • THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE R

    THE OTHER REASON FOR ACADEMIC REFORM: USE TECH TO SCALE THE BEST, AND EXIT THE REST.
    —“Most professors outside of the very top tier don’t break the 120 -130 range (not bright enough to move… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497562774173951&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 17:33:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190320859359174658

  • DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY A

    DON’T BOTHER. AT PRESENT THERE IS NO THEOLOGICAL SOPHISM THAT I CANNOT FALSIFY AND TRANSLATED INTO AN ATTEMPTED FRAUD OR THEFT.

    —“You are going to have a bad time giving a materialist account for logical absolutes”—

    No I am no going to have any difficulty. You are going to be horrified that I am not. 😉

    Man can sense by nerves, disambiguate, categorize, perceive categories, and associate them, reinforce them by rehearsal, and recall them, hold one or combination or a prediction from a combination in his attention, recursively modify it, and in that order, because of his neurological ability to identify constant ad inconstant relations between stimuli over time. That’s all neurons do: on off, faster, slower.

    1. Man can discover and identify (categorize) and name (give name to) sets of constant relations (an identity, referent,).

    2. Man can invent patterns of testing constant-inconstant relations(relations)

    3. Man can name those patterns of constant-inconstant relations (general rules)

    4. Man is capable of language using ‘continuous recursive disambiguation over time.

    5. Man can invent a grammar (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) for any paradigm of constant relations (dimensions) he chooses. For example, counting, accounting, linear geometry, curvalinear geometry, multi-dimensional geometry. Or testimony, narrative, story, fiction, fictionalism, lie. Or physics, chemistry, biochemistry. one of the grammars he developed we call logic: the tests of constant relations in state between statements.

    6. Man can use a grammar of any one of the logics, the most simple being first order logics, to describe the constant relations or failure of constant relations between any two or more references that he is capable of imagining, or which, by some instrumentation we can reduce to perceivable differences.

    The brain is a very simple thing it turns out. It does only one thing really. focus attention on successful prediction of from patterns of stimulation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 13:15:00 UTC